Mediaboss Marketing

Table of Contents

Show more Show less

In the short 12 months since its launch, generative AI platform ChatGPT has become the most widely recognised AI language model. According to a recent Forbes Advisor poll, a staggering 85% of Brits are now aware of AI language models as a concept.

But this means that Chat GPTs mission to, transform work for the better by helping humans with mundane or complicated tasks such as essay research or writing emails, is by no means unique.

Heres our round-up of some of Chat GPTs most notable alternatives.

Googlelaunched Bard, its own AI chatbot owned by Alphabet (Googles parent company) earlier this year.

According to Google, Bard seeks to, combine the breadth of the worlds knowledge with the power, intelligence and creativity of our large language models.

A few months after its launch, logic, maths and coding capabilities were added to Bards linguistic offerings. Initially only available to the UK and US, Bard is now available in more than 180 countries worldwide.

Cost: Free. Google says that there are currently no plans to make this a paid product

Microsoft 365 Copilot was made universally available from November 2023. The software is now built into a raft of its popular products including Microsoft 365, Bing and various apps across PCs with Windows. For example, it can be integrated with Microsoft Teams to summarise a meeting for those unable to attend.

Cost: 23.75* ($30) per month

ClickUp is an AI tool that promises to help users write better and faster. Whatever your role or job function, ClickUp AI can transform the way you work, states its website.

ClickUp claims that its research-based tools ensure high-quality content via user-input prompts tailored to specific roles. Like ChatGPT, the AI language platform can be called upon for everyday tasks such as generating emails, improvising first drafts of presentations or essays, or brainstorming.

Cost: Free for personal use; 5.54* ($7) per month for unlimited (per user); 9.50* ($12) per month for business (per user)

Otter AI is an AI tool focused more on transcription than production. Developed in Mountain View, California, it offers speech-to-text transcription applications using AI and machine learning.

Through these transcriptions, Otter AI claims it can write notes and summarise meetings, 30 times faster than a human by automatically adding comments, highlighting key points and assigning action items depending on the transcription.

Cost: Free for personal use; 7.92* ($10) per month for the Pro subscription; 15.83* ($20) for the Business subscription.

Chatsonic is built on the GPT-4 language model and offers direct access to Google Search. It is very similar to ChatGPT in that its a conversational AI chatbot designed to interact with users and assist them with various tasks, from text to image generation.

Chatsonic claims its technology makes it the, most advanced AI Chatbot in 2023. It was developed by San Francisco-based technology company, Writesonic.

Cost: Free trial plan lets you generate up to 10,000 words per month at no cost; the Long-Form plan offers up to 47,500 words for 10.03* ($12.67) per month

Amazon CodeWhisperer describes itself as a, general purpose, machine learning-powered code generator. It generates code suggestions from snippets to full functions in real time based on a users comments and existing code. As the name suggests, its ultimately a coding AI tool first rather than a linguistic one.

Cost: Free for individual use; 15.04* ($19) per month for professional use

So, should you switch from ChatGPT to a different AI tool? The answer depends on how you use the tool and whats important to you.

If you are looking for more of a coding solution, then Amazon Codewhisperer may be a better choice; while for those needing transcription might opt for Otter AI, for example.

But its important to note that theres a whole raft of AI platforms on the market with different benefits across a range of prices, so its worth periodically checking out newcomers and alternatives within this ever-evolving technology sector.

For comparison on cost, ChatGPT is free for general use, with a premium subscription plan costing 15.83* ($20) per month. Its worth noting that the premium tier is billed as more accurate than the free version.

*Conversions correct as of 28 November, 2023.

As weve outlined, there are many other alternatives to ChatGPT. And the list is only likey to grow over the coming months and years.

Recent government data shows that natural language processing and generation is the second most commonly-adopted AI solution with 8% of UK businesses investing.

When Google launched Bard it was widely believed that it would be ChatGPTs biggest competitor, especially considering Googles dominant market share of the internet.

However, as both AI tools are under constant development, and needs and preferences differ between individuals, there is no clear answer to which one is best.

ChatGPT is entirely owned by OpenAI, a San Francisco-based artificial intelligence research organisation.

ChatGP is a an AI tool that uses a large language model of learning to answer queries, write code or copy, product poems and texts as well as brainstorm ideas.

Users prompt the chatbot to perform tasks, which are completed to increasingly higher standard over various iterations as the user gives feedback.

It was developed by US-based company OpenAI, and is considered the early instigator of the AI revolution.

Visit link:
How To Find Alternatives To ChatGPT Forbes Advisor UK - Forbes

If youre considering an alternative to ChatGPT, weve done the research for you. Here are a few AI programs that rival ChatGPT.

For comparison on cost, ChatGPT is free for general use, with a premium subscription plan costing $US20 ($30.49) per month. Its worth noting that the premium tier is billed as more accurate than the free version.

Related: AI Stocks On The ASX: A Guide To Investing

Google launched Bard, its own AI chatbot owned by Alphabet (Googles parent company) earlier this year. According to Google, Bard sought to combine the breadth of the worlds knowledge with the power, intelligence and creativity of our large language models, referring to it as an experimental conversational tool.

A few months after launching, the softwares capabilities were enhanced, with Bard now adding logic, math and coding capabilities to its linguistic skills. Bard was initially only available to the US and the UK, but by May, it was available in more than 180 countries worldwideincluding Australia.

Cost: Free. Google says that there are currently no plans to make this a paid product

Related: Googles Bard Is Now Available In Australia. How Does It Compare To ChatGPT?

In September 2023, Microsoft announced that it was launching its own AI technology.

We are entering a new era of AI, one that is fundamentally changing how we relate to and benefit from technology, the press release read.

At Microsoft, we think about this as having a copilot to help navigate any task.

Microsoft, the company maintained, had been building AI-powered copilots into its most popular products, such as Microsoft 365, Bing and other apps across PCs with Windows.

The company had decided to take the next step to unify these capabilities into a single experience with Microsoft Copilot: aka your everyday AI companion. It is available in windows 11, Microsoft 365, and in Microsofts web browser with Edge and Bing.

While it was initially only released overseas, Microsoft announced in October that a handful of Australian customers will access Microsoft 365 Copilot as part of the invitation-only global Early Access Program (EAP). It is expected to be available to the general Australian public in the near future.

Cost: US$30 ($45.72) per month

ClickUp is an AI tool that promises to help users write better and faster. Whatever your role or job function, ClickUp AI can transform the way you work, the website reads.

It states that by using research-based tools, it ensures high-quality content is produced via user-input prompts tailored to specific roles. You can also use ClickUp AU tasks for everyday written tasks like generating emails, improvising first drafts, or brainstorming, the website states.

Cost: Free for personal use; US$7 ($10.47) per month for unlimited (per user); US$12 ($18.29) per month for business (per user)

Otter AI is slightly different from ChatGPT, in that it is an AI tool focused more towards transcription than it is to production. The California-based tech company developed the software that develops speech to text transcription applications using AI and machine learning.

However, through these transcriptions, it claims it can then help you write notes and summarise meetings 30 times faster by automatically adding comments, highlighting key points and assigning action items depending on the transcription.

Cost: Free for personal use; US$10 ($15.24) per month for the Pro subscription; US$20 ($30.49) for the Business subscription.

Chatsonic is built on the GPT-4 language model and claims to be a more up-to-date AI chatbot than its rival, with direct access to Google Search. It is very similar to ChatGPT, in that its a conversational AI chatbot designed to interact with users and assist them with various tasksfrom AI text to image generation.

Chatsonic also claims its technology is the most advanced AI Chatbot in 2023. It has been developed by the technology company Writesonic, which is based in San Francisco.

Cost: Free trial plan lets you generate up to 10,000 words per month at no cost; the Long-Form plan offers up to 47,500 words for US$12.67 ($19.31) per month

Rather than focusing solely on AI-generated text, Amazon CodeWhisperer generates code suggestions from snippets to full functions in real time based on your comments and existing code. Ultimately, its a coding AI tool rather than solely a linguistic one.

As Amazon explains on its website, the tool is a general purpose, machine learning-powered code generator As you write code, CodeWhisperer automatically generates suggestions based on your existing code and comments.

Cost: Free for individual use; US$19 ($28.97) per month for professional use

Featured Partner Offers

Plan costs

$7.33 AUD per month or $87.95 for the first year

Price

Starting From $3.07 AUD Per Month

Encryption

AES with 256 -bit keys

On Private Internet Accesss Secure Website

Number of devices

Unlimited

Plan Costs

Starting from $2.97 AUD per month

Read more from the original source:
How To Find Alternatives To ChatGPT Forbes Advisor Australia - Forbes

For a limited time, Ubisoft are giving away free PC copies of 2015s Assassins Creed Syndicate for free through their Ubisoft Connect client. This free game promotion will be running until December 6th, giving PC gamers a chance to see 1868s London through the eyes of twin Assassins.

While the game is from 2015, Syndicate remains visually impressive in 2023. The games interpretation of Industrial Revolution London looks incredible, and while technology has moved on, the games artistry is strong. While the games less visually impressive than its predecessor, Assassins Creed Unity, it also ran a lot better on PC and consoles at launch. If anything, Unity pushed PS4 and Xbox One too hard at launch, resulting in sub par framerates on both systems.

In Syndicate, players will control twin Assassins in the form of Jacob and Evie Frye. Jacob is a hot-headed brawler who specialises in combat, while Evie specialises in stealth and intelligence gathering. Players will control both Assassins throughout the game through linear missions and within the games large open world.

During the game, players will see historical figures like Darwin, Dickens, and even Queen Victoria. Syndicate is also the first Assassins Creed game to feature a grappling hook. On PC, Syndicate features support for Tobii Eye tracking, and PC-only graphical features like TXAA, HBAO+, and PCSS Shadows.

Unlike most newer AC games, Syndicate does not feature a levelling system or similar RPG mechanics. In many ways, Syndicate is more similar to this years AC: Mirage than it is to the games between them.

PC gamers can grab their free copy of Assassins Creed Syndicate through Ubisoft Connect. This free game promotion will end on December 6th at 1pm GMT. It is unknown if Ubisoft has any other game giveaways planned for December 2023.

You can join the discussion on Assassins Creed Syndicate being available for free on PC on the OC3D Forums.

Read more:
Assassin's Creed Syndicate is now free to keep on Ubisoft Connect - OC3D

"The abolition of third-party cookies will make it possible to protect privacy-related data such as what sites users visit and what pages they view from advertising companies," notes the Japan-based site Gigazine.

And this month "Google has confirmed that it is on track to start disabling third-party cookies across its Chrome browser in a matter of weeks," writes TechRadar: An internal email published online sees Google software engineer Johann Hofmann share with colleagues the company's plan to switch off third-party cookies for 1% of Chrome users from Q1 2024 a plan that was shared months ago and that, surprisingly, remains on track, given the considerable pushbacks so far... Hofmann explains that Google is still awaiting a UK Competition and Markets Authority consultation in order to address any final concerns before "Privacy Sandbox" gets the go-ahead. The Register explores Google's "Privacy Sandbox" idea: Since 2019 after it became clear that European data protection rules would require rethinking how online ads work Google has been building a set of ostensibly privacy-preserving ad tech APIs known as the Privacy Sandbox... One element of the sandbox is the Topics API: that allows websites to ask Chrome directly what the user is interested in, based on their browser history, so that targeted ads can be shown. Thus, no need for any tracking cookies set by marketers following you around, though it means Chrome squealing on you unless you tell it not to...

Peter Snyder, VP of privacy engineering at Brave Software, which makes the Brave browser, told The Register in an email that the cookie cutoff and Privacy Sandbox remains problematic as far as Brave is concerned. "Replacing third-party cookies with Privacy Sandbox won't change the fact that Google Chrome has the worst privacy protections of any major browser, and we're very concerned about their upcoming plans," he said. "Google's turtle-paced removal of third-party cookies comes along with a large number of other changes, which when taken together, seriously harm the progress other browsers are making towards a user-first, privacy-protecting Web.

"Recent Google Chrome changes restrict the ability for users to modify, make private, and harden their Web experience (Manifest v3), broadcasting users' interests to websites they visit (Topics), dissolving privacy boundaries on the Web (Related Sites), offloading the battery-draining costs of ad auctions on users (FLEDGE/Protected Audience API), and reducing user control and Web transparency (Signed Exchange/WebBundles)," Snyder explained. "And this is only a small list of examples from a much longer list of harmful changes being shipped in Chrome."

Snyder said Google has characterized the removal of third-party cookies as getting serious about privacy, but he argued the truth is the opposite. "Other browsers have shown that a more private, more user-serving Web is possible," he said. "Google removing third-party cookies should be more accurately understood as the smallest possible change it can make without harming Google's true priority: its own advertising business." The Register notes that other browser makers such as Apple, Brave, and Mozilla have already begun blocking third-party cookies by default, while Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge "provide that option, just not out of the box."

EFF senior staff technologist Jacob Hoffman-Andrews told The Register that "When Google Chrome finishes the project on some unspecified date in the future, it will be a great day for privacy on the web. According to the announcement, the actual phased rollout is slated to begin in Q3 2024, with no stated deadline to reach 100 percent. Let's hope Google's advertising wing does not excessively delay these critical privacy improvements."

TechRadar points out that after the initial testing period in 2024, Google will begin its phased rollout of the cookie replacement program starting in June.

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the news.

Read the original here:
Google Confirms Its Schedule for Disabling Third-Party Cookies in ... - Slashdot

Richard Speed reports via The Register: A jury has sided with Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) against Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) over the theft of source code and documentation. A total of $210 million was this week awarded. According to the verdict [PDF], a Texas jury agreed that TCS had "willfully and maliciously" misappropriated both source and confidential documentation by "improper means," awarding CSC $140 million in damages, with another $70 million tacked on for TCS's "unjust enrichment." The complaint [PDF] was filed in April 2019 regarding CSC's VANTAGE-ONE and CyberLife software platforms. CSC had licensed these software platforms to Transamerica Corporation, a life insurance holding company, to whom Tata -- used here to collectively refer to Tata Consultancy Services Limited and Tata America International Corporation -- began providing maintenance services.

In 2014, CSC and Transamerica signed off on a Third-Party Access Addendum that would allow Tata to alter CSC's software, but only for the benefit of its customer -- Transamerica. All was well until 2016, when Transamerica decided it needed to refresh its software. CSC and Tata both put in bids. CSC lost, and Tata won with its own software platform called BaNCS. The circumstances got sticky at this point, not least because Tata hired more than 2,000 Transamerica employees. CSC alleged that these former employees had access to its code and documents, and forwarded them on to the Tata BaNCS development team. The situation escalated in 2019, when a CSC employee was accidentally copied in on an email between Tata and Transamerica showing that Tata was accessing confidential information, according to CSC. The company then began legal proceedings. Documents and motions have been exchanged in the years since as Tata sought to get the case thrown out while CSC's claims were upheld. Eventually, it went to a jury trial, which found for CSC.

Continued here:
Tata Consultancy Services Ordered To Cough Up $210 Million In ... - Slashdot