Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Cuomo: Resign or stay put? In Virginia, we’ve been there, done that. – Virginia Mercury

Andrew Cuomo should have known theyd come for him.

New Yorks Democratic governor often scolding and demeaning; at times a bully had made plenty of enemies over the years. He appeared almost daily on cable news, painting a picture of a decisive, effective leader in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic. It found traction, contrasted with then-President Donald Trumps denials, inaction and dangerous absurdities that made doctors cringe.

His abrasive and condescending style with political adversaries, with the press, even with Democratic allies he considered rivals or insufficiently deferential to him lit a fuse. First came evidence that his administration had significantly shorted the count of COVID-19 nursing home deaths across New York. Then came claims from numerous women that Cuomo made unwanted advances ranging from indecent suggestions to groping. The resulting detonation has blown his governorship to bits.

Calls for his resignation are nearly universal. Even President Joe Biden who also survived accusations of improper touching said in an ABC News interview last week that if an investigation validates the womens allegations, not only should he resign, he would probably be prosecuted.

Virginia has been there, done that and mailed the kids postcards.

Two years ago, separate, simultaneous scandals provoked loud and widespread cries for the departures of all three of Virginias top statewide elective officeholders.

First, on Feb. 1, 2019, Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam encountered the mother of all PR nightmares when a Republican blogger discovered a photo on Northams medical school yearbook page showing one man dressed in blackface standing beside another in Klan regalia. That night, in a panic, Northam and his advisers issued a statement in which Northam apologized for appearing in the picture.

The next day, however, after a late night of phone calls with old medical school friends and classmates, Northam reversed himself, announcing in a nationally televised news conference that he was not in the photo, but admitting to applying shoe polish to his face for a Michael Jackson dance contest in the 1980s.

As calls from state and national leaders reached hurricane force, Northam hunkered down to ride it out.

Prominent among those calling for Northam to go was Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax, a fellow Democrat who stood to succeed him and become Virginias second Black governor. His potential shortcut to the throne was sidetracked when two women alleged that Fairfax had sexually assaulted them in the early 2000s, allegations Fairfax has repeatedly and vehemently denied. Instantly, demands for Fairfaxs resignation ensued, relieving some of the pressure on Northam.

Then Attorney General Mark Herring, who also had clamored for Northams exit, disclosed that he, too, had once applied brown makeup and a wig to impersonate rapper Kurtis Blow for a party during his University of Virginia frat boy days.

For weeks, Virginias entire Democratic power triumvirate seemed to teeter at the precipice. But all three remain in office. Fairfax is a candidate in a large, diverse Democratic gubernatorial field.

Northam, uniquely barred by Virginias Constitution from seeking re-election, has proved to be one of the commonwealths most consequential governors. He went from being a pariah in the winter of 2019 to helping position fellow Democrats for electoral triumphs that fall that gave them majorities in the state House and Senate for the first time in a generation. Under full Democratic rule, Virginia has reformed its election laws, passed new gun control measures, decriminalized marijuana and approved its eventual recreational use and abolished the death penalty in making historically conservative Virginia the Souths most progressive state.

A review of the yearbook scandal commissioned by the Eastern Virginia Medical School concluded that neither person in the photo could be identified and that the origin of the photo could not be determined.

Herring, who had been weighing a gubernatorial run, is seeking re-election a prospect made more interesting by Northams endorsement of Herrings primary challenger, Del. Jay Jones of Norfolk.

Fairfaxs situation most closely parallels Cuomos. He has insisted that the encounters with his accusers were consensual. Unlike Cuomo, no other women have made claims against Fairfax. He has not been charged in either encounter and, from the outset, has called for independent investigations that so far have not materialized. He filed a $400 million defamation lawsuit against CBS News over interviews CBS This Morning did with his accusers in 2019 and is appealing a lower courts dismissal of the case to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Set aside moral considerations for a moment and consider Cuomos dilemma from a realpolitik perspective: why should he unilaterally abdicate power given Virginias outcomes? Consider, too, how Trump shrugged off numerous womens claims and even his own hot-mic boasts about taking obscene liberties with women only to be elected president and remain in office for a full single term.

But in the second decade of the 21st century, how could anyone in such a position of power behave as though the misogynist Mad Men culture of the 1960s, when men sometimes considered the office a sexual hunting ground, still applies?

No one should imagine that sexual harassment or even sexual assault are vanquished. It still happens and, perhaps, always will. But now, at last, there are swift and terminal consequences for it in the #MeToo world. Companies spend huge sums of money training employees to identify, avoid and report sexual harassment and assault. Its untenable for C-suite executives and even mid-level managers in todays corporate world. Even consensual workplace romances are viewed harshly by HR departments, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a leading national outplacement firm.

So how is it that the nations most powerful elected leaders supposedly exemplars of the best in America seem to get away with it? When did it become survivable in politics?

Bill Clinton and Gennifer Flowers. 1992, said political scientist Mark Rozell, dean of the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.

The claim by Flowers, a Little Rock cabaret singer and TV reporter, of a 12-year affair with Clinton, then the governor of Arkansas, came as Clinton positioned himself in that years crowded Democratic presidential primaries. Days after The Star tabloid published the allegation, Hillary Clinton appeared at the side of her husband for a joint 60 Minutes interview. He denied improprieties with Flowers but acknowledged wrongdoing (and) causing pain in my marriage. He survived it and subsequent revelations during his presidency. He was impeached over lying to a federal grand jury about his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky but avoided conviction and removal from office in the Senate.

Remember that just one election cycle before that, the frontrunner had been knocked out of the race over allegations of infidelity that he had denied, said Rozell, dean of the Schar School of Government and Policy at George Mason University. Sen. Gary Hart of Colorado, then 50, withdrew from the 1988 Democratic field, done in by newspaper reports of an extramarital relationship with Donna Rice, then a 29-year-old actress and model.

What changed?

Much of it comes down to how the political figure handles the issue, whether he is transparent and confronts the accusations honestly and is able to convince the public that certain private actions have no bearing on public performance Rozell said. I think that was the big distinction many people made in 1992.

Will it work for Cuomo? Time will tell.

The New York legislature has begun an impeachment inquiry of Cuomo. And a new Quinnipiac Poll shows that while his support has slipped, 49 percent of state residents surveyed said he should not resign and 43 percent say he should.

As his number of accusers grew, he finally got around to apologizing, but in doing so, denied ever touching anyone appropriately. It had the feel of mea culpa prompted not so much by what was done but by getting caught doing it.

But for all his words of contrition, the lead of the story remains this: he flatly refused to resign.

If past is precedent, he probably wont have to.

Read the original here:
Cuomo: Resign or stay put? In Virginia, we've been there, done that. - Virginia Mercury

Democrats pushing to weaken the filibuster say it enables racism – Roll Call

The same year, 2013, a bipartisan gun background check measure, sponsored by Manchin and Pennsylvania RepublicanPatrick J. Toomey, won a majority but failed to get past the Senates filibuster threshold partly because four Democrats voted against it. Last year, the Senate fell five votes short of 60 on a policing measure sponsored by South Carolina RepublicanTim Scott.

That Schumer would choose to test McConnell rather than pursue these past bipartisan efforts indicates just how inflexible politics has become on Capitol Hill, and how Democrats see political gain in taking a stand on the filibuster.

Democrats see their best shot at beating the odds in the 2022 midterm elections, and either maintaining or expanding their majorities, by keeping their coalition of progressive whites and minority voters engaged.

While Democrats share of the former grew in the 2020 presidential race, their share of the minority vote shrank. Donald Trump took 12 percent of African American ballots, up from 8 percent in 2016, and 32 percent of the Latino vote, also 4 points higher than he did in his victory over Hillary Clinton.

Democrats plan to use their elections bill, which would require states to permit early and mail-in voting and, for states with voter ID laws, to accept a sworn statement in lieu of an ID card, and the coming fight over the filibuster, to appeal to minority voters.

Read more:
Democrats pushing to weaken the filibuster say it enables racism - Roll Call

Navy SEALS Arrest Hillary Clinton – Real Raw News

The chant lock her up has finally seen fruition.

US Navy SEALS loyal to Donald Trump raided Hillary Clintons Chappaqua, NY estate and arrested her on charges of treason, destruction of government property, and aiding and abetting the enemy, Real Raw News has learned.

The arrest happened on Tuesday night, according to a source in Trumps orbit, only hours after Trump had spoken to Rear Admiral Hugh W. Howard at US Special Operations Command and given him a mammoth trove of evidence of Clintons criminality dating back to her days at the State Department. The evidence allegedly includes thousands of never-before-seen emails, which Clinton acid washed prior to the 2016 presidential election, as well as documents implicating her in plots to assassinate Republican legislators across the country.

The evidence was so compelling, our source added, that Adm. Howard had trouble believing that Clinton wasnt arrested years ago.

Trumps been wanting to get her, and the rest of the Deep State cabal, ever since he set foot in the White House. It has taken him years to dig up the motherload. Once he had military support, he greenlit the operation. Trumps team, for lack of a better word, had been surveilling Clinton a long time, and he knew she was always alone on Tuesday nights. Thats when the SEALS nabbed her, our source said.

Under cover of darkness, an eight-man detachment from Naval Special Warfare Group 3 infiltrated the Chappaqua mansion shortly after 2:00am. Mysteriously, Clintons two-man Secret Service detail, which normally lives in a guest house on the property, was absent that morning. The SEALS cleared the main building, then silently breached the door to her bedroom, where they found her awake rehearsing a speech before a vanity mirror. They fired a single tranquilizer dart into her neck, our source said, before taping her mouth and sealing a black cloth bag over her head.

The SEALS also seized several laptops and reams of paper, our source said.

I dont know where they took her; only Trump knows that. But this is proof that Trump and the military have started taking out the cabal. It took him longer than expected, longer than he wanted, but better late than never. Trump is doing whats right for America, our source said.

Trump will soon send her to Guantanamo Bay to face a military tribunal for her crimes against America and its people. GITMO, our source said in closing, is run by the Marine Corps. and the US Navy, both of which have forsaken Joe Biden and instead pledged to help Donald Trump vanquish the forces of darkness that have enshrouded the nation in corruption for decades.

Update:

Clinton Shipped to GITMO, Awaiting Military Tribunal

Note: We are aware that MSM-spondsored, so-called fact checking agencies, such as SNOPES, are challengnig the content of this article. Snopes, Politifact, MediaBias, and most other so-called fact checking organizations are controlled wholly by the MSM and the liberal left to promote their agenda. RRN stands by the story as written, and will present an update shortly.

Please help support alternative media. We follow the truth, wherever it leads. We reject absolutely big-tech and the narrow, dogmatic views of MSM. Although we are new to the arena, the MSM and its watchdogsSnopes, Media Matters, Politifact, etc.have waged war on us. We need your help to thrive, so that we can present important, unique news not found elsewhere.

(Visited 397,737 times, 964 visits today)

Follow this link:
Navy SEALS Arrest Hillary Clinton - Real Raw News

Hillary Clinton Just Took a Big Ol’ Nasty Swipe at the …

Queen Hillary as she likes to think of herself was sitting on her big throne in Upstate New York, passing judgment on the British Monarchy.

TIRED OF THE ADS? BECOME A PREMIUM USER TODAY!!

As you know Hillary is one of the biggest elitists in all of America. Her family has wielded more power than most other Ameican dynasty families, and shes been at the font-and-center of many scandals and controversies some of the biggest involving the abuse of women.

So, its really, really rich to see her attacking the Royals for not treating women respectfully.

MORE NEWS: Look Who Meghan Markle is Now Consulting With on Her Possible 2024 White House Run

I mean, give me a break. This is the woman who smeared and silenced the army of women who have spoken out about her lecherous husband his entire adult life.

But narcissistic, self-absorbed Hillary doesnt think about stuff like that when shes trying to inset herself into a story and scare up some much-needed PR.

Thats likely why she was clamoring to get a word in edgewise about the disastrous Meghan Markle interview with Oprah.

>>>FOLLOW US ON GAB<<<

And Hillary didnt waste any time trashing the Royals.

She stopped short of calling them racists as Meghan and Harry did, but she made sure to paint the Royals as an outdated, stuffy tradition that holds young, amazing women back.

Oh, get real, Hillary

From CNN

Hillary Clintonweighed in Monday on Oprah Winfreysexplosive interviewwith Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, and her husband, Prince Harry, offering support for Meghan and decrying the tabloids and bureaucracy that often targeted her.

I found it so heart-rending to watch, Clinton said during a Washington Post Live event on Monday, noting that she had met the pair as well as Harrys late mother, Princess Diana. Clinton called it heartbreaking that Meghan was not fully embraced not just by the permanent bureaucracy that surrounds the royal family, but by the media in the UK.

Clinton, a woman who has been in positions of power as a former first lady, senator, secretary of state and Democratic presidential candidate, has at times faced heavy public scrutiny and pushed back on press she found unfair. British tabloid reporting on disgraced former US congressman Anthony Weiner, the husband of longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin, became a significant obstacle for Clintons 2016 presidential campaign.

She noted that shes experienced the intensity of Britains notoriously vitriolic tabloids first-hand, calling Meghan incredibly accomplished and lauding the Duchess of Sussex efforts to advocate for herself.

[]

Clinton said that every institution has got to make more space and acceptance for young people coming up particularly young women, who should not be forced into a mold that is no longer relevant, not only for them, but for our society.

And it was heartbreaking to see the two of them sitting there having to describe how difficult it was to be accepted, to be integrated, not just into the royal family as they described, but more painfully into the larger societies whose narrative is driven by tabloids that are living in the past.

She added, I just hope that there will be some serious thoughtful consideration in all of the institutions, not just in response to what Meghan and Harry were talking about, but literally across all of our societies.

Clinton also cited diversity as key to bringing such establishments into the future.

Hillary should worry more about how terribly shes treated, countless women thanks to her disgusting perverted husband.

***FOLLOW US ON TELEGRAM***

The damage she has done to countless lives with her tabloid smear jobs, rivals anything the Briitish press has done to Meghan Markle.

And speaking of outdated traditions the Hillary political dynasty is so old its got mold growing on itand no matter how many times or ways the American people make it clear that they dont want her around, Hillary just keeps coming back.

Attn: Wayne Dupree is a free speech champion who works tirelessly to bring you news that the mainstream media ignores. But he needs your support in order to keep delivering quality, independent journalism. You can make a huge impact in the war against fake news by pledging as little as $5 per month. Please click here Patreon.com/WDShow to help Wayne battle the fake news media.

Go here to see the original:
Hillary Clinton Just Took a Big Ol' Nasty Swipe at the ...

Trump and Hillary: Forever connected by self-created failure | TheHill – The Hill

At some point, nonbiased historians (hard to find these days) will take a deeper dive into our recent presidential elections. When they do, an irony should jump out at them: Both Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonBiden says Putin will 'pay a price' for 2020 election meddling The Memo: Biden team's Obama criticisms draw some blowback USintel says Russia, Iran sought to influence 2020 election MORE and Donald TrumpDonald TrumpBorder surge scrambles Senate immigration debate GOP looks to measures barring trans athletes to rally voters House GOP holdouts muddle Trump vaccine message MORE are personally responsible for the losses they suffered. Two larger-than-life personalities and egos, who seemingly cant stand each other, will forever share an asterisk in political history. Who says karma cant be humorous?

Clinton twice lost the chance to become president. The first time, in 2008, the Democratic nomination was taken from her by a relatively unknown Illinois senator, Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Forget about comity in Congress The GOP bets against American recovery Obama on Atlanta shootings: We've neglected 'epidemic of gun violence in America' MORE. The second time, in 2016, as the Democratic nominee, she lost the general election to Trump.

Both losses clearly stung. But to lose the presidency to a man with no political experience and virtually no campaign, someone who was belittled and laughed at from one end of the progressive spectrum to the other, must be the stuff of recurring nightmares.

In 2008, most of the conventional wisdom had then-Sen. Clinton pegged as the inevitable nominee. So, what went wrong? Its simple: candidate and campaign hubris.

Clintons campaign team truly believedit was invincible. Because of that,it underestimated Obamas toughness, his campaign and the excitement he generated with a constituency that long felt abandoned. Just weeks before he announced his run, the Clinton campaign was assuring the world that Obama would not become a candidate for president. On top of that embarrassingly wrong prediction, strategically and logistically, the campaign team couldnt get out of their own way.

When Clinton registered a shocking third place in the Iowa caucus, it showed the political world that the Obama campaign not only had figured out how to navigate the complex caucus system which Clintons campaign mostly ignored but was not going to concede a single delegate.

Quite ironically, and seemingly forgotten by many in the news media, as Obama racked up delegate after delegate, it was then that Clinton first rolled out the argument But Ive got more popular votes than him.

Most pundits believed Clinton had learned her lessons from the tactical errors of 2008 and once again installed her as the prohibitive favorite to win the presidency in 2016. Just weeks before the election, the RealClearPolitics average put Clinton up 7 points over Trump, a theoretically unbeatable number until it wasnt.

Inexplicably, Clinton decided she didnt need to campaign in Wisconsin and barely did so in Michigan. More than that, she apparently thought it was a winning political move to label potential Trump supporters as deplorables and, in March 2016, at a Democratic town hall meeting in Ohio, to declare,We are going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business. That was a jaw-dropping gaffe considering that she needed to win coal-rich Pennsylvania in the fall.

She went on to lose all three of those states by close margins. As accurately summarized by the liberal authors of the book Shattered, While Hillary was measuring the drapes in the Oval Office, her team was mis-measuring the electorate.

Next, we come to Trump and his 2020 campaign. The argument can be made that Trump lost because he was a flat-out jerk at times, one who shamefully turned the office of the president into a WWE SmackDown chamber as he continually barked out insults.

As Trump supporter Conrad Black more delicately put it in a recent column for American Greatness, Americans demand more dignity of the president and a president who is less exhausting and constantly in the face of the country not only during all waking hours but, through his Twitter account, during much of every night.

In the end, Trump could not deliver such dignity.

Consider the state of Arizona, historically a reliably red state, which Trump managed to lose by about 11,000 votes. How? Well, to start with, he repeatedly had bashed the late Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainMeghan McCain and Joy Behar argue over whether antifa 'does exist' Trump and Hillary: Forever connected by self-created failure Democratic Arizona Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick says she won't seek reelection MORE, Arizonas war hero. That presumably cost Trumpmore than 10,000 votes among the more than 3 million cast.

Several Republican political professionals with whom I spoke believe that Trumps bullying tactics directly cost him 10 percent of the vote. Lets assume they are being much too punitive and dial down that estimate to, say, 1.5 percent of voters who were turned off by Trumps infantile affronts after initially intending to vote for him.

Even giving him that generosity, Trump lost Arizona and its 11 electoral votes by three-tenths of 1 percent of the vote. He lost Georgia and its 16 electoral votes by two-tenths of 1 percent of the vote. He lost Wisconsin and its 10 electoral votes by seven-tenths of 1 percent of the vote, and he lost Pennsylvania and its 20 electoral votes by 1.2 percent of the vote. If we add up the electoral votes lost to Trumps churlishness, we get 57. Had Trump won these states along with those he did win in November, his Electoral College votes would have totaled 289instead of 232and President BidenJoe BidenThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Forget about comity in Congress Border surge scrambles Senate immigration debate GOP looks to measures barring trans athletes to rally voters MOREs total would have dropped from 302 to 245, making Trump the winner.

Tens of millions of Americans collectively put their faith in Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and their respective visions for our nation. Sadly for those voters, the vanity and condescending attitudes of these two candidates betrayed that trust. It is, as former two-term President Obama might say, a teachable moment regarding outsize egos and political hubris.

Douglas MacKinnon, a political and communications consultant, was a writer in the White House for Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and former special assistant for policy and communications at the Pentagon during the last three years of the Bush administration.

See the original post here:
Trump and Hillary: Forever connected by self-created failure | TheHill - The Hill