Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

George P. Bush’s defeat could be the end of the line for a four-generation political dynasty – The Texas Tribune

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

When George P. Bush burst onto the scene at the Republican National Convention in 2000, the handsome, 24-year-old nephew of presidential nominee George W. Bush had all of the makings of a future leader of the GOP.

He was already political royalty heir to a dynasty that included his father, then-Florida governor Jeb Bush, and his grandfather, former President George H.W. Bush. The son of a Mexican mother, and a fluent Spanish speaker, he seemed poised to broaden the appeal of the Republican Party to a younger and increasingly diverse electorate in the 21st century.

Que viva Bush! he told the convention to roaring applause. Y que vivan los Estados Unidos!

On Tuesday, the 46-year-old badly lost his runoff primary challenge to two-term Attorney General Ken Paxton, a staunch conservative who was seen as the most vulnerable Republican incumbent on the ballot due to his mounting scandals, including a felony indictment and an FBI investigation into his office for allegations of malfeasance.

Bushs loss marks what will soon be the end of an eight-year stint as a statewide elected official, after serving back-to-back terms as land commissioner. He continues to serve until the end of the year. But more significantly, it heralds a shift in the Texas Republican politics away from the pro-business establishment and toward a more populist, combative and harsh style of politics. Bushs defeat also notches another victory for former president Donald Trump, who has clashed with the Bush family for years and who repeatedly expressed his support for Paxton in the attorney general race.

This defeat could mark the end of a four-generation political dynasty, and the end of an era of Texas politics that began when the first George Bush moved to Odessa in 1948.

The Bush family name is essentially what the Romanov family name is in Russia, said Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University. Theres still somebody out there claiming to be czar but nobodys listening.

Twenty two years after George P. Bushs debut at the RNC, the factors that once made him appealing to GOP voters have turned against him the party has moved to the hard right, making opposition to immigration (both legal and illegal) a pillar of its agenda and eschewing the more genteel bipartisan consensus that the Bushes once seemed to embody.

Bushs inability to get past such a troubled candidate as Paxton shows how much the Texas electorate, and the American electorate, has changed since his uncle, George W. Bush, was elected Texas governor in 1994 and then president in 2000.

An April poll by the Texas Hispanic Policy Foundation found that 40% of Republican primary voters said they would never vote for George P. Bush. Two-thirds of those voters said thats because hes a member of the Bush family.

Texas politics have shifted so much in the last 20 to 30 years that the family that was Republican royalty have gone from that to basically being vilified for essentially being mainline doctrinaire conservatives, said Jon Taylor, a political scientist at the University of Texas at San Antonio. The Bush family helped to build the modern Republican Party of Texas.

The Bush family got its start in politics more than 1,000 miles away from Texas in Connecticut with the familys patriarch, Prescott Bush, an investment banker who served as that states U.S. Senator from 1952 to 1963.

In 1948, his son, George Herbert Walker Bush, moved to Odessa to enter the oil business. He became involved in Republican political circles in a state dominated by conservative white Democrats since the end of Reconstruction.

George H.W. Bush would run in multiple races for the states U.S. Senate seats and lose, but he made inroads by winning election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1966. He was appointed as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and served as chairman of the Republican National Committee and director of the Central Intelligence Agency before being elected as Ronald Reagans vice president in 1980 in a landslide that swept Texas. (Texas has not voted for a Democrat for president since Jimmy Carter in 1976.)

Bushs two terms as vice president coincided with the rise of the GOP in the state, which in 1978 elected Bill Clements, its first Republican governor since the end of Reconstruction. In 1988, George H.W. Bush was elected president and his expertise in foreign relations stood out in his navigation of the final years of the Cold War, the first Persian Gulf War, and the negotiation of what became the North American Free Trade Agreement.

In hindsight, his view of America as a global beacon, his appeal for a kinder, gentler nation and his distaste for budget deficits were the last years of a more consensus-driven politics that had begun to erode in the 1980s and all but vanished by the end of the 1990s. And his aspirational view of the country as a force for good was epitomized in his frequently used thousand points of light metaphor to encourage civic engagement by community organizations.

But after famously reneging on a promise not to increase taxes, George H.W. Bush was defeated in the 1992 presidential election by Bill Clinton.

His son, George W. Bush, picked up the Bush dynasty mantle in 1994 and swept into the Texas governors office by defeating Democrat Ann Richards. The election marked a turning point for Texas politics. Four years later, during Bushs reelection run, Republicans would sweep all the major statewide offices and have not relinquished them in the 24 years since.

As governor, George W. Bush proved popular and focused on issues like cutting taxes, tort reform and public education. In the statehouse, he bred a reputation for working across the aisle with Democrats and the compassionate conservatism that would fuel his presidential campaigns in 2000 and 2004.

I felt compelled to phrase it this way because people hear conservative and they think heartless, George W. Bush later reminisced. And my belief then and now is that the right conservative philosophies are compassionate and help people.

That conservatism focused on improving education, reducing barriers for business and helping people of color achieve economic and social success. He courted Latino voters and, as president, appointed Alberto R. Gonzales, a former Texas Supreme Court justice, as the nations first (and so far only) Hispanic attorney general. Mexican ranchera legend Vicente Fernandez sang at the 2000 Republican National Convention at which Bush was nominated (and his nephew, George P., fted).

George W. Bush won more than 40% of the Latino vote in his 2004 presidential race and brought to the White House a desire for immigration reform, including the creation of a guest worker program (opposed by many Democrats) and an eventual path to citizenship (opposed by many Republicans).

Family values dont end at the Rio Grande Valley, George W. Bush often said.

While popular during his initial years in the White House, those goals were stymied by an increasingly anti-immigrant faction of the Republican Party. A Bush-backed, bipartisan immigration bill was defeated in the Senate in 2007. A similar measure, backed by then-President Barack Obama, died in 2014 at the hands of House Republicans.

George W. Bushs final years in the presidency were soured by the publics opposition to the Iraq War, the governments increasing surveillance during the War on Terror following the Sept. 11 attacks, his handling of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and the Great Recession.

Those dissatisfactions would continue to fester within the GOP during Obamas eight-year tenure in office, with Republicans repudiating George W. Bushs policies and blaming him for not being more aggressive on socially conservative issues and for tanking the economy.

Once Bush is out of office, immediately the Republican party is in a position of the wilderness, said Taylor, the UT-San Antonio political scientist. The Republican party didnt know where it was going. They knew where they were going only in opposition to Obama, and that morphed into the Tea Party movement.

In Texas, the Tea Party movement rocked the statehouse hard when Republicans won 99 seats in the 150-member House in 2010, ousting several moderate Republicans and Democrats. In the same election, Republicans took control of the U.S. House.

Two years later, a relatively unknown former Texas solicitor general named Ted Cruz, a Tea Party favorite then endorsed by George P. Bush, beat out Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, a moderate Republican, in the 2012 U.S. Senate race. Dewhurst was a member of the GOP establishment whod been first elected statewide as land commissioner the same year George W. Bush won a second term as governor. Dewhurst lost his bid for another term as lieutenant governor in 2014 to a conservative senator named Dan Patrick whod been a pariah to most Republicans during his first years in office.

That same year, George P. Bush, whose middle name is that of the familys patriarch, won election as land commissioner with 61% of the vote. Back then, the younger Bush pushed a big tent version of the Republican Party, appealing to disillusioned Democrats and independents and expressed support for the Texas Dream Act, which provided in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants who came to the state as children.

At his swearing in ceremony, then-Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett said George P. Bushs election kicked off a new era for one of the most revered families in American history.

Bushs style was wonky and in the weeds, reminiscent of his grandfather. He focused on the states water rights, creating the first online auction for oil leases, and making sure protecting endangered species didnt get in the way of business interests. In 2016, he said his top legislative priority would be protecting the states coasts.

But he also borrowed from his uncles compassionate conservatism, which espoused that there is enough room in politics for tougher border security and helping undocumented immigrants who came to the country looking for a better life.

As a Latino, George P. Bush also worked hard to court candidates and voters of color to the GOP, which at times required him to denounce members of the party who made racist comments.

In 2019, he denounced a Republican state legislator who said his opponents in a highly diverse state house district in Fort Bend County were only running because they were Asian and had decided that my district might need an Asian to win. George P. Bush also called for the resignation of a GOP county chairwoman who used a racial slur in a text message about a Black party organizer.

At the beginning of the younger Bushs first term as land commissioner, an intraparty war within the Texas GOP was already raging, and despite being more socially conservative than his predecessors, Bush still found himself aligned with the center-right, pro-business faction.

The 2016 presidential election defined the partys rightward shift. George P. Bushs father, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, announced his candidacy in June 2015 and received millions of dollars from donors and strong support from the party establishment.

But he collided in the primary with the eventual winner of the race, Trump, who used his campaign announcement to denigrate Mexican immigrants as criminals, drug dealers, rapists.

The younger Bush, like much of the party establishment at the time, dismissed Trump as a trivial candidate and said his comments have no place in our party. George P. Bushs mother is a naturalized U.S. citizen from Mexico.

But Republican voters gravitated toward Trumps nationalist vision to Make America Great Again and his penchant for making outlandish, frequently insulting, comments about women, people of color and political opponents. In fact, it was Jeb Bush whom voters bounced early in that race, largely based on Trumps frequent characterization of him as low energy.

When Trump became the partys nominee, most of the Bush family declined to publicly support him. George P. Bush, the only member of the family still in office, was the sole member of the clan to endorse him.

He initially stumped for his dad, Jeb Bush, but ultimately threw his support behind Trump, saying it was a bitter pill to swallow for Team Bush, but Republican voters had to stop Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Later, George P. Bush characterized his relationship with Trump as professional but remained concerned that the Republican Party was viewed as unwelcoming for people of color. Still, he supported Trump in his reelection effort in 2020.

When George P. Bush launched his campaign for attorney general last June, he lobbied hard for Trumps endorsement, handing out campaign koozies with a cartoon picture of Trump that quoted the former president saying: This is the only Bush that likes me. This is the Bush that got it right. I like him.

Bushs problem: Paxton was far closer to the president. Paxton had filed a last ditch lawsuit in federal court to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in four states where Trump lost. The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed that lawsuit because Texas had no standing, but it appeared enough to curry Trumps favor. The former president endorsed Paxton early in the race.

Still, George P. Bush shifted to the right to win over Republican primary voters. He pledged to help the state secure the border and build Trumps unfinished wall, while supporting state investigations into families of transgender children and denouncing Democrats as a woke mob. He went back on his previous support for the Texas Dream Act, now saying that he supports the Republican Party of Texas platform to repeal the law.

But despite his best efforts to stay in step with the party, he was trampled by its rightward shift.

The party shifted, Republican voters shifted and the conservatism that may have been popular during George W. Bushs tenure as governor just doesnt fit Texas anymore, said Renee Cross, a political scientist at the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston.

George P. Bushs gaffes as land commissioner also came back to haunt him. His handling of federal hurricane recovery relief funds, which gave far more money per person to inland areas than to coastal ones that had been more seriously impacted by storms, is still hounding him. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development found his agency's distribution of the funds discriminated against people of color.

Perhaps his most consequential mistake was wading into a redesign of the Alamo grounds that considered relocating a monument to the revolutionaries who died at the 1836 battle.

Bush argued that the cenotaph, as the monument is called, needed to be moved 500 feet to the south near the historic Menger Hotel to be preserved. But opponents of the move said the relocation would dishonor the sacrifice of the revolutionaries who died there. Major Republican officials, like Patrick, sided with those who wanted the cenotaph to stay in place. During the attorney general race, Paxton characterized Bush as a liberal who had backed a woke plan to remove historic monuments.

It was pretty much a debacle, said Rick Range, a member of a group created to fight Bushs redesign of the Alamo who ran against him in the GOP primary for land commissioner in 2018. His mishandling of the Alamo was what got me in opposition.

As a fourth-generation politician, who grew up attending political conventions for his elders, George P. Bush has always been aware of the weight his name carries and the assumptions that come with it.

What a lot of people get wrong about my family is that we covet title and it's about continuing some sort of tradition, when it's all about public service, he said in March as he prepared for a runoff with Paxton.

This has never been about titles, let alone the D word as we call it in our family, he added, nodding to the use of the word dynasty to describe his family, This is about serving.

Bush is serving his second term as Texas land commissioner and though his race became tighter in 2018 because of a strong showing by Democrats, he was still one of the top statewide vote getters with 4.4 million votes in his favor. That was more than senatorial candidates Ted Cruz and Beto ORourke received and more than any other statewide candidate except for Gov. Greg Abbott.

That counts for something despite his more recent loss, said longtime lobbyist Bill Miller.

If you think about the arc of politics, the Kennedys have not always been successful. Theyve won and lost. Political dynasties have ups and downs, Miller said. Theres unpredictability to it. Theres a season for it. Right now, hes running against a guy whos really popular with the Republican primary electorate. Its not about George P. losing, its about Paxton winning.

Tuesdays loss marks the second time in two years that a member of the family failed to get out of the primaries in a Texas election. In 2020, George P. Bushs cousin, Pierce Bush, came a distant third in the GOP primary for Congressional District 22 near their grandfathers old stomping ground of Houston and failed to even make a runoff.

Taylor said the two losses indicate voters fatigue with political dynasties.

Weve seen and heard their names so many times, its like, Oh gosh, another one? he said. There comes a point where the electorate just gets tired of it.

Pierce and George P. are the last Bushes for now to express any interest in politics. Jenna Bush Hager, one of George W. Bushs twin daughters, is a journalist who works on the Today Show on NBC. Her sister, Barbara Pierce Bush, is the co-founder of a public health nonprofit.

Miller said the family name is going through a rough patch with the electorate, but he doesnt expect that to last. He thinks George P. Bush has enough name recognition and political chops to make a comeback in the future.

Time heals all wounds, Miller said. The political climates always change and everyone knows that. The political climate is not conducive to him or helpful to him at the moment. That may change or that may not, but [the Bush name] wont be a negative going forward for much longer.

The recent defeats the family has taken indicate a halt in the familys run of success, Miller said.

Now is it permanent? he asked. I would argue its temporary.

Tickets are on sale now for the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival, happening in downtown Austin on Sept. 22-24. Get your TribFest tickets by May 31 and save big!

Read the original:
George P. Bush's defeat could be the end of the line for a four-generation political dynasty - The Texas Tribune

US Immigration Updates-Week of May 16, 2022 – Lexology

Update on Employment Authorization for Certain E and L Nonimmigrant Spouses

As of January 30, 2022, USCIS and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began issuing Form I-94, Arrival-Departure records, with new classes of admission (COA) codes for certain E and L nonimmigrant dependent spouses who are employment authorized based on their status. The COA designations for E nonimmigrant spouses are E-1S, E-2S, E-3S, and L-2S for nonimmigrant L spouses. Forms I-94 containing these code designations are acceptable as a List C, #7 employment authorization document issued by the Department of Homeland Security.

UPDATE: USCIS mailed notices in early April 2022, to E and L spouses (age 21 or over) who have an unexpired Form I-94 that USCIS issued before Jan. 30, 2022. This notice, along with an unexpired Form I-94 reflecting E-1, E-2, E-3, E-3D, E-3R, or L-2 nonimmigrant status, will satisfy Form I-9, List C, #7.

Employees who are an E or L spouse, employment authorized based on their status and under 21, or did not receive the notice by April 30 can email [emailprotected] to request a notice. Individuals who received their Form I-94 at the time of their entry into the United States should visit https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/#/home. Not all spouses of principal E nonimmigrants are considered employment authorized incident to status.

Source: USCIS, May 10, 2022: UPDATE: Documentation of Employment Authorization for Certain E and L Nonimmigrant Dependent Spouses | USCIS

House Bill Prompts Fight Over STEM Green Card Caps

A proposal to exempt science, technology, engineering and math graduates from green card caps is proving to be a sticking point for lawmakers negotiating a bill to boost U.S. competitiveness against China, with critics arguing the proposal doesnt fit the purpose of the legislation.

Proponents say eliminating green card caps for STEM graduates with a doctorate or equivalent degree would give the U.S. a leg up in economic competition with China by helping the U.S. science and technology industry attract and retain top talent.

But several lawmakers expressed skepticism about the connection between those issues on Thursday at the first meeting of a bipartisan committee made up of members of both houses tasked with hashing out differences between the two chambers competition bills.

The STEM green card proposal faces a rocky road ahead in part because it was included only in the House version of the legislation, passed by Democrats in February in a party-line vote.

The overwhelming majority of speakers at Thursdays conference highlighted the importance of keeping the U.S. technology industry ahead of Chinas to ensure the U.S. maintains an economic and military edge over its chief global rival, and backers of the green card provisions hope national security arguments will resonate on both sides of the political aisle.

Even if the green card provisions dont make it into the final competition bill, lawmakers on Capitol Hill are engaged in separate negotiations seeking to come up with a bipartisan immigration reform package that could provide a vehicle for the proposal.

But previous attempts at finding bipartisan consensus on a broad immigration bill have repeatedly run aground, raising skepticism about whether anything will ultimately come of those talks.

Source: Mike LaSusa, Law360.com, May 13, 2022: https://www.law360.com/immigration/articles/1492838/competition-bill-sparks-fight-over-stem-green-card-caps

Read more here:
US Immigration Updates-Week of May 16, 2022 - Lexology

Editorial: True reform, not Title 42, the solution – San Antonio Express-News

Those who support maintaining Title 42 point to an overtaxed immigration system on the brink, one that would have been pushed beyond its limits with the repeal of this Trump-era policy.

The Biden administration had sought to end Title 42 on Monday, but the repeal, as expected, was blocked late Friday by District Judge Robert R. Summerhays.

Like many, we had concerns about the Biden administrations preparedness to handle any influx of migrants, estimated to grow to as many as 18,000 a day, had Title 42 been repealed.

But we dont support Title 42, which is neither a policy solution nor an effective deterrent. It is a public health law, not an immigration law, that has been used to deny people their legal right to claim asylum, spurred dangerous and deadly crossings, and also prompted repeat crossings.

The very existence of Title 42 which we view as a legal shortcut shows the dire need for comprehensive immigration reform. This lack of reform, coupled with a bitter political environment, is why our Editorial Board will be further exploring border and immigration issues throughout the summer and fall, seeking to cut through the political rhetoric to advance meaningful policy solutions.

Agree or disagree?

We would love to hear your perspective about Title 42 and immigration. Please email us at letters@express-news.net.

We, too, want a safe, secure southern border. We want an immigration system that has penalties for illegal entry, supports border communities, honors asylum claims and efficiently processes people.

As for Title 42, we see a misapplied public health law that has become a political lightning rod.

Title 42 dates back to 1944 with the aim of preventing the spread of communicable diseases. Its antecedent is an 1893 law designed to prevent the spread of cholera.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention invoked Title 42 on March 20, 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic took hold in the United States.

But, really, I think the Trump administration saw it as far less of a public health measure and far more of a way to block unwanted migration, Mark P. Jones, a political science professor at Rice University and the Joseph D. Jamail Chair in Latin American Studies, told us.

Title 42 has resulted in nearly 2 million expulsions. But as Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior policy counsel with the American Immigration Council, testified to Congress on April 6, Title 42 itself has been a major contributor to increased border crossings because it caused a significant increase in repeat border crossings.

In a subsequent interview, Reichlin-Melnick told us, Because its not an immigration law, a Title 42 expulsion carries no immigration consequences.

He continued: The most likely outcome of an expulsion under Title 42 is simply going to be a bus ride back to Mexico, if you are caught. And that incentivized a lot of people to start crossing the border repeatedly, rolling the die every time.

To repeal Title 42, he said, would have spurred an initial influx of migrants. But in the longer term, he said, numbers would likely stabilize and decrease with a return to traditional immigration law.

And here is another point to consider: Title 42 has created much of this pressure.

Certainly, there would be a lot of people, but that situation is the result of more than two years of violating international law by not processing asylum-seekers, said Erica B. Schommer, a clinical professor at St. Marys School of Law.

Initially, a repeal would be messy, she said, but it is a mess that we made.

To solely focus on numbers ignores humanitarian concerns. Title 42, coupled with Remain in Mexico, has forced asylum-seekers to either wait in Mexico, at great risk, or attempt potentially deadly crossings.

Title 42 has actually pushed people into making that perilous journey through either the desert or across the Rio Grande, Maurice Goldman, an Arizona-based immigration attorney and past president of the Arizona chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told us.

Yes, federal officials and border communities are stressed to the max. There were more than 177,000 U.S. Customs and Border Protection encounters in the Yuma, Ariz., sector through April of this fiscal year, a 401 percent increase over the prior year, and there were more than 236,000 encounters in the Del Rio sector through April of this fiscal year, an increase of 161 percent.

But Title 42 has so many exceptions, it is more of a symbolic provision at this point, Goldman said. Its giving people this sense of security that probably isnt even there.

As Sister Norma Pimentel, executive director of Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley, told us during a visit to the Humanitarian Respite Center in McAllen on Monday: I think that the United States, it needs to have control of who enters the country but, at the same time, must have a pathway to enter the country legally, safely, orderly, and that is through the ports of entry, through the bridge. And right now, that is happening through exceptions to Title 42.

Title 42 is neither grounded in immigration law nor is it mitigating COVID or alleviating illegal immigration. It reflects our failure to address root causes of immigration, bolster border communities and prioritize modern-day security. It is the product of a broken system, not a solution.

The rest is here:
Editorial: True reform, not Title 42, the solution - San Antonio Express-News

Congressional District 2 representative and hopefuls react to the upholding of Title 42 – KOAT New Mexico

Title 42 will remain in effect for the time being. Congressional District 2 representative Yvette Herrell says it's been vital towards keeping Americans safe. Herrell said, "The communities need it, the Border Patrol needs it. I mean, this is a great first step. This week is huge for our communities and law enforcement. It allows the Border Patrol to do a quick process on the border for those coming here illegally." Her democrat counterparts disagree. In November, Gabe Vasquez is one of two Democrats looking to run for Herrell's seat in Congress.Vasquez said, "Title 42 was a short-term solution to a health crisis, and it was never meant as a long-term solution to immigration or border control. We do have very extreme members of the Republican Party like representative Yvette Herrell, who ideologically refused to sit at the table with Democrats to find the solutions to some of the most complicated issues in our country, like immigration." We also spoke with Dr. Darshan Patel, the other democrat candidate in that race.Patel said title 42 is not a solution to our country's border problems. He also believes upholding title 42 was not the right decision and that democrats and republicans need to find a solution together. "We're using Title 42 as a wedge to separate our communities rather than bringing us together because immigration reform is a bipartisan issue. If the Republicans and Yvette Herrell are serious about addressing our border issues, they would come to the table with Democrats and pursue bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform," Patel said.Herrell believes Title 42 is vital for restoring our economy and that it should stay in place for as long as possible.

Title 42 will remain in effect for the time being. Congressional District 2 representative Yvette Herrell says it's been vital towards keeping Americans safe.

Herrell said, "The communities need it, the Border Patrol needs it. I mean, this is a great first step. This week is huge for our communities and law enforcement. It allows the Border Patrol to do a quick process on the border for those coming here illegally."

Her democrat counterparts disagree. In November, Gabe Vasquez is one of two Democrats looking to run for Herrell's seat in Congress.

Vasquez said, "Title 42 was a short-term solution to a health crisis, and it was never meant as a long-term solution to immigration or border control. We do have very extreme members of the Republican Party like representative Yvette Herrell, who ideologically refused to sit at the table with Democrats to find the solutions to some of the most complicated issues in our country, like immigration."

We also spoke with Dr. Darshan Patel, the other democrat candidate in that race.

Patel said title 42 is not a solution to our country's border problems. He also believes upholding title 42 was not the right decision and that democrats and republicans need to find a solution together.

"We're using Title 42 as a wedge to separate our communities rather than bringing us together because immigration reform is a bipartisan issue. If the Republicans and Yvette Herrell are serious about addressing our border issues, they would come to the table with Democrats and pursue bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform," Patel said.

Herrell believes Title 42 is vital for restoring our economy and that it should stay in place for as long as possible.

Read more:
Congressional District 2 representative and hopefuls react to the upholding of Title 42 - KOAT New Mexico

Managers of well-known Nocatee restaurant accused of harboring undocumented immigrants – ActionNewsJax.com

Managers of two well-known St. Johns Co. restaurants accused of harboring undocumented immigrants

ST JOHNS COUNTY The managers at Tanks Sushi Bistro in World Golf Village and Nocatee are accused of hiring and harboring undocumented immigrants.

Yanshen Huang and Ge Tang, both born in China but naturalized in the U.S. in 2011, face federal charges. According to court documents, they harbored immigrants since December of 2020.

Federal agents raided a home on Pine Creek Drive in World Golf Village last week belonging to the suspects.

TRENDING: FBI Jacksonville investigating letters containing unknown substances sent to SAO

Records show a three-bedroom trailer had an additional six makeshift bedrooms. Agents said they witnessed a van picking up undocumented immigrants and dropping them off to work at Tanks.

A neighbor on Pine Creek Drive said she would see the van pickup the residents, and they would duck below the windows while making the drive to work. They would also sometimes walk or bike.

One of the individuals questioned by agents said he worked from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. six days a week and made $3500 a month. Thats approximately $12 an hour.

The suspects are also accused of harboring aliens in another home in the Beachwalk development. Records show there were several makeshift bedrooms there as well, including one bed placed in a utility closet.

Agents said they witnessed a van picking immigrants up there as well.

Tanks is located in both World Golf Village and Nocatee. Action News Jaxs Robert Grant visited the location on Tuscan Way. An employee there said she has not seen the managers around and was unaware of the federal charges.

TRENDING STORY: Tens of millions of households face medical debt; some relief is coming

Rebecca Black, an immigration attorney in Jacksonville, said its more common than expected.

You have a lot of companies desperate for quality help and they cant get it, she said and added that its a problem because of the lack of immigration reform. Theyre not documented because they cant get a visa to be here and they cant get a visa to do what they want to do which is work.

Documents show some of the aliens were here illegally from Guatemala and crossed the Mexico border in Texas about seven years ago.

2022 Cox Media Group

See original here:
Managers of well-known Nocatee restaurant accused of harboring undocumented immigrants - ActionNewsJax.com