Archive for the ‘Immigration Reform’ Category

More Guestworkers Will Make it Even Harder for American Workers to Keep Up with Soaring Inflation, Charges FAIR – PR Newswire

WASHINGTON, March 31, 2022 /PRNewswire/ --Today, the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Labor (DOL) announced that they will exercise their discretionary authority to issue an additional 35,000 H-2B guestworker visas for the second half of the fiscal year. This move will further dampen wage prospects for struggling American workers who are falling further behind due to soaring inflation unleashed by the global pandemic and disastrous fiscal policies.

In announcing the release of 35,000 additional guestworker visas, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas assured the public that he recognizes "the importance of strong worker protections," and is committed to "applying greater scrutiny to those employers who have a record of violating obligations to their workers and the H-2B program."

The following is attributable to Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), in response to the forthcoming publication of a joint temporary final rule to make available an additional 35,000 H-2B guestworker visas for the second half of fiscal year (FY) 2022:

"Instead of incentivizing the return of millions of American workers to the labor force by allowing the laws of supply and demand to set competitive wages, the Biden administration is enabling employers to keep wages low and fill jobs with cheap foreign labor.

"Having opened the flood gates to millions of illegal aliens since taking office many of whom are already competing with lower-skilled American workers the Biden administration has found another avenue to allow more people to enter the country.

"In keeping with the administration's stance on all matters related to immigration policy, the secretary made no mention of true reforms to the program that will actually help American workers. In fact, under policy guidelines Mayorkas issued last fall, U.S. employers have been given carte blanche to bypass American workers in favor of guestworkers or illegal aliens, so long as they don't blatantly exploit them.

"Just another day at the office for a secretary of Homeland Security who is dedicated to ensuring that there are no limits on immigration, and another blow to the people he is supposed to protect," concluded Stein.

Contact: Preston Huennekens, 202-328-7004 or [emailprotected].

ABOUT FAIR

Founded in 1979, FAIR is the country's largest immigration reform group. With over 3 million members and supporters nationwide, FAIR fights for immigration policies that serve national interests, not special interests. FAIR believes that immigration reform must enhance national security, improve the economy, protect jobs, preserve our environment, and establish a rule of law that is recognized and enforced.

SOURCE Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR)

Original post:
More Guestworkers Will Make it Even Harder for American Workers to Keep Up with Soaring Inflation, Charges FAIR - PR Newswire

A visa crisis is hitting the children of Silicon Valley tech workers – San Francisco Chronicle

When Deepasha Debnaths mom opened their Cupertino mailbox on a sunny February afternoon, she found the green cards her family had awaited for 12 years. But Deepasha did not receive one.

The 24-year-old grad student is part of a growing visa crisis hitting the children of Indian immigrants, many of them Silicon Valleys tech workers, a generation forgotten in immigration reform efforts.

Brought to the U.S. on their parents work visas, many have spent their entire childhood here as their families waited to gain legal permanent residence, a process that can take years and even decades for Indians because of visa backlogs. Yet as they turn 21, they lose their family status and face expulsion from the country.

They did not celebrate when they got their green cards, knowing that I did not receive it with them, Debnath said of her parents and younger brother.

Debnaths family arrived from India in 2006 when an American company hired her father. She was 9, and as her father worked for companies in the Bay Area, California became their home. In 2010, the family applied for green cards.

Deepasha Debnath points out a family photo from when she lived in India. She moved with her family to the U.S. at age 9, after her father was hired by a U.S. company in 2006. Despite growing up here, Deepasha may have to leave the U.S. due to a gap in immigration law.

When she turned 21 and lost her dependent child visa, immigration rules also eliminated her from the familys pending green card application. Debnath was in college at the time and managed to switch to a foreign student visa, extending her stay in the U.S. But she no longer has a path to permanent residency or citizenship. Her visa will end when she graduates.

Debnath is not alone. The Cato Institute estimates that 10,000 minors will turn 21 and age out of legal status in the country this year.

As Debnath has learned, there is no permanent solution for young adults like her. They are left to choose between staying with their family and becoming undocumented, or returning to a country they barely know.

Policymakers are increasingly aware of the plight of young people like Debnath, who have come to be known as documented Dreamers, a term some in the movement embrace for its increased political visibility, but others reject because they dont want to be viewed in competition with undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and have secured some protections in Washington.

Despite the advocacy of documented Dreamers, they have not succeeded in winning a fix in gridlocked Washington, instead finding themselves caught in the same political battles as many other immigrants seeking reform.

But unlike some policies that intentionally excluded groups from citizenship, the plight of Indian young people aging out is a product of an immigration system that hasnt been overhauled in three decades.

This is one of the many problems that crop up not through design but through neglect, said David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian Cato Institute. This is not an issue of Congress designing a problem into existence; its an oversight thats turned into a crisis.

Sumana Kaluvai (front) takes in her San Francisco rooftop view with other members of the Hidden Dream nonprofit she started to advocate for children of visa holders, who are losing their legal immigration status as they turn 21.

At the root of the issue are caps that limit the total number of green cards that can go each year to immigrants from any one country. For Indians, who came to the U.S. in growing numbers on high-skilled job visas after the dot-com boom and to join family already here, the wait times stretch for decades.

Theres hope that the issue could be addressed, at least temporarily, by President Biden and his Cabinet agencies.

The 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, originally applied to qualifying immigrants brought to the U.S. as children with no restrictions on legal status. But in implementation, the policy granted protections only to undocumented immigrants excluding those who age out of visas.

The Biden administration is seeking to create a more formal DACA program to protect it from court challenges, with several organizations and lawmakers urging the administration to simply include children of visa holders.

Another possibility, Bier said, is for the administration to let these children keep their place in line for green cards even after they age out. He argues that previous court decisions have given the administration that discretion.

The administration said it is considering its options, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a visa-granting agency of the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement that it is exploring legal methods to provide relief. The White House said it is very aware of the hardships but laid the blame on Congress inaction.

Executive actions, even if they come through, would be only a patch. But the odds of passing any of the bills before Congress are dire.

The 2021 Americas Dream and Promise Act, which alongside undocumented Dreamers would create a pathway to citizenship for aging-out children of visa holders, passed the House by a slim bipartisan margin but stalled in the Senate.

The Americas Children Act, which would specifically tackle the aging-out issue, faces similarly long odds despite bipartisan support.

In the Senate, 60 votes are required to advance legislation, but getting 10 Republicans to join 50 Democrats on any immigration legislation especially one that increases the number of immigrants who can come to and stay in the U.S. would probably require significant border security measures and harsh cuts to other aspects of immigration such as asylum protections.

Deepasha Debnath and her brother Akshat in their Cupertino kitchen.

Those moves to mollify the Republican base are anathema to Democrats, leaving compromise at an impasse. Even if a deal could be reached with the right to move a narrow change, Democrats could face defections from progressive advocates who object to protecting some groups of vulnerable immigrants without the others.

California Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla, one of the authors of the Americas Children Act, said he remains hopeful and called the situation for this group fundamentally unjust and unfair.

Still, in the decades-long cycle of disappointments for immigration reform advocates, what the documented Dreamers have accomplished is significant, said Rep. Zoe Lofgren of San Jose, who said she persuaded her fellow Democrats to include the group in their latest version of the Dream Act, first introduced more than 20 years ago.

It wasnt a hard lift to get it in, but I do give them credit for their advocacy in raising the issue, Lofgren said.

Dip Patel, who created the grassroots group Improve the Dream, said he and others were inspired by the undocumented Dreamer movement to begin their own efforts to educate lawmakers about the situation facing children of foreign workers.

Seeing that change can happen with how Dreamers had organized and how they were able to build a movement is also part of what inspired me to know that it is possible, Patel said. Our system shouldnt allow for us to grow up here, be raised here and be educated here and even after 20 years of living here not have a path to citizenship and possibly have to self-deport.

His organization is also working with California senators to amend the states Dream Act, which allows undocumented students to attend college and pay in-state tuition, but does not include students on visas.

Bier, who has been tracking the issue and other problems with the immigration system for years, said even in 2012, policymakers should have foreseen the crisis.

Every year its another 10,000 or so Dreamers losing status, Bier said. No one has done anything about it, and so its really building up; theres more and more people being impacted, the population whos affected is growing, and thats having political consequence.

On a recent Saturday night, a group of friends ate pizza and played the card game Were Not Really Strangers on the floor of Sumana Kaluvais San Francisco apartment. These children of Indian immigrants grew up in the U.S. and managed to transfer to student visas to finish their degrees, yet face the same unknown fate when they graduate.

Kaluvai drew a card, blushed, and read, Whats the first thing you noticed about me? One friend said it was her smile. Its bright and it hides a lot of the pain youve been through.

Kaluvai, 24, arrived in the U.S when she was 2. She turned 21 midway through her undergraduate studies at UCLA and now has five months left on her foreign student visa. Kaluvai has been accepted to various law schools for the fall, but worries that a new student visa might be denied. If that happens, then I will be undocumented, she said.

Kaluvai first felt her visa limitations when she was 17 and landed a job scooping ice cream, only to be told that her immigration status did not permit her to work.

I was like, Wow, I guess you can work hard and do everything quote-unquote right, but youre still going to be barred from some opportunities because of your immigration status.

One morning on the drive to school, her mother told her college might also be inaccessible unless she could get a foreign student visa and afford the high fees charged to international students.

That whole day I spent switching between bathroom stalls in my high school. I was just crying the whole day.

Kaluvai also decided to self-deport to India right before she aged off her H-4 dependent visa, advising that a visit to the U.S. Embassy in Chennai would speed up the process of getting a student visa. She almost got stuck in India when the consular official informed her it could take a lot longer than she had anticipated.

Sumana Kaluvai hosts a pizza night with her friends and fellow activists in San Francisco. Kaluvai is the founder of the Hidden Dream, which advocates for the children of visa holders who are losing their protected immigration status as they turn 21.

All these experiences turned the student into an activist. She began an organization, the Hidden Dream, to help young adults in her situation. The nonprofit runs courses in college prep, premed workshops and navigating the immigration system.

Kaluvai feels a kinship with Dreamers, also shut out of work and study opportunities because of their immigration status. As her organization grew now reaching 700 youths they began to push back on the think-tank-imposed label of documented Dreamer, which made her uncomfortable.

That just leads to a sentiment that one set of kids is better than the other set of kids; it just allows us to pit communities against one another, Kaluvai said. I think its much more powerful if we realize the commonalities between kids on visas and kids not on visas and use that to leverage our power and unite our voices and ask for change for all kids who grew up here.

This message of solidarity has been a hard sell inside her own community.

She confronted the rule-following nature of her green card backlog community when she was unable to get much participation in a national day of protest on Feb. 14, when immigrants were asked to walk off their jobs to demonstrate the countrys reliance on immigrant labor.

This is why our community isnt winning, Kaluvai said, because were not willing to take a unified stance and show people that were not going to show up to work.

Kaluvai gave up her dream of studying philosophy and chose bioengineering simply because immigration rules allow STEM students those in science, technology, engineering and math an extra two years to gain work experience before their visas expire. If she can get another student visa, she will accept one of her law school offers and plans to practice immigration and human rights law.

I (need) the skills to work in a field that Im actually passionate about.

Debnath is completing a masters degree at the University of San Francisco. With just months left before that course finishes, and then a 90-day grace period to find work in a highly competitive field, Debnath is frantically applying for jobs. She knows her chances are slim. As a foreign student, she will have to find an employer willing to do immigration paperwork to hire her, which includes showing there is a shortage of qualified American applicants.

I havent received a single call for an interview, Debnath said. Its devastating.

Deepa Fernandes and Tal Kopan are San Francisco Chronicle staff writers. Email: deepa.fernandes@sfchronicle.com, tal.kopan@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @deepafern, @talkopan

Read this article:
A visa crisis is hitting the children of Silicon Valley tech workers - San Francisco Chronicle

‘We’ve Got a Real Problem Here’: Parkinson Warns SNF Operators Could Face Medicare Funding Cuts – Skilled Nursing News

Skilled nursing operators may soon face disastrous Medicare funding cuts, American Health Care Association President and CEO Mark Parkinson warned on Thursday.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is expected to release its latest proposed payment rule for skilled nursing providers in the coming weeks. While the nursing home sector has successfully fought against similar cuts in the past, the head of the nations largest lobbying and trade group indicated that this years effort will be different and even more critical than ever before.

The tea leaves are indicating that weve got a real problem here. So were working as hard as we can to make the best possible case that nursing homes have never been in a worse position and this would not be a good time for a cut, Parkinson told Skilled Nursing News during a virtual event hosted by the news organization on Thursday.

Parkinson pointed to the federal governments comments on possibly recalibrating the industrys relatively new Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) after determining the model increased payments to nursing homes by about 5% in fiscal 2020, for a total gain of $1.7 billion.

Some analysts, including CMS, believe that were being overpaid, Parkinson explained.

Before the end of 2021, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recommended a 5% cut to the base payment rates for nursing homes in fiscal year 2023.

The recommendation which in part was informed by what MedPAC called rebounded industry transactions was met with groans from providers and leaders in the sector, though it was not entirely unexpected.

Parkinson, in his comments Thursday, hinted that the backlash CMS faced when the $1.7 billion increase was announced could put pressure on the agency to pursue cuts as PDPM was supposed to be budget neutral.

While the nursing home sector has made significant gains in the past two years, its recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic continues to this day.

Prior to the pandemic, nursing home occupancy was at around 80% and at its lowest point in December 2020 the sector fell to 67%, according to Parkinson.

We gained 6% of that back in the first six months of 2021, Parkinson explained. We were making a nice steady recovery and were on a trajectory that looked like we were going to be recovered by the end of 2021 before delta hit.

Following the emergence of the delta variant, the industrys occupancy didnt decline but it also didnt improve much over a seven-month span.

That was really painful to be at 73% for seven months in our recovery, Parkinson admitted. Over the last four weeks weve seen a 1% increase so were at 74% but I would say we have at least another year in order to recover.

With occupancy still down and staffing shortages forcing some facilities to close, Parkinson thinks cuts could spell disaster for the sector, and he plans to press policymakers on that in the coming months.

While Parkinson admitted the MedPAC recommendation was not much of a surprise, he thinks it may be more difficult to talk CMS out of it this time around compared to previous years.

Its not uncommon for MedPAC to propose that we should get a cut and were pretty used to being able to convince CMS policymakers that they shouldnt do that this year its going to be really hard, he explained during the webinar.

MedPAC recommended similar cuts for nursing homes in 2020, but CMS did not follow the recommendation at the time.

While Parkinson does not know what CMS will ultimately propose, he said the industry needs to brace for the very strong possibility that cuts are coming.

A 60-day comment period will follow the proposed payment rule announcement after which CMS will issue a final rule with new payments going into effect in October.

The current situation reminded Parkinson of what happened in 2011, the last time the sector had a sizable change in its payment model following corrections to the former Resource Utilization Group (RUG) system.

That first year we were overpaid by 12%, according to CMS, he said. And they completely cut it the next year.

He described the move as a huge jolt for the sector as publicly traded companies got cut in half and the real estate investment trusts were eviscerated.

It was a really tough time, Parkinson said.

It was during this time that HCR ManorCare which was eventually acquired by ProMedica began to fall behind on its rent payments, eventually leading to it filing for bankruptcy.

We thought as we entered 2020 that were going to have a big battle on our hands over PDPM and whether its budget neutral and then the pandemic occurred, Parkinson explained.

Now fast forward to where we are today and now theyre saying they arent sure they can let it go anymore, Parkinson said.

Parkinson told SNN that hes had multiple positive meetings with several federal government officials throughout this week, including CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, along with several nursing home providers.

They need to hear whats really happening in the buildings from providers, he said

He said providers of various sizes met with Brooks-LaSure specifically to discuss current labor challenges the industry faces, and how that has impacted industry recovery as they remain committed to quality.

Parkinson said the group has a meeting with a top White House official on Friday. Its part of the associations strategy to speak with as many government officials as possible about the struggles the industry faces leading up to AHCAs congressional briefing in June.

Parkinson doubled down on his comments that this years congressional briefing will be among the most important in the sectors history. He also thinks the timing of it is perfect in more ways than one.

We hope to have 500 to 600 providers in D.C. and they will go up to Capitol Hill to meet with their members of Congress and one of our primary asks will be to weigh in with CMS, HHS and the administration on our payment, so the timing for that whole effort is absolutely perfect, Parkinson explained.

On top of that, the extension of the public health emergency, which Parkinson is hopeful will be extended in the next couple of weeks, would possibly be up for renewal again in mid-June, shortly after the AHCA event.

Parkinson also met with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to discuss industry funding, and arguably the most critical issue the sector presently faces: staffing.

He said during the webinar that he indicated AHCA would start pounding away and planting the seeds for more comprehensive immigration reform to bring in additional nursing home workers from overseas.

Immigration reform would be one of the things that could help us more than anything else [when it comes to staffing], Parkinson said. There are millions of people that want to come to the US and work, it would help on so many different levels.

While Parkinson plans to start making noise once again on immigration, he admitted reform likely wont happen given the current partisan divide in Congress.

AHCA pushed for lawmakers to amend the countrys current immigration visa prioritization to consider prioritizing the entry of foreign-trained nurses and health care workers into the U.S. prior to the end of 2021.

We have shifted our focus to the administration and there are things that the administration can do that can speed up people that have already been approved to come over, he said. This doesnt solve the macro problem of being 238,000 short but there are thousands of RNs that havent been able to get their interviews because of COVID.

He said he keeps pounding away to see that process become more streamlined.

Curbing skyrocketing agency costs has been another strategy AHCA has advocated for as a way to help with rising staffing costs, though progress has been slower than expected, Parkinson said.

Im really surprised that as I talked to providers, they havent seen any relief from agencies, Parkinson said. I would have thought that by now we would start to see a decline in these prices but that hasnt happened.

Parkinson remains hopeful that just by bringing attention to it on the federal level will have an impact.

Were not going to get a law passed at the federal level, he said. But I think that there are a handful of states that may pass laws that will restrict how much agencies can charge.

View post:
'We've Got a Real Problem Here': Parkinson Warns SNF Operators Could Face Medicare Funding Cuts - Skilled Nursing News

Biden Promised to Protect Sanctuary Cities. So Why is ICE Still Partnering With Local Cops? – VC Star

Angelika Albaladejo| Capital & Main

When Joe Biden ran againstPresident Donald Trump in 2020, he promised to fight back against anti-immigrant policies, including those that punished sanctuary cities and that gave more local authorities power to act as an extra arm of federal immigration enforcement.

More than one year into Bidens presidency, his administration has done little to support so-called sanctuaries cities, counties or states that limit how much they help federal agents to investigate, arrest or detain immigrants.

Biden told voters he would dial back Trumps expansion of cooperation agreements between local police officers and agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Instead, the Biden administration has left such collaborations in place and is even trying to convince local governments that refused to cooperate with ICE under Trump to start doing so now, a Capital & Main review of government documents and speeches shows.

While Trump used the presidential pulpit to drive sanctuary cities, and undocumented immigration more broadly, into a kind of culture war, the Biden White House has made it a lower priority, said Benjamin Gonzalez OBrien, a San Diego State University political science professor who co-wrote a 2019 book about thehistory and politicsof sanctuary policies.

In Congress, deep partisan divisions and internal party disagreements endure, and have caused immigration reform efforts tostall out, as Republicans falsely accuse Biden of overseeing open borders and Democrats fail to pass any of the nearly half-dozen immigration bills introduced so far.

But immigration remains a part of daily life in communities across the country, and local and state governments continue to pass laws and elect officials on one or the other side of the issue. These local decisions on whether or not to collaborate with federal enforcement canaffect public safetyand trust in law enforcement, including by diverting resources or encouraging racial profiling.

Were going to see the battle over sanctuary policies play out [in different localities] until we get some kind of national legislation, said OBrien. There are still millions of people living in a legal gray zone who are afraid of leaving the house and interacting with other members of their community because that threat of deportation hangs over their head.

As a presidential candidate, Biden pledged to end Trumpshistoric expansionof local-federal cooperation on immigration enforcement because the partnerships known as 287(g) agreements undermine trust and cooperation between local law enforcement and the communities they are charged to protect.

But under Biden, the federal government is still relying on local police partnerships as the main engine of the deportation system, said Lena Graber, a senior staff attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center in San Francisco who studies the role of local police in immigration enforcement.

More than 140 local law enforcement agencies are currently signed up to help ICE, including by sharing information with federal agents when they arrest, detain or intend to release an undocumented immigrant.

A Capital & Main analysis of ICE data shows that under Trump, 111 sheriffs departments began partnering with ICE for the first time through the 287(g) program. Nearly half of all local agencies that did so were in Florida and Texas. Some pro-immigrant advocates, policy analysts and civil rights groups say Trumps aggressive recruitment of local sheriffs facilitateddiscriminatory policing, such as racial profiling, that has separated families and created legal and financial challenges for people otherwise living quietly in the community.

Under Biden, ICE has only ended its collaboration with one sheriffs office, Bristol County in Massachusetts, after guards responded to immigrant detainees protesting conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic byshooting pepper ballsand siccing dogs on them.

The Biden administration has the authority to order ICE to cancel such partnerships at any time, Graber said. Its the easiest policy thing for them to do.

Instead, contrary to campaign promises, the administration intends to expand local cooperation. Alejandro Mayorkas, the head of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, recently sought toconvince mayorsthat they should resume collaborating with federal immigration authorities because the agency of today, and what it is focused upon, and what it is doing, is not the agency of the past.

But the mayors of several cities including Berkeley, Philadelphia and New York have already said through spokespeople that theydont intendto expand cooperation with ICE.

Prominent immigrant legal services groups called Mayorkas pitch abetrayalof the presidents commitments and warned in a public statement directed to him that such partnerships co-opt local resources into questionable, racially discriminatory purposes, and strip communities of safety and public trust.

Bidens pick to run ICE, Ed Gonzalez, haspromisedto continue such local cooperation if he is confirmed by Congress, despite the fact that as sheriff of Harris County, Texas most populous, hecanceledhis departments 287(g) agreement. During Trumps final year in office, Gonzalezcriticized the tactic, tweeting that Diverting valuable law enforcement resources away from public safety threats would drive undocumented families further into the shadows & damage our community safety.

When it comes to supporting sanctuaries, the Biden administration has taken some steps.

Bidens administration hasrepealeda Trump-era ban thatbarredsanctuary cities like New York from receiving some federal grants. Under Biden, ICE haslimitedthe scope of who its agents should arrest and detain, has committed toending worksite raidsand is now arresting and detainingfewer peoplewithin the United States than under Trump.

But the biggest change so far has been in how the administration talks about undocumented people, said Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia Hernandez, an Ohio State University law professor who specializes in the intersection of criminal and immigration law.

In contrast with Trump, we dont see the kind of racist, abrasive, offensive language coming from the president, Garcia Hernandez said. But the Biden administration is still struggling to find its footing when it comes to differentiating its actual immigration policies.

Garcia Hernandez said that city, county and state governments still have a good amount of wiggle room when it comes to making life easier or harder for immigrants to live in their communities.

The direction in which local authorities go is not so much a matter of law, but of their politics, he said.

In the years since Trump turned up the pressure on immigrant sanctuaries, some state legislatures across the country have passed laws pushing in opposite directions, with some enacting sanctuary-style policies and others banning them.

Within the last year, states likeIllinoisandNew Jerseypassed laws limiting the ways their police departments and jails can cooperate with immigration enforcement, including by banning them from entering any new contracts to detain immigrants for ICE.

Some states have strengthened long-standing protections for undocumented immigrants. Oregon, the nations oldest sanctuary state, faced pushback from conservative state legislators over such policies during the Trump administration, and responded last summer. The states Democratic lawmakers passed a sanctuary promise law intended to reinforce immigrant access to social services and block local police from sharing information with ICE or detaining immigrants.

Some local agencies have pushed back against such efforts, including the counties of Kankakee and McHenry, outside of Chicago. They sued Illinois, saying the state couldnt stop them from getting paid tens of millions of dollars per year to detain immigrants for ICE. But a federal judge recentlyruledthat the state does have the constitutional power to ban its counties from doing so.

At the same time, some states are going in the opposite direction by requiring their local agencies to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. Texas, Florida and South Carolina are among at least 10 states that passed laws during Trumps presidency blocking their cities and counties from engaging in sanctuary practices. A federal judge ruled that Floridas ban isunconstitutionalbecause it was adopted with discriminatory motives. A federal appeals court upheld most ofTexas 2017 law, but legal challenges are pending.

No matter which way states go, immigration enforcement agencies still have the power to investigate, arrest and detain people anywhere in the country, including in sanctuaries.

To do so, ICE relies heavily on its expansive and long-standing partnership networks with local and state authorities. Some are so deeply embedded that they remain in place irrespective of whether or not a community is a so-called sanctuary jurisdiction, said Jorge Loweree, policy director of the American Immigration Council.

For example, California has passedseverallawsover the years intended to stop state and local police from sharing information with ICE or transferring people into ICE custody. But despite these protections, some sheriffs offices haveworked with ICEanyway. At times, these partnerships have led to potentially illegal practices, such as when Californias prison system transferred a U.S. citizen into ICE custody in 2020. The man wasdetainedfor a month by immigration authorities during the pandemic, until a judge finally ordered him released. In Seattle, also a longtime sanctuary, ICE similarly detainedanother U.S. citizenin 2019.

ICE also has access to a wide range of databases created by police agencies and information companies, such as the data mining corporation LexisNexis and the software creator Palantir, which was co-founded by the Trump-supporting billionaire Peter Thiel. Some immigrant rights advocates told Capital & Main these databases can help immigration officersobtain informationthat local agencies decline to provide.

Nonetheless, since Trump made anti-immigrant policies a centerpiece of his presidency and both campaign runs, some pro-immigrant activists have pushed back through local elections.

Max Rose, who directs the North Carolina-based Sheriffs for Trusting Communities, said his group works with local organizers across the country to elect more progressive sheriffs to replace those who have fueled mass deportation, doubled down on over-policing in communities of color, and built jails that prioritize expansion rather than treatment and reentry.

Rose said the communities he works with are pretty tired of law enforcement demonizing immigrant families, and doing so at the expense of doing their job. As a result, some sheriffs with a history of cooperating with ICE paid an electoral price in 2020, particularly in progressive pockets of the South. Democratic sheriffs ran and won on promises tocut such ties, including in Georgia's populous Gwinnett and Cobb counties, where advocates claim community safety and relations have sinceimproved.

The immigrant-friendly sheriffs showed theres a winning message on immigration, Rose said. Its a line that the Democrats are trying to walk around the country. But I think theres a path that was cleared in 2020.

Some hardline sheriffs who had close relationships with the Trump administration are also expected to face challengers in elections later this year. Among them isSheriff Thomas Hodgsonin Bristol, the only county to have its ICE partnershipterminatedby the Biden administration.

Rose said that because Trump so polarized immigration enforcement and cooperation with local police, its no longer politically palatable for Biden to continue those same policies.

While some sheriffs continue demonizing and scapegoating immigrants in their community, Rose said, we know it should no longer be acceptable for any sheriff to abuse that power, and to play the role of federal immigration enforcement.

Continue reading here:
Biden Promised to Protect Sanctuary Cities. So Why is ICE Still Partnering With Local Cops? - VC Star

Kansas Sanctuary City ban passes Senate, heads to governor – KSN-TV

TOPEKA, Kan. (KSNW) The Kansas Senate passed a measure aimed at addressing immigration laws and sanctuary cities in the state.

The Senate voted 29-10 to pass House Bill 2717 on Wednesday after it recently passed the House last week.

The measure now heads to the governors desk.

The bill was firstintroduced on Feb. 22at the request of Attorney General Derek Schmidt in reaction toWyandotte County passing the Safe and Welcoming ordinanceon Feb. 10. Wyandotte Countys ordinance would make it illegal for the Unified Government to collect immigration data unless required by state or federal law and would issue municipal ID cards to those who were recently in prison, homeless or undocumented.

It was mostly Democrats who voted against the bill in the Senate. Some also spoke out against the plan when brought to the House floor.

Like other lawmakers, Rep. Pam Curtis, D-Kansas City, pointed to the federal government for lack of action on immigration reform.

That leaves municipalities, like KCK, with large immigrant communities to deal with this as best they can, Curtis said.

Curtis also expressed concerns for people with mixed status. In hearings, people testifying against the bill explained that many worry about interactions with law enforcement or going about their daily routine. Curtis said many people take the ability to have an ID for granted, arguing that its hard for people to access services without identification.

From borrowing books to enrolling their child in school to renting an apartment or a home, Curtis said.

HB 2717 would make any municipal identification card used in lieu of state ID to be invalid, including for voter ID purposes. Both the ordinance and the legislation to undo it have sparked discussion across the state regarding immigration laws and haveraised concerns for many immigrants living in Kansas. Other lawmakers argued that the government shouldnt interfere with the states long-held standard of local control.

Were here today considering a bill demanding that our cities and counties enforce the laws of the tyrannical and out-of-control federal government, said Rep. Dennis Highberger, D-Lawrence.

Attorney General Derek Schmidt spoke about the bill at theKansas GOP conventionthis month, voicing his concerns over the ordinance.

That instructs their police officers not to cooperate and communicate with federal enforcement authorities and says theyre going to start issuing local governmental IDs, Schmidt said. Thats a problem, and it ought to be unlawful.

To read HB 2717 in full, click here.

Read more here:
Kansas Sanctuary City ban passes Senate, heads to governor - KSN-TV