Archive for the ‘First Amendment’ Category

Orange County judge dismisses Sunshine Law violation against Chris Dorworth

An Orange County judge today dismissed a charge of breaking the state's public meeting laws against former state representative-turned-lobbyist Chris Dorworth.

Judge Tanya Davis Wilson, who was set to start jury selection Thursday, ruled that Dorworth's First Amendment rights to free speech was violated by the misdemeanor charge against him.

"A private citizen has a protected constitutional right to communicate with public officials or members of a public body about matters that may come before that body," Wilson wrote.

Dorworth's attorney, Richard Hornsby of Orlando, said, "I'm pleased. I thought this was a flawed prosecution from the beginning."

Chief Assistant State Attorney Richard Wallsh said his office would issue a reaction later this afternoon.

Dorworth was accused of acting as a go-between, or conduit, between two former members of the Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority in a plot to oust then-director Max Crumit.

According to the state's so-called "Government in the Sunshine" laws, authority business could be discussed only in public, such as a board meeting, and not in private. Conviction of the misdemeanor is punishable by a $500 fine and up to 60 days in jail.

Dorworth, according to an Orange County grand jury indictment, passed information between Scott Batterson and Marco Pena, who were on the board and were part of a 3-2 vote in August 2013 to seek a replacement for Crumit.

Pena earlier this year pleaded guilty to breaking the sunshine law and paid a $500 fine. Batterson last week pleaded no contest to the same charge.

Hornsby said the proper people to go after were Pena and Batterson, not Dorworth.

Link:
Orange County judge dismisses Sunshine Law violation against Chris Dorworth

SCOTUSblog on camera: Laurence H. Tribe (Part two) Case law – Video


SCOTUSblog on camera: Laurence H. Tribe (Part two) Case law
Two important cases -- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (public access to trials) and Larkin v. Grendel #39;s Den, Inc. (the First Amendment Establishment Clause and a church #39;s power to...

By: SCOTUSblogoncamera

Go here to read the rest:
SCOTUSblog on camera: Laurence H. Tribe (Part two) Case law - Video

INFOWARS Nightly News: with Jakari Jackson Wednesday October 15 2014: Plus Special Reports – Video


INFOWARS Nightly News: with Jakari Jackson Wednesday October 15 2014: Plus Special Reports
Wednesday: The Infowars Nightly News. A Chilling Assault On The First Amendment In Houston, Texas. Plus, Media Ratings Numbers Shell Game Revealed. --SUBSCRIBE TO PRISONPLANET.

By: Ron Gibson

Original post:
INFOWARS Nightly News: with Jakari Jackson Wednesday October 15 2014: Plus Special Reports - Video

The City of Houston subpoenas ministers sermons, First Amendment violation? – Video


The City of Houston subpoenas ministers sermons, First Amendment violation?
A group of ministers sued the City of Houston over the rejection of petitions to get a referendum on the ballot attacking the City #39;s Equal Rights ordinance. The City subpoenaed the sermons...

By: Chris Tritico

View post:
The City of Houston subpoenas ministers sermons, First Amendment violation? - Video

Topeka attorney defends abortion provider's killer in First Amendment case

It is the law. And Abortionist's Know that their own lives are at risk performing abortions.

Christians, it's best to leave this judgement to the people who seek abortions and GOD almighty to judge their decisions and their circumstances. The men and women that accommodate those decisions will someday face the same equal judgement.

Although I believe that abortion laws have been abused, I still believe in the core principal of the original law as it was written "" In cases of RAPE, INCEST, and the LIFE OF THE MOTHER!""

That is why you hear me say that I am pro choice,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,at the skin of my teeth.

I understand COMPLETELY the arguments that the Pro lifers make, but to take a life to save a life only damages the cause!

It's best to do what you do best, and that is preach the Gospel and do your best to change hearts to stop abortions.

You can do none of that Sitting in prison. You are not a judge!

View post:
Topeka attorney defends abortion provider's killer in First Amendment case