Archive for the ‘Hillary Clinton’ Category

Trump Organization to sell Washington DC hotel in $375m deal reports – The Guardian

The Trump Organization has reportedly agreed on a $375m deal to sell its hotel near the White House in Washington DC.

The Wall Street Journal first reported the long-in-the-offing deal, with CGI Merchant Group, a real estate investment firm from Miami.

The New York Times said the buyer was exploring a renaming of the hotel, replacing the Trump brand with Waldorf-Astoria, under a deal with Hilton.

Any deal must be approved by the federal government, which leased the Old Post Office building on Pennsylvania Avenue to Donald Trump in 2013.

The hotel opened for business in 2016, shortly before Trump defeated Hillary Clinton for the presidency, and swiftly became a magnet for controversy.

Trump allies and foreign governments seeking to do business with the Trump administration made the hotel a Washington power centre, leading to accusations of self-dealing and violations of the emoluments clause of the US constitution.

The Trump Organization explored a sale before the coronavirus pandemic, during which business suffered badly.

Problems deepened after Trump was beaten at the polls by Joe Biden, a defeat he attempted to overturn by stoking supporters to attack the Capitol, at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

In March this year, Sally Quinn, an influential Washington author and journalist, told the Guardian she could not imagine most people staying there when they come. I dont know anybody who goes there or has gone there.

I suspect that whoever does buy it will take down all the gilt and all of the trimmings and turn it into something very un-Trump-like.

Documents released amid House investigations of Trumps affairs have shown that the hotel lost $74m between 2016 and 2020.

Trumps financial problems have been widely reported in October he fell off the Forbes list of the 400 wealthiest people in America for the first time in 25 years. He is also in widespread legal jeopardy, over his business dealings as well as his attempts to subvert the election.

Nonetheless, Trump remains the dominant power in the Republican party and seems likely to mount another White House run.

Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which sued Trump for accepting payment from foreign governments via the hotel, said: Donald Trump is now selling the location of four years of self-enrichment, conflicts of interest and constitutional violations.

Selling it now that hes out of office and the grift dried up is, to say the least, too little, too late.

The Crew lawsuit was dismissed after Trump left office, and the matter deemed moot by the supreme court.

Read more here:
Trump Organization to sell Washington DC hotel in $375m deal reports - The Guardian

How Trump reshaped the fifth circuit to become the ‘most extreme’ US court – The Guardian

One publicly mourned the moral tragedy of abortion. Another suggested that same-sex marriage imperils civic peace. A third tweeted negatively about Hillary Clinton using the hashtags #CrookedHillary, #basketofdeplorables and #Scandalabra.

James Ho, Stuart Kyle Duncan and Cory Wilson are among six judges appointed by former president Donald Trump to the US court of appeals for the fifth circuit, skewing one of the most conservative and influential courts in America even further to the right.

The consequences of Trumps reshaping of the federal judiciary are being felt acutely at the fifth circuit on issues ranging from abortion to immigration to the coronavirus pandemic. The courts willingness to entertain Republican extremism has effectively made it their principal legal bulwark against Joe Biden.

The Supreme Court is, no doubt, the nations most powerful court. But the 5th Circuit, the federal appeals court that covers Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, is staking out a claim to be the most dangerous, Ruth Marcus, deputy editorial page editor of the Washington Post, wrote in August.

The supreme court does indeed have the last word on the constitutionality of contentious laws and bears Trumps stamp with his three appointees. But the great majority of cases never make it that far. Instead 13 appellate courts, each covering a different region, get to rule on most legal appeals around the country.

Edward Fallone, an associate professor at Marquette University Law School, said: Theyre really error-correcting courts. Their function is primarily to correct the trial judge if they made a mistake. They dont have the power to overturn settled precedent from the supreme court but, if there are cases where there is no precedent and theyre writing on a clean slate, then they get the first crack at defining what the law is.

Among the 13 appellate courts, which typically put cases before three-judge panels, the US court of appeals for the District of Columbia circuit in Washington is widely regarded as the biggest hitter. On Thursday, for example, it temporarily blocked the release of Trumps White House records relating to the 6 January attack on the US Capitol.

But the fifth circuit, based in New Orleans, Louisiana, has long shown an ability to punch above its weight. Half a century ago it was seen as a trailblazer as it handled most civil rights cases. In 1964 Time magazine quoted a leading lawyer as saying: Without the Fifth Circuit, we would be on the verge of actual warfare in the South.

The courts transformation mirrored the politics of the deep south, recruiting from increasingly conservative ranks of judges and legal scholars. Of its 17 active judges today, 12 were named by Republican presidents.

When two vacancies arose during Barack Obamas presidency, Republicans managed to derail the nomination process and keep the seats open. (In 2015, notably, the court upheld a decision blocking Obama executive orders protecting undocumented immigrants whose children are US citizens.)

Then came Trump, who named six judges to the court, more than a third of its total composition. All are relatively young: they include Andrew Oldham, a former legal adviser to Texass governor, Greg Abbott, who is in his early 40s. Federal judges have lifetime tenure and typically serve long after the presidents who nominated them have left office.

Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia, said of the fifth circuits judges: The vast majority have been appointed by Republican presidents going back to Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush and George W Bush. Of course, the Bushes knew all of these people personally, I think, but Trump has really amped it up because he has chosen even more conservative people than the Bushes did.

This affects which cases the court is likely to hear. Appeals in the ruby red states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas naturally go before the fifth circuit. But its hard-right reputation is also an invitation to outsiders for forum shopping, in which a plaintiff or their backers choose a court that will treat their claims most favourably.

Christopher Kang, co-founder and chief counsel of the progressive pressure group Demand Justice, said: What weve seen over the last several years is that conservatives have stacked the fifth circuit with very ultra-conservative ideological judges and so, when particularly controversial issues come up, lawyers from across the country find a way to file in the fifth circuit, which then allows it to hear these cases and have an outsized impact on the development of the law.

He added: This has been a very intentional decision by conservative legal activists to file their cases in the fifth circuit so that they can get the most extreme ruling possible as early as possible in the process.

In October the fifth circuit temporarily reinstated Texass abortion law, the most extreme in the country, which bars the procedure as early as six weeks into pregnancy and outsources enforcement of the ban to ordinary citizens. Earlier this month it issued a stay freezing the Biden administrations efforts to require workers at companies with at least 100 employees be vaccinated against Covid-19 or be tested weekly.

Kang remarked: Time and time again, the fifth circuit is the place for the most extreme rulings to come forward and then the question is whether or not the supreme court will step in or how the supreme court will react.

So far the fifth circuit has frequently proven too extreme even for a supreme court that has a solid conservative majority. The higher court reversed six of seven decisions by the fifth circuit in the 2019-2020 term and five of seven decisions in the 2020-2021 term. Among them were fifth circuit rulings upholding a Louisiana abortion law and striking down the Affordable Care Act.

Trump appointed more than 200 judges to the federal bench, including almost as many federal appeals court judges in four years (54) as Obama did in eight (55) partly because Mitch McConnell, the Republican majority leader in the Senate, thwarted many Obama appointees. Trump flipped the balance of several appeals courts to a majority of Republican appointees.

Biden, however, has set about reversing the trend with impressive speed. Kang commented: There definitely is grounds for optimism in that President Biden and Senate Democrats are prioritizing judges like never before on the Democratic side. I do think they are on pace for President Biden to appoint more appellate judges than Trump did in his first year.

Bidens emphasis on professional diversity is also encouraging, Kang continued. Public defenders and civil rights lawyers and union-side labour lawyers the kinds of lawyers who have been traditionally excluded from the bench are being elevated now and that is tremendously important.

The question is, how many vacancies will President Biden be able to fill? Because these are lifetime judgeships, youre only able to fill vacancies when a judge retires or passes away. President Biden is filling these vacancies very quickly but at some point there may not be any more vacancies to fill.

Conservatives, however, reject the premise that Trump warped the lower courts so they no longer represent the will of the people on reproductive rights and other issues. Curt Levey, president of the advocacy group the Committee for Justice, said: Polling indicates that something like 70, 75% basically think that there should be some protection of abortion but that it shouldnt be abortion on demand a moderate position which hasnt been able to be enacted because of Roe v Wade.

Depending on what the supreme court rules, it and the fifth circuit might very well be right in the middle of American public opinion. I could name a bunch of issues like that so I dont know that I buy that the fifth circuit is any more out of step with the American people than some of the more liberal circuits. The circuits tend to reflect America because its a number of presidents, going back to Reagan, who have appointed the judges.

Read more here:
How Trump reshaped the fifth circuit to become the 'most extreme' US court - The Guardian

White House rallies around Kamala Harris after reports of dysfunction in West Wing – USA TODAY

VP Kamala Harris tours US cemetery in Paris

Vice President Kamala Harris toured Suresnes American Cemetery in Paris on Wednesday, ahead of a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron. (Nov. 10)

AP

WASHINGTON The White House rallied around Vice President Kamala Harris Monday after news media reports of discord between her office and that ofPresident Joe Biden.

"The president relies on the vice president for her advice, for her counsel," White House press secretary Jen Psaki said when asked if Biden has confidence in Harris' leadership, adding that Harris is tackling "challenging" issues and "not looking for a cushy role" as vice president.

Psaki's comments come afteraseries of reports airing concerns over Harris' leadership and political future. A Sunday CNN report quoted anonymous sources describing"exasperation and dysfunction" in the vice president's office. That report drew intensive pushback from the administration.

A Friday Washington Post reportcontrasted Harris with Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, noting that the two leaders face increased scrutiny as high-profile potential successors to Biden's legacy.

A Sunday Politico story highlighted early jockeying to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee for president in 2024 or 2028 and noted that Democrats outside the White House arestill gearing up for a potentially competitive primary despite Harris' status as Biden's second-in-command and presumed heir.

"They don't reflect his view or our experience with the vice president," Psaki said of the various reports detailing conflicts between Harris' staff,political allies and the broader administration.

Psaki added that Harris, as a confidant and top surrogate for the president, will also be "out in the country promoting the infrastructure bill," Biden's signature bipartisan achievement, alongside other senior administration officials in the coming weeks.

On Sunday, Psaki and other officials wrote tweets in support of Harris and her staff, disputing the notion that there are divides in the White House or that Biden is not confident in her leadership.

Since taking office, the White House has taken steps to highlight Harris' role as Biden's closest adviser, with aides often referring to the "Biden-Harris administration" in official documentation and public statements.

As vice president, Harris would become a clear frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination if Biden decides not to seek reelection in 2024. If he runs and is reelected, she'd be seen as the top contender for the nomination in 2028.

Harris is facing political headwinds lately. A November USA TODAY/Suffolk University poll found Harris had a 28% approval rating, a historically low rating that trails Biden's 38% in the same poll.

Recent news media reports have zeroed in on anxieties felt within the vice president's inner circle and public dissatisfaction with Harris. Activists involved insome issues in the vice president's portfolio have also expressed concern over a lack of progress while political allies worry she is not being set up for success.

Harris' political allies were quick to push back on the coverage as well, claiming some of the stories featured sexist or lazy stereotypes.

"I have a larger issue with the tone and tenor by which Kamala Harris is covered, and I think we saw that in this article," Bakari Sellers, a former South Carolina state representative and surrogate for Harris during her unsuccessful presidential bid, said Monday on CNN's "New Day."

"When you have these articles come out, it puts a lot of us in a defensive posture, because we see that a lot of people are treating Kamala Harris the same way they treated Hillary Clinton, which is attempting to end her political career in a death by a million cuts," Sellers said.

Follow Matthew Brown online @mrbrownsir.

See more here:
White House rallies around Kamala Harris after reports of dysfunction in West Wing - USA TODAY

Kash Patel: In Durham Investigation, All Roads Lead To FBI’s Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok – RealClearPolitics

Maria Bartiromo interviews former Trump administration Department of Defense Chief of Staff Kash Patel on FOX News Channels "Sunday Morning Futures."

Special counsel John Durham's investigation is "about 60-70% of the way there" to uncovering the origins of Russiagate, Patel said, out in the cold.

And, again, what happened with the Steele dossier, a grand jury is saying, was criminal in nature. And I expect that all of the folks that are involved with creating it and peddling it falsely would be in jeopardy.

BARTIROMO: And that was former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe with me last week on this program on what he declassified, which, of course, exposed that this dossier and whole Russia collusion lie was a fabrication from Hillary Clinton.

I am back with Kash Patel right now.

And, Kash. We mentioned Fiona Hill making all of these introductions to Christopher Steele, as well as Charles Dolan. Meanwhile, she says she has no idea what they were doing. Here is a quote from her from a closed-door testimony from October of 2019, saying: "I have no knowledge whatsoever of how he developed that dossier. None. I just want to state that."

What are your thoughts on this? And give us your sense of the three indictments we have seen so far and where this is going?

PATEL: Yes, real quick on Fiona Hill.

I think John Durham is on the case here, because Fiona Hill has a credibility problem. I believe she lied to Congress there under oath. She connected the main Clinton political operative, who Devin and I had never heard of because DOJ and FBI withheld those documents from us intentionally, I believe, so.

And now John Durham has exposed that. She connects the Steele operation to the Democratic Party. And she has the gall to go on national TV or in closed-door testimony and say, I don't know what's going on with Steele.

But John Durham's on that case, and I think we're going to get there.

As to the three indictments that John Durham has issued, I believe he's built a sort of triangle of indictments, as I call them. At the top of the pyramid, you have Sussmann, who represents an indictment of the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DNC, the law firm and Fusion GPS, funneling tens of millions of dollars to perpetuate the biggest fraud in American history into the FBI.

The bottom two pillars of the Durham triangle, I believe, are the FBI's -- John Durham's indictment of the FBI attorney, which is literally an indictment of the FBI, and now a criminal conviction for lying to a federal court to perpetuate a fraud and get a FISA warrant falsely.

The last leg of the Durham triangle comes in the form of his recent indictment of Danchenko. Who's Danchenko, and why does it matter? Danchenko is Steele's main source introduced to Steele by Fiona Hill who Steele relied on to write his dossier, in which he said he, Steele, received credible information from Danchenko.

We now know Danchenko is a liar. We also know, because of the Durham investigation, Danchenko provided no credible information to Christopher Steele. So he has now been -- his credibility has been destroyed. And these merchants of menace are finally coming to light, thanks to John Durham's great work. And he's got a long way to go.

And I'm glad he's getting the indictments -- excuse me -- the information that Rod Rosenstein and Chris Wray intentionally withheld from Chairman Nunes and our investigation during Russiagate probe.

BARTIROMO: So, on the Kevin Clinesmith indictment -- this is the FBI attorney -- does it end there? Or are we going to see a road to others in the FBI perhaps getting arrested for directing Kevin Clinesmith?

This is a young guy who obviously changed paperwork to say that Carter Page was not an asset of the CIA, when, in fact, he was.

PATEL: Yes, you're absolutely right.

Look, I think all roads lead to Andy McCabe, the former deputy director of the FBI, who was caught lying three times by the inspector general during his tenure there. Kevin Clinesmith, a mid-level FBI attorney, cannot pull off the greatest political scandal in history alone.

He needs direction from his supervisors. He's a convicted felon. He doctored a piece of paper for the FISA court. And I, as a former national security prosecutor who did FISAs, know how horrendous and how egregious that type of conduct is. But, more importantly, I know that it cannot be done alone. It is virtually impossible to get that information to a federal judge for a secret surveillance warrant without the deputy director of the FBI knowing it.

And I think all roads lead to Andy McCabe. His credibility is in question, not to mention that of Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Andy McCabe, who orchestrated the insurance policy to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president. That's their own text messages.

BARTIROMO: Real quick. Real quick, before you go, you took the deposition of Jake Sullivan.

As I keep saying on this program and have for some time, those who abused power are now in power. Jake Sullivan was the communications person for Hillary Clinton, a manager for her. Now he is working for Joe Biden at the NSA. He said -- he put out a tweet and a post back in October of 2016.

Listen to this: "This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow. Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to the Russian-based bank."

Here is his post that Hillary Clinton then tweeted out. Jake Sullivan was peddling and spreading the dossier.

PATEL: He was. Then he has the gall to come into Congress -- and, as you mentioned, I took so many of those depositions -- and say he had no idea, like Fiona Hill, how the dossier was created or who the $10 million Jake Sullivan and the DNC were paying was being utilized to collect foreign intelligence fraudulent information.

So, I think John Durham's on his case. And, Maria, wouldn't it be the irony of all ironies for the current national security prosecutor to get charged with an actual felony based on real information and fact, and not have this Department of Justice withhold exculpatory evidence, like they did to the former national security adviser under Donald Trump?

I think that's the accountability that the American public so desperately need. And I think that's where this road is going and where John Durham's taking us.

So, stay tuned. I think we're only 60 to 70 percent of the way there.

Read more here:
Kash Patel: In Durham Investigation, All Roads Lead To FBI's Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok - RealClearPolitics

‘Impeachment: American Crime Story’: Hillary Clinton …

The following contains spoilers from Episode 8 of Impeachment: American Crime Story. Read our full coverage of the series here.

Impeachment has finally delved into the Hillary of it all.

Episode 8 of the FX series focuses on a woman who played a central role in the impeachment saga and Bill Clintons life but has until now been a spectral presence in the series: Hillary Clinton. Perhaps youve heard of her?

Using two of her best-known media appearances a 1992 sit-down on 60 Minutes that helped save Bill from political oblivion in the New Hampshire primary and a 1998 interview on Today that reframed the conversation around the Monica Lewinsky scandal Stand by Your Man explores Hillarys complicated role as the devoted wife and steadfast political ally of a man repeatedly unfaithful to her.

Written by Flora Birnbaum, the episode opens during the Democratic primaries in 1992, when Bill Clintons insurgent quest for the presidential nomination was nearly tanked by allegations hed had a 12-year affair with a former Arkansas state employee and singer named Gennifer Flowers. Clinton, who needed a first- or second-place finish in New Hampshire to keep his campaign afloat, was in trouble.

Newsletter

The complete guide to home viewing

Get Screen Gab for weekly recommendations, analysis, interviews and irreverent discussion of the TV and streaming movies everyones talking about.

Enter email address

Sign Me Up

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

That is, until Hillary came to his rescue on 60 Minutes. In an interview that aired after the Super Bowl and was seen by an estimated 50 million viewers, Hillary came to her husbands defense, shooting down rumors of an affair and denying that their marriage was a politically convenient arrangement.

Im not sitting here like some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette, she said. Im sitting here because I love him, and I respect him, and I honor what hes been through and what weve been through together. And you know, if thats not enough for people, then, heck, dont vote for him.

Clinton finished in a strong second place, earning him the nickname the Comeback Kid because of his seemingly superhuman political resilience. It was really Hillary that saved him, Clintons onetime rival, Bob Kerrey, later told the New York Times. (For his part, Bill would eventually admit in a 1998 deposition that he did have sex with Flowers, though he denied an ongoing affair.)

Hillary, meanwhile, had fallen into a role that would become familiar: culture war flashpoint. While her husband was surging in the polls, Hillary was caught up in a public feud with Wynette, portrayed as an elitist career woman who didnt understand more traditional wives a perception that was strengthened a few weeks later when Hillary committed another infamous gaffe, saying she could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas instead of working as a lawyer.

Mrs. Clinton, you have offended every woman and man who love that song several million in number, the singer wrote in an open letter demanding an apology. I would like you to appear with me on any forum, including networks, cable or talk shows and stand toe to toe with me. I can assure you, in spite of your education, you will find me to be just as bright as yourself.

Hillary apologized to Wynette repeatedly but the interview solidified her polarizing place in American life. Everyone had opinions on her, even Richard Nixon, who told the New York Times, If the wife comes through as being too strong and too intelligent, it makes the husband look like a wimp.

The 60 Minutes interview was typical of the impossible high-wire act Hillary would have to perform throughout her tenure as first lady: She needed to be supportive without seeming like a pushover, strong without being too assertive. The interview also established a pattern that would define much of her political life, salvaging her husbands image at the cost of her own reputation.

Its probably one of the great political missed opportunities of all time, Richard Mintz, Hillarys staff director during the campaign, told Politico in an excellent deep dive into the fateful 60 Minutes interview.

As Clinton recounted in her 2003 memoir, Living History, and the 2020 docuseries Hillary, the president woke her early Jan. 21, 1998, sat on the edge of the bed and warned her about the just-published stories that he had been having an affair with a former White House intern. He adamantly denied the reports and suggested that perhaps his attention to Lewinsky had been misinterpreted.

Clinton accepted her husbands explanation, which he also offered in private to friends and aides. For me the Lewinsky imbroglio seemed like just another vicious scandal manufactured by political opponents, she wrote in Living Memory.

In the days that followed the Lewinsky revelations, the presidents legal team and political aides fought about how to respond. The first lady was a a leading advocate of an aggressive strategy attacking Starr, reported the Washington Post, in reference to Kenneth W. Starr, whose four-year independent counsel investigation led to the House impeachment of President Clinton in 1998.

First, Bill Clinton used a routine White House event about education to deny the affair the infamous I did not have sexual relations with that woman moment depicted in Episode 7, The Assassination of Monica Lewinsky.

A few days later, the first lady sat for an interview with Matt Lauer oh, the irony on NBCs Today show, forcefully denying that her husband had an inappropriate affair and arguing that he was the victim of a politically motivated attack by his opponents.

The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president, she told the host. (Clinton also conceded that if the allegations were proved true, that would be a very serious offense.)

I believed it was part of the whole Starr investigation. I was absolutely persuaded because of my own experience that this guy would make up stuff, Clinton said in Hillary. In the Hulu docuseries, Nancy Gertner, a classmate from Yale Law School, said she and most of their friends believed Bill Clinton had an affair with Lewinsky because it just didnt seem far from the person that we knew. But Hillary was in denial at the time: It would be like a mask would come over her in those days, Gertner said.

Though Hillary Clinton instantly made the phrase vast right-wing conspiracy famous, the concept originated in a comprehensive memo written by political consultants Chris Lehane and Mark Fabiani outlining the ways in which conservative media outlets had helped spread dubious theories about the death of Vince Foster and the Whitewater scandal. In her memoir, Clinton wrote, I might have phrased my point more artfully, but she stood by her characterization of Starrs investigation despite the truth about the affair with Lewinsky.

Back in 1998, Hillarys Today interview was seen as an effective counterattack that helped clearly establish talking points for his political allies.

Clive Owen as Bill Clinton and Beanie Feldstein as Monica Lewinsky in Impeachment: American Crime Story.

(Tina Thorpe / FX)

Eventually, Hillary learned the truth. On Aug. 15, 1998, two days before he was due to testify before a grand jury, Bill Clinton once again woke his wife up and shared some bad news, telling her for the first time that the situation was more serious than he had previously acknowledged.

I could hardly breathe, Hillary recalled in Living History. Gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, What do you mean? What are you saying? Why did you lie to me?

The revelation left her dumbfounded, heartbroken and outraged that Id believed him at all, she wrote, admitting that she wanted to wring his neck. Hillary also told Bill that he would have to confess to their daughter, Chelsea, before the news became public.

Days later, the first family headed to Marthas Vineyard, Mass., for summer vacation. On their way to Marine One, Chelsea walked between her parents and grasped their hands in a show of support. But the weeks that followed were frosty, with Hillary rarely speaking to her husband. Their dog Buddy joined them on vacation and was the only member of our family who was still willing to spend time with the president, Clinton wrote in her memoir.

Clinton defended her husband throughout the impeachment process, ultimately deciding that his behavior did not warrant removal from office. When it came to their marriage, the answer was less clear.

I still had to decide whether I wanted to stay in the marriage, whether I thought it was worth saving. We saw a counselor, had painful, painful discussions, she said in Hillary.

Ironically, the public humiliation was good for Hillarys image. Opinion polls indicated that the American public approved of her conduct throughout the scandal. At a time when her husband was toxic, she served as a valuable surrogate in the 1998 midterms, which resulted in gains for the Democrats a rarity for the party in the White House.

The ordeal also seems to have inspired Hillary to run for office herself, something shed denied any interest in partly because she was more interested in policy than campaigning, according to Carl Bernsteins biography, A Woman in Charge.

On the day the Senate voted to acquit President Clinton in his impeachment trial, Hillary was in a study near her office looking at maps of New York state and plotting her campaign. There was something particularly defiant about choosing this moment to begin her decision-making in earnest, Bernstein wrote, but she was determined to redeem some of the promise of their journey to the White House.

She told me afterwards, that was the first time in 53 years that I spoke with my own voice as my own political person, said Gail Sheehy, author of Hillarys Choice, in a PBS Frontline special about the 2016 election.

As we all know now, that historic presidential campaign was dogged by her husbands decades-old indiscretions. Many have argued that it was Hillary Clinton, not Bill, who paid the price for these missteps, which have been weaponized against her never more vividly than when Donald Trump invited Bill Clintons accusers to an October 2016 debate to deflect attention from the Access Hollywood tape. Clintons decision to stay in her marriage haunts her in a way that she can never get out from under, said Jennifer Palmieri, communications director on the 2016 campaign, in Hillary.

In an interview with The Times last year, Clinton reflected on this chapter in her life. The whole impeachment saga and the terrible pain in our family and all of that was difficult, as it always is, even to think about, she said. Feeling very positive about the decisions that Ive made in my life, even the most difficult ones, doesnt make it any easier ... Im glad to be out on the other side of it all these years later.

Read the rest here:
'Impeachment: American Crime Story': Hillary Clinton ...