Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Mary Catherine Bateson Dies at 81; Anthropologist on Lives of Women – The New York Times

Mary Catherine Bateson, a cultural anthropologist who was the author of quietly groundbreaking books on womens lives and who as the only child of Margaret Mead had once been one of the most famous babies in America died on Jan. 2 in Dartmouth, N.H. She was 81.

Her husband, J. Barkev Kassarjian, confirmed the death, at a hospice facility. He did not specify the cause but said she had suffered a fall earlier that week and experienced brain damage.

Dr. Batesons parents, Dr. Mead and Gregory Bateson, an Englishman, were celebrated anthropologists who fell in love in New Guinea while both were studying the cultures there. (Dr. Mead was married to someone else at the time.) They treated their daughters arrival almost as more field work, documenting her birth on film not a typical practice in 1939 and continuing to record her early childhood with the intention of using the footage not just as home movies but also as educational material. (Dr. Batesons first memory of her father was with a Leica camera hanging from his neck.)

Benjamin Spock was her pediatrician she was Dr. Spocks first baby, it was often said and his celebrated books on child care drew from lessons learned by Dr. Mead.

Still, it wasnt her babyhood, her lineage or her scholarship an expert on classical Arabic poetry, she was as polymathic as her mother that brought Dr. Bateson renown; it was her 1989 book Composing a Life, an examination of the stop-and-start nature of womens lives and their adaptive responses life as an improvisatory art, as she wrote.

In the book, Dr. Bateson used her own history and those of four friends as examples of ambitious women at midlife. (She was 50 at the time of its publication.) All five had lived long enough to have experienced loss, the strains of motherhood, sexism, racism, career setbacks and betrayals. In Dr. Batesons case, she had been ousted as dean of faculty at Amherst College in Massachusetts in an apparent back-room deal orchestrated by male colleagues. It left her hurt at first; her anger would take years to blossom.

Written with wry compassion and a behavorial scientists sharp eye, the book became in its way an unassumimg blockbuster and a touchstone for feminists. Jane Fonda hailed it as an inspiration, as did Hillary Clinton, who as first lady invited Dr. Bateson to advise her.

Reading Composing a Life made me gnash my teeth and weep, the author and Ms. magazine co-founder Jane OReilly wrote in The New York Times Book Review in 1989. I scribbled all over the margins, turned down every other page corner and underlined passages with such ferocity that my desk was flecked with broken-off pencil points.

The insights in the book, Dr. Bateson wrote, started from a disgruntled reflection on my own life as a sort of desperate improvisation in which I was constantly trying to make something coherent from conflicting elements to fit rapidly changing settings, as if she were rummaging frantically in the fridge to make a meal for unexpected guests.

Mary Catherine Bateson was born on Dec. 8, 1939, in New York City. Her father was in England at the time; an avowed atheist, he sent his wife a congratulatory telegram instructing, Do Not Christen.

Mary Catherine was reared according to the rituals and practices her parents had observed in their fieldwork, including being breastfed on demand; her mother would consult with Dr. Spock. So committed was Dr. Mead to record-keeping that when Mary Catherine was in college and wanted to throw out her childhood artwork, her mother declared that she had no right to do so.

Mary Catherine grew up in Manhattan, mostly in the ground floor apartments of two townhouses in Greenwich Village that Dr. Mead shared in succession with friends who lived on the upper floors. As Dr. Mead was often away from home for work or, when at home, working full-time it was a convenient living arrangement: Mary Catherine could be looked after when necessary by a full bench of unofficial siblings and their parents, as well as an English nanny and her adolescent daughter.

Dr. Meads housekeeping techniques were also novel: When home, she cooked and ate dinner with her daughter but eschewed dishwashing, so as not to waste time that could be better spent with Mary Catherine or on her work. Day after day, dishes piled up in dizzying verticals like a Chinese puzzle, awaiting a maid who would arrive on Mondays, as Dr. Bateson recalled in an earlier book, With a Daughters Eye: A Memoir of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson (1984).

The memoir is an affectionate yet sober portrait of two very complicated people. One of the premises of the household in which I grew up, Dr. Bateson wrote diplomatically, was that there was no clear line between objectivity and subjectivity, that observation does not preclude involvement.

In his review of the book in The Times, Anatole Broyard noted that Dr. Bateson had brought almost as much sophistication to bear on the picture of her childhood and her parents as they did on her.

We are used to novelists and poets giving us their highly colored or hyperbolic versions of their fathers and mothers," he went on, but Miss Bateson, who was born in 1939, is a behavioral scientist as well as a writer with considerable literary skill.

Her parents were married for 14 years before divorcing. Dr. Mead died in 1978 at 76. Gregory Bateson died in 1980 at 76.

Mary Catherine attended the private Brearley School in Manhattan. At 16, after accompanying her mother on a trip to Israel for one of Dr. Meads lectures, she stayed behind and spent part of that year on a kibbutz, where she learned Hebrew. Over the years she would also learn classical Arabic, Armenian, Turkish, Tagalog, Farsi and Georgian, the latter because she thought it would be fun.

She entered Radcliffe at 17, studied Semitic languages and history, and graduated in two and a half years. She had already met Dr. Kassarjian, a Harvard graduate student at the time, but promised her mother that she would not marry until she finished college. She earned her Ph.D. in linguistics and Middle Eastern languages at Harvard in 1963; her husband earned his there in business administration.

Early in their marriage, she and Dr. Kassarjian lived in the Philippines and then Iran, following his career running Harvard-related graduate institutes in those countries. Dr. Bateson found work as an academic and an anthropologist, learning Tagalog in the Philippines and Farsi in Iran to do so. They lived in Iran for seven years, until they were forced out in the late 1970s by the revolution there, having to leave most of their possessions behind.

Dr. Bateson taught at Harvard, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Brandeis University and Spelman College in Atlanta, among other institutions. At her death, she was professor emerita of anthropology and English at George Mason University in Virginia and a visiting scholar at the Center on Aging & Work at Boston College.

Her husband is a professor emeritus of management at Babson College in Wellesley, Mass., and professor emeritus of strategy and organization at the International Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Dr. Bateson published a number of books on human development, creativity and spirituality, including Composing a Further Life: The Age of Active Wisdom (2010).

In addition to her husband, she is survived by their daughter, Sevanne Kassarjian; her half sister, Nora Bateson; and two grandsons.

At her death, Dr. Bateson was working on a book titled Love Across Difference, about how diversity of all stripes gender, culture and nationality can be a source of insight, collaboration and creativity.

Original post:
Mary Catherine Bateson Dies at 81; Anthropologist on Lives of Women - The New York Times

Hamilton song written by AI features odd reference to Hillary Clinton – CNET

Michael Gribble, a film music student, dons an appropriate wig to perform Hamilton lyrics written by AI. Gribble put the words to music.

Hardcore fans of the musical Hamilton can't get enough of the catchy soundtrack (I speak from experience). So they may be happy to know there's a new Hamilton earworm in the world. Lin-Manuel Miranda, the musical's creator, had nothing to do with this one, though. The lyrics were written entirely by AI.

To come up with the song's lyrics, Eli Weiss, a film production student at California's Chapman University, used Shortly Read, an AI application designed for writing that incorporates GPT-3, the powerful third-generation machine learning language model used by OpenAI, a nonprofit artificial intelligence research group backed by Elon Musk.

GPT-3 has been supplied with 45TB of text data, presumably including the full lyrics to Hamilton, and can generate a range of written content with simple inputs.

Weiss and team entered this one sentence: "Here are the lyrics to a new song from the hit musical Hamilton: An American Musical." The program then created lyrics to a tune with four verses, a chorus and a bridge that correctly identifies characters in the story and their relationships to each other.

"It messes up a few times, like when Hillary Clinton makes a brief appearance," says Weiss, a huge Hamilton fan, "but overall it's incredibly convincing."

Indeed, most of the lyrics, both in words and cadence, feel like they'd fit right in to the musical, which tells the story of American Founding Father Alexander Hamilton, largely through hip-hop. "I wrote my way out of hell, I wrote 6 feet past the grave. I wrote a song about you, the only thing that kept me safe," the AI lyrics go.

Entertain your brain with the coolest news from streaming to superheroes, memes to video games.

GPT-3 produces word sequences that are often amazingly human-like, but can also contain some amusing surprises.

In the case of the new Hamilton song, Hamilton's devoted wife gives him a most unwelcome gift: "I met a certain young lady called Eliza and I'm 90% sure she gave me syphilis. But I hope I gave it back to you."

Then there's the reference to Hillary Clinton as "my new Eliza." The machine learning tool likely linked the former secretary of state to Hamilton lyrics referencing that government post. How Clinton becomes Hamilton's new love is anyone's AI guess.

Weiss' friend Michael Gribble, a film music student, put the AI-written song to music and performs it in the video above. This isn't the first time AI has written a new Hamilton song, however. A few years ago, creative Max Deutsch trained a neural network on the musical's lyrics and asked it to come up with a new tune.

AI is becoming an increasingly visible player in the creative space, doing everything from generating Katy Perry and Elvis songs to painting nude portraits and crafting poetry in the style of the classics. Sometimes the results genuinely connect to the human experience. Other times, they're downright creepy.

Weiss and his creative partner Jacob Vaus are among those fascinated by AI's creative potential and have tapped it to write scripts and compose other songs.

"Right now, most of that work still has this comedic charm to it, but I think somewhere in the middle of that spectrum is what we will start to see a lot of in the years to come," Weiss says. "AI being used here and there in the creative process to fill in gaps and make adjustments."

History has its eyes on you, AI.

Read the original post:
Hamilton song written by AI features odd reference to Hillary Clinton - CNET

Imagine if Hillary Clinton had acted like President Trump after she lost the 2016 election | PennLive letters – pennlive.com

I wonder what the response from Donald Trump and his supporters would have been if following the 2016 general election, defeated opponent Hillary Clinton had engaged in a constant drumbeat of condemning the election process, telling the American people that she had won.

What if she had repeatedly gone to state and federal court to try to have millions of legally cast votes in areas of the country that favored Trump thrown out and if she had blasted Democratic officials who failed to nullify the election as hapless and enemies of the people?

What if her comments had caused the duly elected president and his family to be the recipients of death threats and if when challenged for her incendiary rhetoric, she doubled down on it, continuing to tell her followers that the contest was rigged?

The president and the shameless cowards within his party who stand by him are attempting to shred our democracy, to force minority rule on our country, and even worse, their actions are causing honorable elected and appointed officials who do not toe the Trump line to fear for their lives.

In the short term, they are menaces to our country, its people, and our democracy. In the years to come, they will land on the scrapheap of history.

Oren Spiegler, Peters Township Pa.

The rest is here:
Imagine if Hillary Clinton had acted like President Trump after she lost the 2016 election | PennLive letters - pennlive.com

VERIFY: Did Donald Trump win the title of 2020s most admired man? – KIIITV.com

Last year, Obama and Trump tied in the Gallup poll.

WASHINGTON, D.C., USA This week, 13News has been getting questions about President Trump and whether a national poll found him to be the most admired man in the country.

The questions are related to reports of the president winning an annual poll conducted by the analytics company Gallup.

Every year, Gallup asks Americans which man and woman in the world (not just in the U.S.) they admire most.

This year, Donald Trump won the survey with 18% of Americans citing him as the most admired man.

Barack Obama came in second with 15%, ending a record 12-year run by Obama as the nations most admired man in the Gallup poll. Last year, Obama and Trump tied.

President-elect Joe Biden (6%) and Dr. Anthony Fauci (3%) finished in third and fourth place in the 2020 poll, followed by Pope Francis, businessman Elon Musk, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates, basketball player LeBron James and the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan Buddhist spiritual leader, according to Gallup.

Critics of the president wonder how he won the most admired man poll during a year when Trumps national approval ratings have been historically low, while his supporters point out he just earned more than 75 million votes in the 2020 presidential election, shattering the old record for an incumbent president.

In explaining the 2020 results, a Gallup statement said: Even though Trump is unpopular now 39% approve of his performance his dominant performance among Republicans, contrasted with Democrats splitting their choices among multiple public figures, pushes him to the top of the 2020 most admired man list.

So while both the popular vote count and Electoral College vote count show Trump lost the 2020 presidential election by large margins, Gallup confirms he did win the companys annual most admired man poll by being selected by 18% of Americans.

As far as the nations most admired woman, former First Lady Michelle Obama won that title for the third year in a row with 10% of the vote. Vice President-elect Kamala Harris (6%) finished second with First Lady Melania Trump placing third (4%).

The rest of the top 10 most admired women list includes television personality Oprah Winfrey, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, former Secretary of State and former First Lady Hillary Clinton, New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Queen Elizabeth II, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett and climate change activist Greta Thunberg.

If you have a question for the 13News VERIFY Team, email us at VERIFY@wthr.com.

Read more:
VERIFY: Did Donald Trump win the title of 2020s most admired man? - KIIITV.com

Trump lowered the bar for presidents. Biden needs to raise it. – MSNBC

I think it's safe to say Donald Trump reached new lows when it comes to the art of presidential scandals. Among the president, his immediate family and the less than savory cohort he's surrounded himself with, the scandals of the last four years have run the gamut from absurd to deadly to absurdly deadly.

Biden will need to raise the bar once he takes office, and he cant be given a pass just for being better than Trump.

The good news is that President-elect Joe Biden could basically walk right over the bar for ethical conduct Trump has set and clear it without missing a step. Unfortunately, though, that's no way to judge a president against the worst of the worst. Biden will need to raise the bar, and he can't be given a pass just for being better than Trump.

This isn't a case of whataboutism. Holding Biden's White House accountable isn't about papering over Trump's misdeeds. In fact, there's little that Biden could do that could erase or justify Trump's commitment to enriching himself, violating the rule of law and otherwise debasing the presidency.

But memory is a funny thing, especially when it comes to presidents. Comparisons are generally made between the current officeholder and the most recently departed.

That's meant that Trump has constantly been compared to Barack "No Drama" Obama. Biden will likewise be held up to Trump's performance.

Trump is something of an anomaly in that his shadow casts backward, as well. That has left Democrats yearning for the Obama years and their relative simplicity in a way that Republicans didn't once George W. Bush left office, even as Bush's approval ratings rose after his term. Biden tapped into this nostalgia throughout his campaign, constantly reminding voters of what the Obama-Biden administration achieved.

Holding Bidens White House accountable isnt about papering over Trumps misdeeds.

And yet, things weren't exactly idyllic back then. The Obama White House committed plenty of its own sins, even if none of them were of the monstrous tenor of Trump's child separation policy. Pursuing the targeted killing program in Pakistan and Yemen, continuing the National Security Agency's domestic spying program, ramping up deportations, investigating and prosecuting reporters all were policies that deserved harsh scrutiny, scandals that warranted outrage or both.

Biden, like Obama, should be held to the previous standards set for presidents, leaving Trump as an outlier. But here's a very, very important caveat: The Republican Party cannot be allowed to be the sole arbiter of what is and is not a scandal in the Biden White House.

Almost all controversies in Washington are exploited politically it's to be expected of all but the most heinous scandals. Both parties' members know that to be called out for "playing politics" is about as stern a set of empty words as exists on Capitol Hill.

What I'm saying, though, is that Republicans have for years exaggerated and embellished Democrats' supposed offenses for political gain. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a particularly rich target remember Benghazi? Even as evidence mounted suggesting that many of the allegations against the Obama White House in response to the 2012 attack in Libya were conspiracy theories, Republicans still took every opportunity to talk up the "four dead Americans" whom Clinton had supposedly left to die.

The culmination of those efforts, including hours of hearings and a whole House committee organized for the sole purpose of hurting Clinton's presidential campaign, issued a final report that found no wrongdoing by any Obama officials after all.

If allowed, Republicans will go back to their pre-Trump ways, hyping the misdeeds of the Biden administration until they look like they're on the scale of, well, the Trump administration's actual offenses. We're already seeing it gear up, as Biden's nominee to head the Office of Management and Budget is being criticized for her mean tweets about Republicans. I mean ... now you're going to pretend to care about tweets?

That can't be allowed to happen. Not after four years of ignoring or outright acquiescing to Trump's misdeeds. It's in bad faith, and it should be called out as such. That's going to require a firm reminder from the media and voters any time a member of Congress gets on TV trying to "but her emails" Biden.

If we're going to get the presidency back to any sort of stability, Trump's way of doing business has to be left behind. Democrats needs to be ready to criticize the head of their party in a way that Republicans have been too cowardly to do. And Republicans need to be blocked from memory-holing the Trump administration's existence as they launch attacks on Biden.

Hayes Brown is a writer and editor for MSNBC Daily, where he helps frame the news of the day for readers. He was previously at BuzzFeed News and holds a degree in international relations from Michigan State University.

Originally posted here:
Trump lowered the bar for presidents. Biden needs to raise it. - MSNBC