Archive for the ‘Iran’ Category

Iran’s Missile Charade – Algemeiner

The launching of an Iranian Ghadr ballistic missile. Photo: Mahmood Hosseini via Wikimedia Commons.

WhenIran launches major missile tests, major protests from Western countries inevitablyfollow.

Theinternational community is rightfully concerned about the dangers of Irans ballistic missile program, and as such, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution 2231 in July 2015, banningIran from testing ballistic missiles capable of delivering a nuclear payload. More recently, after Iran tested missiles multiple times, the Trump administration slapped new sanctions on Tehran.

Yes, the Islamic Republicpays a heavyprice for testing long-range missiles.

March 23, 2017 8:05 am

But, how accurate are Irans claims of its capabilities? How real are the threats of its supposed new, advanced weaponry? And why would the mullahs continue to engage in these missile tests when they pay for it on the world stage every time they do?

Several months ago, Iran announced the manufacturing of three missiles theKhorramshahr, Qadir and Sejil claiming they hadhigh-level accuracy, landing less than 10 meters away from their intended targets. On Jan. 29, Tehran test-launched an intermediate-range Khorramshahr ballistic missile, but technicians were forced to self-destruct the vessel, as therange-error was proven to be embarrassinglysignificant (the projectile washeaded fordozens of kilometers off target)andthreatened to cause civilian casualties. This was the fate of a missile that Iran boasted had pinpoint accuracy.

Iran also bloviatesabout manufacturingtheFajr missile series,which arenothing but replicas of Russian World War II designs. The notion that those missiles could have pinpoint accuracy is far-fetched, as they areuseless in todays world.

The truth is that Iran is facing major domestic crises andforeign challengesthroughout the Middle East, making itall the more necessary for its leaders to use military tests, including stagingdifferent Revolutionary Guards (IRGC)drillsand engaging in variousmissile launches. Then, asnew sanctions were imposed, Iran understood itcould no longer repeat major ballistic missile tests, and instead resorted to usingterms likesmart rockets with precision accuracy or anti-helicopter mines. Too bad we live in a world in which helicopters are targeted using state-of-the-art laser-guided missiles, not mines.

Iran received a major blow from thenucleardeal sealed with the international community, which forced itto exhibit strength and engage in these over-blown missile tests. The irony is that the dealalso forced theregimes Foreign Ministry to insist that the Iranianmissile program is entirely defensive in nature, taking the bite out of the mullahs posturing about power.

However, there are parties benefiting from Iransrocketprogram, namely the regimes proxy militia groups, including the Lebanese Hezbollah, the Badr Organization, Asaeb a-l Haq and Kataeb Hezbollah in Iraq, the Houthis inYemenand many others. TheIRGC, which controls Irans missile drives, recently established underground missile-production factories for Hezbollah, which sits close to Israels northern border. This is all part of Iransdestabilizingcampaign in the region.

It is very challenging to reach conclusions about the reality behind the mullahsrhetoric, of the true character of the movesthey make. But,ifthe international community is truly serious about taking significant and meaningful action to curband ultimately uproot the Iranian missile threat, designating the IRGC as a foreign terrorist organization is thecorrect path forward.Such a stepwouldquickly curb Irans missile threat and bring the entire Middle East closer to peace and stability.

The rest is here:
Iran's Missile Charade - Algemeiner

On Iran, President Trump is sending mixed signals – The Hill (blog)

Two months into the Trump presidency, uncertainty and confusion about U.S. foreign policy in general, and its policy in the Middle East in particular, continue to puzzle experts and decision makers around the globe. Regarding Iran, the administration has been sending mixed signals, making it difficult to understand its intended policy.

On the one hand, the new administration has continued the tough anti-Iran rhetoric that Trump adopted during his election campaign.

On Feb. 1, after Iran tested several ballistic missiles, then-national security adviser Michael Flynn put Iran on notice for its provocative missile test and for its arming and training of the Houthi rebels in Yemen. Two days later, Washington imposed sanctions on 25 individuals and entities involved in Irans ballistic missile program.

Then, Flynn released a new statement and threatened that the international community has been too tolerant of Irans bad behavior. The Trump administration will no longer tolerate Irans provocations that threaten our interests. The days of turning a blind eye to Irans hostile and belligerent actions toward the United States and the world community are over.

On the other hand, the Trump administration has sent some signals that could be interpreted as the continuation of President Obamas conciliatory approach toward Iran.

On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly called the nuclear deal with Iran, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a catastrophic deal, and in his speech to the AIPAC conference in March 2016 he declared, my number-one priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran. However, according to numerous reports, Senior U.S. officials have given assurances to the European Union that the Trump administration is committed to the Iranian nuclear deal.

The administration has also confirmed that it would continue to grant licenses to companies such as Boeing so that they can pursue multi-billion dollar deals with Iran. In addition, according to Iranian press, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has allowed American citizens to open accounts in Iranian banks: According to the latest ruling of OFAC, American citizens, who live in Iran and need a bank account, are allowed to open one in Iranian banks. Irans leading economic website, Donyaye-e Eghtesad, has interpreted these two developments as Trumps positive signals after his commitment to the nuclear deal.

These actions are viewed by Tehran as conciliatory gestures showing Trumps desire to prime business deals over a costly confrontation with Iran. During a roundtable in Tehran that included Irans deputy foreign minister, Nasser Hadian, a top adviser to the Foreign Ministry asked the government to make the necessary preparations and economic opportunities to attract Trump, as he is a pragmatist with no real partisan standing who only cares about economic interests.

Regarding the proposal to designate Irans Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization, the White House seems hesitant. An administration official told Reuters that sanctioning IRGC could backfire, strengthen the hardliners and undercut more moderate leaders such as Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, and encourage Iranian-backed forces in Iraq and Syria to curtail any action against Islamic State in Syria and Iraq and perhaps even sponsor actions against U.S.-backed or even American forces battling Islamic State in Iraq.

The Trump administrations confusing signals toward Tehran have caused concern among policy experts in Washington. As Reuel Marc Gerecht, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, wrote in the Weekly Standard, there is a contradiction between Trumps desire for business and the need to confront Irans malign activities. Does the president see ideological forcesIran's version of Islamismas a sufficient threat to override his obvious desire to see American trade expand? Given the central role of commerce in the president's worldview and the strong tendency of businessmen to see other businessmen non-ideologically, it's possible Trump could incline towards the conventional view: better to support Rouhani the Moderate against the hardliners.

The contradictions in Trumps policies are clearer in his approach to Syria; Ambassador Dennis Ross has underlined that the Trump administration cannot say it is going to be tougher on Iran and at the same time join with the Russians in Syria. The two are mutually exclusive.

Similarly, Gerald Feierstein, former U.S. ambassador to Yemen, told the International Business Times that Trump would like to minimize his engagement in the Middle East, except for the fight against ISIL and other violent extremist groups. If that were the case, it would strengthen Iran's hand in pursuing its efforts at regional hegemony, particularly if the fight against violent extremism includes enhanced cooperation with Russia, the Syrian regime and, by extension, Iran.

These policies could induce the Trump administration to pursue Obamas failed policies. Marc Gerecht has raised the alarm about such a slippery slope: A certain momentum will develop if Trump decides to keep the nuclear deal and allow the plane contracts. If Trump becomes committed to this accord, it will take on a life of its own. If Trump decides to accept the nuclear deal and basically ignore the clerical regime's search for dominion in the Middle East, he will take the United States to where Obama was headedjust more quickly.

Iran certainly represents a key policy dilemma for the United States, both in terms of its influence in the region as well as its nuclear program. To date, Trumps actions toward Tehran have not matched his rhetoric, leaving many to wonder what changes if any changes we can expect with regards to this issue.

Hassan Dai is a human rights activist, political analyst and editor of the Iranian American Forum. @IranianForum

The views of contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.

Go here to read the rest:
On Iran, President Trump is sending mixed signals - The Hill (blog)

Iran’s top leader faults government’s progress on economy – Columbus Ledger-Enquirer


Columbus Ledger-Enquirer
Iran's top leader faults government's progress on economy
Columbus Ledger-Enquirer
In this picture released by official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader on Monday, March 20, 2017, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei sits in a session to deliver his message for the Iranian New Year, Iran. Nowruz, a festival to ...
Canada needs to stand with brave Iranian activistsToronto Sun
Supreme Leader Criticizes Iran's President On Economy Ahead Of ElectionRadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty
Happy Nowruz: 3 British-Iranian cooks share their favourite New Year dishesEvening Standard
Press TV -The Herald
all 57 news articles »

See more here:
Iran's top leader faults government's progress on economy - Columbus Ledger-Enquirer

Iran accused of planning attack on head of French-Israel business group – Jerusalem Post Israel News

Iranian protestors burn an Israeli flag during a demonstration in Tehran on July 25, 2014 to mark the Quds Day. (photo credit:BEHROUZ MEHRI /AFP)

Iran's Quds Force plotted with the aid of a paid Pakistani man to surveil --and possibly assassinate--the head of the French-Israeli chamber of commerce, according to revelations from a Monday court proceeding in Berlin and German media reports.The daily Berliner Zeitung reported that the 31-year-old Pakistani Syed Mustafa spied on the French-Israel business professor David Rouach who teaches at the elite Ecole Suprieure de Commerce de Paris (ESCP) and served as head of the French-Israeli chamber of commerce.

Quds Force, a US-classified terrorist entity, is part of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and paid Mustafa at least 2,052 euros between July 2015 and July 2016. Rouach is expected to testify on Tuesday. The federal prosecutor Michael Greven said at an earlier proceeding that a collection of surveillance activities took place to prepare for possible attacks. Mustafa amassed information on Rouach from July until August 2015. German investigators seized more than 300 photographs and 20 videos from Mustafa. The video and photographic material showed the ESCP campus and various travel distances in connection with the college.

According to German prosecutors, Mustafa's assignment was to identify Israeli and Jewish institutions, as well as pro-Israel advocates, for possible attacks. Mustafa conducted espionage in Gemany, France and other unnamed western European countries. He monitored a German-Jewish newspaper's headquarters in Berlin, and Reinhold Robbe, the former head of the German-Israel Friendship Society. Robbe told the court "I consider the regime there [in Iran] to be one of the worst dictators on the planet."

Mustafa delivered his dossiers to the IRGC. The criminal complaint said Mustafa had contact with a Quds Force agent named Mehmud since 2011. The Quds Force has a history of employing Pakistanis for their operations outside of Iran, said Greven. The trial started in early March and is slated to run until the end of the month.

Mustafa, who worked for the German Aerospace Center in the northern German city of Bremen, could face a prison term of three to three-and-a-half years.

Relevant to your professional network? Please share on Linkedin

Read more here:
Iran accused of planning attack on head of French-Israel business group - Jerusalem Post Israel News

Trump takes chance to question Iran deal amid Abadi’s visit – Press TV

US President Donald Trump greets Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi as he arrives to the White House on March 20, 2017, in Washington, DC. (Photo by AFP)

US President Donald Trump has questioned the Iran nuclear deal amid a visit by Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

Trump, who has been a staunch opponent of the international agreement negotiated by the USunder President Barack Obama, took the opportunity to criticize it amid meeting Abadi in the White House on Monday.

The billionaire-turned-president told an Iraqi delegation that he was wondering why Obama supported the deal, dubbed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), further asserting "nobody" knows why.

One of the things I did ask is, 'Why did President Obama sign that agreement with Iran?' because nobody has been able to figure that one out," Trump said. "But maybe someday we'll be able to figure that one out."

Since he started campaigning for the 2016 presidential election, Trump has criticized the Obama administration for backing the JCPOA, also supported by the UK, Germany, Russia, China, and France.

The new president has said that Iran is one of the topics for discussion between Washington and Baghdad during the visit by Abadi and his delegation.

Discussing Daesh

The Republican president welcomed the Iraqi premier to the White House for his first meeting since Trump gained power.

Trump said it was a "great honor" to meet the Iraqi prime minister, the 9th foreign leader received by the US president.

The two also discussed the Daesh Takfiri terrorists militancy in Iraq.

Before leaving the Iraqi capital Baghdad for the afternoon meeting, Abadi said in a video statement, "We are in the last chapter, the final stages to eliminate ISIL militarily in Iraq."

In Washington, he also stated that Iraq has "the strongest counter-terrorism forces, but we are looking forward to more cooperation between us and the US."

Tackling what Trumprefers to "radical Islamic terrorism," was one of his campaign promises as the GOP nominee for 2016 presidential election.

Meanwhile in Iraq, a fight to completely liberate areas under the Takfiris control continued.

Daeshterrorists were among militants initially trained by theCIAinJordanin 2012 to destabilize the Syrian government.

Go here to see the original:
Trump takes chance to question Iran deal amid Abadi's visit - Press TV