Archive for the ‘George Zimmerman’ Category

This Black Lives Matter Founder Still Has Hope For America – GOOD Magazine

Nearly two weeks have passed since white supremacists marched in Charlottesville, Virginia, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer and injuring 19 others. And for some Americans, if President Donald Trump could just get his apology right or if social justice activists would stop stirring things up then things could get back to normal. Never mind that in America, normal day-to-day racism means people of color are denied job interviews because they have ethnic-sounding names, their children are funneled into the school-to-prison pipeline, and theyre stopped and frisked by law enforcement.

That horrific weekend of violence and hate in Charlottesville has also catalyzed a nationwide drive to remove monuments to the Confederacyand spurred thousands of people to protest in Boston and elsewhere against white supremacy. Whats happening in the country calls to mind the tagline of Black Lives Matter: This isNot a Moment, but aMovement.

That so many Americans are clamoring for racial and social justice makes Patrisse Cullors, one of the founders of Black Lives Matter, feel hopeful. Even with white nationalism rising up, Im a part of a growing movement that just keeps getting bigger by the day, where people are saying, We dont agree with this. This is not of our values. These are not American values, Cullors says.

Cullors, who lives in Los Angeles, co-founded Black Lives Matterin 2013 with fellow activists Alicia Garza and Opal Tometi after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the 2012 killing of Trayvon Martin. Together theyve grown the organization into a network of roughly 40 chapters across the United States and internationally. All three of us are trained organizers, Cullors says. We didnt come into creating Black Lives Matter as novices.

A common misconception is that Black Lives Matter is only a trendy hashtagor that it only fights police brutality or vigilante violence against black people. But were a group thats looking at the totality of anti-black racism and its effects on communities of color, Cullors says.

Countering white vigilantism and white terrorism is of particular concern.

As weve seen in Charlottesville and the counter protests in Boston, Black Lives Matter is trying to redefine how this country talks about safety and whos actually safe,Cullors says. Similar to how the full name of the 1963 March on Washington is the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom and how Martin Luther KingJr. advocated for striking sanitation workers group in Memphis the day before he was assassinated in 1968, Black Lives Matter is giving a signal boost to grassroots efforts tied to economic prosperity and justice.

That looks like the work that weve done around bailing out black moms on Mothers Day. That looks like the work that weve done fighting for justice for parents and siblings whove had their loved ones killed by police and law enforcement, Cullors says. And it looks like the work that weve done to ensure black people have employment the work that weve done to work with the Fight for $15 folk across the country.

For that work, Cullors and other members of Black Lives Matter have been been demonized as the black equivalent of white supremacists. Last week Dan Bishop, a Republican state senator for North Carolina tweeted that Nazis and Black Lives Matter are both violent, racist movements.

But white supremacists, not Black Lives Matter, are the focus of a statement released Wednesday by the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

There should be no place in the world for racist white supremacist ideas or any similar ideologies that reject the core human rights principles of human dignity and equality, the committee said.

And the committee demanded action, too: We call on the US Government to investigate thoroughly the phenomenon of racial discrimination targeting, in particular, people of African descent, ethnic or ethno-religious minorities, and migrants, said chairpersonAnastasia Crickley.

That kind of investigation seems unlikely under the Trump administration and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who Coretta Scott King called out in a 1986 letter for using the awesome powers of his office in a shabby attempt to intimidate and frighten elderly black voters. But Cullors says theres still plenty that the average American can do in their local communities.

One, having conversations with other white people. Interrupting the jokes, the racist jokes, the homophobic and transphobic jokes, Cullors says. I think its believing when people of color say that the system is set up to destroy us. I think its getting involved ... in the activism and saying that youre not going to uphold this racist system anymore and committing themselves to an alternative to the life you were given, which is privilege.

Part of getting involved might also mean joining Black Lives Matter. Cullors says people can look on the website and see if theres a chapter in their city; its always being updated with new ones. She also suggests reaching out through the groups social media channels. Together, Cullors says, we can build a new system based in justice and equality.

Right now, We live in a system with old values. We saw that in Charlottesville, we saw it in Boston, where there are these values where white people are superior to everybody else, Cullors says. So this is an opportunity to create something new.

Top image courtesy Patrisse Cullors. Share image by Gerry Lauzon/Flickr.

The rest is here:
This Black Lives Matter Founder Still Has Hope For America - GOOD Magazine

Civil rights lawyer accuses AT&T of discriminating against low-income communities – The Hill

Civil rights attorney Daryl Parks filed a formal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Thursday on behalf of three black women who say that their Cleveland neighborhoods dont have access to the same broadband services as the surrounding suburbs.

The complaint cites a March report from the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) and Connect Your Community (CYC), which showed stark disparities in the internet transmission technologies deployed in different areas in and around Cleveland.

The report concluded that AT&T has systematically discriminated against lower-income Cleveland neighborhoods in its deployment of home Internet and video technologies over the past decade a practice that NDIA and CYC refer to as digital redlining.

AT&T denied the allegations, saying that any disparity in internet speeds is the result of the companys financial considerations and not discrimination.

We do not redline, Joan Marsh, AT&Ts chief regulatory and external affairs officer, said in a statement to The Hill. Our commitment to diversity and inclusion is unparalleled. Our investment decisions are based on the cost of deployment and demand for our services and are of course fully compliant with the requirements of the Communications Act. We will vigorously defend the complaint filed today.

According to the complaint, a July meeting between Parks and AT&T executives ended in a flat denial by AT&T that it is redlining. Parks also said that the company is unwilling to engage in mediation and that the two sides were unable to reach a settlement.

Parks is known for having represented Trayvon Martins family after the black 17-year-old was shot and killed by George Zimmerman in 2012.

Parkss three clients alleged that they experience extremely low download speeds despite paying for premium broadband access. One of the women, Joanne Elkins, said that she had spent $1,500 on a security system for her home only to find out that it was rendered useless by the slow internet service.

Parks wrote that AT&T has violated the Communications Act by failing to serve the low-income, communities of color in Cleveland and that the FCC should impose fines on the telecommunications giant.

A spokeswoman for FCC Chairman Ajit Pai declined to comment, citing a policy of not weighing in on pending adjudications.

The complaint also asks that AT&T disclose details about its marketing towards communities of color, demographics about its customers and information on its internet deployment operations.

This story was updated at 1:47 p.m.

Read the original post:
Civil rights lawyer accuses AT&T of discriminating against low-income communities - The Hill

Don’t restrict free speech. Restrict the right to carry guns at potentially explosive public events – Los Angeles Times

Russian playwright Anton Chekhov noted that, as a dramatic device, a gun introduced in the first act of a play must be fired in the second, otherwise it has no reason to be there. Lets hope thats not as true in life as it is in art, now that we have an armed racist right squaring off against leftist counter-protesters in public confrontations.

Weve already seen violence, even death, at these rallies. But the potential is for much worse if participants continue to carry guns into such provocative situations. The question is how to minimize the risk without trampling peoples constitutional rights.

The 1st Amendment to the Constitution establishes the right to free speech and peaceful assembly. The 2nd Amendment creates a right to own firearms. Neither is absolute. Nevertheless, firearms have become a significant presence in our culture, and only a dozen states prohibit people from carrying them openly in public. Whats more, over 40 states have NRA-backed preemption laws, which to varying degrees limit the ability of local governments to adopt stricter gun regulations than the state as a whole.

Virginia is a preemption state that also allows open carry, and the nation saw the results at Charlottesville, where paramilitary militias men heavily armed with military-style weapons and in some cases battle gear appeared as part of the Unite the Right rally. But far-left groups, including the so-called Redneck Revolt, a liberal pro-gun group, have also paraded around with their firearms at various demonstrations.

Now, another provocative rally aimed at promoting the true Confederate heritage is planned for Sept. 23 in Austin, Texas. Billing it as a Dixie Freedom Rally, its organizers, the Texas Confederate Militia, are telling prospective attendees that state law will allow them to bring openly carried and concealed handguns, as well as long rifles. Given the mix of firearms, passions and politics, its not hard to see the potential for violence.

This is a problem that the nation must resolve. A group of self-organized, trained and heavily armed men (and these groups are predominantly male) is a paramilitary organization, and giving it megaphones and parade banners doesnt magically transform it into something peaceful. Adding open carry to a contentious event can put public safety at risk, and the presence of visible firearms creates unique problems for the police.

Open carry can also be an act of intimidation. Heres one illustration: During the Unite the Right event, gun-toting and swastika-carrying Nazis chanting anti-Semitic slogans marched past a Charlottesville synagogue containing 40 worshippers, leaving them so frightened that they felt compelled to sneak out the back. And heres another: In April 2016, opposing protesters at a Dallas-area Nation of Islam mosque engaged in a tense face-off that, fortunately, ended without those Chekhovian firearms being used. This is not the America we want.

Another complicating factor: Two dozen states, including Texas, have adopted stand your ground laws similar to the one that became an issue in Florida after George Zimmerman shot of wrongdoing after shooting dead 17-year-old Trayvon Martin during a confrontation. The details differ among the states, but at their core the laws allow people to shoot to kill if they perceive they are under physical threat.

Incendiary political speech, demonstrators, open-carry and stand-your-ground laws what could possibly go wrong here?

This is madness. Police train to control unruly crowds, and develop strategies for separating rival groups of protesters, but are they equipped and able to keep the peace when the protesters have become paramilitary militias? If states such as Virginia and Texas insist on allowing citizens to brazenly strut around their streets with guns slung over their shoulders like Third World mercenaries, they must at least make an exception at rallies and demonstrations. A ban on weapons from firearms to pointed sticks, concealed or carried openly should be a condition for obtaining a permit.

Boston took the right approach this weekend at a controversial Free Speech rally that drew 40,000 protesters: Anything that could be used as a weapon, from guns to sharp sticks, was prohibited.

Fearing violence, some lawmakers and advocates have urged officials not to give permits, period, for these contentious rallies. But thats the wrong answer. Its not the right to speech and assembly that should be restricted; its the right to carry guns in certain potentially explosive situations. Gun advocates like to argue they have the right to bear arms as a bulwark against tyrannical government, but government has a responsibility here as well: to keep people safe.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion or Facebook

View post:
Don't restrict free speech. Restrict the right to carry guns at potentially explosive public events - Los Angeles Times

Pittenger asks: Why aren’t liberals condemning Black Lives Matter and others? – Sacramento Bee

Pittenger asks: Why aren't liberals condemning Black Lives Matter and others?
Sacramento Bee
The #BlackLivesMatter hashtag gained prominence on social media after the 2013 acquittal of George Zimmerman, who was charged in the 2012 killing of Trayvon Martin, a black teen, in Florida. The first Black Lives Matter protests came after the shooting ...

and more »

Continue reading here:
Pittenger asks: Why aren't liberals condemning Black Lives Matter and others? - Sacramento Bee

Pittenger asks: Why aren’t liberals condemning Black Lives Matter and others? – News & Observer

Pittenger asks: Why aren't liberals condemning Black Lives Matter and others?
News & Observer
The #BlackLivesMatter hashtag gained prominence on social media after the 2013 acquittal of George Zimmerman, who was charged in the 2012 killing of Trayvon Martin, a black teen, in Florida. The first Black Lives Matter protests came after the shooting ...

and more »

Read the original here:
Pittenger asks: Why aren't liberals condemning Black Lives Matter and others? - News & Observer