Tutorial acpi_call_GUI
This is a video tutorial that shows how to use acpi_call_GUI, a java program that provides a graphic interface to install the acpi_call module. -------------...
By: Marco Dalla Libera
Read more:
Tutorial acpi_call_GUI - Video
Overclocking Guide Part 2: FAQs, Core Voltage, More Free Software (Crysis 3 Gameplay/ Commentary)
GTX 780, 770, and 760 Ti Specs: http://youtu.be/CaCxLK2iCe4 EVGA Precision X http://www.evga.com/precision/ Uniengine Heaven http://unigine.com/products/heaven/ #9659;Subscribe! http://goo.gl/E2DgF...
By: VeryTraumatic
See the article here:
Overclocking Guide Part 2: FAQs, Core Voltage, More Free Software (Crysis 3 Gameplay/ Commentary) - Video
Online Reputation Management: How to use Advanced System Care Free software
Online Reputation Management: How to use Advanced System Care Free software by Timothy Weissbrot at firstpagebrokers@gmail.com . advance system care software...
By: Timothy Weissbrot
Read more:
Online Reputation Management: How to use Advanced System Care Free software - Video
A coalition of organizations led by the Free Software Foundation has petitioned the Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C) to reject the Encrypted Media Extensions (EME), a proposed expansion of the HTML spec that would create a standard digital rights management (DRM) mechanism for the web.
In an open letter addressed to W3C director Tim Berners-Lee, dated April 24, the groups described the EME proposal as "disastrous," saying that the very idea of adding DRM to the web flies in the face of core W3C principles.
"Ratifying EME would be an abdication of responsibility; it would harm interoperability, enshrine nonfree software in W3C standards and perpetuate oppressive business models," the letter states.
The EME proposal is largely the work of giant online companies that have big stakes in streaming media. Its three co-editors hail from Google, Microsoft, and Netflix, respectively.
"These companies have been promoting DRM both for their own reasons and as part of their close relationships to major media companies," the FSF's letter claims.
It's hard to argue that's not the case. Earlier this month, Netflix said that it was planning to move away from its current Silverlight-based streaming technology to one based solely on web standards, but that it would only do so once EME and other DRM-related proposals were ratified by the W3C.
Speaking at the Linux Collaboration Summit in San Francisco earlier this month, Netflix cloud architect Adrian Cockroft told the audience that the company wasn't interested in developing a version of its service that could work without digital content restrictions.
"Right now what we're basically doing is giving billions of dollars to Hollywood to buy the content, so that they can afford to build more content," Cockroft said. "That's basically the business we're in."
But according to the FSF and its cosigners, attempting to back such a business model by enshrining DRM in W3C standards would inevitably erode individual freedoms.
"Applying such restrictions to streaming media may seem less harmful now, when 'ownership' of most media is still possible by storing it on a personal hard drive," the letter to the W3C explains. "It is quite possible, however, that this option will disappear as companies create a system in which media isonlyavailable via streaming where they are able to control who views what when with which software."
Originally posted here:
Internet freedom groups urge W3C to keep DRM out of HTML