Archive for the ‘Illegal Immigration’ Category

Barone: What was the left thinking? | News, Sports, Jobs – Daily Herald

Whether youre contemplating San Francisco voters recall of left-wing District Attorney Chesa Boudin or the plight of Democrats nationally as they face voters dismay at out-of-control inflation, immigration and crime, the question is liable to come to mind: What were they thinking?

Actually, there are some initially plausible answers. Weve just been informed this last week by Janet Yellen biographer Owen Ullmann that the treasury secretary argued in early 2021 for a smaller bill than the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan.

Yellen denied having opposed it outright. But she didnt deny sharing concerns that overspending would fuel inflation, as her Clinton administration predecessor Larry Summers argued in the Washington Post.

Whoever swept aside Yellens concerns perhaps bought leftists Modern Monetary Theory that the government can print as much money as it wants without risking inflation. Or that since the Obama administration ran deficits without spurring inflation after an economic shock, the Biden administration could do so after a quite different shock.

Which leaves you asking the question: What were they thinking?

Consider immigration. When Joe Biden became president, immigration was not out of control. Most immigrants were arriving legally, and the 2010-2019 decade saw a rising proportion of high-skill immigrants something those with multiple views of the issue favored.

The Biden administration promptly disrupted this equilibrium. It stopped construction of the border wall, presumably because Donald Trump promised to build it. It abrogated the Remain in Mexico policy Trump had pressured leftist Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador to agree to. It treated border-crossers with accompanying children as asylum-seekers and allowed them into the United States.

Attempts to deny that this was an open borders policy were unpersuasive, starting with assigning the border to an obviously reluctant Vice President Kamala Harris. Her do not come speech in Guatemala and her four-hour trip to El Paso, Texas, had zero effect on the inflow.

The result was predictable. Border crossings have risen to record highs. The pro-restrictionist Center for Immigration Studies estimates that 1,350,000 illegal immigrants have entered the United States during the first 17 months of the Biden administration, about double the number of legal immigrants. That means the proportion of high-skill immigrants is lower.

Did the Biden administration think voters wanted more illegal and a lower proportion of high-skill immigration? What were they thinking?

As for crime, the disconnect between liberal officeholders and ordinary voters is most glaring in San Francisco. The city that voted for Biden 85% to 13% in 2020 voted this week 60% to 40% to recall, or remove from office, leftist DA Boudin.

Boudin backers blamed conservative Republicans, and probably both of them voted against him. But obviously, the biggest change of mind came from San Franciscans who initially liked Boudins ideas eliminating cash bail, classifying under-$950 minor thefts as misdemeanors, sternly punishing alleged police misconduct but didnt like the increased murders, brazen public thefts and feces-laden streets that resulted.

Political scientist Vladimir Kogan, while sympathetic to Boudins policies, points out that academic studies suggesting theyd be harmless failed to take into account the effect theyd have in practice. When you let defendants pending trial out on the streets, you intimidate witnesses. When you defund and overdiscipline the police, you no longer have proactive policing. All this leaves violence-prone young men free to commit crimes.

The phenomenon is not local. The death of George Floyd in May 2020, followed by mostly peaceful Black Lives Matter demonstrations that included violent riots in some 570 cities, resulted in the Ferguson effect on steroids as coined by Foxs Jesse Watters not just in San Francisco but around the country, and especially in cities with George Soros-type reform prosecutors.

So what were they all thinking?

Common threads in the thinking behind policies incentivizing out-of-control inflation, immigration and crime are the inclination to sympathize with those seen as victims and the assumption theyll respond with virtuous restraint.

But when you give people free money, they spend with little restraint. When you grant illegal immigrants free entry, they enter in vast numbers. When you let criminals go free, they maraud en masse. Its nice to be nice, but its foolish to expect everyone to be nice in return.

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and longtime co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.

Join thousands already receiving our daily newsletter.

Read the original post:
Barone: What was the left thinking? | News, Sports, Jobs - Daily Herald

What is Kansas’ Stance on Immigration? – Legal Reader

This specific case revolved around an illegal immigrant who used someone elses social security number to get a job at a restaurant.

Kansas has a relatively tough stance towards illegal immigration, but those who come to the state legally are essentially welcomed with open arms. This is a similar stance to many other states in the nation. These states wish to encourage immigrants to come to the United States legally while respecting local and federal laws. While this philosophy is certainly understandable, there is a growing divide in the nation when it comes to immigration. Many believe that illegal immigrants should be given the same rights as legal immigrants, and that borders should be policed with a less draconian approach.

Regardless of where you stand on immigration law, its always a good idea to come to the United States legally. Fortunately, you can do this with relative ease by enlisting the help of a qualified, experienced immigration attorney in Kansas. These legal professionals can guide you towards a positive legal outcome and help you settle in the Sunflower State. By coming into the state legally, you can avoid a number of potential consequences, including deportation.

Kansas Has a History of Being Tough on Illegal Immigrants

In 2020, an illegal immigrant in Kansas was successfully convicted of identity theft after a Supreme Court decision went against him. The court also determined that the state itself could convict him of the crime without interfering with existing federal immigration laws. This ruling encouraged states across the nation to use identity laws to enforce immigration laws and sidestep federal regulations.

This specific case revolved around an illegal immigrant who used someone elses social security number to get a job at a restaurant. This led to a conviction under the states identity theft laws. Those who appealed this decision argued that this action basically allowed Kansas to create its own immigration laws, but the federal government sided with the Sunflower State when it went to the Supreme Court.

Kansas Senator Pushes Back Against Compensation for Illegal Immigrants

Kansas Senator Roger Marshall was one of many politicians who pushed back against Bidens plans to compensate illegal immigrants who had been separated from their families. In October, it was reported that the Biden administration was considering payments of up to $450,000 for families that had been separated. Marshall was one of 30 senators who signed an amendment to block these payments. He argued that this would incentivize more illegal crossings, stating:

As if President Biden leaving our southern border wide open for thousands of people to pour into our country isnt enough, now his administration plans to provide hundreds of illegal immigrants with $450,000 each as a reward for breaking the law.

Enlist the Help of a Qualified Attorney Today

If youve been searching for a qualified, experienced immigration attorney in the Wichita area, there are many legal professionals waiting to assist you. While Kansas general stance towards immigration can seem daunting, its important to remember that the state is generally only tough on illegal immigration. If you work with an attorney and follow all of the various rules and regulations, you should be able to settle in Kansas without much of an issue. Book your consultation today and go over your legal options.

Visit link:
What is Kansas' Stance on Immigration? - Legal Reader

5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. | Pew Research Center

Note: For more recent information on this topic, visit this post.

The number of unauthorized immigrants living in the United States has dropped to the level it was in 2004, and Mexicans are no longer a majority of this population. This decline is due mainly to a large drop in the number of new unauthorized immigrants, especially Mexicans, coming into the country. The origin countries of unauthorized immigrants also shifted during that time, with the number from Mexico declining and the number rising from Central America and Asia, according to the latest Pew Research Center estimates.

Here are five facts about the unauthorized immigrant population in the U.S.

There were 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. in 2017, representing 3.2% of the total U.S. population that year. The 2017 unauthorized immigrant total is a 14% drop from the peak of 12.2 million in 2007, when this group was 4% of the U.S. population.

The number of Mexican unauthorized immigrants declined since 2007, while the total from other nations ticked up. Mexicans made up less than half of all unauthorized U.S. immigrants (47%) in 2017 for the first time, according to the Centers estimate, compared with 57% in 2007. Their numbers (and share of the total) have been declining in recent years: There were 4.9 million Mexican unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2017, down from 6.9 million in 2007.

Learn about U.S. immigration through five short lessons delivered to your inbox every other day.Sign up now!

Meanwhile, the total from other nations, 5.5 million in 2017, ticked up from 2007, when it was 5.3 million. The number of unauthorized immigrants has grown since 2007 from both Central America and Asia. There were 1.5 million Central American unauthorized immigrants in 2007 and 1.9 million in 2017. This growth was fueled mainly by immigrants from the Northern Triangle nations of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. The number from Asia, 1.3 million in 2007, rose to 1.5 million in 2017.

At the same time, the number of unauthorized immigrants from South America and Europe decreased between 2007 and 2017. Other large regions (the Caribbean, Middle East-North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and the rest of the world) did not change significantly during that time.

The U.S. civilian workforce includes 7.6 million unauthorized immigrants, representing a decline since 2007. Between 2007 and 2017, the number of unauthorized immigrant workers fell by 625,000, as did their share of the total U.S. workforce over the same period. In 2017, this group accounted for 4.6% of those in the U.S. who were working or were unemployed and looking for work.

Six states account for 57% of unauthorized immigrants: California, Texas, Florida, New York, New Jersey and Illinois. From 2007 to 2017, individual states experienced different trends. The unauthorized immigrant population decreased in a dozen states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York and Oregon. In five states, the unauthorized immigrant population rose over the same period: Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, North Dakota and South Dakota.

A rising share of unauthorized immigrants have lived in the U.S. for more than a decade. About two-thirds (66%) of unauthorized immigrant adults in 2017 had been in the U.S. more than 10 years, compared with 41% in 2007. A declining share of unauthorized immigrants have lived in the U.S. for five years or less 20% of adults in 2017, compared with 30% in 2007. In 2017, unauthorized immigrant adults had lived in the U.S. for a median of 15.1 years, meaning that half had been in the country at least that long.

Note: This is an update to a post originally published on Nov. 18, 2014.

More here:
5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. | Pew Research Center

MW434 : Illegal Immigration – Key Topic | Migration Watch UK

Illegal Immigration: MW 434

1. Illegal immigrants do not have the right to remain in the UK. They may have entered legally but failed to leave when they were required to do so. Alternatively, they may have entered the UK illegally.

2. The substantial illegal population in the UK adds to the pressures on housing and public services while paying little, if any, tax. The government has estimated (see p.8) that each additional person staying on costs the taxpayer between 4,255 and 7,820 per year through the use of public services such as health, education and welfare benefits. These figures were calculated by apportioning public spending to the resident population in the UK.

3. In 2013, the government estimated that illegal immigration cost the NHS 330 million per year. The London School of Economics has estimated that the long term costs of benefits for illegal migrants could be 1.6 billion a year.

4. Illegal migrants can be exploited by employers who ignore safety and minimum wage legislation. In addition, illegal immigration displaces the UK-born from jobs and places negative pressure on the wages of the lowest paid. Illegal immigration has been linked to organised crime. In the governments words, stronger efforts to tackle immigration abuse would reduce the operation and profitability of organised crime (see 2013 Home Office document, p.7).

5.There are four main ways in which a person can become an illegal immigrant:

6. The EU migrant crisis has had a significant impact on the UK in recent years although its effects have declined from the peak in 2015/16. Until the closure of the Jungle camp in 2016 there were as many as 10,000 illegal immigrants camped out in the Calais region with the intention of making it to the UK, despite being in France, which is obviously a safe country.

7. Despite this, clandestine trips to the UK across the Channel remain a major problem. One source (Policy Exchanges Border Audit, 2018) suggests that the average number of detected illegal lorry drops in recent years has been around 15,000 per year. In 2017 there were 30,000 recorded attempts to enter the UK illegally from northern France (Parliamentary Answer, 2018). Official statistics also revealed that only a third of 439 illegal migrants who were intercepted while crossing Channel to the UK in 2018 and early 2019 were returned to the safe country of France (also see article by Migration Watch UK).

8. By its nature, illegal immigration is very difficult to measure, although it was announced in June 2019 that the ONS and Home Office statisticians have been working with departments across the Government Statistical Service and academics to explore possible approaches to measuring illegal immigration and have speculated on various possible methodologies. The Census does not record the immigration status of respondents and, in any case, most illegal immigrants would be very unlikely to respond.

9. In 2005 the Home Office estimated that in 2001 the population of illegal immigrants was approximately 430,000, excluding the UK born children of illegal immigrants.

10. In 2009, the London School of Economics produced an estimate of the illegal immigrant population in 2007; they suggested a central figure of 670,000 using a similar methodology to the 2005 estimate.

11. In 2010 Migration Watch UK estimated the illegal immigrant population to be 1.1 million (a figure later echoed by former top officials). In 2017 a former Head of Immigration Enforcement, David Wood, and previous Home Office (HO) speechwriter Alisdair Palmer claimed that the HO estimated that each year as many as 150,000-250,000 foreign nationals failed to return home when they should or entered illegally. Some will eventually go home. To read Wood and Palmer's full report click here.

12. Our research, based upon available data, estimates a net rise in illegal immigration of just under 70,000 per year (see report) nearly equivalent to the size of the full-time British Army.

13. In April 2015 the government reintroduced exit checks allowing the authorities to know who had departed the country. While they appear to have been useful in providing clarity on the scale of compliance by those on study visas in particular, the Exit Checks have been criticised for failing to use information regarding nationals from more than 50 countries whose citizens are not required to obtain a visa to visit for up to six months (these account for the majority of visitors to the UK).

14. Indeed, the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) found in late 2017 that the Exit Checks did not contain evidence of departure for more than 600,000 people who were required to depart the UK between 2015 and 2017 (85% of these, or more than 510,000 people, were non-visa nationals see p.20 of report). It remains unclear whether the Home Office has addressed this by including a routine operational assessment of non-visa nationals. If this has not been done yet it should clearly be expedited.

15. The number of illegal immigrants removed from the UK is very low in comparison to the size of the illegal population. In 2018, there were just 9,400 enforced returns (a drop of a third in five years) and 15,000 voluntary returns - a fall of more than 10,000 since 2014.

Figure 1: Returns of those with no right to be here, 2014-18, HO.

16. There are an average of 25,400 asylum applications every year. Yet fewer than half of these applications for asylum have ultimately been granted, even taking into account those successful on appeal. Those whose asylum claim has been rejected do not have permission to remain in the UK and are required to depart.

17. However, on average, over 60% of those who were refused asylum or some other form of international protection after having applied for it during the period 2004-2017 did not leave the country. This amounts to nearly 120,000 failed asylum seekers remaining here over the entire period, or 8,500 people per year (a number have been granted amnesty by stealth in 2011 it was revealed that the government had given settlement to over 160,000 people as part of what was called a backlog clearance exercise, including failed asylum seekers).

18. Despite a larger number of overall applications, removals of failed asylum seekers have dropped by nearly two-thirds over the past decade, from 11,600 per year to just over 4,000 in 2018.

Figure 2: Removals of failed asylum claimants, 2009-18. HO.

19. In 2017, the ICIBI reported that there was little evidence that effective action was being taken to locate the vast bulk of 55,000 illegal immigrants - including failed asylum seekers, immigration offenders and foreign national offenders - of whom the Home Office (HO) had lost track. The HO should urgently report to the public on its progress.

20. The Chief Inspector of Borders has said that the Windrush affair has made officials less willing to remove illegal immigrants from the UK. However, there is no reason why a bureaucratic failure primarily affecting people with a right to be here should lead to a condoning of illegal immigration, in clear contravention of the publics wishes. Doing so can only be manna for traffickers who profit by encouraging people to break the law and put their lives at risk needlessly in perilous cross-Channel journeys.

21. Meanwhile, the view of a former chief of immigration enforcement is that there is a whole system breakdown The message to people here illegally is that there is no serious response by the authorities. From what I hear there is paralysis.

22. An effective system to remove those who have no right to remain in the country is essential to the credibility of border control. That credibility is at risk. The declining effectiveness of removals can only further encourage people to put their lives at risk and depress public confidence in immigration control.

23. There is a great deal of public support for tackling illegal immigration. 77% of the public said it was a serious concern (Project28 poll, 2018). Meanwhile, between 70% and 80% of the public support compliant environment measures aimed at making it difficult for illegal migrants to remain in the UK (YouGov, April 2018).

24. It is deeply concerning that, as was reported in July 2019, more than 10 million of taxpayers money has been spent by the government in five years on phantom flights to deport failed asylum seekers that were then abandoned before take off. According to the latest Home Office accounts, the bill for cancelled repatriation flights was just over 2 million in 2018.

25. Insufficient resources are being allocated to enforcement. In 2018/19, gross expenditure was just under 462 million about a twentieth of one percent of total government spending in that year.

26. The head of the Immigration Services Union has said that illegal immigrants have very little chance of being caught due to the dearth of investment in enforcement. Meanwhile, a former chief executive of the Border Agency warned that the government does not have the resources or political levers to deal with this issue and noted that insufficient attention was being paid to the number of non-EU migrants working here illegally (The Times).

27. An additional impediment is the size of the detention estate. At present only around 3,500 can be held in detention at any one time. This is clearly inadequate compared to the size of the task.

28. The lack of return agreements between the UK and source countries is a further problem (a returns agreement is one whereby two countries agree to return their nationals to each other when they are found illegally in each others territory).

29. The UK does not have such agreements with countries (e.g. Brazil / Bangladesh) thought to be significant sources of illegal immigration.

30. Another material factor is a lack of documentation. Some illegal immigrants will not have had documents i.e. a passport, when they arrived. Others will have purposely destroyed documents to frustrate the returns process. Some countries refuse to re-document their own citizens. Others, such as India, make it as difficult as possible.

31. The government should encourage source countries to re-document their citizens who are illegally present in the UK. It should also encourage cooperation by linking it to the possible removal of visa-free access (e.g. for Brazil) - or where applicable, to aid provision.

32. Although there is alack of clarity in the official statistics on this topic, the number of grants of leave to those with no right to be in the UK appears to haveincreased significantly in recent years. Regularisation means that the person goes from being someone with no right to remain to being a legal migrant with either temporary or indefinite leave to remain.

33. There were 41,300 extensions of stay under the Family life (ten year route) in 2018 (a 45% increase on the previous year). The increase may have been linked to an August 2017 Supreme Court ruling (see summary) that expanded use of the Family Life (ten-year route). Typically those making an attempt to stay under this route are overstayers at the time of application.

34. There were also 6,200 extensions of leave to remain under the Private life route (a 56% increase on the previous year). This latter route includes the rule covering those with periods of overstay who have 20 years of continuous residence (see more here), the seven-year residence rule for children and families (introduced in 2012), the half of life rule for under 25s and the very significant obstacles to integration rule.

35. The Home Office also issued around 2,200 grants of leave to remain on a discretionary basis as well as 3,400 labelled as Other, some of whom may have been illegal migrants being granted leave to remain.

36. The number of people regularising status via such routes has risen in recent years amounting to a significant additionto the UK population via the back door. We recommend that all such routes be urgently closed as they are entirely unfair to migrants who go through the proper channels, undermine the rule of law and potentially risk lives by further encouraging illegal immigration.

37. We have also suggested the following:

38. Those who knowingly enter the UK without permission or overstay are guilty of a criminal offence (see Section 24 the Immigration Act 1971). Yet 129 MPs recently signed a pledge to not report suspected illegal migrants to authorities. Such a move amounts to deliberately ignoring illegal behaviour and is grossly irresponsible.

39. Meanwhile, calls for an amnesty are absurd. In countries where they have been tried they have simply added to the number of illegals (see our paper). Furthermore, an amnesty would of course reward illegal behaviour while being grossly unfair to migrants who go through the correct channels. It would also extremely expensive for the taxpayer (see our paper The financial case against an amnesty for illegal immigrants).

40. The government has a duty of care to protect and enforce the UKs borders. Illegal immigration is a serious failure of governance. There appears to be paralysis in enforcement while the number of people whose presence has been legalised as a result of amnesty-by-stealth has massively increased since 2012. This only serves to encourage the UK to be seen increasingly as a soft touch while the problem and backlogs become more intractable. The new Prime Minister should set an entirely new course, reinstating the deterrent of enforcement and ruling out any kind of amnesty.

Updated 11 July, 2019

Here is the original post:
MW434 : Illegal Immigration - Key Topic | Migration Watch UK

Illegal immigration in the United States – Statistics & Facts

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of immigrants detained at the Southern border decreased significantly. However, as infection numbers began to decrease in 2021, the number of detainees and undocumented immigrants increased. Alongside supporting progressive immigration legislations, President Biden and Vice President Harris have discouraged migrants from Central and South America from entering the U.S, stating that the journey is too dangerous and to wait for safer measures to cross the border.

In a 2020 poll on illegal immigrants being allowed to stay in the U.S. if they fulfill certain criteria, 75 percent of American respondents believed that illegal immigrants should have a way to them to stay legally if certain requirements are met. Around 24 percent of respondents thought that illegal immigrants should not be allowed to stay in the country legally.

This text provides general information. Statista assumes no liability for the information given being complete or correct. Due to varying update cycles, statistics can display more up-to-date data than referenced in the text.

See original here:
Illegal immigration in the United States - Statistics & Facts