Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Dominican Republic to construct fence along border with Haiti – Reuters

FILE PHOTO: Border security soldiers guard border control as Haitians wait to cross the border, in Dajabon, Dominican Republic, September 22, 2019. . REUTERS/Ricardo Rojas/File Photo

SANTO DOMINGO (Reuters) - The Dominican Republic will begin constructing a fence along its 376-kilometer (234 mi) border with Haiti later this year to curb unauthorized migration and illicit trade, President Luis Abinader said on Saturday.

In a period of two years, we want to put an end to the serious problems of illegal immigration, drug trafficking and the movement of stolen vehicles, Abinader said in a presentation to Congress.

Construction of the border fence, whose cost has not been disclosed, will begin in the second half of 2021, Abinader said.

The barrier will include a double-fence in the most conflictive sections, along with motion sensors, facial recognition cameras and infrared systems, he added, speaking on the 177th anniversary of the countrys independence from Haiti.

According to government estimates, about 500,000 Haitian immigrants resided in the Dominican Republic as of 2018, along with tens of thousands of their children born in the Caribbean country. A large part of the Haitian community, which makes up about 5% of the total population, does not have residency permits.

The announcement came a month after the government agreed to help Haiti provide identity documents to its citizens living in Dominican territory.

Reporting by Ezequiel Abiu Lopez; Editing by Daina Beth Solomon; Editing by Leslie Adler

Go here to read the rest:
Dominican Republic to construct fence along border with Haiti - Reuters

Immigration hard-liner US attorney stepping down in South Texas – KGBT-TV

McALLEN, Texas (Border Report) U.S. Attorney Ryan Patrick who was instrumental in carrying out several hard-line immigration policies during the Trump administration, like zero-tolerance and border wall land condemnation cases, is stepping down as the chief law enforcement officer for the Southern District of Texas, his office announced Monday.

Patrick, who is son of Republican Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, had served in the role since January 2018. His resignation is effective on Feb. 28.

In his first year alone, his office found itself at the forefront of a nationwide immigration debate, his office said in a news release, which characterized him as a prominent leader of the ever-increasing immigration debate.

He frequently discussed and addressed challenging border issues andprotecting people from the harms associated with illegal immigration and human smuggling, the statement said.

But migrant advocates claim that Patricks actions have led to the harsh treatment of asylum-seekers. And in the summer of 2018, he was in the center of the Trump administrations zero-tolerance policy, which led to the separation of thousands of migrant families and children, including those crossing into South Texas.

While he was in that position, hundreds perhaps thousands of parents were separated from children in the Southern District of Texas and he is directly responsible for that, said Efren Olivares, deputy legal director for immigrant justice at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The statement that he was protecting people from the harms of illegal immigration is just a talking point from the hard-liners within certain circles so it is not surprising, but Im hopeful that whoever takes the position will take a more humane and smart approach to the administration of criminal justice, Olivares said.

Olivares pointed out that the crime rate along border cities, including the Southern District of Texas, are some of the lowest in the country.

Latest estimates are that over 600 migrant children remain separated from their families and in the care of U.S. Health and Human Services, nearly two years after they were removed from families who crossed illegally into the Southern border of the United States.

Since 2014, South Texas has been a hotspot for families to cross into, but the Trump administration tried to stop that trend by implementing the controversial zero-tolerance policy that resulted in the separation of families.

Under his leadership, the department also pursued hundreds of border landowners to give up right of entry onto their properties to survey the land for placement of a border wall.

Although the Biden administration has put a halt to the construction of the border wall, many cases still are pending in federal courts under Patricks jurisdiction.

Upon hearing that he was resigning, Melissa Cigarroa, a landowner in Zapata County who has been sued by Patricks assistants for the right of entry onto her border property exclaimed, Its fabulous! Im assuming hes the reason this all happened on my property after the election and after he knew the new administration would be taking a new direction.

Cigarroa, who is president of the board for the Rio Grande International Studies Center in Laredo, Texas, said the land case against her continued under Patricks leadership without even the ability to discuss other outcomes or consider other alternatives.

Her case is scheduled for the Southern District Court in Laredo in early March, just days after Patrick is set to leave office.

Her parting words to him: Dont let the door slap you in the ass when youre going out.

Added Cigarroa: Im so happy that the Biden administration is righting wrongs.

Here is the original post:
Immigration hard-liner US attorney stepping down in South Texas - KGBT-TV

Forget the border wall. To reduce illegal immigration, jail employers who hire ineligible workers – Washington Times

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The Republicans are learning quickly how to be in the minority in Congress, and thats good news.

How can you tell? Thats easy. They are starting to use the legislative process to move their own agenda and tangle the other side. As part of that, Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Mitt Romney of Utah on Thursday morning are set to introduce the Higher Wages for American Workers Act.

The legislation would phase in an increase in the federal minimum wage to $10 by 2025 and index it to inflation thereafter, while requiring employers to E-Verify their employees, phasing in implementation over 18 months to allow small businesses additional time to compl). The verification process prevents fraud by requiring workers 18 and older to provide photo identification to their employer, which will be cross-referenced through the federal E-Verify system.

The genius of the legislation is that it harnesses the progressives burning desire to raise the federal minimum wage to the single most important element of immigration reform making sure that employers are hiring those legally eligible for employment.

The verification of employees in a comprehensive, timely and thorough manner has been the grail of immigration reformers for years. No one has yet been skillful enough to get it through Congress or bold enough to mandate it administratively, not even President Trump.

As a practical matter, by tying together the federal minimum wage and employment verification, the legislation ensures that rising wages will go to legally authorized workers.

Thats essential. Workers and companies understand that immigration, legal and (especially) illegal, serves primarily to suppress wages in the marketplace. It is no accident that in the previous century wages increased the fastest from the 1920s to the 1960s a period that saw a pause in immigration into the United States.

By mandating employment eligibility verification, the legislation leverages the weakest link in an immigration system that sometimes seems largely indifferent about legality companies fear of participating in criminality. It is not accidental that the legislation increases civil and criminal penalties on employers that hire ineligible employees or file fraudulent paperwork.

Forget the border wall. If the United States is serious about reducing illegal immigration, it needs to start putting those who employ ineligible workers in jail. Illegal immigration would dry up in a matter of weeks.

Moreover, rather than destroy 1.4 million jobs like the $15 federal minimum wage is projected to do, the proposed legislation would raise wages for 3.5 million workers without harming the very people it is intended to protect.

In short, mandating E-Verify would preserve American jobs for legal workers and rebalance the risk-reward equation for corporations on illegal immigration. The federal minimum wage increase and the verification would work in tandem to create upward pressure on wages. The phase-in would help employers adjust.

The legislation is also politically graceful. For the Republicans, they now have a better alternative with respect to the federal minimum wage. For the Democrats, especially for moderates in the House and Senate, the legislation creates a problem. They will need to explain to voters why they excluded consideration of employment eligibility when raising the minimum wage.

Mr. Cotton and Mr. Romney were also careful enough to leave themselves some room to negotiate. By setting the federal minimum wage at $10 an hour, they can offer a concession to increase the number to $11 West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin IIIs new number or even $12 or $13 if that helps make the deal.

This is what legislating looks like. It is good to see that Congress can still do it.

Michael McKenna, a columnist for The Washington Times, is the president of MWR Strategies. He was most recently a deputy assistant to the president and deputy director of the Office of Legislative Affairs at the White House.

Excerpt from:
Forget the border wall. To reduce illegal immigration, jail employers who hire ineligible workers - Washington Times

Paying Illegal Aliens to Stay Is a Radical Position – Immigration Blog

Recent moves toward paying illegal aliens to stay in the U.S., at both the federal and state levels, are extreme and radical, as the mainstream media does not seem to realize.

There are, to condense the options available about enforcing the immigration law, five different levels:

In other words simply proposing to suspend most deportations, one of President Biden's policies, while drastic enough, is just one step along the way to open borders, while paying disaster grants or extra unemployment insurance to those in illegal statusis a fifth step in the same direction. The media simply does not understand this, or if it does, it ties itself in knots trying not to convey this reality.

For a good example of this kind of journalistic denial, one only has to read a February 20 Washington Post article about how some Maryland Democrats are trying to add illegal aliens to the list of families about to receive state-level disaster grants of $300 to $500 each.

Erin Cox, writing on tax credits for illegal aliens in Maryland, so shrank from that term that she used, inaccurately, the following terms: "noncitizen Marylanders" in the print version headline, "immigrants who are not citizens", and the value-loaded "taxpayers without Social Security numbers" in the text. "Noncitizen Marylanders" is inaccurate in this context because some of them are here legally and eligible for the payments, and some are not.

Maryland Governor Larry Hogan's posture on this issue do not pay illegal aliens to stay in the country is the correct one. Noncitizens should get these benefits if they are here permanently and legally as permanent resident aliens (those with green cards); aliens who are here legally on temporary visas, and those here without papers should receive nothing.

Maryland's position, more precisely, that benefits should not go to aliens without Social Security numbers, is the right one; these numbers are supposed to be handed out only to people here legally. There are ITINs (individual tax identification numbers) for aliens who are not here legally; no benefits should go to them.

While Maryland, so far, is doing the right thing on this issue, California and the feds are not. We reported earlier that the U.S. Senate, on a party-line vote, decided that illegal aliens could get the next round of $1,400 disaster payments. Similarly, the state legislature in California made the same decision about its last round of such payments, $500 for adult illegal aliens.

Read more:
Paying Illegal Aliens to Stay Is a Radical Position - Immigration Blog

Biden immigration plan raises hopes for those in Berks seeking path to citizenship – Reading Eagle

A lot of people had been anxiously awaiting the unveiling of President Joe Biden's plan to overhaul the nation's immigration system, a priority he made clear in his campaign and his first day in the Oval Office.

Fatima Mendez of Reading was one of those people. But for her it's not a matter of policy or politics. It's personal.

She is one of nearly 700,000 young men and women known as "Dreamers," recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an administrative action from the Obama era that protects immigrants from deportation who were brought into the United States illegally as children.

They are commonly referred to as "Dreamers," based on never-passed proposals in Congress called the DREAM Act. Opponents say the law rewards people for breaking the law, encourages illegal immigration and hurts American workers.

In the case of Mendez, she came to Berks County from El Salvador as a 14-year-old in 2006. She was escorted by adults on the arduous journey to reunite with her parents, who received temporary protected status in 2001, following a devastating earthquake that hit their home country.

Mendez, who went on to earn a degree from Albright College, said being part of the program has enabled her to work at a local bank and contribute to her community. Without the program, she would face the possibility of being sent back to a country that she barely remembers.

So it should come as no surprise that the immigration system is something Mendez pays quite a lot of attention to. And the 30-year-old says that Biden's election, and his early attempt to address that system's flaws that was unveiled last week, have her cautiously optimistic.

"I think this proposal is great and pretty ambitious," she said. "It honestly feels like Biden is setting the bar high and that what we will actually get from lawmakers will be very different in the end."

Biden's plan looks to make sweeping changes to the immigration system like creating pathways to citizenship for the 11 million immigrants here illegally and for the more than 1 million here under protected status like the "Dreamers".

The proposal, known as the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, would have a profound impact on her family.

"It's always good to be hopeful, but it's expected that since you're an immigrant we should be grateful for whatever we get," she said. "I feel like, in some ways, I can't really criticize a plan like this."

Although Mendez is excited about the possibilities of Biden's plan, she said she realizes it has a long way to go before becoming a reality. Parts of it will likely receive pushback, aspects of it may end up changing significantly.

"These proposals come and go all the time," she said. "I want to be excited but at the same time, I feel like this is an issue that gains momentum every few years and then nothing actually happens. We need lawmakers to take action."

Mendez, who recently bought a home in Reading with her boyfriend, said she is relieved just knowing the president isn't actively looking to deport all those living in the country illegally.

"I have been just enjoying ordinary life," she said. "I'm just like everyone else: I go to work. I pay taxes. I worry about all the same things and I live in this community."

Mendez said she considers herself privileged. She was able to get a college education, she can legally drive, she has a Social Security number, she can live without being in constant fear of being deported if someone discovers her immigration status.

"I pretty much have all the perks of being a citizen," she said. "But there is still a fight to be respected as an American."

Mendez said becoming a citizen would mean she could finally cast a ballot, travel outside the country and have the ability to apply for school loans. But the biggest change it would make would be how she views her place in the community.

"I think I would feel more empowered to speak out about the things I would like to see in my community," she said. "I think there is still a fear that I carry around about my status and what it could mean for me if someone has a problem with it.

"Not having to worry about being judged would be a huge relief."

Like Mendez, other local immigration advocates have applauded Biden's effort. But they also remain a bit wary, unsure if there's enough political will for the immigration system to be rewritten and of what it will look like in the end.

The administration and congressional Democrats haveunveiled an immigration reform billthat includes proposals Biden announced on his first day in office.

The centerpiece of the legislation is an eight-year path to citizenship for most of the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. as of January.

After passing background checks and paying taxes, they would be allowed to live and work in the U.S. for five years. After that, they could apply for a green card, giving them the opportunity to gain citizenship after three more years.

It would also remove restrictions on family-based immigration, expand worker visas, reduce immigration court backlogs and provide funding to reduce asylum application backlogs.

Attorney Abraham Cepeda, who practices immigration law at Cultura Law in Reading, said there are many proposals in the legislation that get to the heart of the problems plaguing the existing immigration system.

"I am glad to see that they are addressing some of the glaring mistakes of the past that have led to this crisis," he said. "The bill has a lot of meat in it if it would pass in this form. And Biden has a good chance because the Democrats control both chambers of Congress right now."

Abraham Cepeda practices immigration law in Berks County.

Cepeda said he was pleasantly surprised that the president stuck to his campaign promise by making it clear that immigration would be one of his first priorities.

"To tell you the truth, I didn't think he was going to come out with this plan on Day One," he said. "This makes me hopeful that he is really ready to get to work on this."

Cepeda said the pathway to citizenship for those in the country illegally is probably the most exciting piece of the legislation.

He said the provisional status would give them the opportunity to work legally, use the banking system, obtain a license to drive and travel outside the country to see family. It would also require that they pass a background check and pay taxes that are owed.

"This proposal makes sure we vet the people going into this system, and I believe what is being asked of them is appropriate," he said. "We want to make sure everyone feels confident that these people are going to contribute to our community."

Cepeda said most of the families that his firm serves have at least one undocumented family member who is worried they will be discovered and deported. So, he said, the proposal would eliminate the constant anxiety that comes from knowing a family member could just disappear one day.

Cepeda said there are also a number of what he called hidden gems in the legislation.

Those include eliminating a provision put in place by former President Bill Clinton that bars someone found to be in the country illegally who leaves voluntarily from returning for 10 years, and providing more funding to help speed up the immigration process.

"I deal with cases stemming from these issues all the time," he said. "Most people are unwilling to voluntarily leave behind the lives they have built here and it can take people more than a decade to get here through the proper channels.

"You hear a lot of people say that immigrants should get in line and do it the right way. But I don't think people know about the backlogs that exist. And if you're living in a dangerous situation in your home country waiting that long is not much of an option."

Michael Toledo, president and CEO of the Daniel Torres Hispanic Center, said Biden's supportso early into his term is a good sign.

"With all the challenges that the president is facing right now, that he put out a comprehensive plan on immigration gives me a great deal of hope," he said. "It is time for Congress to take action now. And, quite honestly, the majority of Americans want to see a fair and humane immigration policy that supports those in our country who are working and contributing to the communities they live in."

Michael Toledo, president and CEO of the Daniel Torres Hispanic Center.

Toledo is right about positive public opinion. It's growing.

A Morning Consult/Politico poll released in January found that 57% of voters believe those in the country illegally should be allowed to stay and become citizens if they meet certain requirements up 11 percentage points from an April 2017 survey. It is the most recent poll available on the issue.

While previous attempts at sweeping immigration reform have failed under both Republican and Democratic administrations, Biden has signaled a willingness to break the legislation into pieces.

As a potential secondary path, lawmakers would work to pass bills legalizing farmworkers and "Dreamers" right away, then move toward a more expansive overhaul. The main objective, officials said, is progress.

Carol Anne Donohoe, a Berks resident who is managing attorney for the immigration advocacy organization Al Otro Lado, said there certainly are actions that can be taken immediately to ease the burden on the millions of families at risk of deportation and those that have protections under temporary programs.

But, she warned, lawmakers should look at the legislation as a whole because people tend to look at these two groups quite differently. Some may feel more sympathetic for a child who was brought here by their parents, but the reality is that those children would still worry about their undocumented parents being deported.

Whether there is the political will to pass comprehensive legislation in the current political environment is the real question. So she acknowledged that working on individual pieces may be a better way to go.

Carol Anne Donohoe, a Berks County immigration lawyer, speaks about her work representing asylum-seeking families detained at the Berks County Residential Center at Albright College in this file photo.

"I'm normally of the opinion that you ask for everything," she said. "But if one piece gets done sooner than the other that's at least one piece that wasn't done before. And this is coming from someone who is so not a fan of incremental change."

Donohoe said that whatever path Congress takes, advocates will be ready for a fight.

"We have to be loud and we have to be demanding," she said. "We have to let them know that we are not going to accept any of the horrors that have taken hold in our immigration system. We learned a lot of tactics under Trump so we are prepared to fight."

She said that since Biden was sworn in, she no longer wakes up every morning with the existential dread that anything she does is useless. But she added that she has been following immigration issues long enough to know that a new president cannot magically make the system better.

"I don't look to a leader as being the answer," she said. "We have to keep watching, questioning and urging action because a lot of harm has been and continues to be done under our current system."

Toledo said members of the Hispanic Center will do everything they can to support the legislation.

"We see the true value that our immigrant and mixed family population brings to the community," he said. "We just have to continue to tell the story about the contributions that they are making. And, hopefully, our congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle can work with the administration on a bill that lifts up everyone.

"Given our current political climate, I have my doubts that this is possible. However, Biden spent so much time in Congress that he understands how important it can be to compromise."

Even if Biden gets most of what he wants on immigration, fully implementing the kind of sweeping changes he's promised will likely take years.

Donohoe said she worries that Biden may not do enough to reverse policies put in place by the Trump administration. And she already has a few examples of ways in which he has disappointed advocates.

Biden issued an executive order banning the detention of migrants from private prisons, but the order does not apply to facilities like the Berks County Residential Center.

Donohoe, who had previously represented those detained at the Bern Township center, said she was discouraged that both the executive order and the legislation supported by Biden does not specifically mention the detention of families at facilities like the one in Berks.

"There is absolutely no purpose for detention," she said.

She is also disappointed that deportations are still taking place.

Biden signed a moratorium on the second day of his term declaring a pause on certain deportations for 100 days. But that moratorium has been blocked by a judge in Texas.

Donohoe said there is more Biden could do. She said the president could have reversed a Trump policy that used an obscure public health rule to effectively close the southern border to asylum seekers due to concerns about the coronavirus pandemic.

"We need more immediate action and more clarity," she said. "We need them to actively stop ICE from deporting people and begin processing people so that they can remain in the country until they have had their day in court."

There has, however, been one bright spot.

Donohoe said she was happy to see Biden sign an executive order creating a task force to reunite hundreds of migrant families who were separated at the border by the Trump administration and remain apart years later.

But she still remains concerned about a lack of details or timeline for the plan.

"These families are told to be patient, but it's really hard to be patient when you haven't seen your child in three years," she said. "The issue is not finding these parents because we know how to find them. The problem is the hundreds of deported parents who have not been able to return."

Cepeda said he can still remember a time when immigration was a nonpartisan issue.

In fact, he pointed out that two of the most consequential changes to immigration law during the last three decades did not fall along our current political lines.

Cepeda noted President Ronald Reagan, who is often referred to as the father of modern conservatism, signed a sweeping immigration reform law in 1986. The law made immigrants who had entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty.

In the end, that law granted amnesty to nearly 3 million undocumented immigrants.

On the other hand, Cepeda cited how Clinton signed the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act that prevented undocumented immigrants who had overstayed their visas or crossed the border illegally from returning after an extended wait period.

"This should not be a political issue but, unfortunately, this is what it has become," he said. "And after four years of Donald Trump the rhetoric against immigration has been ratcheted up to a level we have never seen before."

However, Cepeda said, that might actually be helpful.

"I think the fact that Trump pushed these horrible policies may have caused some people to take a more humane look at this issue," he said.

Toledo said there may be some truth in that. He said he believes people want an immigration system that is fair, humane and keeps families together.

"There's a lot of fear out there in the country," he said. "Our foundation is based on immigrants but, unfortunately, there are people out there who spread fear and falsehoods that turn it into a political issue. But it should not be that way. It's going to be challenging, but I think if there was ever a time to start moving the needle forward it's now."

See the original post:
Biden immigration plan raises hopes for those in Berks seeking path to citizenship - Reading Eagle