Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

An Expensive Escape Hatch For US Illegal Immigrants Fearing Deportation – Forbes


Forbes
An Expensive Escape Hatch For US Illegal Immigrants Fearing Deportation
Forbes
President Trump's proposed budget aims to dramatically increase immigration enforcement and border security funding by adding $300 million to the current $20 billion spent each year. The proposed budget would also provide funds to increase immigration ...
How Sanctuary Cities Can Protect Undocumented Immigrants From ICE Data MiningThe Intercept
Business pushes Rauner to sign bill to protect immigrantsChicago Tribune
ICE director: If you entered the US illegally, you 'should be concerned'ABC News
Independent Journal Review -GOPUSA
all 49 news articles »

See more here:
An Expensive Escape Hatch For US Illegal Immigrants Fearing Deportation - Forbes

The Ranch Part 3 Tackles Illegal Immigration In Episode 5 Twist – TVLine


TVLine
The Ranch Part 3 Tackles Illegal Immigration In Episode 5 Twist
TVLine
Colt is initially shocked by the news, having had no idea that his best friend was in the U.S. illegally, but above all else is clearly devastated. Asked by Rooster why he never told them, Umberto says there was no upside [to telling you]. We live in ...

See the article here:
The Ranch Part 3 Tackles Illegal Immigration In Episode 5 Twist - TVLine

Soros-Linked Groups Behind California Ban on Detaining Illegal Immigrants – Breitbart News

As left-wing blog Mother Jones reported, the initiative to protect illegal immigrants would be included in the California state budget. The proposal makes it illegal for local or county jails from entering into agreements with federal immigration authorities to protect Americans from illegal immigrant crime.

Coincidentally, the two organizations pushing the plan behind the scenes have links to Soros and his infamous Open Society Foundation, which serves as a slush-fund to enrich left-wing social justice and open borders groups.

For instance, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), which is promoting the plan, has taken grant money from Soros Open Society Foundation since at least 2009 when itreceived$200,000 from Soros.

In 2012, ILRC took even more money from the Open Society Foundation, receiving more than $1.8 million from Soros that year.

The other open borders organization behind the pro-illegal immigrant California plan is the Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC) This group also has staff ties to Soros.

CIVIC staffer Tina Shull runs the organizations storytelling projects, while also being a recipient of the Soros Justice Fellowship, a Soros-funded grant department that gives out anywhere between $58,700 to $110,250 to specific individuals for social justice advocacy.

CIVICs co-executive director Christina Fialho told Mother Jones in an interview that California potential ban on detaining illegal immigrants was a powerful first step in the states overall agenda to oppose President Trumps agenda.

This is not the first California initiative this year that Soros-linked organizations have pushed. Breitbart Texas reportedin May that the Soros-funded Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) pushed legislation forcing landlords to rent to illegal immigrants, even after they know their immigration status.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart Texas. Follow him on Twitter at@JxhnBinder.

P.S. DO YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS ONE DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR INBOX?SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY BREITBART NEWSLETTER.

Original post:
Soros-Linked Groups Behind California Ban on Detaining Illegal Immigrants - Breitbart News

Crackdown on illegal immigration won’t hurt ag economy – Chambersburg Public Opinion

Sen. Mike Regan 3:50 p.m. ET June 18, 2017

Sen. Mike Regan(Photo: PA Senate)

In the June 10th edition of the Wall Street Journal, an opinion piece entitled Fiestas and Apple Orchards: Small-Town Life Before Trump offers a romanticized view of illegal immigration in Pennsylvania.

The author, Dickinson College professor Crispin Sartwell, paints an idyllic image of the vibrant, intersectional culture of York Springs, PA, where the streets are purportedly lined with Mexican food trucks and children playing ftbol and a bona-fide real estate revival is well underway thanks to townspeople [fixing] up old houses.

That is, until Donald Trump was elected President.

According to the author, stringent enforcement of immigration law by the Trump administration has precipitated the destruction of a rich, new rural culture and has sent York Springs spiral[ing] into a local depression that is personal, cultural and economic. He cites only 15 documented cases of immigration enforcement in the area but assures readers there have been many more.

Central to his narrative is the fact that Adams County is a national leader in apple production, and that York Springs 70 percent Hispanic population plays an essential role in the growth and harvest of Galas and Granny Smiths.

The thesis of Mr. Sartwells narrative, of course, is that the lawful detainment of unlawful migrant workers will devastate the local economy, to the detriment of all residents, legal and illegal. Sartwell goes on to explain how the devastation transcends economics:

This is separating families, and people are living in fear, he writes. Children arent playing out in the yard any longer. Parents are afraid to leave their homesthe food truck is gone, and its been a while since I heard Mexican pop music.

Unsurprisingly, the narrative propagated by Mr. Sartwell aligns closely with the left-wing orthodoxy on this topic. It is rooted in the common misconception that American agriculture cannot function without illegal immigrant labor and that the concerted enforcement of federal immigration law will result in the collapse of the farming industry altogether.

According to the Pew Research Center, the U.S. civilian workforce includes 8 million unauthorized immigrants, but only 4 percent of that population is employed in agricultural jobs like farming, fishing, and forestry.

While illegal immigrants do comprise a larger share of the agricultural labor force compared to other industries, the vast majority of the American farming workforce is composed of legal workers, foreign and native-born.

This fact alone calls into question Mr. Sartwells assertion that the removal of unauthorized immigrant labor (not to be confused with legal immigrant labor) will have an adverse impact on the domestic farming economy.

It also goes far in discrediting the leftist clich that illegal immigrants are needed to perform the dirty, blue collar jobs American citizens are allegedly unwilling to do.

Sure, labor-intensive fruit-and-vegetable farming does attract illegal immigrant workers, but those commodities constitute a relatively small part of the overall U.S. farm economy. Bigger crops wheat, cotton, and corn, for example account for a far greater share of total agricultural output. The production of these major crops is largely automated and can be performed with minimal human inputs.

Bottom line: The modern agriculture economy is diverse and dynamic. Most farmhands are working legally and agribusiness in general is becoming less reliant on manual labor. The enforcement of federal immigration law will never stop Americans from engaging in one of the oldest forms of organized economic activity known to the human race.

Mr. Sartwell, and others who share his worldview, use scary rhetoric about vanishing children and food trucks to obfuscate economic reality and perpetuate the wink-and-nod immigration policies of the Barack Obama administration. In doing so, they defend a broken system that has bankrupted taxpayers and endangered American communities.

Laissez-faire immigration enforcement has resulted in dramatic population growth, not only in our cities but in rural pockets of America like York Springs. Costs in public education, health care, social welfare programs, and the criminal justice system all borne by American taxpayers have increased correspondingly.

The American opioid epidemic, which claims the lives of 10 Pennsylvanians each day, has been fueled in part by the unmitigated trafficking of heroin across the porous southern border.

Sartwell observes in his column that the migrant labor community of York Springs has been quick to adopt rural American valueswhich are instinctively traditional and oriented toward family and hard work.

Before authoring opinion pieces that decry the enforcement of federal immigration law, he should be reminded that an abiding respect for the rule of law is another value rural Americans hold dear.

Illegal immigration is not a victimless crime.

Sen. Mike Regan, a Republican serving parts of Cumberland and York counties,is a member of the PA Senate Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committee and previously served as U.S. Marshal in the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Read or Share this story: http://ponews.co/2thjuUR

Original post:
Crackdown on illegal immigration won't hurt ag economy - Chambersburg Public Opinion

DHS rescinds Obama-era DAPA policy that would have protected illegal immigrant parents – Washington Examiner

The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday rescinded an Obama-era immigration policy that had allowed for deferred action for parents of Americans and lawful permanent residents, which was known as DAPA.

DHS Secretary John Kelly signed a memo on Thursday directing his employees not to carry out an instruction his predecessor, Jeh Johnson, had put in writing in November 2014 that sought to extend a 2012 program aimed at the illegal immigrant community.

Kelly made the decision to revoke the policy because "there is no credible path forward to litigate the currently enjoined policy" due to its current entanglement in the courts, his office said in a statement.

The 2014 Johnson memos had been intended as extensions of Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, the 2012 policy that permitted illegal immigrants who entered the U.S. as minors to receive a two-year period of deferred action and work permit. DACA permits would last two years and could be renewed if the individual remained in good legal standing. The program also allowed recipients to become eligible for state-managed public benefits.

Under DAPA, recipients would have had to be a parent of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident as of Nov. 20, 2014; have continuously resided in the U.S. before Jan. 1, 2010; have been physically present in the U.S. on Nov. 20, 2014 and when applying for relief; have no lawful immigration status on that date; have not fallen within the secretary's enforcement priorities; and have presented no other factors that, in the exercise of discretion, make the grant of deferred action inappropriate.

A 2015 report by the Migration Policy Institute estimated 3.6 million illegal immigrant parents would have been eligible for DAPA.

But DAPA was never implemented.

In early 2015, 26 states responded to the months-old announcement with a lawsuit against the Obama administration in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas. The states alleged the program violated the Constitution and federal statutes. The majority of the states that took legal action identified as red states.

The program was put on hold for the next two years as it wound its way through the courts. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, and the Supreme Court ultimately granted the lower court's injunction to remain in place.

The now-defunct DAPA policy also would have changed the DACA program's two-year extension to three-year terms.

President Trump's hardline stance on immigration has remained resolute, but wavered at times since he took office nearly five months ago. Trump admitted he wanted to show compassion to people in the U.S. illegally, but has been adamant about eradicating all future illegal immigration by enforcing all immigration laws and creating a secure wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

The White House has not issued a statement on the newly announced DHS decision.

Read this article:
DHS rescinds Obama-era DAPA policy that would have protected illegal immigrant parents - Washington Examiner