Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

LBJ Civil Rights Summit: Long road ahead for immigration reform – Austin American-Statesman

Editors note: This article was originally published April 8, 2014

That, in essence, is what some political leaders have for any chance of comprehensive immigration plan to pass soon in this country.

Among those leaders with hope is San Antonio mayor Julin Castro and former Mississippi governor Haley Barbour. Both spoke on the panel Pathway to the American Dream: Immigration Policy in the 21st Century during the first day of the Civil Rights Summit at the LBJ Presidential Library. The two agreed on pretty much every point covered and often complemented one other. It left many of us to wonder why more politicians from opposing parties cant work together so gracefully on this particular topic.

Both Castro, a Democrat, and Barbour, a Republican, say comprehensive immigration reform is needed. The right reform, they agree, would find a solution for the more than 11 million undocumented immigrants deportation, not being a part of the solution.

The panel set out to talk about two types of immigration: legal vs. illegal. Castro agreed that there are distinction, but clarified that a potential large percentage anywhere from 15 percent to 45 percent of the 11 million immigrants cited have entered with a valid visa and just stayed, also known as over-stayers.

When we talk about border security, I hope people also talk about those people with visas who overstayed, said Barbour.

This segment of the undocumented immigrants is not talked about much because, Castro said, over-stayers arent as scary a thought as those who illegally cross the border.

That makes sense. For many, working immigrants have been unjustly stereotyped as criminals and violent people.

Barbour said, Americans want a safe border and theyre willing to pay for it.

However, throwing more money into border security and more boots on the ground wont make it more secure. And the panelists agreed.

It accounts for something that weve paid so much on border security and weve yet to figure out what that really means.

One of the first steps to securing the border is to set a standard by which to measure security, Castro said. Border crossings will never be at zero.

A heckler, who identified herself as a DREAMER, pointed out that the panel hadnt mentioned anything on deportation. And though they didnt immediately address the topic, the panelists agreed that deportation was not a viable solution to the immigration problem.

Anyone who thinks we are going to send back 11 million people, if they tell you that, theyll lie to you about other things, said Barbour. Thats just not going to happen.

So what can be done to solve the problem?

Both panelists agreed that crafting a law that takes into account the contributions made by millions of undocumented individuals and find a way to assure they earn citizenship is essential. Its just not practical to send them back.

After the summit Castro talked to me about the issue of deportation.

I asked him, while Americans wait for reform to pass, what should be done about the thousands of deportations that happen on a monthly basis across the nation.

My hope is that regardless of whether or not a reform happens in this calendar year, that the administration will find ways to alleviate deportations for people with families and for those who dont have serious criminal record, he said.

That is exactly what many local activists have been pushing for.

But that definition for a secured border nor a comprehensive reform can not come if republicans dont set politics aside and focus instead on a policy that works for the United States, said Barbour.

Both Castro and Barbour believe it will happen, if not this year, most certainly by election year 2016.

Lets hope it comes sooner than later.

More:
LBJ Civil Rights Summit: Long road ahead for immigration reform - Austin American-Statesman

Editorial: There are two Christies on immigration reform – NorthJersey.com

NorthJersey Published 12:09 a.m. ET Feb. 5, 2017 | Updated 7 hours ago

Chris Christie(Photo: Julio Cortez/AP)

What a difference nine years make. In 2008, U.S. Attorney Chris Christie said immigrants living in the United Sates without valid documentation were not in violation of the U.S. criminal code.

In 2013, when running for a second term as governor, Christie supported a bill allowing undocumented college-age immigrants who were brought into the United States as children so-called Dreamers to attend state colleges and universities at in-state tuition rates. He signed the bill into law.

But in 2017, Governor Christie is really willing to partner with President Donald Trump in punishing municipalities that proclaim a willingness to aid undocumented people.

The governor said that on Fox News Channels OReilly Factor Thursday night. Christie has been making the rounds of talk shows of late, perhaps a sign that he is looking to once again raise his national profile as the Trump administration stumbles in its first weeks.

Back in 2008, Christie was a gubernatorial hopeful and was pitching himself as a pragmatic Republican, someone who would govern a blue state with an even hand. Christie made a nuanced distinction between a violation of criminal law and a civil law. There are differences, from a legal perspective, between crossing the border illegally and entering legally but then overstaying a visa.

But to many Americans in 2017, this is a moot point. Trump campaigned heavily on building a wall on the U.S.-Mexican border, instituting some form or Muslim immigration ban and cracking down on so-called sanctuary cities.

What makes a municipality a sanctuary city is not well defined. Some city councils pass ordinances declaring an intention to not enforce federal immigration policy. Other cities just do not want to be forced into dealing with federal immigration policy. Many police departments rightly believe if they are forced to act as federal immigration agents, they compromise their relationships in the very communities federal officials need willing partners.

There was a time Christie understood this completely. Federal officials in New Jersey in the months following 9/11 built bridges. Now the Trump administration and a willing Christie want walls.

Writing today in the Sunday Opinion section about Trumps refugee ban, Newark Cardinal Joseph Tobin says, Scripture impels my brother bishops and I to call on the federal government to alter its executive actions, and instead craft a well-conceived and comprehensive approach to immigration and refugee resettlement reform that both protects our people and national security and treats newcomers and refugees with respect, mercy, love and kindness.

That approach has to also apply to how the federal government deals with the 11 million undocumented people living in the United States. Rather than punish cities, the Trump administration should be focused on how to reform U.S. immigration policies and forge a legislative compromise in Congress that separates individuals who should be deported from the millions of people who are contributing to U.S. society and need to be taken out of the shadows.

It is not an easy task. And it is one where Christie could play an important part on the national stage as a former U.S. attorney and a governor of a diverse state. It just depends on which Christie shows up the one from 2008 or 2017.

Read or Share this story: http://northjersy.news/2k8ZKhc

Go here to see the original:
Editorial: There are two Christies on immigration reform - NorthJersey.com

Not just ‘bad hombres’: Trump is targeting up to 8 million people for deportation – Los Angeles Times

When President Trump ordered a vastoverhaul of immigration law enforcement during his first week in office, he strippedaway most restrictions on who should be deported, opening the door for roundups and detentionson a scale not seen in nearly a decade.

Up to 8 million people in the country illegally could be considered priorities for deportation, according tocalculations by the Los Angeles Times. Theywere based on interviews withexperts who studied the orderand two internal documents that signal immigration officials are taking an expansive view of Trumps directive.

Far fromtargeting only bad hombres, as Trump has said repeatedly, his new order allows immigration agents to detain nearly anyone they come in contact with who has crossed the border illegally. People could be booked into custody forusing food stamps or if their child receives free school lunches.

The deportation targets are a much larger group than those swept up inthe travel bans that sowed chaos at airports and seized public attention over the past week. Fewer than 1 million people came to the U.S. over the past decade from the seven countries from whichmostvisitors are temporarily blocked.

Deportations of this scale, which hasnot been publicly totaled before, could have widely felt consequences: Families would be separated. Businesses catering to immigrant customers may be shuttered. Crops could be left to rot, unpicked, as agricultural and other industries that rely on immigrant workforcesface labor shortages. U.S. relations could be strained with countries that stand to receive an influx of deported people, particularly in Latin America. Even the Social Security system, which many immigrants working illegallypay into under fake identification numbers, would take a hit.

The new instructions represent a wide expansion of President Obamas focus on deporting only recent arrivals, repeat immigration violators and people with multiple criminal violations. Under the Obama administration, only about 1.4 million people were considered priorities for removal.

We are going back to enforcement chaos they are going to give lip service to going after criminals, but they really are going to round up everybody they can get their hands on, saidDavid Leopold, a former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Assn. andan immigration lawyer for more thantwo decades.

Trump's orders instruct officers to deport not only those convicted of crimes, but also those who arent charged but are believed to have committed "acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense."

That category appliestothe 6 million people believed to have entered the U.S. without passing through an official border crossing. The rest of the 11.1 million people in the country illegally,according to a study by the Pew Research Center, are believed to have entered on a valid visa and stayed past its expiration date.

Also among those 11.1 million are about 8 million jobholders, Pew found. The vast majorityhave worked in violation of the law by stating on federal employment forms that they were legally allowed to work. Trumps order calls for targeting anyone wholied on the forms.

Trumpsdeportationpriorities also include smaller groups whose totals remain elusive:people in the country illegally who are charged with crimes that have not yet been adjudicated andthose who receive an improper welfare benefit, used a fake identity card, were found driving without a license orreceived federal food assistance.

An additional executive order under consideration would block entry to anyone the U.S. believes may use benefit programs such as Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, according two Trump administration officials who have seen the draft order.

The changes reflect an effortto deter illegal migrationby increasing the threat of deportation and cutting off access to social services and work opportunities, an approach that2012 Republican presidential nomineeMitt Romney called self-deportation.

The White House insisted that it is intent onrooting out those who endanger Americans.Trump aidespointedto 124 people who were released from immigration custody from 2010 to 2015 who went on to be charged with murder, according to immigration data provided to Congress by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Its not that 6 million people are priorities for removal, it is the dangerous criminals hiding among those millions who are no longer able to hide, said a White House official who would not be named describing internal policy debates.

Weve gone from a situation where ICEofficers have no discretion to enhance public safety and their hands are totally tied, to allowing ICE officers to engage in preventative policing and to go after known public safety threats and stop terrible crimes from happening.

The changes, some of which have already begun with more expected in the coming months, set the stage for sweeping deportations last seen in the final years of the George W. Bush administration.Factories and meatpacking plants were raidedafter talks with Congress overcomprehensive immigration reform broke down in 2007.

After Obama took office, hisadministration stopped thoseworksite raidsand restricted deportation priorities. Expulsions of people settled and working in the U.S. fell more than 70% from 2009 to 2016.

That era has come to an end.

For too long, your officers and agents haven't been allowed to properly do their jobs, Trump told uniformed Border Patrol agents and immigration officers just after signingthe order.

Although immigration agents will want to go after criminals and people who pose national security risks, Trumps order gives them leeway and marks a return to traditional enforcement, said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that advocates for restrictions on immigration.

Almost everyone who is here illegally could potentially be considered a priority, Vaughan said.

Just how many people are swept up will depend on new instructions being drafted for immigration agents that will be rolled out over the next several months. But already, signs point to immigration officials embracing Trumps order.

In late January, Trumpsimmigration policy experts gave a 20-page document to top Homeland Security officialsthat lays out how to ramp up immigration enforcement, according to two people familiar with the memo. A list of steps included nearly doubling the number of people held in immigration detention to 80,000 per day, as well as clamping down on programs that allow people to leave immigration custody and check in with federal agents or wear an ankle monitor while their cases play out in immigration court.

The instructions also propose allowing Border Patrol agents to provide translation assistance to local law enforcement, a practice that was stopped in 2012 over concerns that it was contributing to racial profiling.

In addition, Homeland Security officials have circulated an 11-page memo on how to enact Trumps order. Among other steps, that document suggests expanding the use of a deportation process that bypasses immigration courts and allows officers to expel foreigners immediately upon capture. The process, called expedited removal,now applies only to immigrants who arearrestedwithin 100 miles of the border and within two weeks of illegally crossing over and who dont express a credible fear of persecution back home. The program could be expanded farther from the border and target those who have lived in the U.S. illegally for up to twoyears.

By giving more authority to immigration officers, Trump has put his administration on track to boost deportations more than 75% in his first full year in office. That would meet the level set in 2012, at the end of Obamas first term, when more than 400,000 people were deported. It dropped to some 235,000 last year after illegal immigration fell andagents were given narrowed deportation targets.

In addition, Trump plans to empower local police to work with immigration agents to identify people they believe live illegally in their cities and towns, particularly those seen as violent, the White House official said, comparingthe arrestofa suspected gang leader on an immigration violation to the FBI charging a mafia leader with tax evasion.

The great thing about immigration law is it is a preventative law enforcement tool, theofficial said.

Plans are in the works to expand a program that provides training for local cops on how to enforce immigration laws. Theapproach is similar to Arizonaspapers, please law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2012 on the grounds that the state was trying to enforce federal immigration laws. Civil liberties advocates warn that such programs risk targeting people for their appearance and could lead to rampant violations of search and seizure rights.

Elizabeth Ford, an immigration lawyer in Chardon, Ohio,near Cleveland, said she has already seen immigration officers detain migrants in the country illegally who have been charged with crimes but not convicted, even when those charges were later dropped.

Before Trump was even sworn in, immigration agents began detaining people as they left court, she said; agents previously only showed up after a conviction.

In addition, far fewer clients making asylum claims are being released while those claims are heard, she said, a stark change from just a few months ago.

It will get even more aggressive, she predicted.

Indeed, though Trump has backed off his campaign call to deport all 11.1 million people estimated to bein the country illegally, he is already facing pressure from his base to go beyond his executive order andend Obamas programthat has awardedwork permits to more than 750,000 people brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

At Fridays White House briefing, Press Secretary Sean Spicer was asked when the program would be ended and permits would stop being issued.

We've made it very clear that we'll have further updates on immigration, Spicer said, though he did not give an update on the status of the work permits program. ...The president has made significant progress on addressing the pledge that he made to the American people regarding immigration problems that we face, and I think we're going tosee more action on that in the next few weeks.

Twitter: @ByBrianBennett

brian.bennett@latimes.com

ALSO:

U.S. authorities end enforcement of travel ban after judge puts Trump executive order on hold

When Trump says he wants to deport criminals, he means something starkly different than Obama

Aid groups see Trumps travel restrictions as 'a huge step backwards'

See the original post:
Not just 'bad hombres': Trump is targeting up to 8 million people for deportation - Los Angeles Times

Pramila Jayapal Named Co-Chair of Women’s Working Group on … – India West

Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., announced Feb. 2 that Indian American Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., will join her as co-chair of the Congressional Womens Working Group on Immigration Reform.

Women and children bear the brunt of our inhumane and broken immigration system. Yet, they have no seat at the table, said Jayapal in a statement. Im honored and humbled to be appointed as co-chair of the Womens Working Group.

As an immigrant woman of color, Ive been fighting for justice in our immigration system for years, Jayapal added. I pledge to bring the same passion and commitment to the group as we work to reform our nations laws. Im proud to be working with a leader like Congresswoman Roybal-Allard to defend and protect immigrant families from this presidents policies.

Roybal-Allard made the announcement during the groups 2017 kickoff meeting held at her Capitol Hill office with several Womens Working Group members, including congresswomen and representatives of immigration groups, in attendance.

I am so excited to have Congresswoman Jayapal join me as a co-chair of the Congressional Womens Working Group on Immigration Reform, said Roybal-Allard in a statement. As an immigrant to America herself, a longtime civil rights activist, and the first Indian American woman in the House of Representatives, her experiences and dedication will enrich our group and our mission, she added.

The Womens Working Group on Immigration Reform was formed in 2013 to ensure that womens voices are heard in the immigration debate, and that Americas immigration policies reflect the interests of women and children.

See the rest here:
Pramila Jayapal Named Co-Chair of Women's Working Group on ... - India West

Immigration Reform – Bloomberg QuickTake

The Situation

The new president, Republican Donald Trump, made cracking down on illegal immigration a centerpiece of his campaign. He pledged to build an impenetrable wall between the U.S. and Mexico to keep out the people taking our jobsand to immediately round up and deport criminal aliens. Hes also said hell terminate the executive orders of his Democratic predecessor, President Barack Obama, which looked toshield as many as 4 million unauthorized immigrants from deportation. In June, the U.S. Supreme Courtdivided4-4over thoseorders and thenrefusedto reconsider the case in October. Thisleft intact an appeals court ruling that said Obama overstepped his authority, along with a trial judges order preventing the program from taking effect.Obama had acted after a series of votes on immigration reformwereblockedby Republicans in the House of Representatives.

Ronald Reagan was the last president to win passage of major immigration reform, in 1986. President George W. Bush pushed for a bill in 2007 that would have tightened border security whilecreating a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who paid fines and met other conditions, but it waskilled by conservatives in Congress. In 2012, Republican candidates focused on deporting the undocumented, and the partys presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, opposed a path to legal residency or citizenship. That November, Hispanic voters cast 71 percent of their ballots for Obama. A post-election review by Republican leaders called on the party to embrace and champion comprehensive changes in immigration or face a further shrinking of political support. In 2013, abipartisan measure similar to Bushs plan waspassed by the Senate. But polls showed that a significant chunk of Republicansopposed offering a path to citizenship; the Republican-controlled House of Representatives refused to vote on the bill.

Democrats are more or less united on immigration, while congressional Republicans have been split. To hard-liners, border security is the only issue that needs to be addressed. Yet some Republican lawmakersare balking at the costs tobuild a wall along the entire 1,933-mile border with Mexico. They say illegal entries can be curbed through more fencing, border patrol agents, drones and other resources. SomeRepublicans had favored the 2013 Senate bill, a position that reflects the wishes of the business community. Other Republicans are wary of supporting measures that would, in the words of conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh, create 11 million new Democrats. And there are conservatives who approve of offering a path to legal status but not citizenship, including House Speaker Paul Ryan. And there areRepublicans whofearthat thecontinued fight over immigration reform risks driving more ofthe growing number of Hispanicsvoters into the arms of the Democrats.

Mark Silvacontributed to the original version of this article.

To receive a free monthly QuickTake newsletter, sign up at bloombergbriefs.com/quicktake

First published Nov. 15, 2013

To contact the writer of this QuickTake: Kate Hunter in London at khunter9@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this QuickTake: Anne Cronin at acronin14@bloomberg.net

Read more:
Immigration Reform - Bloomberg QuickTake