Archive for the ‘Iraq’ Category

Iraq suspends Mosul offensive after coalition airstrike …

Resident of Mosul Jadida retrieve bodies from the rubble following the coalition airstrikes. Photograph: Felipe Dana/AP

Iraqi military leaders have halted their push to recapture west Mosul from Islamic State as international outrage grew over the civilian toll from airstrikes that killed at least 150 people in a single district of the city.

The attack on the Mosul Jadida neighbourhood is thought to have been one of the deadliest bombing raids for civilians since the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. Rescuers were still pulling bodies from the rubble on Saturday, more than a week after the bombs landed, when the US-led coalition confirmed that its aircraft had targeted Isis fighters in the area.

They carried out the attack on 17 March at the request of the Iraqi security forces, and have now launched a formal investigation into reports of civilian casualties, the coalition said.

British planes were among those operating in western Mosul at the time. Asked if they could have been involved in the airstrikes, a spokesman did not rule out the possibility of British involvement, saying: We are aware of reports [of civilian casualties] and will support the coalition investigation.

There had been no reports of a UK role in any civilian casualties in more than two years of fighting Isis, he added. We have not seen evidence that we have been responsible for civilian casualties so far. Through our rigorous targeting processes we will continue to seek to minimise the risk of civilian casualties, but that risk can never be removed entirely.

A UK report on the 17 March fighting, which was issued just a couple of days later, described very challenging conditions with heavy cloud. Tornado jets were sent to support Iraqi troops advancing inside western Mosul in intense urban fighting, where crews had to engage targets perilously close to the Iraqi troops whom they were assisting. They used Paveway guided missiles to hit five targets. The coalition said in a separate statement it had carried out four airstrikes aimed at three Isis tactical units. They destroyed more than 50 vehicles and 25 fighting positions.

The deaths have intensified concerns over up to 400,000 Mosul residents who are still packed into the crowded western half of the city, as Iraqi security forces backed by foreign air power advance on Isiss last major stronghold in the country.

Civil defence workers say they have pulled more than 140 bodies from the ruins of three buildings in Mosul Jadida and believe that dozens more remain under the rubble of one building, a large home with a once cavernous basement, in which up to 100 people had hidden last Friday morning.

Local people at the site told the Observer that the enormous damage inflicted on the homes and much of the surrounding area had been caused by airstrikes, which battered the neighbourhood in the middle of a pitched battle with Isis members, who were under attack from Iraqi forces.

The UNs humanitarian coordinator in Iraq, Lise Grande, said: We are stunned by this terrible loss of life.

Chris Woods, director of monitoring group Airwars, said: The Jadida incident alone is the worst toll of a single [airstrike] incident that I can recall in decades. The coalitions argument that it doesnt target noncombatants risks being devalued when so many civilians are being killed in west Mosul.

He warned that the deaths, and other recent attacks in Syria that have claimed dozens of lives, risked turning public sentiment against the coalition. We have until recently always credited the coalition for taking care to avoid civilian casualties, compared with the Russians. But since the last months of 2016 you have seen this steep climb in civilian casualties and public sentiment has turned very sharply against the US-led coalition.

As the scale of the disaster became apparent, Iraqi military sources confirmed that they had been ordered not to launch new operations.

The Australian defence force issued a statement on Sunday in response to questions about its involvement. While there are no specific allegations against Australian aircraft, Australia will fully support the coalition-led (Operation Inherent Resolve) investigation into these allegations.

Mosul Jadida residents said three homes had taken direct hits from airstrikes and others had been damaged by debris and shelling. They started in the morning and they continued till around 2pm, said Mustafa Yeheya. There were Isis on the roof of several of the buildings and they were in the streets fighting. But the strange thing is that the house they were hiding in, their military room, was not even hit. None of their bases was.

Journalists were banned from entering west Mosul on Saturday and Iraqi commanders could not be contacted. Iraqi and US forces have previously said that Isis deliberately blended among the civilian population and, in some cases, fighters were posted near civilian targets in a bid to increase casualties and slow the offensive against them.

A United States Central Command statement said: Our goal has always been for zero civilian casualties, but the coalition will not abandon our commitment to our Iraqi partners because of Isiss inhuman tactics terrorising civilians, using human shields and fighting from protected sites such as schools, hospitals, religious sites and civilian neighbourhoods.

Muawiya Ismael, who said he had lost six members of his clan in the attack, said: It is true that this was a battle zone and that Isis were here. They had about 15 people in the area, and they were in high positions. But they did not have heavy guns. Nothing that should justify an attack of this scale. It was not in proportion to the threat and soldiers could have fixed this.

Read more:
Iraq suspends Mosul offensive after coalition airstrike ...

Why Are So Many Civilians in Iraq and Syria Dying? – Slate Magazine

An Iraqi rescue worker gestures toward bodies wrapped in plastic in the al-Jadida district of Mosul on Sunday, following airstrikes in which civilians were reportedly killed during an ongoing offensive against ISIS.

Ahmad Al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images

Despite his initial support for the Iraq war, Donald Trump ascended to office with a vow to untangle America from Middle Eastern conflicts. But he also ran as a nationalist, promising to steal Iraqs oil, torture alleged terrorists, bomb the shit out of ISIS, and loosen the rules of military engagement. Its too early to know exactly how the Trump administrations policies in the region will play out, but the U.S. has continued heavily bombing Iraq and Syria with catastrophic consequences.

Isaac Chotiner is a Slate staff writer.

According to the nonprofit group Airwars, which tracks civilian casualties, Almost 1,000 civilian non-combatant deaths have already been alleged from coalition actions across Iraq and Syria in Marcha record claim. Three particularly deadly air attacks, one in Syria and two in Iraq, including an especially deadly assault on Mosul, are responsible for much of the toll.

To discuss why civilian casualties are increasing, I spoke with Samuel Oakford, a New Yorkbased investigative reporter at Airwars and a former U.N. correspondent at Vice News. During the course of our conversation, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, we discussed how his group reports on civilian casualties, Russian intervention in Syria, and why military planning must take the lives of innocent people into account.

Isaac Chotiner: When did your organization first notice an increase in civilian casualties?

Samuel Oakford: There were some marked increases in the last months of the Obama administration, so basically the fall of 2016. You really started seeing the number rise, both in Iraq and Syria. Those figures have continued to rise even higher during the first few months of the Trump administration. Obviously most of these casualties are tied to ongoing campaigns in Mosul and elsewhere.

Is the increase coming from the number of airstrikes or the deadliness of them?

Definitely the strikes appear to be more deadly. Were seeing larger numbers of civilians killed in individual strikes. That could be a product of bombing in heavily urbanized areas, so in Mosul thats obviously true. Some have pointed out that higher numbers of civilian casualties were inevitable in western Mosul, but Im not sure how much comfort that gives to the civilians there. I do think that the qualitative changes to the strikes are probably a product both of where theyre taking place, but also maybe some changes to the way that theyre being authorized. Thats the big question herewhether there have been changes to the rules of engagement. The Pentagon denies that, but they also say that there have been changes to who can authorize strikes, so it becomes a bit of a semantic conversation.

How does your organization tally civilian casualties?

Its a good question. In a lot of Iraq and Syria, especially in ISIS-controlled areas, you cant go in and do a post-strike assessment after bombs are dropped. Even in places like Yemen, where the Saudis bombed, the U.N. is sometimes able to go and look at what happened, and try and see who died, and so forth. If youre bombing in Raqqa, though, its very difficult, or its impossible to go. We have to rely in those placesand this is the model overallof being an all source monitor. We take all sources and create a constellation of evidence, then do our best to see which strikes are the most likely to have taken place. You can often reasonably attribute them to one side or another.

For instance, in this recent strike in Mosul we have over 50 sources. Some are social media accounts. By and large the sources are local, so most people in the West are not looking at them. Social media is huge, so the way this war is being recorded is in a lot of cases online, and you have to know where to look. We have researchers that speak Arabic and researchers who focus on Iraq and Syria, and then we compare that to what we know about strikes in the area and we try to arrive at a reasonable conclusion.

Despite the heavy Iraqi casualties, some of the news reporting suggests that its the Iraqi military pushing hard for more strikes. Have you found that too?

Some of whats coming out is that Iraqi forces are suggesting that the U.S. is being too loose with rules of engagement. But previously, in east Mosul, my understanding was that in some cases, the Iraqis wanted the U.S. coalition to move faster. I think its a little bit all over the place, but they definitely want to take Mosul as quickly as possible. I dont think they want to kill everyone there, so theres a tension that exists.

I read that your group has started focusing more on coalition airstrikes and less on Russian airstrikes because of how many civilians the American-led mission has killed.

Basically, the Russian intervention started in September of 2015, and it got really, really awful within a few months, with thousands of alleged casualties. Only now is the coalition approaching the number of alleged casualties that can be attributed to the Russians.

We still have researchers who are just really, really amazing and still recording all of these reports on casualties from Russian strikes and putting them in our database. The next step is to vet them and that is the process I described for you. But we have had to pause on some stuff regarding Russia in order to do that sufficiently for the current coalition activities.

And the Russians are still very active, correct?

Russian strikes are still quite active. Theyre not as active as they were, but theyre still bombing regularly. And they have room to ramp up again, I think, is what I might say.

Do the civilians you hear from have a sense that they are under a different degree of siege than several months ago?

If youre under a hail of artillery fire, and coalition airstrikes, and also Iraqi airstrikes, I dont know one has time to parse the distinctions between various rules of engagement. Obviously theres a substantive change in your reality when youre running for your life, when youre sheltering, and when perhaps the place youre sheltering, which maybe ISIS directed you to, speaking hypothetically, has been obliterated in an airstrike. Its a reality that people are experiencing rather than empirically observing.

Has this job made you think differently about war?

We have countless pages of these firsthand accounts. People post things on Facebook, they post pictures of the people that are killed. Sometimes were able to reach out through our researchers in Iraq and Syria, or Im able to reach out to family members. I know for me, Im just speaking personally, having these images and talking to family members hasnt changed the way I look at war, but its made it a lot more difficult to look at war. In my experience doing this work, I know even more clearly how important it is that reporting happens in Iraq, where you meet with family members and talk with people that were witnesses and victims, and not just listen to the Pentagon and get an update on the rules of engagement.

There is clearly an intensifying campaign of late. There does seem to be a qualitative difference in the strikes as well. At a certain point, the coalition, the Iraqis, the government has to ask how many civilians will die in this operation. I just think thats the real question here, because by a lot of accounts the worst fighting in Mosul is only starting, which is kind of hard to believe. You really have to plan out military activities with an eye to civilians, and what that means for the future of countries and communities.

Visit link:
Why Are So Many Civilians in Iraq and Syria Dying? - Slate Magazine

Spicer Pressed on Trump Saying US Troops Fighting in Iraq ‘Like Never Before’ – Fox News Insider

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday American troops are "doing well" in Iraq and the U.S. is making progress in its fight against ISIS.

"We are doing well. I just had long call with Gen. Mattis," Trump told a group of senators and their spouses gathered at the White House yesterday.

"We are doing really well in Iraq. Our soldiers are fighting, and fighting like never before, and the results are very good, so I just wanted to let everyone know," Trump said.

But the comment about U.S. troops "fighting like never before," drew immediate criticism, including a sharp rebuke from Montel Williams, a Marine and Navy veteran.

At a press briefing on Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer was asked about Trump's statement.

CNN's Jim Acosta noted thatAmerican troops are now in the country primarily to "advise and assist" Iraqi forces.

"Does that take into consideration what happened during the Bush and Obama administrations when they were fighting house to house?" he asked.

Spicer said Trump was expressing his pride in the work that our soldiers and sailors are doing in Iraq, specifically in taking back Mosul from ISIS.

"I think the progress that's being made in Iraq and the fight against ISIS is going extremely well and he's proud of it," said Spicer, adding that the comment did not mean that the president believes U.S. troops are "in combat" in Iraq.

Watch the exchange above, and relive Spicer's memorable "Russian dressing" quip from Tuesday's press briefing.

Dem State Rep Warns Illegal Immigrants About Upcoming ICE 'Raid'

Chris Matthews Compares Ivanka, Jared Kushner to Saddam Hussein's Sons

Sen. McCain Says Select Committee Must Be Formed to Probe Trump & Russia

View post:
Spicer Pressed on Trump Saying US Troops Fighting in Iraq 'Like Never Before' - Fox News Insider

Pope demands ‘urgent’ action to protect civilians in Iraq – WJLA

Pope Francis arrives for his weekly general audience, at the Vatican, Wednesday, March 29, 2017. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)

VATICAN CITY (AP) Pope Francis demanded "urgent" action Wednesday to protect civilians in Iraq, saying forces involved in the battle for Mosul have an obligation to protect innocents following a recent spike in civilian casualties.

Francis issued a special appeal for peace in Iraq at the end of his general audience. He greeted an interfaith group of Iraqis on hand in St. Peter's Square, encouraging them in helping Iraq find reconciliation among various ethnic and religious groups.

Francis said that he was particularly concerned about Iraqis trapped by recent fighting to take Mosul back from Islamic State group militants.

"In expressing profound sadness for the victims of the bloody conflict, I renew my appeal that everyone commit themselves to using all efforts to protect civilians, an imperative and urgent obligation," he said.

The U.N. human rights office has called on the U.S.-led coalition conducting airstrikes on Mosul to minimize civilian casualties, saying at least 300 people have been killed since mid-February including 140 from a single March 17 airstrike incident on a house. The U.N. says IS militants are using human shields and setting a trap for the coalition.

Amnesty International has said the rising civilian death toll suggested the U.S.-led coalition wasn't taking adequate precautions as it helps Iraqi forces try to retake the city, though the U.S. has denied any loosening of the rules of combat.

Go here to see the original:
Pope demands 'urgent' action to protect civilians in Iraq - WJLA

Army General: Iraq Must Do More to Engage, Empower Its Sunni Population – CNSNews.com


Rudaw
Army General: Iraq Must Do More to Engage, Empower Its Sunni Population
CNSNews.com
(CNSNews.com) - Army General Joseph Votel, the head of U.S. Central Command, told the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday that "there is still much work to be done" to bridge the Sunni-Shi'a divide in Iraq, something that must be done to ...
Iraq will not sever ties with Iran despite pressure from Arab nationsRudaw
What role will Iran-linked militias play once IS leaves Iraq?Al-Monitor
Did Iraq really start to rebuild the synagogues that were destroyed by ISIS?JerusalemOnline
Middle East Eye
all 10 news articles »

Read more here:
Army General: Iraq Must Do More to Engage, Empower Its Sunni Population - CNSNews.com