Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

Gibbons Students Are ‘Senators For A Day,’ Debate Immigration Reform – Patch.com


Patch.com
Gibbons Students Are 'Senators For A Day,' Debate Immigration Reform
Patch.com
Using high-touch technology on tablets provided by the Institute, students took on the role of U.S. Senators and worked together to build and pass a bill calling for comprehensive immigration reform, according to an announcement from the Gibbons school.

Read more:
Gibbons Students Are 'Senators For A Day,' Debate Immigration Reform - Patch.com

CalChamber CEO talks health care, immigration reform – Fresno Business Journal

Details Published on 06/05/2017 - 3:54 pm Written by Business Journal staff

CalChamber CEO Allan Zaremberg speaks with the Fresno Rotary Club Monday afternoon.Allan Zaremberg, president and CEO of the California Chamber of Commerce in Sacramento, made a stop in Fresno Monday to talk business with the Fresno Rotary Club.

Zaremberg touched on a number of topics during his talk, including health care, immigration and the state legislature.

Zaremberg acknowledged the flaws of the Affordable Care Act, but also conceded that stripping away subsidies as part of a repeal and replace act in Congress would not serve to get people who cannot afford coverage to be covered.

But the extreme opposite of that take is currently in Sacramento in the form of a universal health care bill a plan the CalChamber has called a job killer with a price tage of $400 billion. He said the measure would eliminate health insurers in the state, and would not allow supplemental health coverage in addition to government coverage.

He said he doesnt think Gov. Jerry Brown would sign the measure, which just recently passed out of the Senate. He sees it more as a message from an emerging liberal wing that may favor Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton.

Its a statement by the people who are active in trying to say we are going to get rid of your choices, Zaremberg said.

In talking about immigration reform, he noted that California and the Central Valley have the most to gain and the most to lose when it comes to a comprehensive solution, especially with the tech sector and agriculture relying on foreign workers.

When asked to sum up Californias business climate, Zaremberg said it was difficult given the states economic diversity. He said two-thirds of the state is doing well, while one-third (inland California) faces ongoing problems with poverty and employment.

A big part of the CalChambers mission is to protect businesses from onerous legislation coming from Sacramento. He encouraged the audience to really flex its civic duties by holding elected officials accountable and to communicate their feelings.

Your voice is heard if you make sure they hear from you, he said.

Read more from the original source:
CalChamber CEO talks health care, immigration reform - Fresno Business Journal

Donald Trump Cuts Consumer Spending by Illegal Immigrants, Laments Federal Reserve Member – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

There are millions of [illegal] immigrants living in this country [who] are not going out and shopping, because of Trumps enforcement policies, said Robert Kaplan, the head of the Federal Reserve of Dallas, and a voting member of the Federal Reserve which regulates the economy by adjusting interest rates.

They are staying home,Kaplan complained during a May 31 presentation at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. Theyre afraid if they go out they may not come home.

Advocates for greater immigration rarely describe legal and illegal immigrants as imported customers. But those advocates are often quick to declare that enforcement of immigration laws will reduce consumer spending in the United States, to the disadvantage of businesses. For example, onepro-immigration advocacy group declared in March 2017 that:

The Partnership for a New American Economy (PNAE), for instance, estimates that undocumented [illegal] immigrants wielded $157.3 billion in purchasing power as of 2014which is money spent in numerous U.S. businesses.

The PNAE is a pro-immigration group run by major business leaders who stand to gain from more imported consumers.

That demand for imported consumers is also echoed by Wall Street advisors, such as Mark Zandi, at Moodys Analytics, who predicted that reduced immigration would lower housing prices. In 2015, Google chairman Eric Schmidt bluntly called on the federal government to import more consumers. Most stock markets assume modest growth, so how are you over a couple of decades to deal with the fact that one-third of your [aging] customers are going to go away? Well, one [way] is to produce more customers through immigration, he said, adding that companies could also grow if they export more products and services.

But business will get more consumers in American once a better economy draws more absent Americans from the sidelines and into the economy, said an official at Trumps Office of Management and Budget. We do expect consumption growth to be faster going forward than it has been in recent years, but this is more a by-product of faster economic growth overall spurred by productivity growth, said an official. As firms invest more because of the Administrations policies, labor productivity growth will rise and overall output will be higher. This is the main source of the increased growth in consumption that we expect, he added.

Business executives and their allies are already complaining that Trumps immigration policies are nudging up Americans wages, as well as reducing consumer spending. For example, Patrick Harker, president of the Federal Reserve of Philadelphia, recently complained that Trumps immigration policies are forcing up wages by enabling a labor shortage. Were feeling real tightness [in the labor market] and part of this is related to immigration policy, he said.

Tightness is the term used to describe a shortage in workers in the labor market. In a loose market for labor, workers compete against other workers for jobs, so allowing employers to pay lower wages. In a tight market, where there are plenty of unfilled jobs, employers must bargain with employees by offering higher wages and benefits, plus better condition and treatment. That tight labor market pressure also prods employers to find, recruit and train marginalized workers, including some of the millions of working-age men who have quit the labor market since 2008.

A tight labor market also pressures employers to invest in boost their workers productivity by buying labor-saving machinery, such as tractors, forklifts, and robots. In turn, higher productivity means the employees can be paid more while still creating profits for Wall Street investors. Overall, the economy grows in line with growing productivity and growing population, either born or imported.

The last time the nation achieved a tight labor market was in the late 1990s, just before President George W. Bush largely ended enforcement of immigration in 2001.

The head of Trumps main budget office, former Rep. Mike Mulvaney, recently dismissed business complaints about a tight labor market. Millions of Americans have fallen out of the labor market since the 2000s, he pointed out, saying if you created economic opportunity and jobs that they want, they would come back.

So Im not worried about the tightness of the labor supply, Mulvaney told The Wall Street Journal.

The OMB official told Breitbart:

The participation rate among 25-54 year-olds averaged 84.0 percent in 2000, but by 2016 had dropped to 81.3 percent. If the same labor force participation rate had obtained in this age demographic in 2016 as it had in 2000, that would imply an extra 3.4 million people working [and consuming] in 2016. This is only a rough, but illustrative, indicator of the number of people who could hypothetically be in the labor force if we had maintained the peak participation rate that we had achieved in 2000.

In fact, that huge number of missing workers are caused by the pre-Trump government policies, admitted a top economic advisor to President Barack Obama. This [dropout] is caused by policies and institutions, not by technology, said Jason Furman, an economist who chaired Obamas Council of Economic Advisors. We shouldnt accept it as inevitable, he told a Brookings Institute expert, Dave Wessel inAugust 2016. Furman continued:

The fraction of prime age men who are working or looking for work has fallen continuously since the 1950s. In the early 1950s, 98 percent of men in that age bracket had a job [or] were actively looking for one. Today, that fraction has fallen down to 88 percent. Understand it is quite large. The difference between a recession and a normal economic period is maybe two percentage points on the employment population ratio so this is something that is more like 10 percentage points The fraction of prime age men who are working or looking for work has fallen continuously since the 1950s. In the early 1950s, 98 percent of men in that age bracket had a job [or] were actively looking for one. Today, that fraction has fallen down to 88 percent.

In another measurement, dubbed the employment to population ratio, the percentage of working-age men is stuck at 85.3 percent, well below the 89.7 percent rate in 1999, leaving at least 2 million men sidelined and out of sight.

In April, Kaplancalled for the work participation be raised via additional government-backed training of workers not via higher wages that would encourage workers to get their own training. He said:

Although the labor force participation rate for prime-age workers is about 88 percent for college graduates and 81 percent for those who have attended some college, it is only 76 percent for those with a high school diploma and only 66 percent for those who have less than a high school diploma. In short, where there is substantial labor slack in the economy, it is highly correlated with segments of the population with lower levels of educational attainment. While there are a variety of reasons for this correlation, individuals in these segments would benefit from additional skills training in order to be more productive members of the workforce.

The U.S. employment rate for prime-age men lags far behind the rate in high-wage Germany.

During the 2016 campaign, Trump promised to change immigration rules to favor Americans, saying:

When politicians talk about immigration reform they mean: amnesty, cheap labor and open borders. The Schumer-Rubio [2013] immigration bill was nothing more than a giveaway to the corporate patrons who run both parties. Real immigration reform puts the needs of working people first not wealthy globetrotting donors. We are the only country in the world whose immigration system puts the needs of other nations ahead of our own.

Since his election, Trump has sharply reduced the inflow of illegal immigrants but has not yet penalized companies that employ illegals. He has begun small-scale reforms to the contract-worker programs, such as the H-1B program, but has not tried to slow or pause legal immigration.

Each year, the federal government provides companies with 1 million new legal immigrants, plus 1 million temporary contract-workers, such as H-1B and H-2B workers. This inflow loosens the labor market, to the huge disadvantage of working Americans, and especially the four million Americans who enter the workforce each year. For example, the inflow of cheap labor cuts Americans wages and salaries by roughly $500 billion per year, nearly all of which is transferred to company owners and investors, according to data provided by the National Academies of Sciences in 2016. Also, the NAS report shows that federal, state and local government provide legal and illegal immigrants with at least $56 billion of taxpayer cash and aid each year, nearly all of which flow back into companies selling food, shelter, autos, retail products, and other consumables.

So far, there is no hard data evidence of a national surge in Americans wages, despite handwringing about labor shortage by business groups. But there are a growing number of anecdotes about employers grudgingly raising wages, although mostly for higher-skilled white-collar workers. According to May 31 edition of the Federal Reserves Beige Book:

Labor markets continued to tighten, with most Districts citing shortages across a broadening range of occupations and regions. Despite supply constraints impeding the ability of firms to attract and retain qualified workers, most Districts reported that employment continued to grow at a modest to moderate pace. Similarly, most firms across the Districts noted little change to the recent trend of modest to moderate wage growth, although many firms reported offering higher wages to attract workers where shortages were most severe. A manufacturing firm in the Chicago District reported attracting better applicants and improving retention for its unskilled workforce by raising wages 10 percent

Respondents in several sectors [in the Boston region] mentioned tight labormarkets. None of our manufacturing contacts reportedany significant hiring moves either up or down. A makerof envelopes said that they expected to hire significantlyin the near future but not right now. Several manufacturingcontacts said it was hard to find qualified workers. Amanufacturer of semiconductors and related goods saidthat they had to raise starting wages to fill vacant positionsin New England. A manufacturer of furniture saidthat retaining new hires was a major challenge as someworkers quit within days of being hired. Staffing firmscontinued to report strong labor demand and tight laborsupply. They singled out the following positions as particularlyhard to fill: systems administrator, network engineer,and medical assistant. All contacted staffing firmsindicated that bill and pay rates had increased

Pennsylvania staffing firms have remained very busysince the start of the year. Contacts from staffing firms inlabor markets with lower unemployment rates havenoted greater wage pressure, while contacts operating inmarkets with higher unemployment rates report minimalwage pressure

[Near Cleveland,] High turnover remains an issue inthe freight transportation industry. In order to retaindrivers, one firm increased driver pay by 3 cents permile, equating to a 7.5 percent wage increase. Attractingqualified applicants for low-skilled manufacturing jobs isdifficult, and many newly hired workers prove to beunreliable. That said, competition for low-skilled workersis strong and is driving up starting wages

[In Richmond] Generally, contacts reported labor shortages for computerscientists, computer engineers, data scientists, welders,and technicians. Also, more manufacturers had difficulty finding quality workers for technical roles. Wagesincreased modestly for firms in most industries, andemployment agencies said that clients had started toincrease wages for positions that remained unfilled

There are also some anecdotes about companies which respond to wage pressure by buying labor-saving machinery much of which is made by Americans workers. According to Bloomberg:

At Task Force Tips, which makes fire-hose nozzles, a vision-guided robot performs a task a person used to do, grabbing a half-finished valve from a miller and handing it off to a mechanized partner that feeds it into the final processor. By adding a dozen bots over the past four years, McMillan said, hes been able to keep the family business thriving in the face of stiff competition from lower-wage countries including China.

And the company payroll in Valparaiso, Indiana, has stayed steady at about 250. Task Force Tips doesnt fire anyone when it brings in a robot, McMillan said. Instead, people are re-trained for jobs such as machine operator or technician. That keeps morale up and allows employees to see the machines as an advantage, gadgets that can do menial chores humans find tedious

But many other companies are hoping imported labor can keep wage increases off the table. The Wall Street Journal reported:

Ariens Co., a maker of lawnmowers and snowblowers, faces a bottleneck in its plans to raise production 40%. It cant find enough workers.The Brillion, Wis., company bused some Somali refugees from nearby Green Bay to help, but they werent enough, and it is spending up to $15,000 a month on recruiting.We see the demand right in front us, said Chief Executive Dan Ariens. Its very frustrating.

Follow Neil Munro on Twitter @NeilMunroDC or email the author at NMunro@Breitbart.com

See the original post:
Donald Trump Cuts Consumer Spending by Illegal Immigrants, Laments Federal Reserve Member - Breitbart News

Texas businesses need immigration reform now – Houston Chronicle

Begin Slideshow 6

Photo: Chip Somodevilla, Staff

Immigration reform activists hold a rally in Washington earlier this year. A poll indicates most Texas voters of every political stripe think the nation's immigration laws are not working.

Immigration reform activists hold a rally in Washington earlier this year. A poll indicates most Texas voters of every political stripe think the nation's immigration laws are not working.

Houston Chronicle columnist Chris Tomlinson.

Houston Chronicle columnist Chris Tomlinson.

Texas businesses need immigration reform now

The legal entanglements of 50,000 children entering the United States illegally this summer may have highlighted our broken immigration system, but Texas businesses are warning that Congress' failure to pass comprehensive immigration reforms could create a bigger long-term economic crisis.

Leaders in Houston's manufacturing, construction and agriculture industries joined colleagues in 40 other cities across the country last week to complain that federal immigration law has left them without enough workers and that the market favors the unscrupulous. They want comprehensive immigration reform now.

"This is about the economy, jobs and a strong workforce for Texas," said Nelson Salinas, lobbyist with the Texas Association of Business, which promotes pro-business policies.

Richie Jackson, CEO of the Texas Restaurant Association, said the current immigration system doesn't work for anybody. In the oil and gas boom areas of South and West Texas, restaurants can't open to full capacity because they don't have enough workers.

To read this article in one of Houston's most-spoken languages, click on the button below.

"We need to be able to access both high-skill and low-skill workers in this booming economy," he said. "When we can't get our lower-skilled, but essential workers, we can't open the restaurants, we can't expand, we can't meet customer needs."

The Republican Party of Texas hurt efforts to ease the economic stress by removing the so-called "Texas Solution" from its platform last month. Instead of supporting a guest worker program to bring in legal workers, party delegates instead demanded that local police round up those in the country illegally and called for the denial of in-state tuition for kids who grew up here without papers.

The most common demand in return for reforms is a sealed border, but that's a paper tiger.

The only border that comes close to being sealed is the 160-mile demilitarized zone on the Korean Peninsula, and that is hardly a model for the 1,933-mile U.S.-Mexico border. I've driven along most of the Texas border with Mexico, and building a Berlin Wall along it is impossible, and frankly silly.

There will always be some leaks. The question is, how much of a reduction in illegal crossings will it take for Republicans in Congress to deal with the much larger humanitarian and economic crises caused by our bad laws? Illegal border crossings are at the lowest level in the last decade.

Few applicants

While we wait on Congress, the booming Texas economy could stumble for lack of labor.

Kelli Vazquez, vice president at a concrete cutting and demolition company called Holes Inc., said her Houston company runs background checks on every employee and gets only a handful of applicants for every opening.

"When we put up an ad, we want to see more people come and apply," Vazquez said. "We're a small company. We would never look abroad to bring workers over, but if there was an easier process for people to come over legally and work, it would help the construction industry."

Companies that follow the rules want a chance to compete for the skilled labor of the millions of people who are working in the country illegally, said Bob Bacon, CFO of Houston-based TAS Commercial Concrete Construction.

'Level playing field'

"If we are able to hire them, as we do all of our employees, through the legal process, we're going to withhold taxes and Social Security, we're going to pay workers' compensation," he said. "It will be a level playing field."

Labor agrees with management in this case. Texas AFL-CIO President Becky Moeller praised Texas businesses for supporting a comprehensive immigration bill.

"To address the crisis at hand, the legislative process needs to continue and the political process needs to take a back seat," she said.

A new poll indicates that business leaders aren't the only ones frustrated by inaction in Washington.

More than 80 percent of Texas voters of every political stripe think the nation's immigration laws are not working and that Congress needs to take action, according to a survey of 1,000 people last month on behalf of the Partnership for a New Economy, a bipartisan, pro-business lobbying group.

When it comes to exactly what policy Texans support, opinions vary. But 61 percent said they would support comprehensive reforms that include additional border protections, visas for workers with needed skills, an employer verification program, work permits for those already in the country and citizenship for those brought here as children.

Blockade in House

The U.S. Senate has passed a plan that includes all of those elements. The only majority in the nation that seems opposed to comprehensive immigration reform is the one in the House of Representatives.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, in April openly mocked the Republican caucus' reluctance to take a vote.

"Here's the attitude: 'Ohhhh. Don't make me do this. Ohhhh. This is too hard,'" he said. Incumbents were worried about taking votes that could hurt them with tea party primary voters.

Perhaps once the Republican primaries are over, and most incumbents are assured their re-election, the business community can get the relief it needs to keep the economy humming.

Here is the original post:
Texas businesses need immigration reform now - Houston Chronicle

Davis-Oliver Act would make Trump’s immigration agenda law of the land – The Hill (blog)

Immediately after taking office, President Trump acted quickly and decisively by using executive power to restart the process of controlling our borders and enforcing Americas existing immigration laws. Progress is being made but much more remains to be done.

Legislation must follow executive action in order to fix flaws in the system, enhance public safety and ensure lasting reforms are solidly in place. The onus is now on the GOP-led Congress to act, particularly given that for eight years, the GOP has railed against President Obamas usurpation of their authority to regulate immigration.

Thus, the introduction of the Davis-Oliver Actis a refreshing signal that the GOP may be taking its responsibility seriously. The bill is a much-needed legislative vehicle for many of President Trumps signature immigration enforcement initiatives and would provide law enforcement professionals the relief, guidance and authority they have long needed to keep America safe. The bill, sponsored by Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee Vice Chairman Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob GoodlatteBob GoodlatteDavis-Oliver Act would make Trump's immigration agenda law of the land Tech giants urge Congress to revise foreign surveillance law Top Dem calls for investigation into Sessions MORE (R-Va.) is a vital first step but not the only step in modernizing our broken immigration system.

The bill adds much-needed clarity to ICEs detainer authority, the tool used by federal immigration enforcement officials to order criminal aliens be held by local jails for at least 48 hours so they can be picked up and removed from the country. Under current law, ICE detainers are regularly ignored by sanctuary communities even for some of the most heinous criminal aliens and result in convicted criminal aliens being released back onto our streets.

The needless carnage created by communities that refuse to cooperate with detainers is a national disgrace. In 2014, for example, 13,288 criminal aliens charged with serious crimes including homicide, kidnapping, assault, sexual assault, drunk driving were released back onto the streets, only to commit new crimes against innocent Americans. It was the pleas from many American parents and families who had buried loved ones too soon that helped cement President Trumps commitment to immigration reform.

Davis-Oliver greatly enhances public safety by withholding key federal grants from dangerous sanctuary cities and by making criminal alien gang members deportable. Thanks in no small part to the Obama administrations catch and release program, incredibly dangerous gangs like MS-13, once based in Central America, have now established a strong foothold in many once-tranquil American communities. The bill also further expedites the removal of criminal aliens from U.S. communities.

The bill also looks beyond our borders, making it more difficult for foreign terrorists and other foreign nationals who pose national security concerns to enter and remain in the United States. Specifically, the bill provides for the quick removal of alien terrorists and bars foreign terrorists or removable immigrants who threaten national security from receiving immigration benefits, such as naturalization and discretionary relief from removal.

Davis-Oliver also tightens up the visa issuance process, with the clear realization that in many cases, the best chance to prevent a terror attack is to deny the would-be assassins entry in the first place. It would expand the Visa Security Program to all U.S. embassies and consular posts, ensuring that all visa applicants receive additional screening. It would also require the Departments of State and Homeland Security to utilize social media networks and other publicly available resources to ensure a potential applicant poses no threat to the nation.

Just months ago, Trump put a face on the victims of illegal immigration, when during a speech to Congress he introduced Jessica Davis and Susan Oliver, widows of Placer County Detectives Michael Davis Jr. and Sacramento Deputy Sheriff Danny Oliver, during a speech to Congress and the American people. These brave women represented two families, and communities, whose government had failed them. Lets hope no other American families are forced to endure this very preventable heartache.

Bob Dane is the executive director atFederation for American Immigration Reform(FAIR).

The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.

Continued here:
Davis-Oliver Act would make Trump's immigration agenda law of the land - The Hill (blog)