Mediaboss Marketing

Editorial board, The Republic | azcentral.com Published 9:05 p.m. MT March 5, 2017 | Updated 8 hours ago

The Department of Homeland Security issued a sweeping set of orders Tuesday that implement President Trump's plan to increase immigration enforcement. Wochit

John Moore/Getty Images Our national political leaders committed the real crime of illegal immigration. The United States needs comprehensive immigration reform in order to solve its border problems. Increasing the numbers of Border Patrol agents and spending billions on surveillance and security efforts are not enough.(Photo: Getty Images)

Immigration reform matters to Arizona for reasons that range from humanitarian to economic. That made last week a wild roller-coaster ride.

It was encouraging to hear reports early in the weekthat the Trump administration thinks the time may be right for reform including a pathway to legalization.

Donald Trumps history of bashing immigrants gives him a Nixon-in-China opportunity to muscle comprehensive reform through Congress, so this was promising.

But the presidents address to Congress Tuesday did not capitalize on that opportunity.

Instead, he hurled the usual unrelenting litany of blame at the undocumented. He also made the ridiculous assertion that our southern border is wide open for anyone to cross.

With the conciliatory tone toward the countrys undocumented population absent from the speech, it looked likecomprehensive reform was off the agenda.

Instead of proposing to solve the long-standing problem of 11 million people living and working in shadows of a great nation, Trump used his bully pulpit to tout his new office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement, which is ostensibly to support victims of crimes by undocumented immigrants.

DIAZ: Do you believe Trump's immigration reform is possible? Not me

Should such victims be supported? Of course. All crime victims should get the help they need.

Should dangerous criminals be deported? Of course. Quickly and permanently.

But Trumps new VOICE office is an official U.S. government platform from which to promote the fallacious idea that undocumented immigrants as a whole are prone to committing violent crime.

They are not. And portraying them as dangerous inflames the discussion and makes reform much more difficult.

That was the low point of the roller-coaster ride.

Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., right, and John McCain, R-Ariz.(Photo: Rob Schumacher/The Republic file)

A couple of Republican senators began the uphill climb from there.

ArizonaSen. John McCain and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham understand the difference between criminals and hard-working mothers a distinction that Trump misses.

RELATED:McCain, Graham: Deportation efforts should focus on serious criminals

Among the questioners at a CNN town hall the senators attended Wednesday were Angel Rayos, the son of Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos, a working woman who was deported after checking in with Immigrationand Customs Enforcement in Phoenix, and Jamiel Shaw Sr., whose 17-year-old son was murdered by an undocumented immigrant.

Graham told them:

"Here's what I think: Most Americans want the man who killed your son to be deported yesterday, and never come back," Graham said. "I think most Americans want your mother not to have been deported. I can tell the difference between your mother and the person who killed his son. Don't you think most Americans can see that difference?"

Now another Phoenix parent has been deported after what was supposed to be a routine visit to ICE. The children of Juan Carlos Fomperosa Garcia are left wondering why. Their father was following ICE requirements, they say.

The president should be able to see it and explain it to the American people.

McCain said: "We have to have comprehensive immigration reform, which gives people a path to citizenship, but it's a long, hard, tough path.

Arizona has known the need for that kind of reform for many years. Our state has been through the spasm of anti-immigrant nativism on which Trump built his political career.

MORE:Phoenix church said no 2 years ago, is now asanctuary for migrants

It didnt work here, and it wont work on the national level either.

The very important job of reforming our immigration policies should bring lasting order to the border and assure this country has a legally authorized workforce. But reform can't ignore11 million people whose presence is a result of our flawed immigration policies.

Nor will continuing to vilify those people create an atmosphere conducive to the kind of compromise necessary to achievemeaningful reform.

Many undocumented people are relatives, friends and neighbors of Arizonans. They have family and social ties to our communities. They have also contributed their labor and their talents to our collective success.

Arizona knows this very well, and Arizona has a great deal to gain from rational, humane immigration reform.

Read or Share this story: http://azc.cc/2luS6lN

View post:
Our View: Another wild ride on the immigration reform roller coaster - AZCentral.com

Miami Herald

Reality check: AQ & A on President Trump's immigration crackdown Miami Herald The office would be called Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement, or VOICE. The website of the immigration control group Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) estimates at more than 600 the number of serious crimes, including murder, ... Trump flirting with Sandoval, Reid's path on illegal immigrationLas Vegas Review-Journal Immigrants in Nebraska fear the unknown, and known, in Trump's reform plansOmaha World-Herald LENA MITCHELL: Undocumented immigrants remain at riskNortheast Mississippi Daily Journal Albuquerque Journal all 74 news articles »

Go here to read the rest:
Reality check: AQ & A on President Trump's immigration crackdown - Miami Herald

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officialsannounced Friday the governmentwould suspend the premium processing route for its H-1B visa program, which allows companies to speed up the approval of temporary legal residency for skilled foreign hires. The change startsApril 3 and will last for up to six months, officials said.

Over the fiscal year, 85,000 H-1B visas are reserved for foreign nationals with a bachelors degree or higher related to their specialty occupationdefined by USCIS as jobs in engineering, math and business, as well as technology fieldsand a clear relationship with the employer petitioning for their legal immigrant status. The premium processing service allows employers to draw down a potentially extensive wait time to 15 days, for a fee of $1,225.

While USCIS cast the decision as an effort catch up on the high volume of incoming petitions and the significant surge in premium requests over the past few years, many worried the move would be only the first attempt to dismantle a worker pipeline program President Donald Trump pledged to eliminate while on the campaign trail. Already, Trump angered the tech community with aJan. 27 executive orderthat banned entry to the U.S. by citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries, without making exceptions for H-1B visa holders. (The ban was later struck down by federal judges, but the White House announced Monday a new ban against six countries.)

The U.S. government is clearly telling companies not to depend on the H-1B visa going forward, Kris Lakshmikanth,chairman of IT recruitment firm Headhunters India, told Quartz, adding that he expected the suspension to force businesses to pay a higher price for labor, due to higher demand for soon-to-be scarce H-1B workers. Companies dont typically keep H-1B visa holders on the bench, so there are no such employees to spare for new projects. That means companies will have to hire H-1B holders from other companies if they get new projects. That will come at a high cost now that H-1B holders are in demand.

Others pointed out that the move would place businesses in decision-making limbo, despite its ostensible goal of prioritizing those whove waited months for their applications to be processed.

"The message specifically mentions they want to bring down the backlogged time, but I worry about my clients, employers and individuals who will be affected by these delays," Tahmina Watson, an attorney at Seattle-based Watson Immigration Law, told CNN. She said the suspension would keep employers from being able to plan for their businesses and act accordingly and was not good for American businesses by any means."

Opponents of the program, which predominantly benefits Indian workers and companies, note that it attracts tech workers who beat out American competition with their willingness to work for lower pay. One requirement for H-1B applicants, however, is that they earn the average wage paid to similarly employed workers in a specific occupation in the area of intended employment.

USCIS did not halt its expedited processing servicea step up from premium processing used in cases of emergency, severe financial loss, a national interest situation, humanitarian reasons or a furtherance of the cultural and social interests of the U.S., according to its website.

Excerpt from:
Immigration Reform 2017: Trump Suspends H-1B Visa Program Premium Processing For High-Skilled Foreign Workers ... - International Business Times

After repeatedly bashing undocumented immigrants on the campaign trail and deporting hundreds of them in his first weeks in office, US president Donald Trump is floating a new approach. He now wants a compromise on immigration policy, a goal that eluded both his Democrat and Republican predecessors.

Trump has provided few details on how to achieve this, other than to say that he favors a merit-based system. But he has indicated he is now open to granting legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants in the country, despite previously promising to expel them.

This may seem totally out of character for someone who built his political career by fanning anti-immigrant sentiment. Indeed, its anyones guess whether he will follow through on this new notion, or if it will vanish from the Trumpian agenda as quickly as it appeared.

Still, Trump may represent the best chance of passing immigration reform that the US has had in years.

Yes, at first glance, hes an extremely unlikely candidate for the task of reaching a comprise on this (or really any) issue. But consider what he brings to the table on immigration.

He obviously knows how to talk to the people most against immigration reform, namely conservative Americans scared that foreigners are changing their country for the worse. And the trust he gained with these voters proved fairly unshakable, over the course of a long race filled with scandal and controversy.

If immigrant-friendly Republicans and Democrats can get past Trumps bad hombre rhetoric and his insistence on building a southern US border wall, they may find that his bombastic tack, steered in a slightly new direction, is precisely the way to convince the 46% of Americans who, according to a recent survey by the Public Religion Research Institute, view immigrants as a threat to American customs and values.

It might not even take much to extract their support for an overhaul of the immigration system. If theres something that virtually all Americans agree on, its that the current system does not work.

Trump seems to recognize that the mind deals in vivid examples, which is why he is far more likely in his speeches to talk about the murder of a San Francisco woman by an undocumented immigrant than to offer up statistics on immigrant-perpetrated crime. Of course, the statistics would ultimately disprove the broader point hes trying to make, that immigrants are fueling a national crime wave, but thats not the only reason he avoids dwelling on numbers.

Our minds were never wired to deal with abstract conceptions of threat, explains Steven Neuberg, a psychology professor at Arizona State University.

Instead, our brains often rely on gross shortcuts to determine whats dangerousand that can come down to processing readily apparent factors such as race, gender, and language. (Neuberg points out that this reaction is natural for people of all political leanings; calls to impeach the president because of his attacks on the press come from the same place as calls to build a wall to stop immigrants from taking American jobs.)

And the mind errs on the side of caution, because mistakenly perceiving an non-existent threat is usually not as costly as missing a real threat.

The type of anxiety that contributes to rabid anti-immigrant sentiment is not assuaged by facts and figures, or by lecturingi.e. the primary strategies so far employed by proponents of more pathways to citizenship.

The way to get people to recalibrate their threat-detection systems is by making them feel less vulnerable, or by showing them that what they fear is less threatening, says Neuberg. While Trump has yet do much of the latter, hes rapidly moved to address the former.

During his Feb. 27 speech to Congress, Trump promised he will soon start to erect his proposed reinforcements of the southern US border. Whether its the 55-foot-high concrete wall he touted during the campaign, or mere fencing, as he later suggested, just the idea of having a protective barrier will go a long way toward placating fears about undocumented immigrants. Trumps raids to deport the bad hombres, as hes referred to them, are another example of how hes trying to quell immigrant-induced anxiety.

How we frame our ideas has a meaningful impact on how theyre received.

A 2015 study published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin suggests that political divides are difficult to close in part because debaters on either side of the issue fail to account for the difference in moral values held by those on the other side.

Psychologists have boiled down the values likely to be endorsed by liberals and conservatives to a list, as one of the studys authors, Robb Willer, explained in a 2016 Ted Talk.

The study found that using each groups values to reframe ideas coming from the opposite side helped to sway peoples minds. For example, conservatives were more likely to support environmental protections if they were told the purpose was to maintain the purity of forests and water, instead of avoiding their destruction. Liberals, in turn, were more open to high spending in the military when it was framed as an institution that reduces poverty and inequality than when it was presented as one that promotes unity and the countrys greatness.

During his address to Congress, Trump, commenting on immigration, drew heavily from the concepts on the right-hand portion of the list, invoking the values of sanctity, loyalty, patriotism, and authority. Heres one example:

I believe that real and positive immigration reform is possible, as long as we focus on the following goals: To improve jobs and wages for Americans, to strengthen our nations security, and to restore respect for our laws.

He spoke specifically of restoring the integrity and the rule of law at our border and ending an environment of lawless chaos, and argued that those given a high honor of admission to the United States should support this country and love its people and its values.

Whether by design or not, thats rhetoric destined to resonate strongly with conservatives.

Trumps heretofore harshness on immigrationin both his rhetoric and his policieshave earned him the trust of immigration reforms most recalcitrant opponents. That has bought him some space to move the conversation beyond the gridlock its been stuck in for years. Heres Trump speaking at the joint session of Congress:

According to the National Academy of Sciences, our current immigration system costs American taxpayers many billions of dollars a year. Switching away from this current system of lower-skilled immigration, and instead adopting a merit-based system, we will have so many more benefits. It will save countless dollars, raise workers wages, and help struggling families, including immigrant families, enter the middle class. And they will do it quickly, and they will be very, very happy, indeed.

The idea of a merit-based immigration system, to set skill parameters that foreigners must meet in order to come to the US, has mostly fallen by the wayside of the immigration debate. It was crowded out by more basic arguments over whether immigrants are welcome or not to begin withbut Trump is clearly attempting to bring the idea back into the fold now.

Of course, the presidents mixed messages on immigration run the risk of alienating both his base and his opponents. But assuming he makes a serious attempt to build compromise between the two, he has a good shot at getting his base to a place of agreement. Will his opponents be game to go along?

See the original post:
Trumpyes, Trumpmay be the one to finally deliver on comprehensive immigration reform - Quartz

WASHINGTON Rep. Don Bacon said he understands that some immigrant families are fearful about the Trump administrations approach to immigration enforcement.

As he travels across the Omaha-based 2nd District, the freshman Republican congressman said, he hears from people who could be affected either because they are not legal immigrants, or because they have relatives who are here illegally.

In particular, he cited young people who were brought into the country as children or even as babies and are now worried whether President Donald Trump will continue to shield them from deportation, as the Obama administration did through its executive order known as DACA.

Theyre obviously in a tough situation, and we ought to try to provide some kind of assurance to them, Bacon said.

Bacon said that while any action on those in the country illegally must go hand in hand with better border security and workplace enforcement, hed like to see a compassionate, balanced approach and he would like to see it sooner rather than later.

But such legislation is unlikely to come quickly, Bacon and other Midlands lawmakers acknowledged.

Immigration will be difficult for us to get done this year, according to Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., who said the 2017 legislative calendar will be packed as Congress tackles health care and taxes, processes nominations and works through the federal budget.

And Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., a member of the Judiciary Committee that would handle any immigration bill, said the issue isnt at the top of the list. In a statement, Sasse said the committee is focused now on reviewing judicial nominees, including Neil Gorsuch, Trumps pick for the Supreme Court.

After the campaign, I dont think many conservatives were expecting President Trump to suggest immigration reform right out of the gate, Sasse said. But I do think that the goals of strengthening border security and restoring the rule of law are things conservatives have been saying for years, and thats where I start to approach the issue.

Bacon, whose congressional district is relatively balanced between Democrats and Republicans, often has described immigration as an area where he differs from more conservative GOP colleagues.

Bacon supports legislation known as the BRIDGE Act that would explicitly allow those covered by DACA Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals to remain in the United States while Congress works on a broader solution. Bacon is the only co-sponsor of that bill from Nebraska or Iowa in the House or Senate.

And some conservatives are chafing at the fact that Trump has yet to rescind the DACA executive order signed when President Barack Obama was in office. That includes Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who has long been outspoken about immigration enforcement.

Each day the administration fails to act on DACA, King said, it becomes more difficult to change it a point he plans to press with the White House.

I hope to have that conversation soon, King said.

While there have been rumblings that the Trump administration might be open to some kind of bipartisan immigration deal that would give legal status to some illegal immigrants, King said he was pleased to see the president leave that kind of talk out of his recent address to Congress.

His message was the rule of law, restore the rule of law, restore the respect for the rule of law thats all stuff that Ive said for a long time, King said.

Bacon said he can envision a bipartisan consensus to provide a pathway to legal status for many of those in the country illegally, although he stops short of saying that would mean full citizenship.

But first, he said, the government must provide tougher enforcement for those currently entering the U.S. illegally, either by crossing the border or overstaying their visas, and focus on stopping employers from hiring those in the country illegally.

If the American people dont see the border security side of the equation addressed, he said, they wont be willing to support a plan for the millions already in the country.

If we can get that security part down, I think it opens up the doors for an easier discussion for DACA and the other folks who are working here and are good neighbors, Bacon said. Weve got to do both, but people have got to know up-front that the problems being fixed. And when that happens, I think more people will be more amenable to finding a consensus on working with those that are here already that are undocumented.

Congress has wrestled with a comprehensive immigration package twice in the past decade or so. Both times, the legislation passed the Senate, only to stall in the House. The last time was in 2013. Fischer voted against that bill in the Senate, as did Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Sasse and Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, were not in office at the time.

Most Republican lawmakers make no bones about putting border security and enforcement at the top of their priority list.

My first concern is securing the border and making sure that we keep dangerous people out of this country, Fischer said. I view it as national security.

Grassley, who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, outlined the steps needed before Congress can consider legislation dealing with those already in the country illegally.

Those steps include securing the border with both physical and virtual measures, and bolstering the border patrol. He also called for addressing visa overstays and interior enforcement.

Which the president is vigorously doing now, but Obama did not do it getting people that are criminal aliens out of the country, Grassley told reporters last week.

He said the government has to demonstrate it is serious about enforcing immigration laws.

Weve been telling people for 20 years were going to secure the border, and there was some actions taken that kind of (we) thought we were securing the border, but its obvious we didnt, he said. So weve lost credibility.

He said hes made that point to the Trump administration. But he also added that he has no objection if Trump allows Obamas DACA approach to continue.

Hes going to let that stand, and I dont think hes going to have a lot of fuss about it, Grassley said.

Overall, he supports Trumps efforts to step up immigration enforcement.

Were talking about just enforcing the law, Grassley said.

Read this article:
Nebraska, Iowa lawmakers say immigration reform is not a top priority - Omaha World-Herald