Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Hillary Clinton Models ‘Nasty Woman’ T-Shirt to Support Planned … – Fox News Insider

Trump Jr: 'There's Nothing I'd Ever Do to Endanger This Country'

Coulter: 'A Lot of Republicans Hate Trump Just as Much as MSNBC Does'

Krauthammer: 'Incompetence is Not a Good Defense' for Don Jr.

Hillary Clinton tweeted a photo of herself modeling a "Nasty Woman" T-shirt to help raise funds for Planned Parenthood.

The shirt was created by Samantha Bee, host of TBS' "Full Frontal,"and the online fundraising platform Omaze. Every $25 shirt sold benefits the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project for Los Angeles County.

Support Samantha Bee & Planned Parenthood & buy a Nasty Woman t-shirt! Clinton tweeted on Tuesday.

White House Accuses Democrats of Obstructing Trump's Nominations

$8 Million?! Marine Injured in Afghan Attack Rips Trudeau for Payment to Terrorist

AP Stylebook Instructs Writers Not to Use Words Like 'Pro-Life,' 'Refugee' & 'Terrorist'

According to theproduct descriptionon the TBS shop site:

By getting this exclusive Nasty Woman shirt, youre joining Samantha Bee and countless other smart, fearless women and men in supporting Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County, standing up for womens (aka, human) rights and helping to pave the way for a brighter future. This is such an incredible time in our country's history. Don't you want to look back on it with pride, knowing that you helped make a difference? We do! Join us and lets make it happen.

"Nasty woman" is a reference to the infamous remark President Trump made about Clinton during a 2016 presidential debate.

Liberals and feminists turned it into a rallying cry for Clinton's failed presidential campaign.

Watch the "Fox & Friends" report above.

Kaine on Trump Jr. Emails: This Is Now a 'Treason Investigation'

Poll Shows Deep Divides on Views of Colleges, Media, Banks

Loesch Blasts Sarsour's Defense of Call for 'Jihad' Against WH

Bernie Sanders Predicts GOP Healthcare Bill Deadlier Than 9/11

NY Prof: Trump Jr. Mtg Involved 'Malpractice' By Paul Manafort

View original post here:
Hillary Clinton Models 'Nasty Woman' T-Shirt to Support Planned ... - Fox News Insider

Hillary Clinton models ‘Nasty Woman’ shirt for Planned Parenthood – USA TODAY

Samantha Bee and Hillary Clinton are "Nasty Women" for a favorite cause.(Photo: Getty/EPA)

Hillary Clinton is teaming up with longtime supporter Samantha Bee to support a favorite cause:Planned Parenthood.

The former Democratic presidential candidate tweeted a photo posing with a new item of Full Frontal with Samantha Bee merch, a t-shirt emblazoned with "Nasty Woman," the infamous insult-turned-catchphrase that President Trump coined about Clinton during a debate last year.

"Support Samantha Bee & Planned Parenthood & buy a Nasty Woman t-shirt!" she wrote, linking to a TBS product page for the $25 t-shirt.

According to the product page, proceeds from the shirt support thePlanned Parenthood Advocacy Project for Los Angeles County, described as "a political advocacy organization that works to advance reproductive health through political action, advocacy, and education."

"By getting this exclusive 'Nasty Woman' shirt, youre joining Samantha Bee and countless other smart, fearless women and men in supporting Planned Parenthood Advocacy Project Los Angeles County, standing up for womens (aka, human) rights and helping to pave the way for a brighter future," readsthe shirt's description. "This is such an incredible time in our country's history. Don't you want to look back on it with pride, knowing that you helped make a difference? We do! Join us and lets make it happen."

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2uenw42

Link:
Hillary Clinton models 'Nasty Woman' shirt for Planned Parenthood - USA TODAY

With 2018 Midterm Season About to Begin, Hillary Clinton Prepares Her Offensive – Townhall

The only problem is she doesnt know what she wants to do. She has already established a super PAC, Onward Together, which will support organizations fighting the Trump agenda. Shes now an avowed member of the Resistance. So, what can she do? Shes already making some Democrats a bit wary since everyone in the Democratic Party, while they still love and respect Clinton, know that new blood is needed, and that her entrance into the midterm race could clog the spot. Second, like with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Republicans can easily turn her into a villain, which means a more energized conservative base pumping cash into GOP war chests. The Hills Amie Parnes, who along with Jonathan Allen, wrote about the former first ladys failed 2016 election campaign, said that the two-time presidential loser might go with the party flow and set her sights on California and other congressional districts that split for her and the current GOP representative during the 2016 election:

She also is looking at the House districts she won in last years presidential contest against Donald Trump as part of an autopsy of her failed campaign, according to two sources who have spoken to the former secretary of State.

Its at least possible shell lend a hand on the campaign trail particularly in the 23 districts held by Republicans where voters preferred her over Donald Trump for the White House.

She's very well aware of how she performed in those districts, said one longtime Clinton confidant who has spoken to the former Democratic nominee.

[]

Democrats are focused on the Golden State as they seek to win back the House majority.

Ellen Tauscher a Clinton ally and former California congresswoman along with a longtime aide Katie Merrill, have started a super PAC focused on seven of the so-called split districts in that state that voted for Clinton but backed a Republican candidate for the House.

[]

Chris Lehane, a Democratic strategist, added that Clinton, could have a real voice in these places, absolutely.

She can go into those districts and make a case that there is an opportunity to do a course correction and do it in a fairly compelling way, Lehane said, particularly if Democrats strengthen their message and give voters a reason to vote for them.

[]

Even staunch Clinton supporters say that while there is room for her to play a role, she also needs to leave room for new leaders to emerge.

Garry Mauro, a longtime friend of the Clintons who led Bill Clintons 1992 campaign effort in Texas, thinks the House can be won with the help of the Longhorn state, where there are three split districts.

But he doesnt want Clinton to be front and center.

Would she be well received? Of course, she would be. But were not going to win these races because Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi comes to the state and campaigns, Mauro said. Were going to win it because we represent new leadership and new ideas.

The problem is that the recruitment of Democrats who want to carry on this new mantle could have serious issues post-Georgia, where Democrat Jon Ossoff failed to beat Republican Karen Handel. Second, the candidate farming system that Democrats crafted for their 2006 takeover has crumbled to dust; it doesnt exist. Third, white working class voter outreach will make a Democratic takeover much more easier but I doubt the insufferable urban professional progressive cohort that runs the Democratic Party would allow lectures on privilege, police brutality, safe spaces, microaggressions, and cultural appropriation be relegated to the backburner. Last, despite President Trumps shaky poll numbers, its quite possible that we could have a 2018 electorate that mirrors 2016, which benefitted Republicans. An increase in Democratic turnout, even at levels not seen in ten years, isnt enough to win. We saw that in GA-06, which are exactly the districts (i.e. Republican ones) Democrats need to flip to ensure a House takeover. California is not where the Democratic majority will be birthed. To make things more brutal for Democrats concerning their 2018 obstacles is that even if the Democrats are able to get every single Clinton voter who backed a House Republican to turn out in 2018 and flip back over,it wouldnt be enough to win the House. Thats from the left-leaning Third Way think tank [emphasis mine]:

The numbers underscore how different even the 23 GOP-held Clinton districts are demographically. Many are suburban and overwhelmingly white. Others are rural and heavily Latino. Within the broad categories, there are stark differences on income, educational attainment and employment rates. More than half of adults in New Jerseys 7th District, for example, graduated from college. Only 17 percent in Californias 10th District did.

The most important takeaway is that there is no one kind of voter or district that can deliver the House for Democrats in 2018, said Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, the vice president for social policy and politics at Third Way. Theres been a lot of focus on suburban districts. Theres no doubt that those are important, but there are not enough of them to win the House.

Hatalsky, who co-authored the report with Ryan Pougiales, emphasized that Democrats still would not win the House even if they could get every single 2016 Clinton voter who backed a Republican House candidate to turn out again in 2018 and cross over.

You cant get to a House majority without winning over Trump voters, she said.

The study also noted that Democrats have to defend 12 districts that Trump carried as well. Once again, weve seen how reaching out to Trump voters is necessary for Democrats to win again. After all, these voters used to form the backbone of the party, which has been replaced by hyper-progressive zealots who are characterized by anti-free speech antics, shunning of white voters, and dogmatic adherence to political correctness. These people care more about whether transgender Americans are able to use the bathroom than job creation. Theres a lot of time between Electon Day 2018 and now, but lets just say the leaderless, divided Democratic Party doesnt look like it has its act together to mount a campaign that clinches Congress for them. Yet, let's not kid around here, we know that Clinton will take the limelight. She'sout for revenge.

Original post:
With 2018 Midterm Season About to Begin, Hillary Clinton Prepares Her Offensive - Townhall

Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine? – Slate Magazine (blog)

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.

AFP/Getty Images

Following the revelation of emails confirming the New York Times Monday story about Donald Trump Jr. being told about Russian efforts to aid the Trump campaign, conservatives, Trump backers, and Trump Jr. himself resurfaced the findings of a January Politico story about Ukranian efforts to aid Hillary Clinton, arguing that Clinton allies had been just as willing to work with a foreign power as Trump Jr. seemed to be.

The widely shared Daily Caller post about the Politico story asserts that Democratic operative Alexandra Chalupa was involved in an effort by Ukraine to provide Democrats with opposition research on Paul Manaforts work as a pro-Russia political adviser in Ukrainea strategy Trump supporters claim is analogous to the Trump campaigns apparent effort to gather research on Clinton that was potentially furnished by the Russian government.

The first thing to note about thePolitico piece is that it goes to considerable lengths to differentiate the activities of Ukrainian officials during the election and the broad and evidently Kremlin-led efforts to assist Trump. Russias effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the countrys military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials, Politicos Kenneth Vogel and David Stern wrote. Theres little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the countrynot to mention its ongoing strife with Russiawould render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another countrys election.

That said, Politicos story did raise questions about the willingness of Clinton allies and the DNC to work with foreign officials in securing information damaging to the Trump campaign, although the parallels to what Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort were involved in are thinner than Trump backers claim.

The Politico story doesnt implicate the Clinton campaign directly so much as it does the DNCwhich, Vogel and Stern wrote, was briefed on Manafort following a meeting between Chalupa, Ukrainian Ambassador Valeriy Chaly, and one of the ambassadors aides at the Ukrainian embassy in March 2016. Its not clear whether DNC officials were aware that Chalupa was working with Ukranian officials at that point. The story does, however, say that DNC officials encouraged Chalupa to ask for a meeting with Ukranian President Petro Poroshenko to gather more information about Manafort, a meeting that never happened:

The story goes on to quote embassy official Andrii Telizhenko as saying that the embassy was additionally working with the Hillary team itself, but the allegation isnt elaborated upon in the piece.

Its important to remember that whats ultimately concerning about Russiagate is the possibility that the Trump campaignincluding staffers now employed in the White House by the presidentworked with a hostile government whose leaders attempted to influence and disrupt the election with cyberattacks. The Chalupa story is about officials in an embassy passing along opposition research to a Democratic operative and reporters. The two episodes are not close to being the same, but that fact obviously wont stop Trumps supporters from deploying the story for yet another round of Clinton whataboutism.

Read the original:
Did the Clinton Campaign Really Collude With Ukraine? - Slate Magazine (blog)

EXCLUSIVE: Libyan Army Spox Says Obama, Clinton ‘Abandoned the Libyan People to the Terrorists’ – PJ Media

In an exclusive interview with PJ Media, the Libyan National Army (LNA) spokesman, Col. Ahmed al-Mesmari, says that President Obama and Hillary Clinton "abandoned the Libyan people to face these terrorists alone."

He also implicates the Obama administration in supporting terrorist militias -- including Libyan al-Qaeda leader Abdelhakim Belhadj and Muslim Brotherhood militias allied to al-Qaeda.

Rather than backing the LNA and the elected Tobruk-based Libyan House of Representatives (HoR) in the fight against these terror groups, the Obama administration -- along with the United Nations and the European Union -- have been trying to impose a "Government of National Accord" (GNA) that has zero constituency in Libya. Further, it is accused of working with terror-linked militias in Tripoli.

With the continuing crisis between several Arab nations -- including the Libyan HoR and Qatar -- Col. al-Mesmari discusses Qatar's role in arming and financing terrorist militias in Libya. He also connects the Muslim Brotherhood militias that have been fighting against the LNA with al-Qaeda and ISIS elements operating in the country.

Col. al-Mesmari also claims that the February 17th Martyrs Brigade -- hired by Hillary Clinton's State Department to protect the U.S. consulate in Benghazi -- cooperated with Ansar al-Sharia in attacking the consulate compound on September 12, 2012.

That attack led to the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

Libyans celebrated last week when, after three years of battle, the LNA finally liberated Benghazi from all terrorist groups in the city:

And over the past month, Col. al-Mesmari has publicly charged Qatar with direct support of terrorist groups operating in Libya:

The following is an exclusive interview I conducted by email earlier today with Col. Ahmed al-Mesmari, official spokesman for the Libyan National Army:

--------------------------------------

1) It's been six years since the U.S.-led NATO intervention in Libya. Hillary Clinton was the leading voice in the Obama administration for the U.S. action. What responsibility does she and Obama bear for that decision?

The main responsibility falls on NATO, which interfered in Libya in 2011 to end the Gaddafi regime and destroyed all Libyan army weapons and infrastructure, only to then leave Libya alone to fight the terrorists. They took none of the necessary measures to help rebuild the Libyan Army or even help to reactivate other security facilities.

Follow this link:
EXCLUSIVE: Libyan Army Spox Says Obama, Clinton 'Abandoned the Libyan People to the Terrorists' - PJ Media