Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Esther Perels Business Is Your Business – The New York Times

The talk was about trauma and intimacy. But the presentation was vintage Esther Perel warm and playful, erudite and provocative, enhanced by her rich souffl of an accent (which sounds French but is in fact Belgian). Alluding to the Mexican poet Octavio Paz and the Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges, she asked: What if accessing the erotic is the catalyst that helps the recovery from the trauma?

Though the audience, at a conference last summer, was full of professionals, many follow-up questions seemed suspiciously asking for a friend-ish. Several were about infidelity or relationships in the time of Covid, two Esther Perel specialty subjects.

Ive been married for 23 years, and twice her podcast has made an enormous difference to me at crisis points, said a therapist in her 50s who asked that her name not be used because of her own professional profile.

Ms. Perel, 64, hardly needed an introduction she is the worlds best-known relationship expert, so familiar that her fans stop her on the streets of New York but the host of her talk, Dr. Bessel van der Kolk, author of The Body Keeps the Score, made one anyway.

Esther is an amazing person, he said, a master trainer, therapist, speaker, podcast host, author.

During the pandemic, her work took on a special resonance as people stuck at home turned to her YouTube videos and to Where Should We Begin?, her couples therapy podcast, for advice on how to navigate relationships in a time of uncertainty. Among the questions she addressed: Why, when we were with our partners all the time, werent we having sex?

But even before 2020, it would have been hard to exaggerate Ms. Perels reach. Her two books have been translated into 30 languages and have together sold nearly a million copies in the United States alone. Her podcasts, one-off couples counseling sessions for romantic and business partners, are regularly ranked in the top 100 in the Apple charts.

Her Where Should We Begin? card game sells for $40. She is in high demand as a speaker at such non-psychotherapy-related events as Workhuman Live 2023, sponsored by a software company, for which she is scheduled to give a keynote address in April. She wont reveal her fees for such events, but says she gives some speeches for free or asks that the fees be donated to charity.

Elizabeth Chambers, the ex-wife of the disgraced actor Armie Hammer, recently revealed that Ms. Perel had been their couples counselor for much of their 10-year marriage.

Zachary Taylor, the director of Psychotherapy Networker, a trade journal that operates as a kind of town square for the psychotherapy community, called Ms. Perel a rare crossover breakthrough artist.

Its not common for therapists to reach this level of celebrity, and when they have in the past, it caused a bit of a rift in the community, he said. Esther has done the opposite.

Alluding to Team of Rivals, Doris Kearns Goodwins book about how the 16th president worked with his competitors, Mr. Taylor said: Shes the Abraham Lincoln of psychotherapy.

Ms. Perel in person is like Ms. Perel in public intimate, engaged, vivacious, with an air of continental sophistication. She speaks in perfectly formed paragraphs and deploys what feels like a thesauruss worth of synonyms. (English is in fact her sixth language. She speaks nine languages and conducts therapy in seven of them.) She comes across as both racy and maternal. She invites confidences. When you talk to her, it is hard not to fantasize about hauling in your own partner for a little impromptu couples therapy.

We were in a bar (empty, because it was daytime) at the Soho Grand Hotel in New York, near the apartment Ms. Perel shares with her husband, Jack Saul, a psychotherapist whose expertise in individual and community trauma came in handy during the pandemic.

They have been married for more than 35 years. After agreeing to an interview on the condition that he not be asked about their marriage, he proved to be a terrific cheerleader for his wife. You cant believe how many people stop her and say, Youve changed my life, he said.

Ms. Perel said she hadnt planned for her life to turn out this way, exactly.

I did not decide to be a public figure, she said. It wasnt a goal, or something I set up.

But if you see her trajectory as an evolution rather than a strategy, you need to start with her childhood among Holocaust survivors among them her parents, Poles who met each other the day their camps were liberated in Antwerp, Belgium.

The community could be divided, roughly, into two groups, Ms. Perel said: those who talked about their experiences, and those who didnt. And there were two kinds of talkers, the people who emphasized the victimization, and the people who emphasized the heroism and the resilience, she said. Her parents belonged to that last group.

They didnt just survive, and they didnt just fight to live, she said. They were going to live life at its fullest. And in that sense, they experienced the erotic as an antidote to death. One night a week, they took the train to Brussels to go ballroom dancing.

Ms. Perel studied education and theater at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. To help support herself, she did improvisational puppet theater for children and ran workshops for teenage girls using movement and drama therapy. This led her to a masters program in expressive arts therapy at Lesley College (now Lesley University) in Cambridge, Mass. Initially she planned to return home, but she was hungry for further training and stayed in the United States.

She has a way of collecting mentors, and mentees, and studied with the pioneering family therapist Salvador Minuchin. For decades, her clinical practice focused on mixed couples interracial, intercultural, interreligious and couples in cultural transition. She wrote papers; she spoke at conferences; she taught at symposiums; she conducted workshops. Her reputation grew. She and her husband had two sons, now both adults.

It was the late 1990s. And then one day comes the Clinton scandal, Ms. Perel recalled. What struck her was how it was also a scandal for Hillary Clinton and a Rorschach test for attitudes toward fidelity in marriage. Publicly humiliated, Mrs. Clinton faced a stark choice: Should she stay, or should she go?

I thought it was such an interesting conversation, culturally speaking, Ms. Perel said. In America the dominant culture is that if you have been cheated on, you better leave. The I is central. But many societies believe that family preservation is more important.

Soon afterward, she was batting around ideas with Rich Simon, the beloved-in-the-profession founder and editor of Psychotherapy Networker. He asked me, What are you thinking about these days? she recalled. And I said, flippantly, Im thinking about Americans and sex. And he said, Why dont you write about it?

The result was an article, Erotic Intelligence: Reconciling Sensuality and Domesticity, published in the magazine in 2003.

The theme was simple, but subversive in a culture that idealizes the notion of a spouse who fulfills all your emotional, intellectual and sexual needs in perpetuity. Ms. Perel argued that the things we want from long-term relationships stability, security, total intimacy, continuity can run counter to exciting sex, which is fueled largely by mystery, danger and uncertainty.

She is one of the few people to combine training in couples therapy, which is about intimacy and sharing and openness, with sex therapy, which says that creative tension is required for eroticism, said the couples therapist Terry Real. Shes also blisteringly intelligent and a feminist who has a deep understanding of masculine psychology.

Ms. Perel was hardly the first to point out that long-term closeness can dampen hot sex; among other influences, she cites the psychoanalyst Stephen Mitchells authoritative 2002 book, Can Love Last? The Fate of Romance Over Time, in her work. But she turned out to be the right person to bring the ideas to a general audience. The Utne Reader magazine reprinted her article; book offers quickly followed.

I had half a dozen agents calling me within a week, Ms. Perel said.

She signed on with the agent Tracy Brown, who had read the Utne article when he wandered into Barnes & Noble in Union Square on his lunch hour. The subsequent book proposal and Ms. Perels stylish presence in the sleepy offices of New York editors generated a brisk bidding war.

You always look for the things she brought to the table, but rarely do you see all of them in one person, said Gail Winston, executive editor of HarperCollins, who bought the book. Her mind is so sharp, and she is so charming empathetic, sexy and very, very funny.

The book, Mating in Captivity: In Search of Erotic Intelligence, was published in 2006. It had a slow on-ramp, and then it became a best seller, Ms. Perel said.

In 2013, she gave her first TED Talk, on The Secret to Desire in a Long-Term Relationship. She had the audience at So, why does good sex so often fade? It was as if she had peered into peoples bedrooms and validated their complex feelings about lust and fidelity. The talk racked up a million views in a week, Ms. Perel said. (The figure is now 20 million and counting.)

And that is when the switch occurs, Ms. Perel said. I said, Im not just going to talk to professional audiences. I want to talk to regular people, and I dont want to just be confined within the four walls of my office.

The world, it turned out, was as eager to listen as she was to talk. Ms. Perels second book, The State of Affairs: Rethinking Infidelity (2017), makes the case that infidelity can, counterintuitively, have positive effects on a marriage and that couples recovering from cheating need to pay as much attention to the longings and needs of the guilty party as to the hurt and betrayal of the injured party. (Often, she says, people cheating on their partners are not sick of their partners theyre sick of themselves.)

Ms. Perel gave her second TED Talk, on this juicy topic, in 2015. Judging from their reactions, many members of the in-person audience found her message something of a relief.

I know what youre thinking, she told them. She has a French accent; she must be pro-affair. Her eyes glinted wickedly, and she paused dramatically. Youre wrong. I am not French.

And no, she is not really pro-affair.

A lot of people have positive, life-changing experiences that come along with terminal illness, she writes in The State of Affairs. But I would no more recommend having an affair than I would recommend getting cancer.

As Ms. Perels profile grew, requests to speak, to write, to give keynote addresses, to hold seminars around the world poured in. She hired Lindsay Ratowsky, who formerly worked as Jessica Biels executive assistant, after meeting her at a party. They became business partners in a new company, Esther Perel Global Media.

The question was, how can we take these ideas and distribute them in different channels and through different outlets and for different audiences? said Ms. Ratowsky, now a consultant who helps clients develop and expand personal brands.

They hired new employees and revamped Ms. Perels website, adding online courses with titles like Rekindling Desire, which people can view for a fee, and other content. Focusing on other things, Ms. Perel cut back her clinical practice to two days a week.

The field of couples therapy is crowded with institutes and formal techniques, but Ms. Perel has resisted embracing a particular ideology.

I decided I wasnt going to create a school where I teach the Esther Perel method, she said.

In 2017, she started Sessions, a multidisciplinary training platform for therapists, coaches and counselors, who pay a monthly fee to watch Ms. Perel in conversation with colleagues from different backgrounds and therapeutic approaches. (Members of the public can pay to tune in to a live annual training conference.)

Attuned to the zeitgeist shes just savvy about the culture, Ms. Winston, the book editor, said Ms. Perel branched out into podcasting, recording the first episode of Where Should We Begin? in 2017; its sixth season will start this summer. In March, she announced a new podcasting deal with Vox Media.

In the podcast, Ms. Perel counsels couples gay and straight, monogamous and polyamorous, and from different backgrounds and ethnicities struggling with issues like trust, desire, fidelity and lingering childhood trauma. The sessions are intense, emotional and nonjudgmental.

In an increasingly confessional culture, the podcast is a voyeuristic window not just into other peoples problems, but into the therapeutic process itself.

The idea of a therapist being a blank slate has really shifted, said Den Logan, a marriage and family therapist in Los Angeles who is mentored by Ms. Perel as part of a monthly supervision group. Theres so much hunger for people to feel that the therapists are doing the work with you.

Responding to the emotional upheaval of the pandemic, Ms. Perel began posting free monthly workshops on YouTube on topics like the bewildering dissolution of boundaries and how not to go crazy when confined to a house in which two adults are working but there is only one desk. She has continued the workshops even as we are (maybe) coming out of this long period of turmoil.

A major piece of the pandemic was the loss of the erotic, Ms. Perel said. We had to choke that part of us that is curious, spontaneous, improvisational, that goes out, that looks at happenstance, that has a joyful encounter with the unknown.

Traditional couples therapy training often involves watching videotapes of therapy sessions, or observing them, with the patients permission, through one-way mirrors. But showing the sessions to a general audience is a relatively new phenomenon, and anathema to old-school psychotherapists for whom patient privacy is sacrosanct.

Ms. Perels general celebrity and tendency to push boundaries mean that she is not everyones cup of tea, though you would be hard-pressed to find a therapist eager to criticize her publicly.

Because its such a big field, there are obviously people who are envious of her, said the couples therapist Ellyn Bader, who belongs to a small group of peers who meet regularly with Ms. Perel to discuss their work.

There are people who think therapy should be extremely private and behind closed doors, she added, and there are people who are glad shes making therapy more accessible to the masses. (Dr. Bader is among the latter group.)

Listening to the podcasts, you might wonder if the couples carefully selected from hundreds of applicants end up feeling exploited or misrepresented. On the contrary, said one woman who was featured on an episode of Where Should We Begin? in which she and her husband discussed opening their marriage: She wanted to, and he didnt.

Shes so conscientious about the words she uses, and so careful about communicating in a way that is accessible, the wife said. (No names are used on the podcast, and the couple spoke on the condition of anonymity.) Its transformed our marriages and our lives.

Her husband agreed.

It was just insight after insight after insight, he said. She has such a great ability to pick up on things you didnt know you were thinking.

Though, he added, I did leave feeling like I wished Esther was my therapist.

Follow this link:
Esther Perels Business Is Your Business - The New York Times

Asked about Trump, McCarthys attention turns to Hillary Clinton – MSNBC

As the possibility of Donald Trumps indictment becomes more apparent, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg isnt the only Democrat on Republicans minds. Evidently, some in the GOP are also thinking about the Clintons.

Rep. Andy Biggs, for example, claimed this week that he now has evidence of a two-tier justice system. His proof: Bill Clinton paid Paula Jones in a civil settlement in the 1990s. Now President Trump does something similar and the [Manhattan district attorney] wants to jail him, the right-wing Arizonan argued.

Donald Trump investigations: Followour live blogfor the latest updates and expert analysis on potential indictments.

Biggs probably shouldve thought this through a bit more because the cases arent similar at all. Unlike Trump, Clinton didnt pay hush money; he simply settled a civil case. Whats more, Clinton didnt try to keep the settlement secret, which is pretty much the opposite of what happened between Trump, Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels.

But as it turns out, the Arizonan wasnt the only one thinking about the Clintons.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy spoke to reporters yesterday and was asked whether GOP lawmakers have concerns about whether Trump might have falsified business records to cover for hush money payments to cover up this alleged affair with an adult film actress. The California Republican responded:

Look, the thing I think about, it was interesting, someone briefed me on the use of money in a situation like this before. You probably covered this. Remember when the DNC and Hillary Clinton paid the law firm a million dollars and said that it was for something else, and we found out later it wasnt. It was all about the Russian inclusion, it wasnt for the legal part. So they went through, and they got investigated. A million dollars they spent, and you know what, at the end of the day, they didnt get arrested. They got fined.

It was at that point that the House speaker emphasized his equal justice talking point, effectively making the case that if Clinton wasnt arrested for her campaign finance controversy, then Trump shouldnt be arrested for his.

But just as Biggs didnt fully appreciate the details of his Clinton-related comparison, McCarthys pitch didnt quite work either, for reasons he shouldve understood.

Its true that Clintons 2016 campaign agreed to a civil penalty of $8,000 in the recent past stemming from an FEC investigation into how campaign money for Christopher Steeles dossier was reported. But as a Washington Post report explained soon after, This analogy isnt terribly strong, given, first, that the campaign and the Democratic National Committee faced punishment for the reporting and, second, that it centered on the mechanics of properly reporting campaign spending to the FEC.

In other words, McCarthy described Trumps hush money scandal as being a situation like the investigation into Clintons campaign finance filings, but the closer one looked, the less sense this made.

But lets also not brush past the disconnect between the question and the speakers answer. A reporter asked McCarthy about possible concerns that Trump allegedly falsified business records to cover for hush money payments to cover up this alleged affair with an adult film actress. The very first thought the California Republican had was to focus on Hillary Clinton.

The King of Whataboutism strikes again.

Steve Benen is a producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show," the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of "The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics."

Read more here:
Asked about Trump, McCarthys attention turns to Hillary Clinton - MSNBC

Online Troll Named Microchip Tells of Sowing Chaos in 2016 Election – The New York Times

The two social media influencers teamed up online years ago.

Both had large right-wing followings and pseudonyms to hide their real identities. One called himself Ricky Vaughn, after a fictional baseball player portrayed in a movie by Charlie Sheen. The other called himself Microchip.

In 2016, prosecutors say, they set out to trick supporters of Hillary Clinton into thinking they could vote by text message or social media, discouraging them from the polls.

Ricky Vaughn, whose real name is Douglass Mackey, was charged in 2021 with conspiring to deprive others of their right to vote, and on Wednesday the men met face to face in court for the first time.

Mr. Mackey sat at the defense table in Federal District Court in Brooklyn wearing a sober gray suit. He watched as Microchip, clad in a royal-blue sweatsuit and black sandals, approached the witness stand, where he was sworn in under that name and began testifying against him.

This month, a federal judge overseeing the case, Nicholas G. Garaufis, ruled that Microchip could testify without revealing his actual name after prosecutors said anonymity was needed to protect current and future investigations.

The sight of a witness testifying under a fictional identity added one more odd element to an already unusual case that reflects both the rise of social media as a force in politics and the emergence of malicious online mischief-makers trolls as influential players in a presidential election. This weeks trial could help determine how much protection the First Amendment gives people who spread disinformation.

Microchips testimony appeared intended to give jurors an inside view of what prosecutors describe as a conspiracy to disenfranchise voters. It also provided a firsthand account of crass, nihilistic motives behind those efforts.

I wanted to infect everything, Microchip said, adding that his aim before the 2016 election had been to cause as much chaos as possible and diminish Mrs. Clintons chances of beating Donald J. Trump.

Evidence presented by prosecutors has shown how Mr. Mackey and others, including Microchip, had private online discussions in the weeks before the election, discussing how they could move votes.

While Mr. Mackey made clear that he wanted to help Mr. Trump become president, Microchip testified that he was driven mainly by animus for Mrs. Clinton, testifying that his aim had been to destroy her reputation.

In the fervid and fluid environment surrounding the 2016 election, Mr. Mackey, whose lawyer described him as a staunch political conservative, and Microchip, who told BuzzFeed that he was a staunch liberal, became allies.

Online exchanges and Twitter messages entered into evidence by prosecutors showed the men plotting their strategy. Mr. Mackey saw limiting Black turnout as a key to helping Mr. Trump. Prosecutors said that he posted an image showing a Black woman near a sign reading African Americans for Hillary and the message that people could vote by texting Hillary to a specific number.

Microchip testified that Mr. Mackey was a participant in a private Twitter chat group called War Room, adding that he was very well respected back then and a leader of sorts.

Prosecutors introduced records showing that Microchip and Mr. Mackey had retweeted one another dozens of times.

Mr. Mackeys particular talent, according to Microchip, was coming up with ideas and memes that resonated with people who felt that American society was declining and that the West was struggling.

Microchip testified that he was self employed as a mobile app developer. He said he had pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge related to his circulation of memes providing misinformation about how to vote. Because of his anonymity the details of that plea could not be confirmed. And he added that he had signed a cooperation agreement with prosecutors agreeing to testify against Mr. Mackey, and to help with other cases.

Under cross-examination, Microchip said he had begun working with the F.B.I. in 2018. He also acknowledged telling an investigator in 2021 that there was no grand plan around stopping people from voting.

His time on the stand included a tutorial of sorts on how he had amassed Twitter followers and misled people who viewed his messages.

He testified that he had built up a following with bots, and used hashtags employed by Mrs. Clinton in a process he called hijacking to get his messages to her followers. He aimed to seduce viewers with humor, saying, When people are laughing, they are very easily manipulated.

Microchip said that he sought to discourage voting among Clinton supporters through fear tactics, offering conspiratorial takes on ordinary events as a way to drive paranoia and disaffection.

One example he cited involved the emails of John Podesta, Mrs. Clintons campaign chairman, which were made public by WikiLeaks during the campaign.

There was nothing particularly surprising or sinister among those emails, Microchip said, yet he posted thousands of messages about them suggesting otherwise. My talent is to make things weird and strange, so there is controversy.

Asked by a prosecutor whether he believed the messages he posted, Microchip did not hesitate.

No, he said. And I didnt care.

Link:
Online Troll Named Microchip Tells of Sowing Chaos in 2016 Election - The New York Times

Anti-Hillary Clinton troll ‘Microchip’ testifies at election interference trial in Brooklyn: ‘I wanted to infect everything’ – New York Daily News

A notorious Twitter troll known as Microchip told a Brooklyn federal jury that he spread chaos, controversy and misinformation online to damage Democrat Hillary Clintons chances of winning the 2016 presidential election.

I wanted to infect everything, Microchip testified Wednesday at the trial of fellow far-right troll Douglass Mackey, 32, whos accused of posting images on Twitter designed to trick people into thinking they could vote by text.

Microchip, who was allowed to testify using only his screen name, cut a striking figure in the fourth-floor courtroom at Brooklyn Federal Court.

Heavyset and bearded, with his hair slicked back, he wore a royal blue sweatshirt, sweatpants, sandals and socks. He often leaned back, looking toward the ceiling or crossing his arms as he viewed exhibits and answered questions.

FILE - A notorious Twitter troll named Microchip told a Brooklyn federal jury that he spread chaos, controversy and misinformation online to damage Hillary Clintons chances of winning the 2016 presidential election. (Shutterstock)

He described how he grew his online following, used psychological tricks to get ideas and memes in front of Hillary Clinton supporters and tweeted hundreds of times a day.

His ultimate goal, he said, was to cause as much chaos as possible, so that it would bleed over to Hillary Clinton and diminish her chances of winning.

Mackey, a former Manhattan resident now living in Florida, is accused of tweeting fake Clinton campaign ads under his popular Twitter moniker Ricky Vaughn a week before the 2016 election, urging voters to avoid the line and vote by text even though that was impossible.

Hes charged with conspiracy against rights, which carries a possible 10-year sentence.

Microchip pleaded guilty to the same charge and is cooperating with the government on the Mackey case and other FBI investigations.

Douglass Mackey, a former Manhattan resident now living in Florida, is accused of tweeting out fake Clinton campaign ads, a week before the election, urging voters to avoid the line and vote by text. Hes charged with conspiracy against rights, which carries a possible 10-year sentence.

At times Wednesday, Microchip tried to keep talking even after a lawyers objection, leading Judge Ann Donnelly to lightly tell him, stay in your lane.

He testified about participating in group chats with names like War Room, and Fed Free Hate.

I was in many group [direct messages], he said. We crafted memes, and one of those memes we crafted dealt with voting the wrong way.

Their intent, he said, was to defraud voters of their right to vote.

The hope would be that Hillary Clinton voters would see this and then vote incorrectly, Microchip testified.

One image posted by Microchip on Election Day showed a photoshopped picture of comedian Aziz Ansari holding up a sign reading Save time, avoid the line, vote from home.

Mackey was active in group chats, Microchip said. He was very well-respected back then, and he still is ... I would say that hes a leader of sorts.

He had good ideas for the strategy for creating memes.

With a Twitter post encouraging voters to vote from home displayed behind him, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) questions witnesses during a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism hearing titled 'Extremist Content and Russian Disinformation Online' on Capitol Hill, October 31, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Microchip said he built his Twitter following 134,000 users for one account, and tens of thousands for others by using automated bot services, then let human nature do the rest.

If you see somebody followed by a lot of people, they might have something interesting to say, he remarked.

He spent about 90% of his time online talking about the upcoming 2016 election, to destroy the reputation of Hillary Clinton.

You wanted her to lose? Assistant U.S. Attorney William Gulotta asked.

Oh, yeah, he responded.

He described spreading his message through memes and humor, explaining, When people are laughing, they are very easily manipulated.

And he amplified images he found on reddit and the web forum 4chan, which often hosts vulgar and bullying photos and posts.

Microchip described 4chan in more benign terms: Its a place for internet intellectuals to gather together to talk about different topics.

He later clarified, 4chan is used by intellectuals and by absolute idiots, so its a dual thing there.

He also talked about the thousands of tweets he posted about Clinton campaign chair John Podestas hacked e-mails, which were twisted into the basis of the online Pizzagate conspiracy theory.

Microchip said he didnt see anything weird or strange in the e-mails, but that hardly mattered.

My talent is to make things weird and strange, so that there is a controversy ... and then his reputation would bleed over to Hillary Clinton, he boasted.

The Daily News Flash

Weekdays

Catch up on the days top five stories every weekday afternoon.

Was what he posted true? No, he said, And I didnt care.

Mackeys lawyer Andrew Frisch pressed Microchip on his cooperation agreement and brought up an earlier statement he made to the FBI in 2021 that his firehose of tweets was meant to flood social media with content not part of a grand plan to prevent people from voting.

Frisch also pointed out that Microchip, who is self-employed as a mobile app developer, could potentially lose clients if he was publicly arrested or if his identity was revealed.

And he asked about out some of Microchips recent tweets, including one from last month in which he announced, My IQ is so high right now, you have no idea.

The trial is set to continue Thursday. Frisch said in his opening statement he expects Mackey to testify in his own defense.

Read more:
Anti-Hillary Clinton troll 'Microchip' testifies at election interference trial in Brooklyn: 'I wanted to infect everything' - New York Daily News

Who Pooped Near Hillary Clinton in Aisle of Broadway Show? – The Cut

A fecal mystery. Photo-Illustration: by The Cut; Photos: Getty Images

Imagine: You buy tickets to a Broadway show a glorious, big, high-kicking (Associated Press) musical comedy, but not Funny Girl and what you actually wind up getting is a smelly, real-life mystery about human feces. This is apparently what happened to Hillary and Chelsea Clinton during a recent performance of Some Like It Hot at Shubert Theater in Manhattan, and while sources in Page Six offer conflicting accounts about the details, one thing seems clear: Last week whenHillary and Chelsea Clinton were in the audience, a source told the tabloid, the lights came up for intermission and there were two human turds in the aisle just near the famous political duo.

There was an incident when Hillary Clinton and Chelsea attended, a second source, someone purportedly close to the production, confirmed. This person claimed that it was an elderly person and its rather sad, but yes, the house staff worked quickly to help resolve the situation and Act II started as scheduled. A third, also unnamed insider described the defecation as an unfortunate one-off. It doesnt sound like the placement of the poop, in the approximate vicinity of the former First Lady and Daughter, was deliberate, but the first source the source who painted the above picture of the scene says a witness spoke to the house manager, who said that it was actually the fourth time it had happened. The individual went on to allege: There is someone who is either shitting in the aisle, or surreptitiously dumping defecation that they smuggled into the theater.

Just one anonymous sources opinion, of course.

Get the Cut newsletter delivered daily

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

See original here:
Who Pooped Near Hillary Clinton in Aisle of Broadway Show? - The Cut