Mediaboss Marketing

Kate Steinle, a 32-year-old San Francisco woman who was shot and killed by an undocumented immigrant, has become the face of immigration reform in the United States.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte introduced a bill named after the California woman as part of U.S. House Republicans sweeping push for immigration reform a charge welcomed by the former immigration attorney from Roanoke County.

In the two years since Steinles death, some conservatives have pointed to the tragedy in opposition to sanctuary city policies.

Juan Lopez-Sanchez, the man charged with Steinles death, is an immigrant from Mexico who was deported five times since first arriving in the country in 1991.

After being taken to San Francisco on an old warrant for marijuana possession, local officials dropped those charges and Lopez-Sanchez was released from jail months before the shooting. Per San Franciscos sanctuary city policy, local law enforcement did not inform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement that they were releasing Lopez-Sanchez.

Goodlattes Kates Law would increase the maximum sentences for immigrants who illegally re-enter the country after being deported.

What happened to Kate Steinle is not at all unusual, Goodlatte said in an interview last week.

The congressman also cited the March death of a Lynchburg teen whose body was found in Bedford County and is believed to have been killed by members of the MS-13 gang. One of the Salvadoran men charged with the murder is also a suspect in a Maryland homicide case.

While some Democrats criticized Goodlattes bill by saying it would apply harsh penalties for garden variety offenses, and other critics argued the legislation wouldnt have stopped what happened to Steinle, the bill passed the House in June with bipartisan support.

Working in tandem with President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans, Goodlatte chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee, which hears immigration bills is pushing an agenda that increases enforcement of illegal immigration and limits legal migration into the country.

The Judiciary Committee has heard and passed a slate of immigration measures that would cut funding for sanctuary cities and secure Americas borders. The committee has also passed measures to usurp presidential powers to grant the authority of states and localities to enforce immigration laws inconsistent with federal statutes and set the refugee resettlement ceiling, which would be capped at 50,000 people annually.

Goodlattes bills Kates Law and No Sanctuary for Criminals Act are two of the most significant in the reform package because they already have passed the House and will set the tone for how far Congress is willing to bend on immigration reform. While they face a difficult road in the Senate, Trump has thrown his weight behind the measures, calling them vital to public safety and national security.

Trump backing Goodlattes bills is no surprise considering the president campaigned heavily on immigration reform and has repeatedly vowed to withhold funds from sanctuary cities. He also name-dropped Steinle in his speech at the Republican National Convention last year, saying, but where was the sanctuary for Kate Steinle?

This collaboration represents a drastic change of pace from when former President Barack Obama was in office.

Shortly after Goodlatte was named chairman of the Judiciary Committee, he sat down with Obama to discuss immigration reform. During the 40-minute meeting, the two talked in detail about their views on immigration, but couldnt manage to see eye-to-eye.

We had an in-depth discussion about the issue and I think we could understand where each was coming from, but we couldnt find common ground, Goodlatte said.

At the time, Obama favored a comprehensive Senate approach that would give millions of undocumented immigrants a chance at citizenship while also beefing up security along the border between the U.S. and Mexico. Goodlatte, on the other hand, has long supported a stronger enforcement model that adheres to the nations current immigration laws.

But Goodlatte said he is pleased with the focus of the current administration because it largely aligns with his own vision for immigration reform.

Other House Republicans also have lauded Trumps push for increased border security and decreased migration into the country during floor debates on immigration reform.

Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., praised Kates Law, saying the U.S. should have no crimes committed by illegal immigrants because there should be no illegal immigrants in the country.

Citing a Fox News analysis, he also argued that illegal immigrants commit crimes at higher rates than American citizens, an argument PoltiFact California has debunked.

For the past 16 years, we had two presidents who did not prioritize dealing with illegal immigrants, he said. Thank God we finally have a president who takes that role seriously.

Pro-immigrant groups see the legislation differently.

Monica Sarmiento, executive director of the Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights, called the Trump administrations push for immigration reform a systemic effort to vilify the nations undocumented immigrant community and reduce the number of legal immigrants into the country.

Its easier for the administration to use immigrants as a scapegoat for Americas problems than it is for Trump and Congress to fix real problems like crippling student debt, reforming the criminal justice system and growing the economy, she said.

What were seeing is that the administration and Congressman Goodlatte are constantly trying to focus and really spend taxpayer money on initiatives that lead to attacking individuals that should not be under the limelight, she said.

Goodlattes sanctuary cities bill would bar sanctuary cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities from receiving some federal funds and opens those localities up to being sued by the victims of crimes committed by undocumented immigrants. The legislation also calls for undocumented immigrants who have committed dangerous crimes to be detained during their removal proceedings.

In June, hundreds of local, state and national organizations that advocate for or depend on immigrants signed a letter to the House of Representatives, urging members to vote down Kates Law and the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act.

Sanctuary policies are critical to promote public safety for local communities, the letter said. Fearing referral to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, victims and witnesses of crime are significantly less likely to communicate with local law enforcement. Local law enforcement authorities have repeatedly echoed this sentiment, acknowledging that community policing policies are paramount to enhancing public safety.

The national Fraternal Order of Police echoed similar sentiments in a letter sent to House leadership in June.

Having garnered support from just three House Democrats, Goodlattes sanctuary cities bill faces a tough road in the Senate.

For comparison, two dozen House Democrats voted in favor of Kates Law, but Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, introduced similar legislation under the same name last year. His bill failed in the Senate.

Regardless of the outcome of his two bills, Goodlatte will continue to work toward immigration reform with the help of the executive branch and his Republican colleagues. Last week, he praised two Republican senators for introducing the Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy (RAISE) Act, which would cut the number of legal immigrants entering the U.S. by half in the next decade and create a merit-based green card system, as opposed to the lottery system currently in place. Trump also has backed the legislation.

This Congress must pass strong measures to ensure that immigration enforcement in the interior of the United States remains a priority , Goodlatte said in June.

The rest is here:
Goodlatte and House Judiciary Committee leading Trump's call for immigration reform - Roanoke Times

The Utah Immigration Reform Coalition responded to theRAISE Act, new legislation sponsored by Senators Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.), and called for a revised solution that harnesses the economic power of foreign-born workers in the U.S. economy.

The proposed bill was endorsed this week by President Trump, and called for a substantial limit to legal immigration with the intended outcome of raising wages for American workers. Instead, the bill will have negative economic impact on both American and foreign-born workers.

While the coalition agrees on the need to modernize our broken immigration system with merit-based solutions, the bill contains a broad misconception that immigrants are hindering the wages of American workers. In fact, research has shown time and time again that foreign-born workers often act as key drivers ofinnovationandjob creation, and do their part infilling the workforce gapsthat the American economy faces with its ongoing aging crisis. Instead, the coalition is urging Congress to take an approach that harnesses the power of immigrants to create a streamlined process that attracts the best talent, builds the workforce needed to support Americas industries, and ultimately lays the groundwork for greater economic growth.

While most agree that our countrys immigration system and policy is broken and outdated, the RAISE Act is not the solution our country needs. It falsely assumes that legal immigration harms our economy, when study after study from leading nonpartisan groups and think tanks confirm that legal immigration actually helps grow our economy, saidTim Wheelwright, Salt Lake City Immigration Attorney and Immigration Reform Task Force Chair at the Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce. The need to reform our immigration system has never been greater, but the RAISE Act would actually be a big step backwards. I urge Utahs Congressional delegation to oppose the RAISE Act.

Former Utah Republican Party Chairman Stan Lockhartadded: We all agree our immigration system needs reform. The election rhetoric of 2016 was to make it harder to come here illegally, but easier to come here legally. That is not what this bill does. Limiting even more of those who can come legally actually has the opposite effect by providing greater incentive to come illegally. Its the wrong policy for America.

The state coalition is sponsored by New American Economy (NAE), a bipartisan organization that supports immigration reforms that help both American workers and immigrants build a better economy. The coalition utilizes local leadership roles and NAEs detailed research on immigrants to create a constructive platform to discuss immigration reform with Congress.

Closing our doors to immigrants wont reverse any of the challenges we face in todays global economy, saidformerUtah State Representative Holly Richardson. Instead, such policy would be severely limiting one of our countrys longstanding strengths, which is the willingness to embrace the best and brightest from across the world. Immigrants are part of the economic engine that makes this country run and should be embraced as the contributors they are.

Read more here:
Utah Immigration Reform Coalition responds to the RAISE Act and calls for modernized system that harnesses the ... - Utah Policy

Immigration returned to the forefront of political discourse with the emergence of Donald Trump, whoannounced his bid for the presidency two years ago by saying he would build a wall between the United States and Mexico, which he accused of sending drugs and rapists into the U.S.

That wall has not yet materialized Congress has so far refused to go along with funding for it but the U.S. Supreme Courtrecently upheld portions of President Trumps travel ban, criticized by some as a discriminatory ban on Muslims.

And last week, the president and a pair of Republican members of the U.S. Senatetouted a plan to dramatically alter the immigration system by slashing the number of legal immigrants allowed to enter the country over the next decade.

Trumps tough talk, the travel ban and recent legislation aimed at punishing cities that provide sanctuary to illegal or undocumented residents has, again, focused attention on an issue that has been held up as an example of American laxity, hypocrisy, cruelty and racism.

Immigration attorneys and foreign-born residents alike say anew, chilling climate has taken hold, one that raises thespectre of deportation for those in the country illegallyeven if they have not committed other crimes since their arrival.

Liberals talk of a system in need of a pathway to citizenship so undocumented residents no longer live in fear. Conservatives talk of one begging for enforcement at the nations southern border and within the country itself, where they say illegal immigrants commit crimes and depress the wages of American workers.

And yet for all of the talk, no sweeping action seems to be in the offing.

Reform efforts by successive presidents, George W. Bush and then Barack Obama, crashed and burned, and Trumps plans have been met by immediate opposition.

Meanwhile, in Palm Beach County and elsewhere, the issue continues to fester, generating fear among those worried they might be deported, concern among farmers who dont have enough workers for their fields and anger among those who see illegal immigration as a threat to the nations economy and safety.

Over the next several months, The Palm Beach Post will explore various aspects of the issue, attempting to bring clarity to a topic that has remained maddeningly muddy.

There are no firm figures on precisely how many undocumented people live in Palm Beach County.

Using U.S. Census data from 2014, the Pew Research Center estimated in February that 450,000 undocumented people live in the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach area.

Two of Palm Beach Countys signature industries tourism and agriculture rely heavily on foreign-born workers.

Even as Trump castigates undocumented residents and calls for a reduction of legal immigration, his businesses in Palm Beach County make extensive use of foreign-born workers.

The Trump Organization has asked the federal government for dozens of special visas for people who would serve as waiters, waitresses, cooks and maids at Mar-a-Lago on Palm Beach and Trump National Golf Club in Jupiter.

Every year, Trump hires dozens of foreign workers through the U.S. Department of Labors H-2B visa program, which is similar to the H-2A program farmers use to staff their operations.

Foreign-born workers definitely play a role in the make-up of the hospitality workforce here, said David Semadeni, secretary of the Palm Beach County Hotel and Lodging Association. Exactly how much is difficult to say without doing an in-depth survey and I have not been able to do this.

For farmers, the visa program is critical and, they say, utterly insufficient.

There are several problems with the program, said Lisa Lochridge, public affairs director for the Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association.

Its very expensive, Lochridge said. Its incredibly cumbersome, and its not reliable.

Jimmy Chavez helps his mother, Maty Carrillo, work on some tax forms after school in their family owned Tikal Tires shop in Jupiter on July 11, 2017. Jimmy, 13, was born in the United States, but both of his parents came to the United States illegally and have been alerted during the Trump administration that they may be deported. (Richard Graulich / The Palm Beach Post) Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Farmers have to estimate how many workers they will need months before knowing anything about their harvest, Lochridge said. And foreign-born workers often arent processed on a timeline that matches up with when farmers need them.

Flawed as it is, the program is still important, Lochridge said.

More and more growers are using it because its all we have, she said. They realize its one of the only tools in their toolbox

Jobs offered through the H-2A program must first be made available to American workers. Lochridge said Americans arent lining up for jobs that are temporary and physically demanding.

With the limitations of the H-2A program, farmers turn to another important labor supply illegal or undocumented workers.

The reality is that agriculture still relies on foreign-born workers who may not be documented, Lochridge said. The stark reality is that these are jobs American workers will not do.

That doesnt have to be true, said Ira Mehlman, media director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that supports better border management and lower overall levels of immigration.

Businesses want to hire undocumented workers so it can pay them less, Mehlman argued.

Hiring illegal workers is basically a subsidy for these employers, he said, and the rest of us are paying in other areas.

Those other areas include depressed wages and more demands on schools and law enforcement, Mehlman said.

Youre not really getting anything cheaply, he said. Youre just padding the profit margins of these employers.

Several studies, however, indicate that undocumented workers are a net positive to the U.S. economy.

A study released in February by Florida International Universitys Center for Labor Research and Studies found that undocumented immigrants contribute $437.4 million to the economy of the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach metro area.

The precise impact of illegal or undocumented immigrants on education and law enforcement in Palm Beach County is difficult to discern.

Federal law prohibits the School District of Palm Beach County from asking students if they are here illegally. Aimed at protecting student privacy and preventing discrimination, the policy also makes it impossible to know how many students are not legal residents.

The district can and does track how many students speak English as a second language.

There were 17,196 English language learners in the district during the 2011-12 school year, the district reported. That figure dropped to 16,749 the next school year and stood at 16,895 in 2013-14.

The next three school years saw major upticks to 21,180 students in 2014-2015, 22,441 in 2015-16 and 24,639 in 2016-17, the district reported.

Not all English language learners are in the country illegally, of course. Many are the children of foreign-born residents who are in the country legally and have moved to the county from some other location.

More than 322,000 of Palm Beach Countys 1.4 million residents are foreign-born, according to estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau.

As the immigration debate rages, high-profile crimes by undocumented residents have intensified calls for their deportation.

That was the case in May when Boynton Beach police say a truck driven by a 48-year old Mexican citizen, Victor Villanueva Rivera, hit and killed Brandon Wesson of Palm Beach Gardens as Villanueva was turning from Hypoluxo Road north onto Lawrence Road.

Wesson, 21, was thrown from the motorcycle he was riding and was dead by the time Boynton Beach Fire Rescue crews arrived.

Police said Villanueva, fearful of being caught driving without a license, kept going after he struck Wesson, dragging Wessons motorcycle behind his truck about 1,400 feet.

This only proves Trumps point why we need the wall! one Palm Beach Post reader wrote on Facebook.

There is no tally for how many crimes in Palm Beach County are committed by undocumented immigrants.

Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office Spokeswoman Teri Barbera said PBSO does not track crimes by illegal immigrants and therefore cant give a factual response about whether criminal activity by undocumented residents is a significant problem here.

PBSO detained 658 people in 2012 and 669 in 2013. In July of 2014, PBSO changed its policy, requiring a federal judge to sign off on the holds, which fell to 438 in 2014 and down to 168 in 2015 and 166 in 2016.

So far in 2017, the number of people detained for ICE stands at 258.

In July 2016, when he accepted the Republican Partys nomination for president, Trump said that nearly 180,000 illegal immigrants with criminal records, ordered deported from our country, are tonight roaming free to threaten peaceful citizens.

Several studies, however, have shown that foreign-born residents those here legally and illegally are less likely than native-born Americans to commit crimes.

With few exceptions, immigrants are less crime prone than natives or have no effect on crime rates, Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration policy analyst, wrote in 2015 for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.

Immigrant advocates say undocumented residents, fearing deportation, are reluctant to report when they are victims of crimes.

Maty Carrillo works on a mounting machine in her family owned Tikal Tires shop in Jupiter on July 11, 2017. She and her husband, Victor Chavez, face immigrated to the United States illegally and during the Trump administration have been told they face possible deportation from the country. (Richard Graulich / The Palm Beach Post) Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

That was the experience ofMaty Carrillo, a Guatemalan citizen who owns a tire sales and auto repair shop in Jupiter with her husband, Victor Chavez.

Carrillo said a man attempted to sexually assault her not long after she entered the U.S. illegally. She said she did not report the man because she feared deportation.

After attempting to get a work permit extended in March, Carrillo and her husband now both face deportation, part of more aggressive removal push launched since Trump became president.

Its a totally different culture with this administration, said William Cavanaugh, an immigration attorney in West Palm Beach. Its very enforcement-oriented.

The Obama administration focused its deportation efforts on undocumented residents who committed felonies after entering the country. The Trump administration has moved away from that focus, seeking instead to remove undocumented residents even if they have no criminal history beyond entering the country illegally.

There are no changes in the law, Cavanaugh said. Its just the application of it, a shift in priorities.

FIRST IN A SERIES

This is the first installment of The Palm Beach Posts continuing coverage of immigration in Palm Beach County.

ILLEGAL OR UNDOCUMENTED?

Whats in a name?

When it comes to the immigration debate, quite a lot.

The terminology one chooses to use in describing people who have entered the country illegally or remained in it without proper documentation says a lot about where one comes down on things like border enforcement, deportations and a pathway to citizenship.

In general, those who favor more aggressive border enforcement, stepped up deportations and no pathway to citizenship (or a very costly, time-consuming one) tend to use the terms illegal immigrant or illegal alien.

Ira Mehlman, media director for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, explains why here:

Illegal alien is a legal term. It doesnt mean you came from Mars. Illegal alien is the proper legal term. The advocates for illegal aliens have come up with all kinds of euphemisms to make whats been done sound kind of innocuous undocumented immigrant, undocumented worker. Those who are not in the country legally are illegal aliens.

As Mehlman noted, those who back limited, prioritized deportations and an easier pathway to citizenship tend to use the terms undocumented immigrant, undocumented worker or undocumented resident.

Afifa Khaliq, a Palm Beach County immigration activist, explains why here:

The logic behind that is if you get a speeding ticket or commit any other offense you are still a legal human. When we use the term illegal we are effectively saying that the persons very existence as a human is unlawful. Illegal Immigrant was the term first used in 1939 by the British towards the Jews fleeing Nazis and entering Palestine without authorization. We the activists believe that no human being is illegal. The unauthorized residents just by overstaying or lack of documentation do not commit a criminal offense. They are subjected to deportation because of civil administrative procedure, not because they have broken a law. The Supreme Court has also noted where Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, said that, As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain present in the United States. Justice Kennedy also noted that the removal of a person is a civil matter. So the activist community uses the word Undocumented Immigrants instead of the term illegal.

In this story and the ones that will follow, The Palm Beach Post will use terms such as illegal immigrant and undocumented immigrant or unauthorized worker interchangeably where appropriate. The Post will not use the term illegal aliens because while it may be a technical term used in legal documents, it is not common American parlance. The terminology used by The Post is not meant to convey support for one set of policies or another.

Read the original:
Immigration in the age of Trump: What it means for Palm Beach County - Palm Beach Post

USA Today NetworkDan Nowicki, The Arizona Republic Published 9:08 p.m. ET Aug. 3, 2017 | Updated 12:54 a.m. ET Aug. 4, 2017

Sen. John McCain talks about the need for immigrants with all skill levels and how the issue should be handled as part of an overall package, during an interview with The Arizona Republic on Aug. 3, 2017. Thomas Hawthorne/azcentral.com

Sen. John McCain speaks with reporter Dan Nowicki at The Arizona Republic in downtown Phoenix, Aug. 3, 2017.(Photo: Tom Tingle/The Republic)

PHOENIX A week after his dramatic call for bipartisanship on Capitol Hill, Sen. John McCain says he wants to revive a long-standing attempt to reform the nations immigration system when he returns to Washington.

Before leaving Washington for treatment for brain cancer, McCain, R-Ariz., said he broached the idea with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The two collaborated on unsuccessful immigration legislation in 2013 as part of the bipartisan effort known as the "Gang of Eight."

President Trump's goal of building a U.S.-Mexico border wall might provide an opening for a bigger bargain on the issue, McCain said.

"Immigration reform is one of the issues I'd like to see resolved," McCain told The Arizona Republicin a Thursday interview. "I've got to talk to him (Schumer) about when would be the best time. I think there are all kinds of deals to be made out there. I really do."

His goal remains a long shot in the Trump era, with Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., running the Senate and House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., leading the House of Representatives.

Even at times when the White House was friendly to the idea, success on the issue has proved elusive for McCain, who has worked on comprehensive immigration reform bills for more than 10 years. But while former presidentsGeorge W. Bush and Barack Obama wanted immigration reform, Trump has appeared hostile to any approach that would balance border-security investments with a pathway for citizenship for immigrants without legal status who have settled in the United States.

More: President Trump's strong-arm tactics backfire in Senate, experts say

More: Senate narrowly defeats 'skinny repeal' of Obamacare, as McCain votes 'no'

McCain's remarks came a day after Trump backed a Senate bill from Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and David Perdue, R-Ga., that proposes sharp cuts to legal immigration.

But the six-term McCain, who turns 81 on Aug. 29, also is in a more reflective place in his long Senate career as he faces a serious health challenge and undergoes chemotherapy for brain cancer.

"We'll know in a few weeks," McCain said of the cancer on Thursday in a meeting with Arizona Republic editors and reporters. "I hate the use the word 'beat it,' because it's not a matter of beating. You either get cured or you don't get cured."

The nation's eyes were on McCain in the early hours of July28when he gave a decisive thumb's down to the Senate Republican "skinny repeal" health-care legislation, which had the effect of derailing the current GOP push to undo the Affordable Care Act, one of Obama's signature accomplishments.

Earlier in the week, McCain who returned to Washington after a surprise July 14 craniotomy to remove a blood clot that revealed the cancer entranced his colleagues with a memorable July 25 floor speech in which he decried the Senate's current state of partisan dysfunction and urged a return to bipartisan camaraderie and compromise.

McCain said he was "shocked" the rest of the Senate stuck around to hear him speak.

"I think they stayed to listen, not so much because of my vote, because of what I was trying to say," McCain said. "They're not happy with this polarization. They're not happy with this not getting anything done. That's not why they come to the Senate."

In the meeting with the newspaper's editorial board, McCain said Schumer is in agreement about the need to return to immigration reform.

"Basically it's what we passed last time, brought up to date with the new challenges, like opioids," McCain said. "It's still there. We got 68 votes, I think, the last time. I don't think that's going to be any different next time."

It's conceivable that a group of bipartisan-minded Republicans in the Senate can make common cause with bipartisan-minded Democrats.

One longtime champion of comprehensive immigration reform applauded McCain's return to the fray, despite the long odds.

"It's difficult to imagine Trump signing a comprehensive immigration reform bill because he's so focused on stoking his base," said Frank Sharry, the executive director of the liberal-leaning national pro-reform organization America's Voice.

"But you can see how more and more people are moving away from Trump as his poll ratings sink, as his lying becomes endemic, and his temperament is so obviously juvenile," he said. "It's conceivable that a group of bipartisan-minded Republicans in the Senate can make common cause with bipartisan-minded Democrats."

McCain would be the natural leader of such a movement, Sharry said.

In 2013, McCain and Schumer led the bipartisan Gang of Eight, which also consisted of Republican Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Marco Rubio of Florida, and Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Michael Bennet of Colorado and Robert Menendez of New Jersey.

Their legislation aimed to balance border security with a pathway to citizenship and a modernized visa system.

In his new book, Conscience of a Conservative: A Rejection of Destructive Politics and a Return to Principle, Flake positively recounted his role in the immigration deliberations, which resulted in a bill that passed the Senate but went nowhere in the Republican-controlled House.

More: Trump backs GOP senators' plan to crack down on legal immigration

More: Full text of John McCain's Senate floor speech: 'Lets return to regular order'

"The Gang of Eight four Republicans, four Democrats proved that the process as designed can actually work," Flake wrote in the book.

For his part, McCain said he realizes it won't be easy, and doesn't know if he could ever persuade to Trump and McConnell to go along.

"I don't know, but what I do know is that if we could pass it through the House and Senate the way we passed it through the Senate last time, it's like this Russia (sanctions) bill, it doesn't matter," McCain said. "Do you think he signed it because he liked it?"

Concerns about border wall and merit-based immigration

In conversations with The Republic, McCain was skeptical that the Senate would support a wall as envisioned by Trump, or its price tag. He emphasized, as others have, that certain stretches of the border don't need a wall because of natural barriers.

"I'm not against a border wall, OK, but go to China and you'll see a border wall there," McCain said. "We need technology, we need drones, we need surveillance capabilities and we need rapid-reaction capabilities. But to think that a wall is going to stop illegal immigration or drugs is crazy."

McCain said he supports merit-based immigration but worries about how farm labor, such as the workers who pick lettuce in Yuma, and other low-skilled workers would fare under the Cotton-Perdue bill that Trump is backing.

"I think you have to consider that we do want high-tech people, but we also need low-skilled people who will do work that Americans won't do," McCain said. "I wouldn't do it. Even in my misspent youth, I wouldn't do it."

Follow Dan Nowickion Twitter: @dannowicki

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2vxZdPh

Excerpt from:
McCain aims to revive immigration reform when he returns to Congress - USA TODAY

The liberal elite such as those at CNN quote Emma Lazarus poem as if its one of our nations founding documents.

Its a poem.

Wouldnt it be marvelous if they were as passionate about our actual founding documents? They like to shrug that the Constitution is a quasi-relevant living document whose words can be bent to whatever shape the current generation likes. Oddly, they never say that about Lazarus prose.

Instead, in almost partisan pushback Wednesday against a proposed immigration policy that simply puts American interests forward, CNNs Jim Acosta accosted Trump administration aide Stephen Miller about how the policy would somehow violate Lazarus um, poem The New Colossus inscribed on the Statue of Liberty.

Make no mistake, the sonnets flowing notions are a lovely sentiment and ideal one that this page ascribes to and which, truth be known, America has lived up to to a fault. Miller notes that the foreign-born population coming into the U.S. has quadrupled since 1970.

We have led the league in immigration, and certainly in the illegal kind, and have strained our ability to absorb it all, particularly since so many immigrants have been low-skilled, low-income workers who have depressed wages and have been prime candidates for government aid. And in the age of terror, we have done so at great risk to our own safety.

Its a wonder there arent cracks on Lady Libertys shoulders.

Acostas diatribe argumentative, interruping and sanctimonious, rather than merely inquisitive objected to reducing immigration, though he offered no specific target number that would please him or the Statue of Liberty. And he seemed to imply that requiring English proficiency is somehow mean, when in reality its the furthest thing from compassion to encourage immigrants not to learn the dominant language in their new country. Its also required for citizenship.

Yet bizarrely, Acosta appeared to equate the English language with a race that we are now only going to allow in people from England and Australia and engineer a racial and ethnic flow of people into this country.

What world-class ignorance. People all over the world speak English; it is the unofficial language of world commerce. Nearly 60 countries in the world have enshrined English as their official language (though, interestingly, we have not). But its racist to expect new Americans to speak it? Good grief.

This is the uphill battle our leaders must fight against the political correctness cops in the media. But most Americans have to be thankful theyre fighting it: 72 percent favor tight restrictions on immigration. Heaven forbid we institute an American policy that actually benefits America.

Were proud that Georgia Sen. David Perdue is in the forefront of this, along with Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, helping lead the charge for an orderly, thoughtful, merit-based legal immigration system that actually takes Americas best interests into consideration: The Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy (RAISE) Act would take into account what skills America needs and what skills, including language, prospective immigrants would bring with them.

This isnt the end of the world. It isnt overturning Lazarus. As Perdue notes, currently only 1 out of 15 immigrants come here with a marketable skill.

All were asking is to tip the scales a little back toward Americas interests.

Its long overdue.

Visit link:
Now, this is immigration reform - The Augusta Chronicle