Archive for the ‘Jordan Peterson’ Category

Column: Laughing in the Face of Treason | Opinion, Perspectives, Politics, US – The Wild Hunt

Like many Americans, I was shocked and outraged at the violent coup attempt incited by President Donald Trump and his sycophantic cabal on January 6th. As the carnage unfolded on my television, I found myself filled with rage and horror at what I was witnessing though in all honestly, I was not surprised.

Here before my eyes was the very thing that I feared back in 2015, when Trump was just an almost comically strange candidate for the nations highest office. His lies, his deranged rhetoric, and his misogyny and racism were on full display even then, though at the time few seemed to take him seriously. When he was actually elected and fairly, due to our electoral college I wept, because I knew what this could mean for our country, as well as for the rest of the world: A rise in violence and hatred. A denial of science and facts. The demonizing of a free press and of any serious criticism. An abject rejection of responsibility and of public service.

Embed from Getty Images

We knew where this has been leading. The last four years have been a train-wreck, a fever dream of xenophobia, misogyny, racism, propaganda, and megalomania. We have seen the exaltation of the far right (those very fine people) and the demonization of the left.

With social media as his bully pulpit, Trump was able to get his message out to the masses, spinning conspiracy theories and blatant lies (or alternative facts) that spread like wildfire, even into our own communities. The effect of all this was the radicalization of our own citizens, fashioning them into a weapon aimed at the very democratic institutions that are supposed to stand for our highest collective ideals.

The parallels between the rise of Trump and the rise of fascists like Adolf Hitler cannot be overstated. While it has become something of a national pastime for liberals to compare those on the right with Hitler, its both exacerbating and exhausting to watch literal neo-Nazis storming the Capitol and still hearing conservative voices continuing to deny reality, even as the threats of violence continue.

All that said there are some bright spots. Some of the insurrectionists are being arrested, and even some members of the MAGA cult are reportedly having second thoughts about their worldview in the wake of the Capitol riots perhaps as a result of being thrown under the bus by Trump himself. On Tuesday, the U.S. Congress impeached Trump for a second time, trying to send a message that a president cannot be above the law.

Embed from Getty Images

What do we do now? How shall we respond in our own lives and communities to this national threat?

There is no one answer, but as for me, I have to renew my commitment to speaking out whenever I see injustice, of being involved in local politics, and of remembering to practice self-care all the while.

We must become skilled at demanding inclusivity in our spaces. No longer can we tolerate the intolerance of others who would share our Pagan and Witchy communities. By now we should all know where this leads. It is not enough to simply not be racist, to not be transphobic, or not be a bigot. We need to be the antithesis of bigotry. We need to openly embrace others with whom we have differences.

The time is over for blatant tribalism and the xenophobic, insular mindset it engenders. We have to be tolerant, but not of intolerance. When it comes to who can have a seat at the table, we must be open to everyone, barring only those who would deny others their basic humanity.

In our Witch communities we are called to be gatekeepers, not necessarily rooted in practice or theology, but in our basic shared humanity. Here is the bottom line: No Nazis. No racists. No transphobes. If we see or hear someone is our communities expressing those values, then it is up to us to confront and possibly expel them. Those who are in charge of creating Pagan spaces must work to help ensure the safety of their members. No more catering to both sides. We simply cannot allow hate speech to go unchecked. Because we know what will happen if we dont.

We are not all called to be activists I would not consider myself such. Though I am no stranger to political demonstrations, I have many friends who are far more experienced in those areas than me. But one thing that I have consistently heard from my activist friends is the deep need to disengage from constant stress and find the humor, even in the darkest of situations. This can be difficult, especially when we have been in the throes of real trauma that these events have caused. This makes it all the more important to find little pieces of joy wherever we can.

Police staging outside the U.S. Capitol building on January 6, 2021 [Tyler Merbler, Wikimedia Commons, CC 2.0]

The queer community has often been known to respond to darkness and evil with humor. With that in mind, I want to provide a few topical distractions from the stress of the news for our twisted amusement. We need to have a laugh, to try to shake off that dark cloud of existential dread. Then we can recommit to being part of the answer, to be a voice of inclusion and acceptance, as we all try to move forward together into a brighter future of our own making.

Here are some of the things that made me laugh recently, all of which mock at Trump and the insurrectionists. They may not all be your style of humor (Im the first to admit that I am far from an enlightened being) but I hope they bring a little levity to an otherwise terribly heavy situation.

I hope these help you find a little bit of joy. In the meantime, stay safe out there. Lets wash our hands, wear our masks, get vaccinated as soon as possible and for the love of all that is holy, lets stop peddling baseless conspiracy theories. YouTube is great for music and comedic parodies, but its not so much for actual news.

Read the original post:
Column: Laughing in the Face of Treason | Opinion, Perspectives, Politics, US - The Wild Hunt

SOUND OFF: Here’s who voted for and against impeachment – The Bakersfield Californian

Reader: When the voting on the second impeachment of Donald Trump is complete, may I ask, if possible, to have The Californian print the voting of Californias House and Senate members?

I know this is quite a hot topic, and I will abide with your decision, but I think the public needs to know the cast of characters. If you feel this request is not able to be done, could you point me in a direction to find this information on the vote?

Thank you for your consideration.

Peterson: Yes, indeed, this is a hot topic, and numerous letter writers have made it abundantly clear where they stand on both sides some with extremely strong language. Readers also have strong feelings on how their local representatives voted.

In the House, 10 Republicans joined Democrats in voting to impeach Trump, including our local 21st District's David Valadao and Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, particularly noteworthy because she is the third-ranking Republican.

The other Republicans who voted for impeachment are Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio; Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington state; John Katko of New York; Adam Kinzinger of Illinois; Peter Meijer of Michigan; Dan Newhouse of Washington state; Tom Rice of South Carolina; and Fred Upton of Michigan.

We know our other local representative, Kevin McCarthy, of the 23rd District, voted against impeachment.

Trump is the only U.S. president to be twice impeached. Every single House Republican voted against Trump's first impeachment in 2019.

Adams; Aguilar; Allred; Auchincloss; Axne; Barragn; Bass; Beatty; Bera; Beyer; Bishop (Ga.); Blumenauer; Blunt Rochester; Bonamici; Bourdeaux; Bowman; Boyle, Brendan F.; Brown; Brownley; Bush; Bustos; Butterfield; Carbajal; Crdenas; Carson; Cartwright; Case; Casten; Castor (Fla.); Castro (Texas); Cheney; Chu; Cicilline; Clark (Mass.); Clarke (N.Y.); Cleaver; Clyburn; Cohen; Connolly; Cooper; Correa; Costa; Courtney; Craig; Crist; Crow; Cuellar; Davids (Kan.); Davis, Danny K.; Dean; DeFazio; DeGette; DeLauro; DelBene; Delgado; Demings; DeSaulnier; Deutch; Dingell; Doggett; Doyle, Michael F; Escobar; Eshoo; Espaillat; Evans; Fletcher; Foster; Frankel, Lois; Fudge; Gallego; Garamendi; Garca (Ill.); Garcia (Texas); Golden; Gomez; Gonzalez (Ohio); Gonzalez, Vicente; Gottheimer; Green, Al (Texas); Grijalva; Haaland; Harder (Calif.); Hastings; Hayes; Herrera Beutler; Higgins (N.Y.); Himes; Horsford; Houlahan; Hoyer; Huffman; Jackson Lee; Jacobs (Calif.); Jayapal; Jeffries; Johnson (Ga.); Johnson (Texas); Jones; Kahele; Kaptur; Katko; Keating; Kelly (Ill.); Khanna; Kildee; Kilmer; Kim (N.J.); Kind; Kinzinger; Kirkpatrick; Krishnamoorthi; Kuster; Lamb; Langevin; Larsen (Wash.); Larson (Conn.); Lawrence; Lawson (Fla.); Lee (Calif.); Lee (Nev.); Leger Fernandez; Levin (Calif.); Levin (Mich.); Lieu; Lofgren; Lowenthal; Luria; Lynch; Malinowski; Maloney, Carolyn B.; Maloney, Sean; Manning; Matsui; McBath; McCollum; McEachin; McGovern; McNerney; Meeks; Meijer; Meng; Mfume; Moore (Wis.); Morelle; Moulton; Mrvan; Murphy (Fla.); Nadler; Napolitano; Neal; Neguse; Newhouse; Newman; Norcross; O'Halleran; Ocasio-Cortez; Omar; Pallone; Panetta; Pappas; Pascrell; Payne; Pelosi; Perlmutter; Peters; Phillips; Pingree; Pocan; Porter; Pressley; Price (N.C.); Quigley; Raskin; Rice (N.Y.); Rice (S.C.); Richmond; Ross; Roybal-Allard; Ruiz; Ruppersberger; Rush; Ryan; Snchez; Sarbanes; Scanlon; Schakowsky; Schiff; Schneider; Schrader; Schrier; Scott (Va.); Scott, David; Sewell; Sherman; Sherrill; Sires; Slotkin; Smith (Wash.); Soto; Spanberger; Speier; Stanton; Stevens; Strickland; Suozzi; Swalwell; Takano; Thompson (Calif.); Thompson (Miss.); Titus; Tlaib; Tonko; Torres (Calif.); Torres (N.Y.); Trahan; Trone; Underwood; Upton; Valadao; Vargas; Veasey; Vela; Velzquez; Wasserman Schultz; Waters; Watson Coleman; Welch; Wexton; Wild; Williams (Ga.); Wilson (Fla.); Yarmuth.

Four House members did not vote, according to the clerk's tally: Granger, Harris, Murphy (N.C.) and Webster (Fla.). They are all Republicans.

The following members of the House voted against impeachment: Aderholt; Allen; Amodei; Armstrong; Arrington; Babin; Bacon; Baird; Balderson; Banks; Barr; Bentz; Bergman; Bice (Okla.); Biggs; Bilirakis; Bishop (N.C.); Boebert; Bost; Brady; Brooks; Buchanan; Buck; Bucshon; Budd; Burchett; Burgess; Calvert; Cammack; Carl; Carter (Ga.); Carter (Texas); Cawthorn; Chabot; Cline; Cloud; Clyde; Cole; Comer; Crawford; Crenshaw; Curtis; Davidson; Davis, Rodney; DesJarlais; Diaz-Balart; Donalds; Duncan; Dunn; Emmer; Estes; Fallon; Feenstra; Ferguson; Fischbach; Fitzgerald; Fitzpatrick; Fleischmann; Fortenberry; Foxx; Franklin, C. Scott; Fulcher; Gaetz; Gallagher; Garbarino; Garcia (Calif.); Gibbs; Gimenez; Gohmert; Gonzales, Tony; Good (Va.); Gooden (Texas); Gosar; Graves (La.); Graves (Mo.); Green (Tenn.); Greene (Ga.); Griffith; Grothman; Guest; Guthrie; Hagedorn; Harshbarger; Hartzler; Hern; Herrell; Hice (Ga.); Higgins (La.); Hill; Hinson; Hollingsworth; Hudson; Huizenga; Issa; Jackson; Jacobs (N.Y.); Johnson (La.); Johnson (Ohio); Johnson (S.D.); Jordan; Joyce (Ohio); Joyce (Pa.); Keller; Kelly (Miss.); Kelly (Pa.); Kim (Calif.); Kustoff; LaHood; LaMalfa; Lamborn; Latta; LaTurner; Lesko; Long; Loudermilk; Lucas; Luetkemeyer; Mace; Malliotakis; Mann; Massie; Mast; McCarthy; McCaul; McClain; McClintock; McHenry; McKinley; Meuser; Miller (Ill.); Miller (W.Va.); Miller-Meeks; Moolenaar; Mooney; Moore (Ala.); Moore (Utah); Mullin; Nehls; Norman; Nunes; Obernolte; Owens; Palazzo; Palmer; Pence; Perry; Pfluger; Posey; Reed; Reschenthaler; Rodgers (Wash.); Rogers (Ala.); Rogers (Ky.); Rose; Rosendale; Rouzer; Roy; Rutherford; Salazar; Scalise; Schweikert; Scott, Austin; Sessions; Simpson; Smith (Mo.); Smith (Neb.); Smith (N.J.); Smucker; Spartz; Stauber; Steel; Stefanik; Steil; Steube; Stewart; Stivers; Taylor; Thompson (Pa.); Tiffany; Timmons; Turner; Van Drew; Van Duyne; Wagner; Walberg; Walorski; Waltz; Weber (Texas); Wenstrup; Westerman; Williams (Texas); Wilson (S.C.); Wittman; Womack; Wright; Young; Zeldin.

Reader: Ive tried to encapsulate my rage for days, tried to capture the intensity of my anger, tried to explain why a hollow call for unity from the enablers like Kevin McCarthy is so infuriating, but Robert Price said it all in his Viewpoint piece (Sunday) morning ("Robert Price: The Trump train is off the rails and McCarthy is still board"). Bravo, Mr. Price. Right on. Thank you.

Peterson: I have received emails and calls both supporting Robert's column and disliking it. I have been inundated with emails from people liking and disliking the various opinions published on these topics President Trump, impeachment and how lawmakers voted and their statements in the Opinion section. It's abundantly clear how divided local readers are on the topic of impeachment and how individual lawmakers voted.

Executive Editor Christine Peterson answers your questions and takes your complaints about The Californians news coverage in this weekly feedback forum. Questions may be edited for space and clarity. To offer your input by phone, call 661-395-7649 and leave your comments in a voicemail message or email us at soundoff@bakersfield.com. Please include your name and phone number.

More:
SOUND OFF: Here's who voted for and against impeachment - The Bakersfield Californian

Local MP to vote against Bill C-6 – Sherwood Park News

Article content continued

During the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights who addressed Bill C-6 on Dec. 6, some major national groups spoke in favour of the bill, including the Canadian Association of Social Workers, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, and No Conversion Canada (a non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots coalition of conversion therapy survivors, LGBTQ2+ individuals, civil society experts, academics and Canadians).

Speaking against the bill included Dr. Jane Dobson, lawyer Daniel Santoro, Quebec-based Rabbi Michael Whitman, and Cardinal Thomas Collins (Archbishop, Archdiocese of Toronto).

Executive director of altView Foundation, Michael Green said the MP created alarmist hypotheticals in his column.

One example included Genuis summarizing Bloc Quebecois MP and Standing Committee member Rhal Fortin who said a parent who tells their young son not to wear a dress to school could be a criminal act, based on the new reference to non-cisgender gender expression in the bill.

That isnt accurate not by legal scholars, not by the Justice Department. Thats not reflective of the spirit or letter of the law, Green said. I dont accept (Genuis) concerns at face value because MP David Lametti said it hasnt been the intent of this law and its not going to be a reality for anyone. This will not criminalize private conversations in homes. This will crackdown on the harmful practice within therapies, social services and all of these various sectors that intersect with people who are LGBTQ2+.

Link:
Local MP to vote against Bill C-6 - Sherwood Park News

Diwan Bookstore recommends the best 10 books to read – Egypt Independent

Diwan Bookstore, Egypts leading book seller, has recommended ten of the best-selling, best-reviewed books from around the world for readers to enjoy.

How can one live decently in a world full of chaos and uncertainty?

Jordan Peterson has helped millions around the world lead productive lives full of value. And now its your turn!

Peterson lays out 12 rules revolving around self-responsibility, with solutions to common problems youll face in life!

Of course, Petersons book allows for more depth and research and his works have become the focus of everyones attention especially among youth.

Thanks to a distinguished and honest translation from Mohamed Ibrahim al-Gendy, you can now read Jordan Petersons most important book in Arabic.

In his debut Charles Akl takes us on a journey that goes beyond just an old Coptic kitchen as he studies the Coptic mind and how it deals with the world in light of state policies and economic considerations.

This book allows readers to understand the thought and feelings of Coptic youth, through Charles Akls skillful styleblending intelligence and lightness.

Read by more than a million readers and translated into more than 50 different languages, Sophies World is an exceptional novel unlike any other that serves as an entry point for those interested in reading philosophy while also serving as a pleasant read.

Gaarder, in a smooth and simple style, attempts to address major philosophical questions concerning life and existence: How and where did we come from? Where did the world come from?

In a novel within a novel, Gaarder takes us on an exciting journey to learn the history of different philosophies and their most important schools, pioneers, ideas, and stages of development.

The Joy of Less is the perfect gift for anyone you love who wants to simplify their life.

It is a book that deserves to be in every home.

Set aside those strict, extreme approaches found in other books Francine Jay gives us simple steps for an easy and fun way to get rid of all the chaos surrounding us in our lives and to organize things wherever we are.

Open this book, and youll be on your way to a quieter and simpler life.

At the end of the 1930s, while the civil war was at its height in Spain after General Franco and the Fascist Party overthrew the government, thousands found themselves forced to make the arduous and terrifying journey on the mountain roads to the French borders.

Even despite the cold winter, French government forces refuse to open up their borders to help the refugees.

And thus steps inPablo Neruda, a Chilean poet and ambassador in Paris who decides to help the refugees himself and prevent a humanitarian disaster.

He arranges the SS Winnipeg ship and interviews the refugees himself, hoping to give them a new life in the land of Chile.

Thanks to a wonderful translation from the late Saleh Almani, were brought a great human work about hope, exile and belonging.

Professor of PsychiatryNabil Elkot presents the experiences he has accumulated during thirty years of working in the field of psychological aid and specialized psychotherapy.

With one out of every four people suffering from a psychological disorder, many are in need of scientifically understanding what mental illness truly is in order to help themselves or a friend.

This book has something for everyone:for those who suffer from mental disorders and for those who do not.

It helps them understand and dissect the nature of some of the most common psychological disorders in a simple and organized manner, and explains what the best ways to deal and coexist with them are alongside how to prevent them

With graceful language and a fluid writing style, this book presents 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your childs developing mind.

It is based on scientific foundations regarding the nature of the brain and nervous system, and aims to help promotehealthy brain development leading tocalmer and happier children.

This book aims to teach parenting through the use of the left and right brain, teaching them to work together and help our children thrive.

Amr Moussas memoir reveals the ins and outs of the closed sessions and rooms that he witnessed firsthand during his presidency of the Arab League and his experiences as aninfluential actor among decision-makers in the Arab world and the Middle East region.

Jay Shetty, a writer and former monk, talks about how his time as a monk can help others unleash their potential.

He turns abstract lessons into tips and exercises that we can all apply to reduce the amount of stress we have and strengthen our relationships.

It is a book that will help you clear your mind of all negative thoughts and wash away bad habits from your life.

This is a book that aims to answer one question: Why do I feel bad?

Nesse, one of thefounders of the field of evolutionary medicine, uses his decades of experience as a psychiatrist to provide a new framework for understanding mental illness.

In this book, the author explains why natural selection has traits that make us vulnerable to disease, and proposes a new theory of how emotions have evolved to help us deal with the various opportunities and threats around us.

Edited translation from Al-Masry Al-Youm

View post:
Diwan Bookstore recommends the best 10 books to read - Egypt Independent

Conspiracy theories on the right, cancel culture on the left: how political legitimacy came under threat in 2020 – The Conversation AU

2020 has been a challenging year. For some challenges, such as the coronavirus, a light is appearing at the end of the tunnel. But for others, the true consequences may be only beginning to appear.

This is perhaps no more true than in the assault on political legitimacy. In 2020, this was threatened by forces on opposite sides of politics: cancel culture on the left and conspiracy theories on the right.

Each poses a serious threat, as a collapse in political legitimacy means people think the normal rules dont apply anymore, making the world a more difficult and even dangerous place for all of us.

What exactly is political legitimacy and why is it important?

Lets start with a definition of legitimacy. Legitimacy, in this context, refers to whether we should accept a decision, rule or institution.

It doesnt require wholehearted agreement. For example, we might think a workplace decision is misguided, but decide that as an employee we should go along with it anyway.

Political legitimacy refers to the legitimacy of laws and authorities in the eyes of the people. It allows rules and public institutions to function effectively.

We will never all agree on exactly what the law should be particularly in pluralistic societies. However, we can all agree that democratic decision-making is an appropriate way to make laws.

Of course, legitimacy has limits. If a democracy votes to enslave an ethnic minority, this wouldnt be acceptable. Legitimacy only works when the outcomes are tolerable.

Read more: To combat conspiracy theories teach critical thinking and community values

The terms cancel culture and call-out culture which became ubiquitous in 2020, particularly on the political left refer to practices of shutting down, shaming or deterring those who are perceived to speak in offensive or harmful ways.

Examples abound, but one notable case occurred during the Black Lives Matter protests against police brutality in the US in May.

Political analyst David Shor tweeted a summary of a Black Princeton professors research about the historical impact of violent protests on Democratic voting. When called out for perceived anti-Blackness, Shor apologised, but was nevertheless fired.

Read more: Is cancel culture silencing open debate? There are risks to shutting down opinions we disagree with

More recently, employees at Penguin Random House in Canada lodged an official protest at the news that a sequel to Jordan Petersons bestseller, 12 Rules for Life, would be published. It echoed an earlier employee-led revolt against the publication of J.K. Rowlings new childrens book.

Stifling and shutting down controversial voices, such as Peterson and Rowling, presents two challenges to political legitimacy.

First, it prevents inclusive dialogue. Those in the minority on any issue can no longer console themselves with the fact that at least they had the opportunity to say their piece and have their views considered. Instead, they are silenced and excluded.

Second, the idea that voters on the right have not just wrong, but harmful views poses a further threat to legitimacy.

Why should progressives respect democratic outcomes such as the victories of Republican legislators in the 2020 US elections, or Trumps win in 2016 if these outcomes simply reflect what they perceive as the manifestly intolerable views of millions of conservative voters?

From the opposite side of politics comes another threat: conspiracy theories.

To be sure, conspiracies do occur, but they are usually confined to close-knit groups at single organisations that excel at secrecy (for example, intelligence agencies).

Many currently popular conspiracy theories require strikingly poor reasoning practices.

Even setting aside QAnons wacky beliefs, the idea peddled by outgoing President Donald Trump that the US election was stolen is far-fetched. No tangible evidence has been presented for this claim.

In fact, many of the institutions certifying the result were run by Republican officials, while Republican-appointed judges have thrown out many Trump campaign cases brought to court. And though Joe Biden won the presidential contest, Democrats had an unexpectedly poor showing in other races.

If Trumps claim was true, such a conspiracy would have to be far-reaching (including both Republicans and Democrats) and powerful (leaving no evidence), while at the same time being stunningly incompetent (having forgotten to ensure Democratic victories in Congress).

Yet, this theory is extraordinarily popular, with the vast majority of the presidents 74 million voters believing fraud changed the election outcome.

Read more: Conspiracy theories may seem irrational but they fulfill a basic human need

This impacts political legitimacy because a stubborn lack of respect for evidence undermines public deliberative practices. It is impossible to find points of agreement when large-scale conspiracies throw so much into question.

Conspiracies about election results also threaten democratic legitimacy. If everything is controlled by a sinister cabal, then elections are a farce.

Worse, if ones political opponents are seen as utterly evil for example, cannibalistic Satanic child traffickers then not even authentic elections could legitimise their rule.

So, both conspiracy thinking and cancel culture can challenge the legitimacy of democratic decision-making.

But this is not all they have in common. Both are longstanding practices whose recent rise has been fuelled by social media. Both are personally rewarding, as they allow believers to position themselves as manifestly superior to others (the deplorables or sheeple).

Both views are also self-sealing insofar as adherents shield themselves from contrary ideas and evidence (allowing groupthink to flourish).

Cancel culture advocates never need face uncomfortable critique because opponents can simply be cancelled or called out, derailing further discussion.

And conspiracy theorists can simply dismiss critique as part of the conspiracy, or based on falsities spread by the conspiracy.

Even in Australia, commentators have observed the woeful state of political deliberation and its impact on trust in institutions. In the wake of the Banking Royal Commission, for example, Commissioner Kenneth Haynes lamented

political rhetoric now resorts to the language of war, seeking to portray opposing views as presenting existential threats to society as we now know it.

Unfortunately, because these views are self-sealing, and because they attach to peoples chosen identities, there are no easy responses to them.

Still, these movements are not monolithic. Many from the left have spoken out against political intolerance, and some Republican officials in the US have stood up against Trumps conspiracy theories.

Perhaps the best message as we enter a new year is to remain respectful and empathetic to others.

At a base level, keep in mind that others may have legitimate concerns: conspiracies do happen and everyone has limits to what they will tolerate.

Rather than reacting with anger or mockery, or directly challenging someones position, its often best to enquire carefully into their views.

And if you disagree with them, rather than aiming to change their mind, instead try to sow a few seeds of doubt that may lead to reasonable discussion and encourage later reflection.

Read the rest here:
Conspiracy theories on the right, cancel culture on the left: how political legitimacy came under threat in 2020 - The Conversation AU