Mediaboss Marketing

FAIR Take | May2023

Sanctuary New York City (NYC) Mayor Eric Adams is complaining loudly about the illegal aliens coming into his city saying the city is being destroyed by the migrant crisis. Ironically, just a couple of years ago, he put out the welcome mat for all illegal aliens to come to New York. In October 2021, Mayor Adams tweeted that NYC will remain a sanctuary city under the Adams administration, expressing that we should protect our immigrants. Now that NYC is shouldering the costs for the latest influx of illegal aliens, he is saying there is no more room at the inn and he is trying to send these unwelcome guests onto neighboringcounties.

As a result of the Biden administrations lax immigration policies, 61,000 illegal aliens have come to NYC over the past year and about 40,000 are on the taxpayer dole receiving housing, food, and other benefits. These illegal aliens are placing a tremendous strain on city resources and existing housing for the homeless is filled tocapacity.

Mayor Adams estimates that the Biden administrations immigration policies will cost the city $4.3 billion in 2023 and 2024. These costs were not included in a recent FAIR cost study that found New York was home to 1.8 million illegal aliens which cost taxpayers $9.9billion.

With existing facilities unable to house the 500 illegal aliens arriving daily and the expected influx of 300-500 additional illegal aliens with the lifting of Title 42, NYC has requested that all city agencies review their facilities to determine whether they can be repurposed into temporary housing for illegal aliens. Some of the locations being considered are hangars at JFK International Airport as well as local college gyms and parks including Central Park and ProspectPark.

One temporary facility currently being used to house illegal aliens is a former New York police department training academy (NYPDTA). While the NYPDTA is no longer in use, there is still a shooting range that is being used. The NYPDTAs gym was set up with rows of cots to house single males. However, the facility also had to admit families and children, prompting Mayor Adams to suspend NYCs Right to Shelter Policy which requires the city to house families in privaterooms.

Open borders advocates have complained about the housing situation, stating that [p]rivate sleeping quarters are required for families safety, for mothers to privately nurse newborns, to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases, and to prevent sexual assault.These advocates raise valid concerns regarding safety. It is estimated that one out of three women and children are sexually assaulted or raped crossing the border and it continues in the US with reports about rape trees and on sexual abuse in stashhouses.

In addition to re-purposing existing facilities in NYC to accommodate the influx of illegal aliens, Mayor Adams is trying to ship illegal aliens into other counties within the state. Mayor Adams notified Rockland, Orange, Rensselaer, and Oneida counties that illegal aliens would be sent to their locales for temporary housing, access to services, and connections to local communities as they build a stable life in New York state.He continued, Elected officials in New York and other parts of the country should do their part and emulate the humane and compassionate approach NYC has taken this pastyear.

Public officials in all of these counties have denounced Mayor Adams plan to send illegal aliens to their counties and have declared states of emergency. These are failures of the sanctuary city policy, and now, big city politicians want to have all of us pay the price for their misguided actions, stated Rensselaer County Executive Steve McLaughlin. We do not have the structure or the resources to take care of these people being forced out of NYC, he added. This is not the first time Rensselaer County has opposed sanctuary policies. In 2019, Rensselaer County filed a lawsuit against New Yorks Greenlight law that granted drivers licenses to illegalaliens.

Rockland County Executive Ed Day also denounced Mayor Adams attempt to ship the migrant problem elsewhere. Rockland County has filed legal action to stop Mayor Adams from sending illegal aliens into the county, and a judge issued a temporary restraining order to keep Mayor Adams from sending aliens to a Rockland County hotel. Commenting on the lawsuit, Mr. Day said, Rockland is not going to stand idly by as your administration which boasts itself as a sanctuary city diverts busloads of undocumented individuals to ourcounty.

Now New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) is currently having her administration look into whether local governments can block NYC from sending illegal aliens into their communities. As the debate unfolds at the state and local level, the Biden Administration has remained quiet. Administration officials this week blamed Congress for not passing the mass amnesty legislation President Biden sent to Congress his first week inoffice.

Read more:
New York Citys Sanctuary Status To Cost Taxpayers Billions - Federation for American Immigration Reform

Thrive PRs Leilani Abels has welcomed immigration reforms committed to by the federal government in the 2023 budget, which she believes will help to see a coming of age in the public relations industry in Australia, now and into the future.

The sector has been calling for immigration reform for some time, as border closures put an even greater strain on an already dwindling PR talent market, Abels said.

Mid last year, the Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) launched the The Migration Task Force, with the financial support of 17 agencies and a recruitment firm, with Thrive part of the cohort.

The task force made a comprehensive submission to the governments National Skills Commission to recognise PR as a long-term skill requirement an effort that has been rewarded with the Albanese governments commitment to an introduce evidence-based approach to identifying labour market needs, rather than a rigid occupations list.

ADVERTISEMENT

In new reforms first announced by the Minister for Home Affairs Clare ONeill last month, the Commonwealth has committed to creating a pathway to permanent residency for all temporary skilled workers by the end of 2023.

These changes were again committed to in last weeks budget, which stated: The government aims to ensure the migration system delivers the skilled migrants needed to address persistent skills shortages by allocating around 70 per cent of places in the 2023-24 Permanent Migration Program to the Skill stream.

In an interview with Mumbrella, Abels said: The PR industry in Australia is overly reliant on global talent, in particular immigration from the UK.

She noted that a pathway to permanent residency has not previously existed for temporary skill shortage visa holders in metro cities, as PR sat on the Short Term Skills list.

This is a mega win for the industry, ensuring permanent residency for those in Australia seeking a future here, she continued.

While Abels described immigration reform as a minefield, being that it is detailed and complex, she pointed to several other promising commitments in the budget she hopes will significantly impact the PR industry.

One of these is a new three-tiered temporary skilled visa framework that will create a permanent residency pathway for workers with skills identified as in demand, who are earning above a base salary of $70,000, replacing occupation lists with evidence-based assessment of skills shortages.

The PR industry can also hope to see a reduction in costs associated with visas, with the government promising to simplify the current process and allow employers to opt-in to pay visa fees in monthly installments, rather than upfront.

This levels the playing field for smaller and mid-level agency operators, who will be able to take advantage of spreading out these costs and participating in an easier immigration system, explained Abels, giving the caveat that there is a chance visa costs may rise.

In addition, Abels welcomed the news there would be a citizenship pathway for Kiwis in Australia for those who have been living in Australia for more than four years, with the major change being they will no longer have to first apply for and be granted permanent residency.

Gareth Beddoes, senior account director at Thrive, has recently been given the opportunity to apply for permanent residency with the support of the agency, as a result of the reforms.

More than six years after moving to Australia from the UK, and building a life with his partner, he said he could not fathom the fact Australia was going to be comfortable with just kicking us out.

The reforms would be a huge positive for the PR and creative industries as a whole, he added.

Post Covid, there was a lot of need to get people back over here and boost immigration, but I think they initially turned a bit of a blind eye to the people who were already here.

So Im grateful to see that theyre now tackling it from a two-pronged approach.

Continued here:
Mooted immigration reforms are a mega win for the PR industry, says Thrive PRs Leilani Abels - Mumbrella

After three weeks of negotiations, the nationalist Finns Party leader said that significant immigration reform is a prerequisite for her party to join the next cabinet.

Riikka Purra, chair of the Finns Party, said that immigration issues have yet to be resolved in negotiations on forming a new government.

The nationalist party leader spoke to reporters at the House of Estates in Helsinki as the third week of cabinet formation talks drew to a close on Friday.

Purra said she had reminded other negotiators that if there are no clear changes to the immigration policy, no government programme will be created involving her party.

She was asked whether immigration issues, which have been perceived as difficult for this planned government coalition, have been avoided by other parties.

"Maybe there is a kind of difficulty [with this issue]," Purra said, but went on to say that "without clear changes to Finnish [immigration] policy, a government will not be formed based on these parties."

According to Purra, there are problems in the talks regarding both work-related and humanitarian immigration.

According to the leading daily Helsingin Sanomat, the Finns Party is seeking changes such as limiting the right to seek asylum in Finland to internal European refugees and restricting the right to social security solely to Finnish citizens.

According to Purra, no agreements have reached over funding for international development cooperation either. Her party has called for a sharp cut in such spending, which now corresponds to about 0.5 percent of Finland's GNP.

Meanwhile, two other potential coalition partners, the Swedish People's Party and the Christian Democrats, have demanded that development assistance be raised to 0.7 percent of GNP, in line with long-standing international guidelines.

Meanwhile, Christian Democrats chair Sari Essayah said that the government negotiations have progressed more smoothly than in 2011, the last time her party was involved. According to Essayah, negotiators are continually adding to the text of the government programme.

Essayah said that it was difficult to say whether the talks had already reached the halfway point.

Prime minister-apparent Petteri Orpo (NCP) estimated earlier this week that the parties were about halfway through the negotiation process. He said he aimed to have a new cabinet in office before the Midsummer holiday on 23 June.

Original post:
Purra: No government deal without "clear changes" to immigration - YLE News

Migration is a hot political issue in the United States.

It is an article of faith among Joe Bidens opposition Republicans that he has lost control of the southern border.

Last month the chairwoman of the Republican national committee Ronna McDaniel maintained that in March nearly 192,000 people were apprehended by US authorities trying to cross from Mexico.

Republicans contend that Biden has adopted a de facto open border policy and that drug cartels and people traffickers are thriving in such an environment.

The president had promised to establish an orderly and compassionate process for asylum seekers as he entered the White House.

But as the number of people seeking to cross into the United States increased, so did the pressure on him from the political right.

In the days ahead the political temperature over immigration will probably get even hotter as a key regulation introduced during the Covid-19 pandemic comes to an end.

A record increase in the numbers seeking to enter the United States is being anticipated, which the White House knows will only intensify the attacks from its critics.

Initially introduced in early 2020 under Donald Trump, the rule known as Title 42 was essentially a public health measure that allowed US authorities to quickly expel migrants who crossed the border without permission.

The stated aim was to prevent the spread of Covid-19. But it also affected those who wanted to seek asylum in the United States.

As the pandemic abated, the Biden administration came under pressure to end the operation of Title 42.

The measure is now scheduled to end on May 11th and the White House is bracing for what could happen afterwards.

Last month, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Troy Miller predicted in testimony to the US Congress that roughly 10,000 migrants could cross the border each day when Title 42 is eliminated.

This would essentially double the existing numbers and more than likel overwhelm the capacity of US authorities to process those making claims to remain in the country.

The White House is all too aware of how such a scenario would be portrayed by its Republican critics as the US political cycle rolls on towards the presidential election next year.

Earlier this week the Biden administration announced that it would send 1,500 active-duty troops to the southern US border with Mexico. They will be deployed for 90 days to supplement the 2,500 National Guard personnel who are already there.

The Pentagon said the troops would fill gaps in transportation, warehouse support, narcotics detection, data entry and other areas.

The Biden administration has also proposed a system that would encourage those seeking asylum to use an app to book a meeting with American officials or first claim refuge in another country before reaching the US. It has announced plans for the establishment of immigration processing centres in various places in Latin America in a bid to slow down the numbers arriving on its southern border.

The Biden administration has also put forward expanded legal pathways for people to get to the United States from countries such as Venezuela, Nicaragua, Haiti and Cuba.

However, the White House has argued that a comprehensive resolution cannot be found while the overall immigration system remains broken.

As the clock ticks towards May 11th, there have been last-minute efforts in the US Senate to temporarily extend the Title 42 powers.

Separately, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives is working on a package of border security measures that is likely to include new restrictions on asylum seekers and a resumption of construction of the famous wall that Donald Trump wanted to build along the Mexican border.

But interestingly, as the US economy struggles to find sufficient workers, there are the hints that politicians in Congress may look at immigration reforms in parallel.

It has been nearly four decades since the last significant immigration legislation. But passing new reforms would be no easy matter and require 60 senators and the Republican House to back any new reform.

The US chamber of commerce the countrys largest business association along with more than 400 other groups has launched a campaign seeking politicians to enact measures before the end of the year that would secure the border and modernise the legal immigration system.

The ending of Title 42 may or may not lead to chaos at the US/Mexico border. But out of that uncertainty may come an opportunity for immigration reform that has not been seen in decades.

See more here:
Fears of chaos at US southern border may lead to immigration reform - The Irish Times

What is included in my trial?

During your trial you will have complete digital access to FT.com with everything in both of our Standard Digital and Premium Digital packages.

Standard Digital includes access to a wealth of global news, analysis and expert opinion. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital, click here.

Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the Settings & Account section.

If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for $69 per month.

For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the Settings & Account section. If youd like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial.

You may also opt to downgrade to Standard Digital, a robust journalistic offering that fulfils many users needs. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here.

Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel.

You may change or cancel your subscription or trial at any time online. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side.

You can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current billing period.

We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments.

See the rest here:
Germany looks to immigration reform to arrest worsening skills shortage - Financial Times