Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Trump’s ‘election integrity’ chief won’t say if Hillary Clinton won the popular vote – CNN

"We will probably never know the answer to that question," said Kobach, who, not for nothing, is running President Trump's Commission on Election Integrity. "Because even if you could prove that a certain number of votes were cast by ineligible voters, for example, you wouldn't know how they voted."

We do, in fact, know the answer to that question.

He provided no evidence for that claim -- likely because, well, there is no evidence to provide.

It didn't make sense then. It doesn't make sense now.

That Kobach, who is leading a commission devoted to "election integrity," would repeat something that has ZERO evidence to back it up is remarkable. Just to be totally clear: This is not a "he said, he said" issue. Everyone in a position to know -- except Trump -- says Clinton won the popular vote.

What's even more amazing is that the Trumpian focus on the popular vote is totally pointless. We decide our presidents by the electoral college -- which Trump won! No one is disputing that fact! Trump is the president through inauguration day 2021 no matter what happened in the popular vote.

Let's say it together: Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. Donald Trump is the president.

See, that wasn't too painful!

More here:
Trump's 'election integrity' chief won't say if Hillary Clinton won the popular vote - CNN

Russia Wanted Hillary Clinton ‘Bloodied’: Ex-CIA Director | Fortune … – Fortune

The FBI learned Russia had hacked the Democratic National Committee back in the summer of 2015. In the spring of 2016, security agencies became aware there was a broader Russian campaign to meddle in the U.S. election. By the summer, they had determined what it looked like.

Their first objective was to undermine the credibility and integrity of the U.S. electoral process. They were trying to damage Hillary Clinton," said former CIA Director John Brennan speaking at Fortune s Brainstorm Tech conference in Aspen Wednesday morning. "They thought she would be elected, and they wanted her bloodied by the time she was going to be inaugurated and they were also trying to promote the prospects of Mr. Trump,

Also clear to Brennan and his national security colleagues at the time: Russian President Vladmir Putin had authorized the campaign. (We have our ways, Brennan said, when asked how they had come to that conclusion.)

That the U.S. government held such intelligence and didnt respond to Russia more aggressively before the election has baffled and angered many, but Brennan defended the Obama Administrations approach, saying anything more may have made things worse. He explained:

In terms of cyber doctrine which you can do, you could have a symmetric cyber strikethere are things you can do [like release all of Putins financial records]but the consideration is, is that going to be purely punitive and going to lead into an escalatory cycle in the middle of a presidential campaign?

And then it gets worse and then the Russians do more, which really calls into question the credibility and integrity of the election in November. Were trying to do everything possible to stop them, but not allow it to be a self-fulfilling prophecy in terms of what the Russians were trying to accomplish.

He added that while America has cyber capabilities that match those of Russia and other more aggressive states, the government is thoughtful about when and how best to deploy them. (One consideration: businesses and citizens can become targets in escalating cyber warfare.) In any case, he said, I dont believe that anything we would have done would have stopped the Russians from doing these activities.

Because of all that, hearing Trump refer to meeting Putin as a great honor several made Brennans blood boil a bit. As for the ongoing investigation into the current Administrations dealings with Russia in the run-up to the election and Trumps repeated denial of them, Brennan said only, He said things. I knew things.Im not going to pulse one against the other. (Though hes not involved, he says the FBI will be looking for evidence of three things: collusion, obstruction of justice and financial irregularities.)

Brennan was more forthcoming on the topic of whether the President has damaged the nations intelligence agencies by repeatedly challenging the findings of their Russia investigation:

Mr. Trump takes the intelligence product when it suits his interests, but he seems to be a very selective consumer of information, not just intelligence. I think thats very, very dangerous because not only does it undermine the confidence of people within the intelligence community, but it undermines the confidence of our allies and partners overseas. If hes questioning U.S. intelligence, how should they feel about it?

The next time we go to one of our partners and say, We really need your help on this issue because we have good intelligence that says X, why should they believe Mr. Trump or someone else from the administration after theyve denigrated the quality of the intelligence communitys work?

Read the original post:
Russia Wanted Hillary Clinton 'Bloodied': Ex-CIA Director | Fortune ... - Fortune

Hillary Clinton is more unpopular than Donald Trump. Let that sink in – The Guardian

The Democratic establishment appears to not be learning any lessons. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Donald Trump is one of the least popular politicians in the history of the United States. Yet, Trump is still more popular than Hillary Clinton. Let that sink in.

According to the latest Bloomberg National Poll, Trump has a net favorability of 41% whereas Clinton has a net favorability of 39%. If Democrats are to escape the political wilderness, they will have to leave Clinton and her brand of politics in the woods.

Now, there is no doubt that Clinton has suffered sexist double standards just as Barack Obama encountered racist double standards. Trump labeled her Crooked Hillary and his supporters rallied around the chant Lock her up. Rich in hypocrisy, Trump has continued to attack Clinton for her emails even though his son has proven to have done much worse.

Nevertheless, it would be wrong to pin all of Clintons unpopularity on sexism and the conspiracies of the extreme right. The Bloomberg poll demonstrates that more than one-fifth of Clinton supporters say they now have an unfavorable view of her. Based on follow-up interviews with poll participants, many Clinton voters expressed that their negative feelings were not simply due to her losing but were about the Democratic partys positioning for the future.

Even though Clinton has blamed everyone but herself, it is clear that her campaigns failure to galvanize voter turnout was one of the biggest reasons why Trump won. Her checkered record on progressive policies, bland centrist message and the Democrats presumption that Trumps nomination sealed their victory probably did not help.

Clinton has largely kept a low profile since the election, occasionally sending Twitter barbs in Trumps direction. The best case scenario for Democrats is for Clinton and her family to stay away. The wise thing for the party to do is to abandon the failed Third Way centrist politics that she and her husband have come to exemplify.

Even so, the Democratic establishment appears to not be learning any lessons. Kamala Harris, the first-term California senator rumored to be a frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020, recently mingled with top Clinton donors and supporters in the Hamptons. Apparently tying rising talent to the infrastructure of a politician less popular than Trump is the game plan for moving forward.

Playing mostly defense against Trump and talking a lot about Russia, the Democratic establishment has struggled to develop an alternative message that Americans find attractive. According to a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll, only 37% of the country believes Democrats stand for something. Even the new sticker options for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee are depressingly shallow. Some of the slogans read: Make Congress Blue Again and I Mean, Have You Seen The Other Guys?

Although the establishment comes across as unimaginative and clueless, it is not as if Democrats lack other options. Bernie Sanders has become and remains the most popular politician in the whole country. His bold and progressive populist campaign may have lost out to Clinton in the primaries, but it may reflect a more viable blueprint for the future. The question is whether Clinton loyalists will put aside their purity politics and be pragmatic enough to change the direction of the party.

Looking across the pond, Jeremy Corbyns Labour Party provides another example to learn from. Dismissed by Blairite centrists in his own party, Corbyn not only over-performed in the general election, he rewrote British politics.

As Matthew Yglesias argued in Vox, Corbyns electoral map looks a lot like Clintons; not only did he inspire young voters in a similar way to how Sanders did here, Corbyn ran on a bold policy agenda. In an age in which voters are characterized as irrational creatures who dont vote because of policy, YouGov found that the top reason supporters backed Labour was because of the partys social democratic manifesto.

Democrats have become a tale of two wings. If the Clintonite establishment wing comes across as hopelessly uninspiring, the Berniecrat progressive wing has appeared energetic and full of ideas. Consider the #PeoplesPlatform sponsored this week by Sanders Our Revolution alongside other organizations, such as Democratic Socialists of America, Womens March and Fight for 15. This platform which Americans can sign a petition for urges Democrats in Congress to support bills, such as Medicare for All, Free College Tuition, Voting Rights and Criminal Justice and Immigrant Rights.

Certainly, Democrats might not win all of these progressive measures in Congress. But fighting for these measures would not only shift the political terrain, it would attract Americans desperately looking for a positive alternative to the Republicans.

Clinton did not provide a true alternative to the status quo. Democrats should look elsewhere for a blueprint forward and leave her politics far behind. Remaining attached to her would be political madness. The majority of Americans know it.

Read the original post:
Hillary Clinton is more unpopular than Donald Trump. Let that sink in - The Guardian

Why Hillary Clinton Is Really Unpopular Again – HuffPost

Hillary Clinton is even less popular now than when she was running for president.

Just 39 percent of Americans view Clinton favorably, according to a Bloomberg national poll conducted last week and released on Monday. A year ago, when Clinton was the presumptive Democratic nominee, her favorability was at 43 percent. The former secretary of state is viewed slightly more negatively than President Donald Trump, who has historically low poll numbers for a president this early in his administration.

That puts Clinton at odds with every losing presidential candidate since 1992. Except for Clinton, the defeated candidate saw an increase in favorability ratings after Election Day, according to Gallup data.

The Bloomberg poll didnt get into reasons for Clintons decline in favorability. But there is, of course, one thing that sets her apart from the pack of failed candidates: Clinton is a woman.

In follow-up interviews, Bloomberg poll respondents said their negative feelings about Clinton had nothing to do with her loss. Instead, they emphasized how unlikable they consider Clinton echoing the opinions of many voters during the 2016 campaign.

She did not feel authentic or genuine to me, Chris Leininger, 29, an insurance agent from Fountain Valley, California, told Bloomberg. She was hard to like.

Thats neither an unusual nor a surprising sentiment. Women with strong ambitions and opinions typically take a likability hit, Colleen Ammerman, director of Harvard Business Schools Gender Initiative, told HuffPost.

A mountain of research on women leaders has found that the idea of a powerful woman runs counter to most peoples expectations for whats considered feminine quiet, supportive, nurturing and definitely not ambitious.

The disconnect puts female leaders in whats known as the double-bind strong bosses are penalized for not acting like women, and those who lean the other way and try to display more characteristically feminine traits are penalized for being weak leaders.

Clintons probably the best-known example of this phenomenon. Shes been criticized for being too loud, but also for smiling too much.

In the past, Clintons favorability ratings tended to go up when she was not actively running for office. In December 2012, when she was secretary of state, 70 percent of Americans viewed Clinton positively,according to Bloomberg.

But since her loss in November, Clinton has stayed in the public eye and has continued to voice her opinions. Thats likely stoked anxiety and discomfort among Americans, Ammerman said.

Clinton opened up about why she thinks she lost to Trump in an interview in April with New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, and again in May in an interview with CNNs Christiane Amanpour at a conference.

Clinton said she took personal responsibility for her defeat, but also cited the last-minute announcement from then-FBI Director James Comey of a reopened investigation into her emails as a decisive factor in Trumps victory. Shes not the only one whos cited Comeys letter as a potent October surprise leading to her loss.

Yet the comments were met with rage and disbelief from certain corners, writes Rebecca Traister in New York magazine.

Heres how Gersh Kuntzman put it in the Daily News: Hey, Hillary Clinton, shut the f up and go away already.

New York Times politics reporter Glenn Thrush tweeted mea culpa-not so much. Countless others rage-tweeted at Clinton the audacity of her trying to analyze her loss.

Ammerman said there was an element of gendered backlash in the response. Clintons willingness to be vocal about being ambitious and wanting to win did little to endear her to the Americans already uncomfortable with a woman audacious enough to want to be president.

Its hard not to see the sexism in the response, though certainly many of these men arent aware of it. The idea that she shouldnt mention the Comey letter when the entire nation and the most respected statisticians are considering its impact is so strange, Amanpour told Traister later. If she were a man, would she be allowed to mention it? As a woman, I am offended by the double standards applied here. Everyone shrieks that Hillary was a bad candidate, but was Trump a good candidate?

You could argue that we live in a highly polarized time, and perhaps thats why public opinion has not bounced back in Clintons favor. But other Democrats havent taken a popularity hit. In fact, former President Barack Obama and Vice President Biden have both seen their favorability ratings rise since November in Bloombergs polling.

Most losing presidential candidates have an easier time and a more generous reception from the public. Former Massachusetts Gov.Mitt Romney, who largely disappeared from view after he lost the 2012 presidential election, saw a 4-point increase in favorability after his defeat. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) stayed in the public eye as a senator after his presidential loss in 2008, and his numbers shot up significantly. Before the election, 50 percent of Americans viewed him favorably. After he lost to Obama, McCains favorability rose to 64 percent.

To be sure, none of those men lost to Trump, an inexperienced and incompetent political leader feared and disliked by a bipartisan array of people. And, as Traister pointed out, its easy and natural to blame the whole Trump thing on Clinton, rather than to dissect the myriad other reasons for his rise.

Its painful to re-litigate the election for a lot of people though Trump certainly keeps trying and maybe that contributes to the feeling of wanting Clinton to just disappear.

Having lived through the 2000 election, I dont remember this level of vitriol and blame leveled at Al Gore arguably as stiff and awkward a presidential candidate as Clinton. Indeed, just seven years after his loss to George W. Bush at a time when the country was struggling under that administration Gore won a Nobel Peace Prize.

Theres more to the Clinton negativity than Trump backlash, as this Bloomberg poll makes clear.

One poll respondent, 46-year-old Robert Taylor, voted for Clinton and said in a followup interview that he doesnt blame her for Trump.

I think my negativity about her would be there whether Trump was elected or not, he said.

The Bloomberg poll was conducted by Selzer & Co. It surveyed 1,001 adults from July 8 to July 12, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cellphones.

Read the original:
Why Hillary Clinton Is Really Unpopular Again - HuffPost

Hillary Clinton is Less Popular Than President Trump, Poll Finds – TIME

Former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during BookExpo 2017 at the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center on June 1, 2017 in New York City. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is less popular than President Trump , according to findings from a new poll .

The Bloomberg poll , released Tuesday, found that just 39% of Americans view Clinton favorably, while 41% view Trump favorably. That two-point difference falls within the survey's margin of error, which was plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Former President Obama, by comparison, was viewed favorably by 61% of respondents, according to the poll.

"Theres growing discontent with Hillary Clinton even as she has largely stayed out of the spotlight," pollster J. Ann Selzer, who oversaw the survey, told Bloomberg. "Its not a pox on the Democratic house because numbers for other Democrats are good."

The poll found that Clinton's current favorability rating is the second-lowest it has been since 2009, when Bloomberg began tracking her. In September 2015, her favorability hit a low of 38%.

Trump's approval ratings have continued to reach record lows , compared to other U.S. presidents at this point in their tenures. Even as he faces a variety of challenges in his presidencyincluding the failure of the Republican health care bill and investigations into Russian meddling in the electionTrump has continued to criticize Clinton and her campaign, rehashing old debates and raising questions about Clinton's primary victory over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Clinton, who is working on a new book that will address her presidential campaign, has spoken out in several interviews and speeches since losing the election. She also launched a Political Action Committee dedicated to promoting liberal causes and candidates.

The poll of 1,001 adults by phone was conducted between July 8 and 12.

Excerpt from:
Hillary Clinton is Less Popular Than President Trump, Poll Finds - TIME