Employees come and go, often taking their knowledge with them. There are also times when just a handful of employees know how to do something and dont have time to provide a mass tutorial. Thats where Scribe comes in. Its software records movement and clicks and converts them into a step-by-step guide in less than a minute with screenshots and text that is editable and shareable. The information can be recorded from a Chrome extension or desktop app and also live in a repository until it is needed.
Today, the company launched with $30 million in venture capital, including a new $22 million round of Series A funding that was led by Tiger Global Management. A group of existing investors also participated in the investment, including Amplify Partners, which led Scribes $8 million seed round at the beginning of 2021, Haystack Ventures, XYZ Venture Capital, AME Cloud Ventures, Morado Ventures and SEV.
Co-founder and CEO Jennifer Smith, formerly of McKinsey & Company and Greylock Partners, formed the San Francisco-based company a couple of years ago with entrepreneur and former Google engineer Aaron Podolny after seeing a knowledge gap in how operational work was done.
Smiths background is in organization and operations work. She talked to more than 1,200 founders about how software was bought and sold, and what they wished existed and learned that not much had changed in this area in a decade.
The process is still being done manually, she told TechCrunch. There is not a standard way to communicate how to do something. With Scribe, it is a standard. You can click the record button, do the task and it auto generates step-by-step instructions.
Scribe has been heads-down since it was founded, but the software is now being used by over 10,000 organizations globally as a way to share with others how to do something. These include use cases by organizations outside of those initially targeted by Smith and Podolny, like governments and schools.
In addition to the investors mentioned earlier, angel investors involved include former Microsoft chairman John Thompson, Adobe chief product officer Scott Belsky, Gainsight CEO Nick Mehta and Opendoor CEO Eric Wu. As part of the investment, Amplify Partners general partner Mike Dauber joins Scribes board of directors.
Scribe is the latest company to attract venture capital for efforts to capture and share digital processes. For example, in August, Tango raised $5.7 million for its Chrome extension that auto-captures workflow best practices so that teams can learn from their top performers.
Ross Fubini, managing director of XYZ, said Scribe was building a company that makes something complex look easy. He credits Smith for helping many marquee startups ramp up their enterprise selling during her time at Greylock and believes that she and her team are creating a product that is doing the same: showing them how to do their job better.
And companies will pay for that, he added. This is just the first part of the journey. When we talk to companies describing problems on creating documentation, we see that bottom-up part. We are here to put in yet more money into the company so that Jennifer and her team can keep doing the work, build the go-to-market and get paid for that value.
Meanwhile, Scribe has both a free version and pro/enterprise plans, and averages nearly 50% reduction in non-productive time spent learning how to do a process.
Smith intends to use the new funding to scale the team to respond to customer demand that is coming from startups all the way to Fortune 500 companies. The companys 20-person employee base is a majority of women and underrepresented minorities, something Smith is proud of as she focuses on building an inclusive, culture- and talent-first organization, she added. She will also invest in R&D and product development that is coming down the pipeline.
We want Scribe to be the new common standard for sharing how to do something, Smith added. We take inspiration from Zoom and Slack, which have both become standard and lexicon. Its really about driving that reach and distribution with colleagues and customers.
Many professions, such as video editing, sound mixing, graphic designing, etc., requires multiple devices to work on simultaneously. In addition, many people use multiple devices for entertainment and work side by side. If you are in such a situation, it might be frustrating for you to switch between devices with different mouse and keyboard for every device.
To overcome such difficulties, many users stack their keyboards on top of each other. However, it is not a feasible solution. Instead of that, you can use much better options that I am going to describe in this article.
In this article, I will walk through several ways to control two computers with one keyboard and mouse. These will allow you to use your mouse without borders and keyboards to function on multiple devices. So, let us start looking at the top ways to control two computers with one keyboard and mouse.
Mouse without Borders (http://aka.ms/mm) is a software product that makes you the captain of your computer fleet by allowing you to control up to four computers from a single mouse and keyboard. This means that with Mouse without Borders you can copy text or drag and drop files across computers. It was developed by a Microsoft developer Truong Do, as an experimental project. The Microsoft Garage Mouse without Borders application is available for Windows OS at Microsoft Store for free.
After downloading and installing the application, you can configure it as per your preference. From the dashboard of the Microsoft Garage Mouse without Borders, you can drag and arrange your devices in the same order as they are placed physically from left to right. This would ensure that you can correctly hop your mouse pointer to the adjacent systems screen.
Generally, Microsoft Garage Mouse without Borders application works well, but it might start to stutter when three or four devices are connected. Still, features such as clipboard sharing allow you to copy and paste between connected devices. You can also drag and drop the items from one device to another without any issue.
If you are having trouble using the Microsoft Garage Mouse without Borders for controlling your multiple Windows PCs, you can use next best software alternative, Input Director. Although installing and setting up the Input Director is a bit intensive than the Microsoft Garage Mouse without Borders, especially for beginner users.
Input Director comes with a lot of security features that let you determine which computer systems are allowed to join the network. In addition, you can create customized hotkeys for different devices. Drag and drop from one device to another, copy and paste from one device to another, and many more advanced features are available on Input Director. Unlike Microsoft Garage Mouse without Borders, Input Director is not freely available to use for commercial purposes. However, you can use it free for personal use.
If you are uncomfortable using the software programs to control two computers with one keyboard and mouse, you can use a very good hardware alternative, the KVM Switch. The KVM Switches are not new and used by users for a long time before the software applications came into existence. The KVM Switch would simply let you switch the mouse and keyboard control to another device with an A/B switch.
The KVM switch is basically a box that you connect each of your computers monitor cable, mouse, and keyboard to the various ports. Then just flip the switch to which computer you wish your monitor, mouse, and keyboard to be connected to for input or viewing. This is one of the easier methods of sharing your devices.
There are multiple configurations of connections available, and can control several different computers.
It might be absurd to use the remote desktop to manage devices placed side by side, but it is one of the most straightforward solutions to control two computers with one keyboard and mouse. If all the devices you want to manage are Windows 10 based, you do not require any third-party application to control them remotely. Windows 10 comes with a fantastic in-built Remote Desktop application that helps you efficiently manage the devices.
Multitasking with several devices can be tedious, especially when you are using cross-platform devices. With the options listed in this article, you can easily switch between
the devices and control two (or more) computers with one keyboard and mouse.
Stay protected!
George Cox is the owner of Computer Diagnostics and Repair. He can be reached at 346-4217.
Latest survey on Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market is conducted to providehidden gems performance analysis of Worldwide Free Music Making Softwareto better demonstrate competitive environment . The study is a mix of quantitative market stats and qualitative analytical information to uncover market size revenue breakdown by key business segments and end use applications. The report bridges the historical data from 2015 to 2020 and forecasted till 2026*, the outbreak of latest scenario in Worldwide Free Music Making Software market have made companies uncertain about their future outlook as the disturbance in value chain have made serious economic slump. Some are the key & emerging players that are part of coverage and profiled in the study are Ableton, Adobe, Apple, Avid & MAGIX.
Click to get Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Research Sample PDF Copyhttps://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-report/3441977-worldwide-free-music-making-software-market
If you are part of the Worldwide Free Music Making Software industry or intend to be, then study would provide you comprehensive outlook. It is vital to keep your market knowledge up to date analysed by major players and high growth emerging players. If a different set of players need to be analysed as per geography or regional target then enquire us with your customized requirements.
Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market: Competition AnalysisWith drastic change in consumers behaviour, firms, brands and value stakeholder in Worldwide Free Music Making Software are curious to understand the implications for their products and services. Some of key competitors or manufacturers included in the study are Ableton, Adobe, Apple, Avid & MAGIX
Market Analysis by Types:, Free Music Making Software markets by type, Editing, Mixing & Recording
Market Analysis by Applications:Professional Users & Casual Users
Worldwide Free Music Making Software Quantitative Market Data
Market Data breakdown by major geographies, Type & Application/End-users Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Revenue & Growth Rate by Type [, Free Music Making Software markets by type, Editing, Mixing & Recording] (2016-2026) Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Revenue & Growth Rate by Application [Professional Users & Casual Users] (2016-2026) Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Revenue & Growth Rate by Each Region Specified (2016-2026) Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Volume & Growth Rate by Each Region Specified, Application & Type (2016-2026) Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Revenue Share & Y-O-Y Growth Rate by Players (2020)
Important Features that are under offering & key highlights of the Worldwide Free Music Making Software market report:1. Why lots of Key players are not profiled in Study?> The market study is surveyed collecting data of various companies from Worldwide Free Music Making Software industry, and the base for coverage is NAICS standards. However, the study is not limited to profile only few companies; connect with sales executive to get customized list. The standard version of research report is listed with players like Ableton, Adobe, Apple, Avid & MAGIX
2. Does Scope of Market Study allow further Segmentation?> Yes, for a deep dive analysis add-on segmentation is applicable in premium customized version of report to better derive market values. The standard version of this report covers segmentation by Application [Professional Users & Casual Users], by Type [, Free Music Making Software markets by type, Editing, Mixing & Recording] and by regions [In North America, In Latin America, Europe, The Asia-pacific, Middle East and Africa (MEA), What are the main countries covered?, The United States, Canada, Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia, China, Japan, Korea, Southeast Asia, India, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Nigeria & South Africa]
3. What value addition does Country landscape will provide?> In the premium version of report, two-level of regional segmentation allows user to have access to country level break-up of market Size by revenue and volume** Wherever applicable
HTF MI provides customized study specific to regional and country-level reports for the following areas. North America: United States, Canada, and Mexico. South & Central America: Argentina, Chile, and Brazil. Middle East & Africa: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Turkey, Egypt and South Africa. Europe: the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, and Russia. Asia-Pacific: India, China, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, and Australia etc.
Stay tuned with the latest and Worldwide Free Music Making Software market research findingsIdentify segments with hidden growth potential for investment in Worldwide Free Music Making SoftwareBenchmark performance against key competitorsUtilize the relationships between key data sets for superior strategizing.Facilitate decision making on the basis of historic and forecast trend of Worldwide Free Music Making Software marketSuitable for supporting your internal and external presentations with reliable high-quality data and analysisGain a global perspective on the development of the Worldwide Free Music Making Software market
Buy Single User PDF and explore latest findings of Worldwide Free Music Making Software Market Study @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=3441977
Thanks for reading Worldwide Free Music Making Software research article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like LATAM, North America, MENA, Southeast Asia, Europe, APAC, United States or China etc
About Author:HTF Market Intelligence consulting is uniquely positioned empower and inspire with research and consulting services to empower businesses with growth strategies, by offering services with extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist in decision making.
Contact US :Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)HTF Market Intelligence Consulting Private LimitedUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218sales@htfmarketreport.com
ON OCTOBER 8TH two journalists, Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov, won the Nobel peace prize for their efforts to safeguard freedom of expression. The Kremlin congratulated Mr Muratov for being brave, which he is. Six of his colleagues at Novaya Gazeta, the Russian newspaper he founded in 1993, have been murdered.
Your browser does not support the
Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.
Ms Ressa is brave, too. Her news organisation, Rappler, started as a Facebook page in 2011. It is one of very few in the Philippines that criticises Rodrigo Duterte, a president who urges the police to kill suspects without trial. At least ten journalists have been murdered since Mr Duterte came to power. In 2016, when he was president-elect, he said: just because youre a journalist you are not exempted from assassination, if youre a son of a bitch.
The Nobel award recognises a sad truth. Globally, freedom of expression is in retreat. The bluntest methods of silencing dissent are widely wielded: autocrats and criminal gangs often use the sword against the pen (or bullets against bloggers). Many governments also lock people up for peacefully expressing their views.
But these old-fashioned forms of repression are increasingly reinforced with or replaced by newer techniques. Freedom House, a think-tank, reports that in the past year efforts to control speech online escalated in 30 of the 70 countries it monitors, and receded only in 18 (see map). Many autocrats and would-be autocrats look with envy at China, where the Communist Party has overseen the construction of a walled-off information sphere, within which criticism of those in power can barely be seen or heard. None can copy it exactly, but many are deploying digital tools to curate the information that reaches their citizens.
Some autocrats still believe that suspending internet services completely is a good way to stymie critics, particularly in an emergency. In 2020 there were at least 155 regional or national internet shutdowns in 29 countries, according to Access Now, an NGO. More than a hundred of those took place in India. But shutdowns batter economies and make strongmen look crude. In 2011 a panicked Hosni Mubarak, Egypts dictator, tried to quash a revolution by switching off the internet. Outrageand boredomspurred even more Egyptians onto the streets. Mr Mubarak was ousted.
Chinas model is more sophisticated. Its national firewall blocks access to foreign social media and a host of other sources of information. Armies of human censors scan Chinese websites. Controls are constantly refined. In 2009 the government suspended internet access almost entirely in Xinjiang, a western region, following riots there. Now the internet is up again but police force Uyghurs, an oppressed minority, to install mobile apps that spy on all their online activity. They can be locked up for downloading a foreign product such as Skype, or software that lets them visit foreign sites such as Facebook.
Any government can order an internet service provider to blacklist sites it doesnt like. Turkey blocks nearly 470,000 sites. It added 59,000 to the list last year. But creating a firewall even remotely like Chinas is hard, even for governments willing to spend billions. One reason is that Chinas internet infrastructure was built, from the outset, with these kinds of controls in mind. The party was blocking sites as early as 1996, when only about 150,000 Chinese were online.
Another reason Chinas controls have proven so effective is that it has a domestic market big enough to support home-made alternatives to every major international website. There is plenty of content inside the firewall to keep Chinese web users entertained, so it chafes less. The sheer size of the Chinese market also reduces the economic costs of walling off the national web. Meanwhile, the Communist Party has extraordinary powers to boss domestic web firms around. Companies such as Tencent, a social-media giant, and Baidu, a search engine, have to hire, train and manage most of the censors who keep Chinas internet spotless.
China also exports software and hardware that help other regimes build a more authoritarian internet. Iran is a happy customer. Officials there cite Chinas great firewall as a model to emulate. Iran already blocks popular foreign services such as Twitter and Telegram. But its pious leaders think it has not gone far enough. The government has been working to create an alternative internet known as the National Information Network. The idea is that all its services would be hosted on domestic servers, with access linked to national identity cards.
Russias plans for purging the domestic internet of free thought are among the most ambitious. Vladimir Putin claims that the global internet is a tool of the CIA. In 2019 he signed an internet sovereignty law with the proclaimed goal of protecting Russia from online threats to its security. That law ordered all providers to install technology that allows the Kremlin to track, filter and reroute traffic.
Gregory Asmolov of Kings College London says that although Russia is ramping up its controls years after China began doing so, it is benefiting from being able to plug in much more modern kit. Roya Ensafi at the University of Michigan says the government is growing keen on tools that make websites slow to load, instead of completely unreachable. That renders them useless for distributing photos and video (the kinds of content the Kremlin finds most troublesome). It is more difficult for clever web users to get around than old-fashioned methods of blocking sites, and more difficult for organisations that monitor and publicise cases of online censorship to detect.
The Russian government is also trying to nudge its citizens to stop using big websites headquartered abroad. It is throwing money at Rutube, an alternative to YouTube owned by Gazprom, the state gas giant. Blocking YouTube is not yet feasible; ordinary Russians would be outraged if they could no longer watch cooking shows and celebrity tittle-tattle on it. But if enough content is herded onto Rutube, it might one day be possible to shut down YouTube without too much backlash.
Meanwhile, all new mobile phones sold in Russia must be set to use Yandex, a Russian search engine, by default. The government plans to require all public-sector workers, including teachers and university professors, to use only Russian email and messenger services while doing their jobs.
Other governments are also trying to persuade users to ditch foreign sites. The United Arab Emirates steers residents towards messaging apps with murky origins (at least one is connected to a government-backed firm). When members of Indias ruling party fell out with Twitter earlier this year they began encouraging their supporters to use Koo, a local alternative. In January spin doctors working for Turkeys president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said they would no longer communicate using WhatsApp, a messaging service owned by Facebook. They encouraged people to sign up for Bi P, a product of Turkcell, a big Turkish telecoms company.
Autocrats reckon that having more citizens on domestic services will make it easier to police what they say. They are also using new software to spy on citizens no matter which devices they own or which websites they visit. Freedom House says 45 countries in its sample were found to have used such spyware at some point in the past 12 months; it calls this a crisis for human rights.
In July investigators for more than a dozen newspapers said they had obtained 50,000 phone numbers of people who they believe were being considered for surveillance by clients of NSO Group, an Israeli firm that helps governments snoop on mobile devices. The governments included those of Mexico, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates. The list of people who may have been surveilled included journalists, politicians and human-rights activists. A British judge ruled in May that Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai, even used spyware to monitor his ex-wife. Snaffling personal data from peoples devices not only helps governments smear critics. It also discourages whistle-blowers and other people with important stories from speaking to journalists, for fear their identities will leak.
All this whizzy technology is increasingly combined with new laws to chill speech. Last year police in at least 55 of the 70 countries monitored by Freedom House investigated, arrested or convicted someone because of posts made on social media. That was the highest number of any year since the index was launched 11 years ago. They include a woman in Thailand who was sentenced to 43 years in jail for sharing clips from a podcast that criticised the monarchy (her initial sentence, of 87 years, was reduced because she pleaded guilty). Thailand is among several countries which have used computer crime laws to greatly expand the types of speech that can be considered criminal.
Lately web firms, not users, have been the target of most new rules. One increasingly common requirement is that they must store user data in the country in which it is generated, where governments can more easily get at it. China has required this since 2017. Other jurisdictions that have passed or are drafting similar legislation include Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and Bangladesh.
Indias government is especially keen to tame digital firms. It is demanding that WhatsApp identify who first sends any message on its platform, which would require removing the end-to-end encryption that protects its users privacy. New rules which came into effect in February require big social-media firms to establish offices within Indias borders, and appoint local representatives. These people face up to seven years in prison if their employers do not comply with local rules. These include taking down within 36 hours content the government deems threatening to public order, decency, morality or national security. To say that such vaguely worded statutes are open to abuse is putting it mildly.
In Turkey Mr Erdogan was accusing journalists of spreading fake news long before Donald Trump made it fashionable. Now his ruling Justice and Development party is considering making the publication of disinformation on social media a crime punishable by up to five years behind bars. The government doubtless hopes it will help keep a lid on dissent. Kerem Altiparmak, a human-rights lawyer, notes that the government has already succeeded in taming Turkeys press. He says if authorities can now subdue social media the free flow of information will end.
Last year Turkey gave individuals and companies the right to demand that tech firms delete some information about them. This supposedly emulates the right to be forgotten held by citizens of the European Union, but safeguards against abuse of the new system are weak. By the end of 2020 nearly 40,000 news reports had been blocked or removed from the web by court order. These include a story about an adviser to Mr Erdogan who forged his high-school diploma, messages posted to a forum about the presidents wifes luxury handbag, and articles about a wrestling champion who was convicted of rape. The web censors have occasionally ended up chasing their own tails. Earlier this year, after one court blocked access to a story concerning a tender secured by a friend of Mr Erdogans son, a second court blocked access to news reports about the first courts decision.
In a few cases new rules aim not to delete speech, but to ensure that governments own propaganda stays put. Leaders of all stripes took fright when, in January, big social-media sites suspended Donald Trumps account for inciting insurrection. In September Brazils president, Jair Bolsonaro, signed an update to internet rules narrowing the circumstances under which firms can remove posts that they believe breach their in-house moderation policies. Mexicos senate majority leader has proposed a law that would allow the countrys internet regulator to restore posts and accounts that social media firms have decided to take down. In June Nigeria began blocking Twitter after it deleted a message from the president, Muhammadu Buhari, alluding to Nigerias civil war, in which perhaps 1m people died, and warning modern secessionists that they would be treated in the language they understand.
Autocracies will doubtless continue to combine high- and low-tech ways of suppressing online speech. During tense times in Egypt police have sometimes stopped people on the streets and demanded they unlock their phones, to see if they have shared anything subversive. Soldiers in Myanmar have been carrying out similar duties since the army launched its coup in February. Freedom House finds that last year people in 41 countries were beaten up or killed because of things they had said online. In a speech in 2019 Paul Kagame, the president of Rwanda, warned online critics outside the country that they risked reprisals. His words carried especial menace, since Rwandan dissidents abroad have often met untimely ends. Those making noise on the internet do so because theyre far from the fire, he said. If they dare get close to it they will face its heat.
This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline "Walls of silence"
The iPhone 13 lineup arrived last month, and as usual carriers rolled out tempting trade-in deals to entice people to switch over to Apple's latest and greatest. (Here are some of the best iPhone 13 deals around.) AT&T came out of the gate essentially giving away the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Mini for a starting price that can go as low as "free" to new and existing customers. Verizon later effectively matched that offer, while AT&T bumped its deal to also allow for a free iPhone 13 (and will also offer $1,000 off the iPhone 13 Pro Max with qualifying trade-ins, too).
T-Mobile is similarly offering all three devices for free to both new and existing customers.
In all cases, there are plenty of caveats. It all depends on the phone model you're trading in, the wireless plan you have and the financing.
The iPhone 13 models are now available (already backordered, in some cases). To help you avoid having to comb through the fine print, we've outlined the key details on the three carriers' respective trade-in offers.
Note: These deals don't include taxes in their prices, which are often based on the full price of the phone. Some carriers may also charge a one-time activation or upgrade fee (usually around $30) as well.
It is also worth noting that T-Mobile has added a new Magenta Max iPhone upgrade program it calls Forever Upgrade that will guarantee you "up to $800" back (up to $700 for the Mini, or less if you're buying an iPhone 12 today) in future trade-in credits.
The catch here: You will need to wait two years to trade in the iPhone 13 or iPhone 12 that you're buying today to get the credits, and you will need to be on Magenta Max for the entire time.
Those with other T-Mobile plans can get up to $500 off, but you will need to trade in an iPhone 11 Pro or 11 Pro Max, or an iPhone 12 Pro or 12 Pro Max to get that discount. Those with older devices can get up to $400 offer, with full details available by clicking on the "On us with Magenta Max with trade" link on T-Mobile's product pages.
Read more:The best iPhone 13 deals are here: Target, Best Buy, Verizon and more
Stay up-to-date on the latest news, reviews and advice on iPhones, iPads, Macs, services and software.