Mediaboss Marketing

BAGHDAD--At least two explosions have hit convoys supplying US-led coalition forces in Iraq in the last 24 hours, security sources said, the first on Monday evening near the southern border with Kuwait and the second on Tuesday north of Baghdad.

The explosions, which caused no casualties but did some material damage, are the latest in a string of such incidents in recent weeks. An attack in southern Iraq on Sunday hit a convoy carrying supplies to coalition forces, the military said.

Several thousand US forces are still based in Iraq, leading a coalition whose mission is to fight Islamic State extremists.

Those forces are also a target for Iran-backed Shia militias, which the United States blames for regular rocket attacks on bases hosting the coalition, and on other US targets such as Washingtons embassy in Baghdad.

The militias have vowed to avenge the death of paramilitary commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, who was killed alongside Iranian military Quds Force chief Qassem Soleimani in a US drone strike in Baghdad in January. Political forces aligned with the militias demand a full withdrawal of foreign troops from Iraq.

They also oppose Iraqs Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, who took office in May. He is viewed as friendly with the United States and has challenged the power of Iran-aligned armed groups in Iraq.

Explosions and denials

Tuesdays explosion near the Taji military base north of Baghdad caused a fire to a container on one vehicle, the Iraqi military said in a statement. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the blast.

The explosion on Monday night near the Jraischan border crossing between Iraq and Kuwait targeted a convoy carrying equipment for US forces, three sources from different branches of Iraqs security services and military said.

The Iraqi military denied that incident took place.

Kuwaits military on Twitter also denied any attack along its border with Iraq.

Vehicles are regularly loaded with military equipment at the crossing, the security sources said, and cargo is usually loaded or unloaded before entering or exiting Iraq.

Foreign companies are contracted by US forces to provide security in the area, the Iraqi security sources said.

Companions of the Cave

A little known Iraqi Shia militia group by the name of Ashab al-Kahf claimed responsibility for the attack and published a video showing an explosion at a distance. It said it was able to destroy US military equipment and large parts of the crossing.

The group issued a statement overnight claiming it destroyed equipment and vehicles belonging to the American enemy in a bombing targeting a border crossing south of the Iraqi city of Basra.

It later published an 11-second video clip it claimed showed the blast, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militant groups.

The out-of-focus video shows what appeared to be an explosion and lights in the distance, with a man speaking in Arabic. The Associated Press could not immediately verify the video.

US Army Major John Rigsbee, a Central Command spokesman, said the American military was looking into reports of the explosion.

The Iraqi military issued a statement early Tuesday through the state-run Iraqi News Agency denying an attack took place

Ashab al-Kahf means Companions of the Cave in Arabic, referring to a Christian and Islamic story about youths escaping religious persecution hiding in a cave for hundreds of years.

The group has emerged alongside renewed threats by Shia militias amid rising tensions between the US and Iran. In January, an American drone strike killed a top Iranian general in Baghdad. Tehran responded with a ballistic missile attack that wounded dozens of American troops at a military base in Iraq.

The SITE Intelligence Group has referred to Ashab al-Kahf as reportedly an Iranian proxy unit. The group initially threatened US forces in April and claimed an attack on a convoy in July.

According to experts, the blasts could be part of an Iranian campaign by proxy ahead of the next round of US-Iraq strategic dialogue scheduled in Washington later this month.

Here is the original post:
Blasts hit US army in Iraq, pro-Iran militias suspected | | AW - The Arab Weekly

TEHRAN: Iran on Saturday hailed a UN Security Council vote rejecting a US bid to extend an arms embargo on the Islamic republic, saying its foe has never been so isolated.President Hassan Rouhani said the United States had failed to kill off what he called the half alive 2015 deal with major powers that gave Iran relief from sanctions in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program.The United States failed in this conspiracy with humiliation, Rouhani told a televised news conference.In my opinion, this day will go down in the history of our Iran and in the history of fighting global arrogance.Only two of the Councils 15 members voted in favor of the US resolution seeking to extend the embargo, highlighting the division between Washington and its European allies since President Donald Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear accord in May 2018.Washingtons European allies all abstained, and Iran mocked the Trump administration for only winning the support of one other country, the Dominican Republic.In the 75 years of United Nations history, America has never been so isolated, said foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi.Despite all the trips, pressure and the hawking, the United States could only mobilize a small country (to vote) with them, he tweeted.The result increases the likelihood that the US will try to unilaterally force a return of UN sanctions, which experts say threatens to plunge the Council into one of its worst-ever diplomatic crises.The Security Councils failure to act decisively in defense of international peace and security is inexcusable, said US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.The embargo on conventional arms is due to expire on October 18 under the terms of a resolution that blessed the Iran nuclear deal, officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.Since Trump pulled out of the JCPOA and slapped unilateral sanctions on Iran under a campaign of maximum pressure, Tehran has since taken small but escalating steps away from compliance with the nuclear accord as it presses for sanctions relief.European allies of the United States who, along with Russia and China, signed the deal with Iran have voiced support for extending the 13-year-long conventional arms embargo, saying an expiry threatens stability in the Middle East.However, their priority is to preserve the JCPOA.The US text, seen by AFP, effectively called for an indefinite extension of the embargo on Iran, which diplomats said would threaten the nuclear agreement.Iran says it has the right to self-defense and that a continuation of the ban would mean an end to the nuclear deal.Pompeo announced that members had failed to back the proposal around 30 minutes before Indonesia, the current president of the Security Council, announced that the official results included two votes against and 11 abstentions.Russia and China opposed the resolution.The result shows again that unilateralism enjoys no support, and bullying will fail, Chinas UN mission tweeted.Ambassador Gunter Sautter of Germany, which abstained, said more consultations are needed to find a solution that is acceptable to all council members.During a call between Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron, the leaders discussed the urgent need for UN action to extend the arms embargo on Iran.Hours earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin called on China, France, Russia, Britain, the US, Germany and Iran to convene an emergency video summit to avoid an escalation of tensions in the Gulf.Washington has threatened to try to force a return of UN sanctions if it is not extended by using a controversial technique called snapback.Pompeo has offered the contested argument that the US remains a participant in the nuclear accord as it was listed in the 2015 resolution and therefore can force a return to sanctions if it sees Iran as being in violation of its terms.European allies have been skeptical on whether Washington can force sanctions and warn that the attempt may delegitimize the Security Council.Nevertheless, the US is expected to deliver the snapback letter next week, AFP understands.Analysts suspect that Washington purposefully put forward a hard-line draft that it knew Council members would not be able to accept.The fact is that everybody at the UN believes this (resolution) is just a prelude to a US effort to trigger snapback and sink the Iranian nuclear deal, Richard Gowan, a UN expert at the International Crisis Group, told AFP.

Read the original:
Iraq reports 24-hour virus toll record of over 3800 - Arab News

Book Title:War in the Age of Trump, The Defeat of Isis, the Fall of the Kurds, the Conflict with Iran

ISBN-13:978-1839760402

Author: Patrick Cockburn

Publisher:Verso

Guideline Price:18.99

Patrick Cockburn has been a familiar figure on Middle East battlefields for decades, racing around frontlines despite a weak leg, the legacy of childhood polio when he was growing up in Youghal, Co Cork.

War in the Age of Trump begins with the US assassination of Gen Qasem Soleimani, Irans eminence grise in Iraq, at the beginning of the year.

Adel Abdel Mahdi, who was prime minister at the time, told Cockburn he was scheduled to meet Soleimani on the morning he was killed. He came to deliver a message from Iran in response to the message we had delivered from the Saudis to Iran, Mahdi said.

Trumps decision to kill Soleimani was widely condemned as a blunder, but it takes on a whole new significance if, as Cockburn suggests, the Iranian commander was endeavouring to defuse tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran. This is the sort of exclusive information we have come to expect from a veteran Middle East correspondent with 10 books and a half dozen awards to his name.

Over the past two decades, Washington has wrought regime change in Afghanistan and Iraq. In both countries, the previous regimes were viscerally anti-Iranian. As Cockburn points out, Shia Muslims allied with Iran are winning in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. The mullahs must be saying thank you America.

The US and Iran, arch-enemies of the Middle East, shake their fists at each other over the table, but shake hands under it, says an Iraqi adage quoted by Cockburn. Washington and Tehran have agreed on the appointments of all Iraqi presidents and prime ministers since the US overthrew Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Though Cockburn clearly dislikes Trump, he credits his administration with successfully co-ordinating a multitude of fractious parties in Iraq and Syria in the offensive against Isis strongholds in Mosul and Raqqa. Cockburn finds Trumps December 2018 decision to pull US troops out of northern Syria perfectly rational. There was to be an open-ended US commitment with no attainable goals in an isolated and dangerous part of the world where it was already playing a losing game.

Cockburn is part of a cohort of western intellectuals and public figures who have sympathised with the plight of stateless Kurds. Because Kurdish self-determination would threaten the territorial integrity of Iran, Iraq and Turkey, the Kurds, like the Palestinians, are invariably betrayed.

The Syrian Kurds lost 11,000 lives fighting Isis, only to be ruthlessly discarded by Trump when he gave a green light to the Turkish invasion of northern Syria in late 2019. As Turkish forces ethnically cleansed the Kurdish enclave of Rojava, Syrian government troops moved in to reoccupy the territory.

Despite his sympathy for the Kurds, Cockburn sees the realpolitik sense of Trumps move. He was lucid about Washingtons five-year alliance with Syrian Kurds. One day the Americans would have to choose between two million embattled Kurds in Syria and 80 million Turks in Turkey, and it did not take much political acumen to foresee what they would decide, he writes.

Iraqi Kurds fared no better. Masoud Barzani, the president of the Kurdish Regional Government, made what Cockburn calls a gargantuan error of judgment in calling a referendum on Kurdish independence in September 2017. Iraq, Iran and Turkey, as well as the US, UK, France and Germany, condemned the referendum as destabilising. The Baghdad government used the landslide vote for independence as a pretext for seizing Kirkuk, which the Kurds had held since the US overthrew Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Cockburns account of the October 2016-July 2017 battle to drive Isis out of Mosul is particularly poignant. As Cockburn continued attempts to enter the besieged city, residents risked their lives to talk to him on the telephone about the terrible conditions inside. Civilians were faced with the horrendous choice of starving in their homes, where thousands were killed in US aerial bombardments, or running the gauntlet of Isis snipers in the attempt to flee.

Cockburn makes a powerful denunciation of double standards in western media. The US-Iraqi assault on Mosul was as fierce as the Syrian-Russian assault on Aleppo, yet only the latter was widely condemned. Media widely reported Syrian atrocities in the siege of eastern Ghouta, near Damascus, in 2018, but ignored Turkish atrocities against Kurds in Afrin, northwest Syria, the same year.

I saw the same pattern repeated in wars in the Middle East and beyond, Cockburn writes. Civil wars were portrayed as black-and-white conflicts between a demonic dictator or movement (Saddam Hussein, Taliban, Muammar Gaddafi, Bashar al-Assad) fighting a pure-as-snow popular opposition. The model was reversed when US-installed Afghan and Iraqi governments were attacked by terrorists.

If the West really wants to help Syria, it must accept that Assad is going to hold on to power, Cockburn writes. Recognition of this fact should be conditioned on a return home for refugees and an internationally monitored amnesty and freeing of prisoners.

Despite its many qualities, War in the Age of Trump suffers from poor editing. The title is misleading, since the book is limited to the past four years in Iraq and Syria, rather than Trumps broader Middle East policy. It does not address Trumps appointment of his son-in-law Jared Kushner to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or his continuing support for Saudi Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman despite the grisly murder of the journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Cockburns short summaries, printed in italics at the beginning of each section, are the most readable parts of the book. The rest of the text is comprised of reprinted articles, with many repetitions and disorienting references to last week and last month regarding events that took place years ago. It makes a hard slog for the reader, without the assistance of a timeline, index or chart of acronyms. If Cockburn and his publisher had used the articles as building blocks for a rewritten, smooth-flowing narrative, this good book could have been great.

Lara Marlowe is France Correspondent of The Irish Times

View post:
War in the Age of Trump: Four years of fighting in Iraq and Syria - The Irish Times

ARBIL, Iraq: Turkish bombardment killed three Kurdish fighters in northern Iraq, a local official said Friday, as Baghdad seeks to rally support to end Ankaras offensive on its soil.

Turkey launched a cross-border ground and air operation in mid-June against Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) rebels in the mountainous terrain of northern Iraq. "A Turkish bombardment targeted a car in the village of Rashanki, in Dohuk province, killing three PKK fighters, and injuring a fourth who fled," said Mushir Bashir, the local mayor, of the bombardment late on Thursday.

The men, who were travelling in an off-road vehicle, were killed when they stopped outside a grocery store, he added. The attack comes as Iraq tries to drum up support from its Arab neighbours to form a united front against Ankaras offensive.

Turkey defends its right to bomb the PKK, which it considers to be a "terrorist" organisation, and accuses Baghdad and Iraqi Kurdistan of not stopping the group. Earlier this week, two senior Iraqi officers and their driver were killed in a Turkish drone strike, prompting Iraq to summon the Turkish ambassador in Baghdad for the third time in two months.

On Friday, Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein contacted his Bahraini and Emirati counterparts, after calling the day before the Egyptian, Jordanian, Saudi and Kuwaiti foreign ministers, as well as Arab League chief Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Hussein pleaded for "a united position, forcing Turkey to withdraw its forces that have infiltrated Iraqi territory."

Follow this link:
Strikes kill three Kurds in Iraq - The News International

The Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC, is in discussions with the Iraqi government to reach a settlement regarding thousands of antiquities in its collection with suspicious or incomplete provenance.

The museum, which was founded by the president of the Hobby Lobby craft store chain, Steve Green, has returned thousands of antiquities to Iraq since it opened in 2017.

While a final agreement is still pending, the Iraqi government has reportedly consented to a $15 million settlement over 4,000 disputed antiquities in the Museum of the Bibles collection, which have been handed over to Iraqi control based on the suspicion that they were looted. In exchange, the museum may retain the right to display some of the objects on loan.

Iraqs culture ministry says agreement in principle will pay Iraq $15 million for training, technical and other assistance in exchange for loan of objects, NPRs international correspondent Jane Arraf tweeted. Arraf also said that Iraq has dropped lawsuits against Hobby Lobby as part of the deal. Artnet News reached out to the Iraqi embassy in DC to confirm but did not hear back by press time.

A spokeswoman for the Museum of the Bible confirmed to Artnet News that the museum has recently returned artifacts that do not meet its acquisition standards (she did not immediately specify exactly how many) and that the museums chairman Steve Green is in discussions with the Iraqi embassy. The museum seeks to support research, exhibitions, and technical assistance projects with Iraq, she said, although the full details of these plans have yet to be finalized. The museum denied knowledge of any previous or pending lawsuits from the Iraqi government.

The bronze doors marking the grand entrance of the Museum of the Bible. Image courtesy Museum of the Bible.

The saga of Hobby Lobbys ties to Iraq is long and winding. Questions about the provenance of Greens many antiquities have dogged the executive since he began collecting in 2009. In 2017, the company was the subject of a US Department of Justice civil action that accused it of engaging in a years-long, willful pattern of smuggling Iraqi artifacts into the US, including by importing ancient cuneiform tablets as tile samples. As part of a settlement with the US government, the company returned 5,500 artifacts to Iraq and paid a $3 million fine for not exercising proper due diligence in its acquisition practices.

At the time, the museums founder attributed the mistakes to his inexperience as an antiquities collector and vowed to reform the museums approach to collecting. As part of this resolution, Green revealed in March that he would be returning a further 11,500 artifacts from the collection to the governments of Iraq and Egypt after their provenance could not be verified.

These items included a valuable clay tablet etched with the Babylonian epic of Gilgamesh that Green had bought for $1.67 million from Christies in 2014. In May, Green announced that Hobby Lobby was suing the auction house for selling him the tablet after it turned out to have been looted from Iraq in the 2000s. (The US government seized the tablet from the museum in September of last year.)

Meanwhile, other controversies surrounding the collection have also cropped up, including the shocking revelation earlier this year the museums collection of 16 fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls were fake.

Additional reporting by Eileen Kinsella.

Follow this link:
The Museum of the Bible Is in Discussions With Iraq to Reach a Settlement Over Thousands of Disputed Antiquities in Its Collection - artnet News