Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

How Local Law Enforcement Leaders and Anti-Immigration Groups Have Joined Forces to Deport More … – Newsweek

While the Trump administration this year has demanded stricter enforcement of immigration laws by local law enforcement, some county sheriffs across the U.S. had already been establishing closer relationships with anti-immigration groups in recent years. Some of the national groups have been offering sheriffs advice, inviting them to border schools to hear anti-immigration speakers, producing television advertisements featuring sheriffs and sending at least one sheriff a model ordinance intended to spur local law enforcement of federal immigration laws.

Depending on your politics, that could be seen as disturbing collusion between heavy-handed law enforcers and nativist organizations intent on maintaining a white majority, or an informal flow of information between two groups with a mutual interest in strict enforcement of federal immigration laws. Either way, a new report released Tuesday on the deepening relationship between sheriffs and anti-immigration groups comes at a time of increased focus on immigration issues.

Nativist groups have recruited county sheriffs to help implement dangerous anti-immigrant policies that split up families, intimidate survivors of violence, and deport people to their deaths, reads a report writtenby the pro-immigrationCenter for New Community (CNC). These are exactly the results that the contemporary anti-immigrant movement has long been seeking, [including] a drastic increase in deportations and attrition through enforcement.

Daily Emails and Alerts - Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

Cultivating relationships with law enforcement officials like county sheriffs has been a goal of anti-immigration groups like the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) for more than a decade.A December 2005 FAIR newsletter stated, Creating coalitions with police and sheriff s [sic] departments all across the country to confront the issues posed by mass immigration has been a key FAIR goal for many years, according to the CNC report. After identifying sheriffs who were concerned about illegal immigration, FAIR staff met with them, sent them a steady stream of information, set up regular conference calls and invited them to D.C. to meet with FAIRs senior staff, according to the organizations 2011 annual report.

In following years there was increased cooperation between sheriffs and FAIR, with the creation of an umbrella group called the National Sheriffs Immigration Council and the organization of border schools, where sheriffs, sometimes traveling at the taxpayers expense, hear presentations by extremist anti-government speakers, according to the report, Crossing the Line: U.S. Sheriffs Colluding With the Anti-Immigrant Movement. The sheriffs evenvisited the headquarters of a border vigilante group in Texas.

Bob Dane, the executive director of FAIR, dismissed the report as sour grapes from a far-left group that is frustrated the Trump administration is enforcing immigration laws. [Sheriffs] have sought the expertise of FAIR,and we have sought their perspective, Dane tells Newsweek, characterizing the relationship as symbiotic and transparent. The common denominator is the rule of law. Local and federal law enforcement officials cooperate when investigating drug-relatedor violent crimes, and that cooperation should also exist when enforcing federal immigration laws, Dane said.Theres a new sheriff in town, and hes in the White House. On its website, FAIR says its goal is to reduce legal immigration to about 300,000 annually from current levels of over one million people.

The Center for Immigration Studiesdirector of policy studies Jessica Vaughan said she wouldnt waste her time reading the report, as she believes a main goal of the Center for New Community is smearing her organization. Obviously they are upset that many law enforcement leaders come to us for information and advice, Vaughan says in an email to Newsweek. They come to us because of our expertise and years of experience on the public safety issues connected to immigration policy.

FAIR is a good resource for local law enforcement leaders who have questions about immigration laws, says the sheriff of a rural Texas county, who said he doesnt know about any actual partnerships between sheriffs in his region and the organization. Ive talked to [FAIR] over the years, Jackson County Sheriff A.J. Andy Louderback tells Newsweek. Theyre simply, as I see it, theyre just advocates for the rule of law. (Earlier this year, Louderback won approval to have his jail officers cross-designated as federal immigration officers, and he said so far hes pleased with the increased information and power that comes with the designation.)

Texass Jackson County Sheriffs Office Deputy Stephen Lang and Sergeant B.J. Novak stand near a department vehicle. The relationship between sheriffs and anti-immigration groups has deepened in recent years, a time of increased focus on immigration issues. Photo courtesy Jackson County Sheriff's Office

Less than a week after he won the 2016 presidential election, President Trump vowed to immediately deport 2 million to 3 million undocumented immigrants who had committed crimes, and after he took office he quickly inked executive orders that expanded immigration powers for local law enforcement and authorized the construction of a wall along the border between U.S. and Mexico. And while arrests of undocumented immigrants by federal agents are higher under Trump than they were under President Obama, a backlog in the court system has meant fewer actual deportations.

FAIR has also teamed with sheriffs on media and legislative efforts. The organization produced a TV ad campaign featuring local sheriffs and warning of the dangers posed by uncontrolled immigration, and it paid about $130,000 for it to be aired in Wisconsin and North Carolina in 2016. The organization produced another ad shortly after Trump was inaugurated, featuring a Louisiana sheriffwho is also the president of the National Sheriffs Associationwho thanks Trump for agreeing to stop illegal immigration and restore the rule of law, according to the report.

The anti-immigration groups have also helped sheriffs increase their role shaping national immigration policy, with FAIR placing sheriffs on Capitol Hill witness panels and hearings at least eight times since 2011, the CNC report says. In their testimony, FAIR-affiliated sheriffs frequently express support for draconian immigration enforcement measures, advancing the dangerous notion that local police should enforce federal immigration laws, the report states.

Hiroshi Motomura, a UCLA law professorwho studies immigration, saidpartnerships between sheriffs and anti-immigration groups and increased enforcement of federal immigration laws by local law enforcement could lead to racial profiling. Weve had cases of jurisdictions where the arrest patterns are skewed by race and ethnicity, Motomura tells Newsweek, citing asan example Maricopa County in Arizona. My concern is its going to happen some of the time, enough to be concerning, and its going to be hard to figure out when its happening.

Sheriffs who hold negative views of immigrants are more likely to head departments where their deputies frequently check the immigration status of the people they encounter, said Mirya Holman, a professor of political science at Tulane Universitywho has studied sheriffs, including a nationwide survey of 500 sheriffs in 2012. Theres no legal reason to check someones legal immigration status when they are reporting a crime, but sheriffs who have negative attitudes toward immigrants were more likely to check the status of victims of crime, Holman tells Newsweek. Given the more aggressive actions by [Immigration and Customs Enforcement under Trump], were going to see sheriffs playing a very important and growing role in immigration enforcement.

Follow this link:
How Local Law Enforcement Leaders and Anti-Immigration Groups Have Joined Forces to Deport More ... - Newsweek

Marco Rubio’s shameful immigration skid – The Week – The Week Magazine

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

You'd have to be pretty heartless to oppose legal status for DREAMers people who were brought to the United States illegally when they were children.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is apparently of requisite heartlessness.

Rubio declared last week that he can't support the bipartisan Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act that some of his Senate colleagues are desperately trying to enact to make DREAMers off-limits to the Trump administration's harsh deportation regime. Regrettably, instead of embracing compassion, he's throwing in his lot with Trump's gang of cruel restrictionists.

Now, President Trump has repeatedly assured us that he has a "big heart" and would concentrate on deporting "bad hombres" while "taking care" of DREAMers. The reality, however, is quite different.

A bit of background: President Obama created the Deferred Action Against Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that, as its name suggests, deferred deportation proceedings against DREAMers and handed them temporary work permits. But DACA does not offer any guarantee against detention or deportation, just a postponement. Its protection can be rescinded for the slightest of infractions even traffic violations which is what Trump has effectively been doing.

In other words, Trump has left DACA in place but rendered it essentially toothless. Even so, 10 hardline attorneys general from red states are not satisfied. They have given Trump an ultimatum and told him he has to totally scrap the program or they'll sue, just as they did with President Obama's DAPA initiative that gave a temporary reprieve even to parents of DREAMers. If the administration obliges them or declines to fight them in court all 1.8 million DREAMers could eventually be deported, including the 750,000 who have DACA status.

Please remember: These are people who had no say in how they were brought to America, and who have lived in this country practically their whole lives with little to no contact with their birth land. They deserve compassion, not icy cruelty, especially since deporting just 750,000 would cost Uncle Sam $60 billion and lead to $280 billion in economic losses over the next decade.

To that end, Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) have dusted off the DREAM Act, which would hand green cards to illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children so long as they (i) graduate from high school or serve in the military; (ii) pass a background check; (iii) speak English; (iv) demonstrate knowledge of U.S. history; and (v) pay a fee. About 1.5 million DREAMers are expected to qualify because they tend to be hardworking, law-abiding people who desperately want to come out of the shadows and participate fully in American life.

Even many vocal immigration hawks don't have a problem with giving these DREAMers legal status so long as it's done via legislative rather than executive action. Rush Limbaugh, who has single-handedly killed many an immigration reform bill, has conceded that "no one's gonna win by deporting a bunch of kids that we let in." Likewise, Pat Robertson, who has derided undocumented immigrants as "moochers," admits that DREAMers are not criminals. "They're teaching kindergarten, for heaven's sake," he says. "They ought to stay. They enrich our society. They bless our society, and what have we got to loose." Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, another immigration opponent and Trump ally, counsels: "Why pick a fight over this group of people who have a lot of emotional stories to tell?" Even more to the point, polls show that 75 percent of Trump supporters Trump supporters don't want DREAMers booted out for the sins of their parents, and actually want them legalized.

So who on Earth are the opponents of the DREAM Act?

Breitbart, the rabid online mouthpiece of immigration hawks, of course. The right-wing nationalist website is trying to kill the bill by calling it amnesty, a curse word in ultra-restrictionist circles. And then there are all the outfits that are part of the quasi-racist FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) network, including the Center for Immigration Studies and NumbersUSA. Both of their leaders are vehemently opposed to any relief for DREAMers without tough border restrictions first.

And now Marco Rubio has jumped on their side.

The Florida senator has declared that he can't support the Graham-Durbin effort because it does not take into account the "reality of the situation" and guard against "unintended consequences." What reality? What unintended consequences? Apparently, Rubio fears that this law will be misinterpreted in Central America and encourage kids to show up on U.S. shores in the hopes of getting amnesty, fueling a repeat of the 2014 unaccompanied minor crisis. But the notion that amnesty not the labor needs of the American economy or the dangerous conditions in their own countries drives desperate foreigners to risk their lives to come to the United States is a right-wing trope with little basis in reality.

The fact is that the "unintended consequences" Rubio is concerned about are for his own political career. He was one of the Gang of Eight senators whose support for a comprehensive immigration reform bill in 2013 made him the favorite whipping boy of ultra-restrictionists in the last presidential election and no doubt (in his mind) cost him the Republican nomination. His opposition to the DREAM Act is now surely calculated to avoid giving them any reason to target him in 2020, should he decide to run again.

But going full Breitbart is unlikely to prove a winning strategy. President Trump derided Rubio as "Little Marco" during the campaign. Rubio could use the DREAM Act to stand up to Trump and ask him to produce that "big heart" he claims to have and sign the bill. Stooping to the level of the restrictionist fringe, unfortunately, would only prove Trump right about just how small Little Marco really is.

Visit link:
Marco Rubio's shameful immigration skid - The Week - The Week Magazine

Trump endorses immigration reform, says he’s ‘liberating cities’ with … – Washington Examiner

President Trump has endorsed a sweeping new Senate immigration plan that puts a preference on job skills and not family ties in granting immigrants entry into the United States.

In a speech in Ohio Tuesday night, the president also bragged that his administration is being "rough" on illegals, especially criminals, and "liberating towns and cities" from MS-13 and other illegal gangs..

"We are dismantling and destroying the bloodthirsty criminal gangs. And, well, I will just tell you this -- we're not doing it in a politically correct fashion. We're doing it rough," said the president of his Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. "Our guys are rougher than their guys. We have tough people. Our people are tougher than their people. Our people are tougher and stronger and meaner and smarter than the gangs. One by one we're finding the illegal gang members, drug dealers, thieves, robbers, criminals and killers, and we're sending them the hell back home where they came from," he added.

Trump gave a strong shoutout to the Republican authors of the new legislation, Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton and Georgia Sen. David Perdue.

"As we speak, we are working with two wonderful senators, Tom Cotton and David Perdue, to create a new immigration system for America," said Trump.

The duo are currently updating the legislation they introduced earlier this year. Basically, it will focus more on immigrant merits, such as job skills, over family ties to those already in the U.S. The goal is a system that doesn't reward illegal crossings or let immigrants take jobs from Americans.

Said Trump, "Instead of today's low-skilled system -- just a terrible system where anybody comes in -- people that have never worked, people that are criminals; anybody comes in -- we want a merit-based system -- one that protects our workers, our taxpayers, and one that protects our economy. We want it merit-based. We want people that work really hard in their country and that are going to come into our country and work really, really hard. We don't want people that come into our country and immediately go on welfare and stay there for the rest of their lives."

The legislative effort comes as the administration is collecting success after success in its war on illegal immigration. ICE officials said that illegal immigration is down 70 percent and the arrests and deportation of criminal illegals is up.

What's more, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has made good on threats to some 300 sanctuary cities and regions, prompting some to change course and cooperate with ICE.

"American cities should be sanctuaries for law-abiding Americans -- the people that look up to the law, the people that respect the law -- not for criminals and gang members that we want the hell out of our country," Trump said during his address in Youngstown.

And, he added, people are cheering his actions.

"We are actually liberating towns and cities. We are liberating. People are screaming from their windows, Thank you, thank you,' to the Border Patrol and to General Kelly's great people that come in and grab these thugs and throw them the hell out. We're liberating our towns and we're liberating our cities," said the president.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com

See the article here:
Trump endorses immigration reform, says he's 'liberating cities' with ... - Washington Examiner

Schumer: McCain Said to Me, ‘Let’s Get Immigration Reform Done’ – CNSNews.com


AZCentral.com
Schumer: McCain Said to Me, 'Let's Get Immigration Reform Done'
CNSNews.com
He even said to me when I called him this weekend, 'Let's get immigration reform done,' so he's thinking of the future. As you know, he and I worked on that [2013 comprehensive immigration reform] bill. And it was great to see him back, strong as he was..
Roberts: Is John McCain's finest hour yet to come?AZCentral.com
When it comes to John McCain, some journalists will never, ever learnMedia Matters for America (blog)
Horowitz: John McCain; An AppreciationGoLocal Worcester

all 1,000 news articles »

Read more here:
Schumer: McCain Said to Me, 'Let's Get Immigration Reform Done' - CNSNews.com

Keep politics out of this tragedy, Dan Patrick – Fort Worth Star Telegram


Fort Worth Star Telegram
Keep politics out of this tragedy, Dan Patrick
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Immigrants in the back of a sweltering tractor trailer in San Antonio this weekend served as a grisly illustration of the sacrifices some are willing to make to get to the United States. By the time authorities found the stifling semi truck in a Wal ...
Deaths show need for immigration reform: EditorialEl Paso Times
Death toll in San Antonio immigrant-smuggling case rises to 10Texas Tribune
Smuggling deaths show need for humane immigration lawsTimes Record News
mySanAntonio.com -Washington Post
all 2,630 news articles »

Read more:
Keep politics out of this tragedy, Dan Patrick - Fort Worth Star Telegram