Mediaboss Marketing

At a time when Iran is engulfed in a conglomerate of domestic and international crises, the regime witnessed two unexpected attacks by ISIS against its godfather in Tehran, marking the first such attack by the terror group on Iranian soil.

Parallel to denunciations from across the globe, the Iranian opposition National Council of Resistance of Iran condemned the attack and warned of Tehran taking advantage of such a development.

NCRI President Maryam Rajavi strongly condemned the loss of innocent lives under any pretext.

ISISs conduct clearly benefits the Iranian regimes Supreme Leader Khamenei, who wholeheartedly welcomes it as an opportunity to overcome his regimes regional and international impasse and isolation. The founder and the number one state sponsor of terror is thus trying to switch the place of the murderer and the victim and portray the central banker of terrorism as a victim, Rajavi said.

Reports and evidence to this day show the presence and crimes committed by ISIS in Iraq and Syria were to the sole benefit of Iran, allowing this regime to justify its role in this region. Iran, in contrast to other countries of the Middle East, has been the only country where ISIS and al-Qaeda had not conducted a terror attack. This could not have been a mere coincidence.

Strangely, all signs indicate Iran actually welcomed this incident. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei outrageously described this attack, that according to state media left 17 killed and dozens of others injured, merely as playing with firecrackers. Maybe he witnessed a potential in this turn of events to cloak the dilemmas and crises his entire apparatus is facing.

The spread of domestic rallies against the mullahs in Iran, the recent presidential election quagmire, escalating protests and gatherings staged outside the parliament by investors who have lost their savings in two now-bankrupt financial firms linked to the Revolutionary Guards, and strong positions taken by the United States and more than 50 Arabic and Muslim countries in the recent Riyadh Summit are a small slate of the regimes current calamities.

To this end, this terrorist attack couldnt have come at a better timing for the regime and provided a number of desperately needed lifelines. The Iranian regime will now seek to justify repressive measures against domestic protests, seek to normalize conditions to portray a status quo similar to those prior to the May presidential election, and escalate its meddling in other countries under the pretext of the war against ISIS.

Despite the fact that ISIS has claimed responsibility for this attack, people inside Iran have taken to Telegram and other social media platforms to express their surprise and suspicions, questioning how assailants were able to penetrate into the parliament, especially considering the already tight security atmosphere in Iran. They are also doubting claims made by various MPs who claimed the parliaments sessions continued despite attackers entering the building. Conflicting reports were issued by official sources regarding the number of attackers and other factors, further adding to the publics doubts over the entire issue.

It is worth noting that Iran has a history of resorting to similar measures when pinned against insurmountable crises. For example, on June 20th, 1994, at a time when thousands of people had filled the Imam Reza Shrine, considered Irans holiest site in the country located in the northeastern city of Mashhad, a powerful bombing left dozens of pilgrims killed and hundreds wounded.

The Iranian regime raised allegations against its main opposition, the Peoples Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK). Khamenei sent a message demanding the PMOI be punished, including expulsion from European countries and Iraq. Five years later, as the light was shed on the chain murders in Iran, evidence surfaced showing the role of Irans Ministry of Intelligence in the Mashhad bombing. In 1999 Irans Armed Forces Judiciary Organization issued a statement accusing Saeid Emami, then Iranian deputy minister of intelligence under Ali Fallahian, acknowledging further the MOIS role in this attack.

There are also voices heard arguing that the Iranian regime and ISIS enjoyed an unwritten agreement, similar to the relationship between Syrias Bashar Assad regime and ISIS. It is to no surprise at all, considering the fact that both parties believe their ending is near. The mullahs are losing the war against the Iranian people, and ISIS is more vulnerable than ever in the face of a global coalition. Their golden era has come to an end.

To uproot terrorism in the Middle East, Rajavi emphasized the following measures:

Continue reading here:
ISIS Attacks On Iran Should Make The Regime Reflect - The Daily Caller

Iran Rounds Up ISIS Suspects Following Deadly Attack in Tehran Wall Street Journal (subscription) Dozens of suspected members of Islamic State were arrested in Iran on Friday as authorities sought to root out the extremist group following this week's deadly attacks in the heart of the Iranian capital. The Intelligence Ministry said 41 suspects were ...

Originally posted here:
Iran Rounds Up ISIS Suspects Following Deadly Attack in Tehran - Wall Street Journal (subscription)

By Marc Martinez By Marc Martinez June 8 at 12:43 PM

Marc Martinez is a senior analyst at the Delma Institute, an international affairs research consultancy in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

For the first time since Irans 1979 Islamic revolution, a Sunni extremist group managed to successfully carry out a terrorist attack in Tehran. Iranians sat mesmerized in front of their TV sets, watching the unfolding events in disbelief and waiting for any information on the terrorists, their motivation and their affiliation.

The Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attacks against two potent symbols of power in Iran, which left at least 12 dead and 42 wounded. By attacking the Imam Khomeini mausoleum, the final resting place of the founder of the Islamic republic, the terrorists targeted the Islamic revolution itself. And by attacking the parliament, they assaulted Irans vibrant yet imperfect democracy. These were attacks on Irans political institutions, not Shiism.

By targeting both the symbols of Iranian democracy and the autocratic system of the velayat-e faqih (governance of the jurist), the terrorists, paradoxically, ended up uniting an Iranian society fractured by the recent presidential campaign that saw Hassan Rouhani get reelected. Reformists, moderates, conservatives and hard-liners are now part of a new sacred union against terrorism that will most likely enable the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to reinforce its involvement in Syria and increase support for its local militias.

The attack will harden nationalist feelings and legitimize the IRGCs rhetoric that such an intervention was necessary to fight terrorists in their locations to avoid having to fight them on the streets of Tehran. In a rare message of national unity, Rouhanis chief of staff for political affairs, Hamid Aboutalebi, encouraged Iranians to applaud the security forces, the IRGC, the Basij militia and police for their power and firmness.

This alliance will, however, only be temporary, as the people will soon increase pressure on their government to focus its attention on Iran and its economic woes rather than distant Syria. Conservatives will also use the tragic event to force political change in the next presidential election in four years.

The next few days are crucial to understanding whether Iranian moderates will be able to rein in the IRGC and its Shiite allies, such as the armed Lebanese group Hezbollah, the Afghan militia Fatemiyoun and the Pakistani Zeynabiyoun brigade which are all doing Irans bidding in the war in Syria. Because the Islamic State did not touch any religious symbols, even though the mausoleum site is sacred for Iranians and many Shiites, the government might be able to control the reaction of the more ideological Iranian forces.

But Iranians are not immune to conspiracy theories and are already questioning the timing of the attack, linking it to Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeirs threat a few hours before the attack, whenhe saidthat Iran must be punished for its interference in the region and its support for terrorist organizations.

Soon after the attack, social media in Iran was abuzz with messages on different platforms such as Telegram and Twitter with every detail of the terrorist operation. The military gear one of the attackers was found with eight grenades and 12 AK-47 magazines and the flawless, classical Arabic spoken by one of the attackers have been used to point the finger at Saudi Arabia and raise suspicions about its involvement. Even official confirmation that the attackers were all Sunni Iranians converted by the Islamic State to extremism was met with suspicion.

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said: These fireworks have no effect on Iran. They will soon be eliminated They are too small to affect the will of the Iranian nation and its officials. However, the IRGC belligerently and publicly said Saudi Arabia was behind the attack and added that the spilled blood of the innocent will not remain unavenged. At a time when regional tensions are at a historic high with the ongoing Qatar crisis, the prospect of an Iranian retaliation through the IRGC or one of its Shiite allies is petrifying, as the consequences for Iran and the region would be unfathomable.

The terrorist attacks will have serious consequences on foreign direct investments, as international companies and governments were waiting for the first signs of economic improvement to enter the Iranian market. And a retaliation in any form would be catastrophic, as it would most likely trigger new U.S. and, possibly, European sanctions against Iran, and once again brand the country as a state sponsor of terrorism.

If the Iranian authorities not only the government but also the supreme leader are able and willing to control their most extremist forces, they will be able to maintain the moral high ground by taking advantage of the Shiite tradition of victimization.

The Islamic State attacks show that Iran is a de facto part of the international community, as its democratic institutions and existence are a threat to the terrorist group. This will force countries and individuals to review their analyses. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, for example, will no longer be able to question Irans relations with the Islamic State (What is the one country in the Middle East that has not been attacked by ISIS? One, that is Iran. That is more than happenstance, Im sure.) or state that I consider ISIS nothing more than an excuse for Iran to continue its mischief. Iran is not an enemy of ISIS.

But by stating that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote, President Trump proved to many Iranians that their suffering is not considered equal to that of others.

Continued here:
The terror of the Islamic State comes to Iran - Washington Post

The Islamic State has struck at Iran and its allies for years but always from afar, in places such as Iraq against Tehran-backed militias and in Syria battling government troops aided by Iranian forces.

That appeared to change Wednesday when bloodshed came to Tehran. In a few chaotic hours, Iran endured the kind of deadly rampages so often claimed by the Islamic State elsewhere.

The twin attacks, the first major assaults in Iran claimed by the Islamic State, targeted the heart of Irans political identity and the notion that militants were no match for the security forces zealously guarding Tehran.

At least 12 people were reported killed and 42 wounded in the assaults in the parliament building and outside the tomb of the leader of the nations Islamic revolution. Security forces eventually killed all four assailants, state media reported. Hours later, Tehrans police chief said five suspects had been detained and were being interrogated.

While the attacks showed that the United States and Iran have a shared enemy, they appeared unlikely to reset U.S.-led efforts against the Islamic State or bring Iran more directly into the fight especially since the Trump administration has embraced Irans main regional foe, Saudi Arabia, as a bulwark in fighting Islamist militants and constraining Irans regional influence.

In a White House statement, President Trump said Wednesday: We grieve and pray for the innocent victims of the terrorist attacks in Iran, and for the Iranian people, who are going through such challenging times. We underscore that states that sponsor terrorism risk falling victim to the evil they promote.

The Washington-based National Iranian American Council promptly rebuked what it called Trumps heartless message, saying that presidents who cannot genuinely recognize victims of terrorism are incapable of leading the fight against terror.

Irans powerful Revolutionary Guard Corps took a thinly veiled jab at Saudi Arabia as a source of militant ideology, saying it was meaningful that the attacks occurred less than three weeks after Trump visited Riyadh and asserted strong U.S. support for the Saudis and their allies.

The Revolutionary Guard statement added that the spilled blood of the innocent will not remain unavenged.

[As ISIS loses ground in Syria, a scramble between U.S. and Iran for control]

Iran is predominantly Shiite Muslim and is at odds with Sunni extremist groups such as al- Qaeda and the Islamic State, which view Shiites as heretics and have attacked Shiite targets across the region.

While it is unclear what direct measures Iran could take against the Islamic State, the fallout is certain to deepen regional tensions at a difficult time. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and others have pledged to try to heal an unprecedented diplomatic break in which Saudi Arabia and its allies have severed ties with Qatar, a key U.S. military partner in the Persian Gulf.

The Saudis and their allies accuse Qatar of supporting Islamist militants and oppose its outreach to Iran.

For the Islamic State, striking directly at Iran appears to be part of a wider attempt to stir regional discord.

An attack inside Iran was absolutely the realization of a long-term ideological goal for the Islamic State, said Charlie Winter, a senior research fellow at the International Center for the Study of Radicalization at Kings College in London.

Ideologically, the implications are huge, he said. Attacking Iran is kind of like attacking the U.S. or Israel.

The near-simultaneous attacks coming in the middle of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan also appeared calculated to elicit maximum shock among Iranians.

The parliament is widely respected as a voice on domestic policies even though Irans supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has the final word on most international and security issues. The shrine of Khameneis predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, is a centerpiece of homage to the 1979 Islamic revolution, which overthrew Irans Western-allied monarchy.

[Trump turned his Saudi trip into a rally against Iranian influence]

The timing, meanwhile, could have been intended to boost the Islamic States stature among backers as it faces a two-pronged assault against its key urban strongholds: Mosul in northern Iraq and Raqqa in Syria. An expanded offensive by U.S.-backed forces against Raqqa, the Islamic States de facto capital, began Tuesday.

It is indeed a boost to ISIS morale, especially given that its the first successful attack in Iran, said Dina Esfandiary, who studies global security issues at the Center for Science and Security Studies at Kings College. The Islamic State is also known as ISIS.

Iranian state TV quoted Khamenei as dismissing the attacks as mere fireworks that would not weaken Irans fight against groups such as the Islamic State.

The Islamic States Amaq News Agency claimed that the group carried out the attacks. The Islamic State, however, is often quick to take ownership of spectacular assaults without providing evidence.

But the news agency also circulated a 24-second video that purported to show a fighter walking near a body during the attack on the parliament.

Oh, Sunni people in Iran, dont you feel the pain from those shackles that are tied around your wrists and ankles? one militant said in the video, calling on Sunnis to wage battle against Shiites in their dens and gatherings in Tehran and other Iranian cities.

The Islamic State also began distributing its online magazine Rumiyah in Persian late last month.

Iran views its parliament, or Majlis, as a symbol of participatory government in contrast with its main regional rivals, including Saudi Arabia and allied sheikhdoms in the Persian Gulf. Last month, Irans president, Hassan Rouhani, won reelection in a race against hard-line challengers.

[Irans election is over, but bigger issues of leadership loom]

The parliament has very specific meaning for Iran after the recent election. Its democracy was attacked, said Marc Martinez, a senior analyst and Iran expert at the Delma Institute, a political consultancy in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates.

The expansive complex around Khomeinis tomb is a spiritual and political testament to the Islamic revolution. The huge courtyard and buildings, including blue-tiled domes that tower over the mausoleum, are particularly filled with visitors during Ramadan, which began two weeks ago.

Attacks of this kind are rare in Irans capital, where security forces are deployed at prominent sites. The Revolutionary Guard Corps also maintains a vast network of informants and allies through a volunteer paramilitary force called the Basij.

The parliament building is in the center of the city, and Khomeinis tomb complex is about 12 miles to the south.

Iran has suffered terrorist attacks in the past but rarely in cities or the capital. Separatist groups and Sunni extremists have carried out bombings in the border region near Pakistan, including a suicide attack in 2010 that killed 39.

Paul Schemm in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Loveday Morris in Irbil, Iraq; and William Branigin and Carol Morello in Washington contributed to this report.

Read more:

U.S. and Iran aligned against the Islamic State for now

Iran president blames U.S. for Mideast violence

Todays coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

See original here:
The Latest: Australia condemns attacks in Iran - Washington Post

New York Times

Terrorist Attacks Pour Gas on Saudi-Iranian Rivalry and Gulf Tensions New York Times The attacks in Tehran threatened to escalate the broader regional conflict between the two heavyweight powers, Iran and Saudi Arabia, at a time when the Western-allied gulf bloc is divided against itself. And Saudi Arabia, under the two-year-old reign ... Trump's pressure on Iran may be stoking sectarian tensions in MideastWashington Post Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf: A tangled web of politics and terrorCNN Qatar Standoff Tests China's Neutrality on Saudi-Iran FeudBloomberg Aljazeera.com -Reuters -NBCNews.com all 6,492 news articles »

View post:
Terrorist Attacks Pour Gas on Saudi-Iranian Rivalry and Gulf Tensions - New York Times