Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

Ninth Circuit Affirms That Temporary Protected Status is Temporary and Subject to the Unreviewable Discretion of DHS, Says FAIR – PRNewswire

WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The following statement was issued by Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), regarding today's ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clearing the way for ending Temporary Protected Status for citizens from four nations:

"Today's ruling by the activist Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upholding the Trump administration's decision to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for individuals from four nations represents a victory for the American people and an unmistakable rebuke to activist judges who seek to make immigration policy from the bench.

"The Ninth Circuit affirmed two clear aspects of TPS. The first is that the T in TPS stands for temporary and that it is not intended, nor should it be, a backdoor to permanent residency. The second is that the Department of Homeland Security, in conjunction with other relevant federal agencies, has clear and unreviewable discretion to determine when conditions allow citizens of countries covered by TPS to return home safely. In the case of citizens of El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua and Sudan, the crises that triggered the TPS designation have long since passed.

"The fact that the legal and justifiable termination of TPS has been delayed for this long is further evidence that pernicious judicial activism must be reined in.

"Finally, and perhaps most important, is that this ruling represents a win for the idea that the American people should be able to provide needed and appropriate temporary humanitarian relief, with the full expectation that their generosity will not be taken advantage of when the emergency is over."

Contact: Matthew Tragesser, 202-328-7004 or [emailprotected]

ABOUT FAIR

Founded in 1979, FAIR is the country's largest immigration reform group. With over 2 million members and supporters nationwide, FAIR fights for immigration policies that serve national interests, not special interests. FAIR believes that immigration reform must enhance national security, improve the economy, protect jobs, preserve our environment, and establish a rule of law that is recognized and enforced.

SOURCE Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR)

https://www.fairus.org

Go here to see the original:
Ninth Circuit Affirms That Temporary Protected Status is Temporary and Subject to the Unreviewable Discretion of DHS, Says FAIR - PRNewswire

State Rep. Jon Hoadley among a trio challenging Congressman Fred Upton for the 6th District seat – MLive.com

KALAMAZOO, MI -- State Rep. Jon Hoadley, D-Kalamazoo, is considered the front-runner among those seeking to unseat U.S. Rep. Fred Upton, R-St. Joseph, to represent Michigans 6th Congressional District.

The district has long been a Republican stronghold. Upton is seeking his 18th consecutive term in the November general election.

In addition to the Democratic Party, the other challengers appearing on the Nov. 3 ballot are members of the Libertarian and Green parties.

Libertarian Jeff Depoy, 35, is a machinist and veteran from Berrien Center. For more about his experience and campaign, visit facebook.com/jefffor6th

Green Party candidate John Lawrence, 31, is a medical dispatcher and logistics and courier transporter from Kalamazoo. For more about his experience and campaign, visit facebook.com/RapsRantsRamblings

Upton, 67, was first elected in 1986. In the August primary he secured 62.66% of the votes to defeat GOP challenger Elena Oelke.

The 6th Congressional District covers much of Southwest Michigan, including the counties of Kalamazoo, Van Buren, Cass, St. Joseph, Berrien and Allegan.

There is unfinished business we have to complete - Cures 2.0, fighting the opioid epidemic, immigration reform, and protecting the Great Lakes, among others, Upton wrote on Facebook in February when he announced he was seeking another term.

According to his campaign website, Uptons focus remains on passing important legislation to encourage job creation, protect taxpayers, help our community and enhance the quality of life for everyone in Southwest Michigan and throughout our country.

Prior to Congress, Upton worked for President Ronald Reagan in the Office of Management and Budget. For more information about the campaign and his background visit fredupton.com.

Hoadley, 37, is completing his third and final two-year term in the Michigan House of Representatives representing District 60, which encompasses the entire city of Kalamazoo and the majority of Kalamazoo Township. He was first elected in 2014.

His home turf of Kalamazoo County carried Hoadley across the finish line in the August Democratic primary. He claimed 61% of the Kalamazoo County vote and 52.24% of the overall vote.

I was really humbled that they would be willing to continue to support me on this next step that we could serve in Congress, Hoadley said after the primary. I think that as we look at the results all across the district it is clear people are ready for change.

MLive Media Group partnered with the League of Women Voters of Michigan to provide candidate information for readers. Each candidate was asked to outline their stances on a variety of public policy issues listed below.

Information on all state and federal races and many of Michigans county and local races is available at Vote411.org, an online voter guide created by the League of Women Voters.

HEALTH CARE: What do you see as the federal governments role in health care? Given the Covid19 pandemic, what are your concerns and plans regarding U.S. health coverage, policies and programs, including Medicare and Medicaid?

UPTON: Americans deserve access to high-quality, affordable health care. In 2016, we passed the 21st Century Cures Act to expedite the discovery and development of life-saving cures. Now Im working on Cures 2 to modernize how we treat diseases and deliver more cures. Regarding reform efforts, we need to lower costs and expand access. One recent success was Michigans expansion of Medicaid. In Congress, I fought to support states that expanded Medicaid eligibility. We also need to protect those with pre-existing conditions, let folks buy plans across state lines, and support telehealth services and community health centers.

HOADLEY: Our healthcare system is broken, and its going to take a lot to fix it. I want to make sure every Michigander has access to high-quality affordable health care, regardless of where they live or what their personal financial situation is. While we work through important questions and details on any specific plan, its clear that moving to a system where every American is covered will continue to bring the cost of healthcare down while helping more people live healthier lives. We need to ensure everyone can get access to the care they need, and lower prescription drug costs.

DEPOY: The Government has no business being involved with healthcare. We need to turn 180 and remove the federal government from any decisions that are rightfully only made between you and your doctor.

LAWRENCE: Medicare and Medicaid should be expanded immediately. Its unfathomable that neither the Democratic or Republican parties will pledge to support a Medicare for All system, in the middle of one of the worst pandemics in the history of the modern world. A public option is better than nothing, but the time for this was 12 years ago during Obamas first term. We are now in a crisis. Dont believe the mainsteam media; Medicare for All would actually SAVE the taxpayers $BILLIONS over the long-term. It is the fiscally conservative approach that actually works, and we should enact it immediately, before more people die

ECONOMY: What federal policies do you support for a healthy economy and to help the broader American public improve their economic positions?

UPTON: Last year we had one of the strongest economies in history. We can get there again by working on solutions that once again put us toward strong economic growth. During COVID, we worked to secure billions for small businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program. This bipartisan program helped protect more than 1.5 million Michigan jobs. Ive also introduced a bipartisan bill to expand broadband service in rural counties like here in SW Michigan. We need to ensure more Americans have access to reliable internet service. Its imperative both parties come together to work and focus on job creation and economic growth.

HOADLEY: As our economy becomes more unpredictable, financial security and stability is out of reach for Michiganders from all walks of life. The middle class of yesterday feels like it has been replaced with side hustles, benefit cuts, and outsourcing. In order to truly reinvigorate the middle-class jobs, we must work to find new solutions to the questions of the twenty-first century. We must create an American economy that invests in American workers through a living wage, new training programs, and reinvigorated unions. America has tried tax cuts and special giveaways to the biggest corporations, and they havent worked.

DEPOY: I support ending federal income taxes on the American people. This in turn will immediately give every family a 12.5-25% raise on day one. You work hard for your money, keep all of it! With this additional disposable income, robust economic growth is sure to occur.

LAWRENCE: First of all, we have to accept as a society that the glory days of American economic exploitation of the world are not coming back. China is the worlds new economic powerhouse, and it will remain that way for the near future. I fully support an expanded jobs program to train Americans and get them to work, but this alone is not enough. We need to look at systems of universal basic income, as well as the restructuring of our economic system to decentralize the power of mega-corporations in our society. We need renewed investment in local shops, farms, family businesses to give our future a fighting chance.

ELECTIONS: What federal policies do you advocate regarding elections, campaign funding and voting rights? Do you support mailing ballots to all eligible voters?

UPTON: Ive supported many commonsense, bipartisan campaign finance and voter access reforms. I supported the Motor Voter law so folks could register to vote when they go to the DMV, the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform, and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. I also support Michigans No-Reason Absentee Ballot System. I support the Voting Rights Act and oppose all forms of voter discrimination. I have always been a vigorous defender of everyones right to vote. With the COVID-19 crisis, we must ensure folks can vote safely, which is why I voted for more resources for the USPS.

HOADLEY: Big money in our politics is standing in the way of progress being made on the issues that matter most to Michigans working families. Whether its skyrocketing prescription drug costs, addressing the impacts of climate change, or investing in our nations crumbling infrastructure, our country is facing massive threats to our economic security and the future of our families. Instead of producing results, the politics and partisanship of Washington are making matters worse. We need to get big money out of politics, end the legislator-to-lobbyist pipeline, end partisan gerrymandering, & protect everyones right to vote.

DEPOY: Every citizen has the right to vote, every citizen has the right to an absentee ballot if they request one. I do not support mailing unrequested ballots.

LAWRENCE: Theres absolutely no reason why we cant mail ballots to every registered voter. And while were at it, every American citizen should be automatically registered to vote at the age of 18, end of story. If the Republicans care so much about encouraging Americans to vote in person, then why dont they support a Federal holiday for election day? I support this. In terms of campaign funding, Citizens United really screwed the American people, but times were bad even before this decision. Corporations shouldnt be allowed to fund political candidates. Its that simple. And it shouldnt take $MILLIONS to run a campaign.

SOCIAL INJUSTICE: Do you believe there is systemic racism, economic disparity, and other social injustices which should be addressed by Congress? If so, what policies do you support?

UPTON: Protests have demanded not to just dismiss racism but dismantle it. Systemic racism is too real for people of color in nearly every facet of society. Ive marched in protests and I certainly believe Black lives matter. I cosponsored the JUSTICE Act and voted to advance the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act. Im working with my Problem Solvers Caucus colleagues on a bipartisan police reform bill. Defunding the police isnt the right answer. Law enforcement needs resources for better pay, training, and body cameras. We need to enhance community services like mental health, youth development, housing, and education.

HOADLEY: All people should have the guarantee of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Its past time to expand our nondiscrimination laws to ensure regardless of someones religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, height, weight, familial status, or marital status, everyone has the same opportunity to work hard and succeed. We need to make sure were looking at the ways people have access to justice. We need to fight for a free and open internet. We need to resist new forms of censorship and protect our rights as technology advances.

DEPOY: No, I believe that social injustice is an invention of the main stream media, in an attempt to sow division, and increase their profits at the expense of we the people. Americans by and large, are kind people. Turn off the tv and talk to your neighbor.

LAWRENCE: Clearly there are major economic and systematic injustices in this country, those arguing otherwise are burying their heads in the sand. Black and brown communities have suffered the worst from this, but in 2020 were all starting to feel the effects. Raising the minimum wage will help, but what we really need to do is tax the billionaire class and the speculators on Wall St. Cultural racism is real, but economic inequality is the fuel which feeds it. Black and brown communities lack the wealth they need to effectively fight the ruling establishment. Multi-generational poverty must end if our society is to prosper.

ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY: What policies do you support to meet U.S. energy needs while protecting our water, air and land for current and future generations?

UPTON: Ive always deeply appreciated our natural resources. I strongly supported the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and led the charge against storing nuclear waste near the Great Lakes. I helped pass the Great American Outdoors Act, a conservation bill that will protect and preserve national parks. I was one of the first members of the Climate Caucus and opposed our withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord. I believe in an all of the above energy plan that focuses on emerging clean energy tech like renewables as well as traditional energy solutions that keep costs low, energy affordable, and our environment clean.

HOADLEY: Climate change is already resulting in intense and unpredictable natural disasters, changes in the health of our food crops, drought and water problems, and more. We must take urgent and bold action to address the climate crisis and invest in sustainable infrastructure to meet the energy demands of the 21st century. We need to pass a Green New Deal, invest in renewable energy and transition our nation off fossil fuels, and ensure clean water for everyone.

DEPOY: Nuclear, nuclear, nuclear. Safe, zero emissions, cost effective.

LAWRENCE: The fact that Republicans (and Democrats, for that matter) are fighting to protect the fossil fuel industry is not only abhorrent, but also incredibly stupid. Even within the free market, solar and wind is making coal and natural-gas obsolete at an expedient rate. Why are we subsidizing fossil fuel industries with no long-term future? Wind and solar expansion is vital to our national security interests. The sooner we become long-term self-reliant the sooner we dont have to rely on China or the Middle East for our energy needs. And yeah, clean water, land, and air -- how is that not vital to our national security?

IMMIGRATION: What policies do you support relative to immigration into the U.S.?

UPTON: Its beyond time to fix our immigration system. Im a strong supporter of legal immigration. I support Congressional action to help Dreamers. The number one issue for SW MI farmers is immigration reform. We need a reliable workforce for all farms. Thats why in 2019 we passed the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, which provides ag workers an opportunity to earn legal status through continued ag employment, improve the H-2A visa program, and establish a mandatory E-Verify for the ag industry. Ive been a supporter of border security funding and supported efforts to fight smuggling and human trafficking on our borders.

HOADLEY: It is past time to fix a broken immigration system. We need comprehensive immigration reform. DACA and other enforcement reprioritization efforts have provided a much-needed safety net for children and young adults who were brought to the United States through no choice of their own. We must protect DREAMERs and grant them a pathway to citizenship. We can end warrantless ICE holds, stop separating families, and build strong communities.

DEPOY: We must grant permanent legal status to the DACA recipients immediately, and provide a possible path to citizenship for them. Then we dismantle the welfare state that makes illegal immigration so attractive, and begin an increase of merit based immigration.

LAWRENCE: The entire immigration discussion in the US is out of hand. Keeping people in cages and separating children from families is horrid and shameful. But beyond that, why is our discussion so focused on citizenship to begin with? Most refugees arent interested in citizenship (in the short term), they merely want legal protection to allow them to live and work within the US. This is the strategy I support. Fund the ability to process people across the border expediently, and give them legal status to live and work without fear of deportation. Take them out of the shadows. Then we can discuss eventual future citizenship.

Click here for more of MLives Election Day coverage from across the state, or here for full coverage of Kalamazoo-area elections.

More on MLive:

Democrats will need another blue wave to unseat Fred Upton, political expert says

Donald Trump offers total and complete endorsement of John James in Michigan

Joe Biden meets with Detroit-area steelworkers during campaign swing through Michigan

Continue reading here:
State Rep. Jon Hoadley among a trio challenging Congressman Fred Upton for the 6th District seat - MLive.com

Trump cultists ignore the facts – Bucks County Courier Times

By Ken Vegotsky| Bucks County Courier Times

Trumpcultists ignore the facts

Donald Trumps supportershave witnessed what all Americans have witnessed: Trump is an amoral, corrupt egomaniac.

He has torn apart our democracy, bankrupted our trust in national institutions, savaged principled people, sank our global alliances, kowtowed to dictators, stoked hatred, division, bigotry, resentment, jealousy and fears among our citizens.

He has committed treason, in my view, as evidenced by his attempt to extort Ukraine to announce a phony investigation of Joe Biden while withholding vital military aid against Russian invaders.

The president was impeached for this. In addition, Trump failed to punish Russias Putin after an intelligence report that determined he was paying the Taliban bounties to kill American troops.

How can Trumps supporters ignore the most egregious recent facts: In his own words, Trump downplayed the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic despite agreeing with experts that the virus was highly contagious and deadly. In his own words, he allegedly called U.S soldiers killed, maimed and injured, suckers and losers.

He hasdefamed women, minorities, allies, religions, and a war hero, the late Sen. John McCain. Trumps most immoral act is separating children from their immigrant parents and locking them in cages.

Trump and his cultists fail to see that the "Black Lives Matter" movement is part of the 155-year history of the advance of liberty.

It's freeing the slaves; giving women the vote; the labor movement; Social Security and Medicare; the civil rights movement; environmental protections; consumer protection; car safety; financial and banking safeguards; affordable health care for all; immigration reform;marriage equality; voting rights; womens reproductive rights.

Ken Vegotsky

Morrisville

Originally posted here:
Trump cultists ignore the facts - Bucks County Courier Times

Biden promises to overturn Trump’s sweeping immigration policies – NYCaribNews

Is it realistic for Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden to promise to dismantle the changes President Trump has made to the American immigration system if he wins the White House in November?

It may be, and Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLUs Immigrants Rights Project thinks it should be done.

According to the Migration Policy Institute, the Trump administration has undertaken more than 400 executive actions on immigration. They include:

Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute says, I dont think its realistic that Biden in four years could unroll everything that Trump did. Because of the intense volume and pace of changes the Trump administration enacted while in office, even if we have a new administration, Trump will continue to have had an impact on immigration for years to come.

Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLUs Immigrants Rights Project says, What the administration has sought to do is to simply turn off immigration and to do it unilaterally by presidential edict, without the approval of Congress or the consent of the American people. That project should be reversed.

Thats exactly what Biden pledges to do.His position paper on immigration 22 pages long seeks to roll back Trumps accomplishments and reenact Obama-era policies.

Biden pledges, If Im elected president, were going to immediately end Trumps assault on the dignity of immigrant communities. Were going to restore our moral standing in the world and our historic role as a safe haven for refugees and asylum-seekers.

The former vice president has an exhaustive to-do list. Within his first 100 days, Biden says he would implement a wide range of policies:

However, if Biden is elected, he would face a host of obstacles that could slow his immigration counter-revolution.

1. Theres the specter of renewed chaos at the Southern border. Last year, groups as large as 1,000 Central Americans at a time waded across the Rio Grande into El Paso, Texas, to request asylum. The Border Patrol was overwhelmed and ended up detaining families in primitive, unsanitary conditions. Immigration hawks are wary that Biden would throw open the gates again.

Federal border officials are worried about what would happen if Biden cancels bilateral agreements with Mexico that have dramatically slowed the migrant flow.

Ron Vitiello, former deputy commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection says, If Mexico right now decided they werent going to continue to help us, people would start coming through like we saw in the caravans two springs ago. Theres no reason that it wouldnt come back as bad as it was.

Some 700 migrants languish in filthy tents pitched in a public park amid mud, rats, and clouds of mosquitoes. The encampment is in Matamoros, just across the Rio Grande from Brownsville, Texas. Theyre seeking asylum in the U.S. but are stuck there under a Trump initiative known as Remain in Mexico.

Theres no doubt about it, this is a monumental challenge, says Heidi Altman, director of policy for the National Immigrant Justice Center. That means a complete and utter reorientation of the culture of the agencies that administer immigration law and policy in the United States.

But thats a tall order and another obstacle Biden would face.

2. Immigration agents have enjoyed extraordinary support from the White House over the past 45 months. The Trump administration has bragged about unshackling them to let them do their jobs more aggressively.

Angela Kelley, senior adviser to the American Immigration Lawyers Association stresses, That isnt something thats a light switch. You cant change the culture within an organization that vast overnight. So I agree that its going to be a long, long road.

A Biden presidency also would likely find itself skirmishing with conservative lawyers the way the Trump administration has been tied up in federal courts fighting immigrant advocates.

3. Groups will sue. The simple fact is if Biden is elected and his administration starts rescinding executive actions that Trump had firm legal authority to do, groups will sue. R.J. Hauman, head of government relations at the Federation for American Immigration Reform confirmed this. It was something they did under Obama.

4. The pandemic.Biden has not said if he would reverse that order to reopen the borders and jump-start the asylum process, which has been suspended. According to an NPR/Ipsos poll the majority of Americans support Trumps decision to shut the nations borders to all types of immigrants to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

Go here to see the original:
Biden promises to overturn Trump's sweeping immigration policies - NYCaribNews

Labor takes baby steps toward immigration reform – MacroBusiness

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, there was a strong case to cut immigration, which had run at turbo-charged levels for 15 years:

First, Australian real wage growth had remained stillborn for nearly 10 years:

Australias labour underutilisation rate had been stuck at stubbornly high levels:

Whereas average monthly hours worked had collapsed to record lows:

All three indicators pointed to an Australian labour market that has been chronically oversupplied, driven by the tidal wave of migrants, both temporary and permanent.

When combined with the negative impacts on housing affordability, congestion and overall amenity in our major cities, it is clear that Australias mass immigration experiment has unambiguously reduced living standards for the typical Australian household.

The situation is obviously far more fragile now with the economy devastated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Real unemployment has risen to levels not seen since the 1930s Great Depression and Australian households are facing heavy income losses once emergency income support is wound back.

Thus, the absolute last thing Australian workers need is to be competing for scarce jobs with hundreds of thousands of migrant workers arriving every year.

Yesterday, Labors opposition leader, Anthony Albanese, flagged a new immigration platform aimed at protecting Australian workers:

The draft platform says Labor would favour permanent migration over temporary migration.

Labor will restore public confidence in Australias temporary migration program and ensure that temporary migration does not adversely affect the employment and training opportunities for Australians, particularly young people who suffer from higher rates of unemployment and underemployment, the draft platform says.

Labors priority is to ensure that job opportunities are offered to local workers first and that temporary migration will never be used as a means to undercut local wages, conditions and training opportunities.

The document also says Labor would encourage skilled migrants to move to regional and rural areas where there are skills shortages

Labor aspires to progressively increase Australias government-funded humanitarian intake to 27,000 places per year, the document states. Labor aspires to progressively increase the community-sponsored refugee program intake to 5000 places per year

The document says Labors humanitarian program would accommodate LGBTIQ people who fear persecution.

This is a great start by Labor. But it needs to go much further to restore integrity to the immigration program and maximise living standards.

Below are suggestions on how to practically reduce Australias immigration intake, both temporary and permanent, to sustainable levels.

The number of temporary visas outstanding reached absurd levels at the end of 2019, at nearly 2.5 million people:

The first step to lowering the number of temporary migrants should be to significantly lift the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT) from $53,900, which is well below the median Australian wage of $1,100 per week ($57,200 p.a.), according to the ABS:

This TSMIT wage floor has now fallen $3,300 (6%) below the median income of all Australians ($57,200), which includes unskilled workers. Thus, the TSMIT has incentivised employers to hire cheap migrants instead of local workers, as well as abrogated the need to provide training.

The wage floor for all skilled migrants (both permanent and temporary) should be set at least at the 75th percentile of earnings (preferably higher).

This would ensure that the temporary migration scheme is used sparingly by businesses to employ only high skilled migrants, not as a general labour market tool for undercutting local workers and eliminating the need for training.

Second, the federal government should lift English-language and financial requirements for international students, alongside limiting work opportunities.

Raising entry standards would ensure a smaller number of high quality international students, while also ensuring they are financially independent and not reliant on work for income.

In turn, this would lift export revenue per student and reduce competition in the workplace. It would also ensure that students come to Australia to study, not for ulterior motives, such as to work and/or to gain permanent residency.

These measures alone would dramatically reduce temporary migration into Australia.

The permanent migrant program is dominated by the skilled stream, which has set aside 108,000 places for so-called skilled workers:

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, this skilled stream was highly dubious.There was no evidence that Australia was experiencing skills shortages that warranted such a strong intake.

We also know that Australias skilled migrant program has been widely rorted, attracting migrants to areas already heavily oversupplied with workers (e.g. accounting, engineering and IT), with most of these migrants employed at levels well below their claimed skills set.

Skilled migrants generally also have significantly higher unemployment and underemployment than the Australian born population, and are paid less. This is evidenced by the Department of Home Affairs Continuous Survey of Migrants. This surveyshows that migrants have significantly worse labour market outcomes than the general population:

In particular:

Even if we focus on the skilled stream only, both median earnings and unemployment is far worse than the general population:

These are shocking results. Skilled migrants should be paid well above the general population, which comprises both skilled and unskilled workers, as well as have very low unemployment.

Thus, like the temporary skilled visa system, the permanent program has unambiguously undercut workers and contributed to Australias poor wage growth, in addition to crush-loading the major cities and making housing less affordable.

With Australians now facing mass unemployment, and skills shortages virtually non existent across the economy, there is zero rationale for maintaining such a strong permanent migrant program.

Instead, the skilled program should be phased back to historical levels of around 35,000, and be reserved only for truly world-class leaders in their field that Australia cannot foster internally.

Moreover, these highly skilled migrants should have an income pay floor set at least at the 75th percentile of earnings (preferably higher), as for temporary skilled migrants.

No longer should Australian employers be allowed to simply grab a migrant to fill ordinary positions in the labour market cheaply. Instead, they would have to lift wages to attract workers (thus countering anaemic wages growth), as well as commit to training local workers.

Lets also not forget that many migrants come to Australia on temporary visas with the hope of transitioning to a skilled permanent visa.

Therefore, if Australia was to remove the carrot of permanent residency by slashing the skilled intake, it would also reduce the flow of temporary migrants, since the two areas are intrinsically linked.

Cutting immigration in this way is an easy sell for Labor. All it needs to argue is:

Most Australians know these to be true and would resonate with these common-sense arguments.

Labor should also state that it is merely seeking to lower immigration back toward the historical (pre-2004) average, and that the new lower intake would still be at the higher end of developed nations.

Moreover, progressively lifting the humanitarian intake by around 10,000 is smart, provided it is accompanied by large reductions in other categories of immigration, since it automatically counters faux arguments of racism and xenophobia that are likely to emerge from the fake left.

If Labor wants any chance of winning the next election, it must return to its working class roots and represent the interests of regular Australians over inner-city progressives. Otherwise it will remain in the political wilderness.

Leith van Onselen is Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.

More here:
Labor takes baby steps toward immigration reform - MacroBusiness