Archive for the ‘First Amendment’ Category

Artist wins case against neighbours he secretly photographed

Artists Art law News USA Appellate court upholds First Amendment rights but encourages stricter privacy laws in future

By Julia Halperin. Web only Published online: 10 April 2015

A New York appellate court has reluctantly upheld the rights of the photographer Arne Svenson to exhibit and sell photographs he took of his neighbours without their permission. The unanimous decision by a seven-judge panel is a win for First Amendment advocates. But the court itself seemed uneasy about its conclusion, calling the photographs disturbing and encouraging the local government to expand privacy laws that would curtail similar work in the future.

Svensons series The Neighbours, shown at New Yorks Julie Saul Gallery in 2013, captured the daily lives of residents of a downtown luxury apartment building as they ate breakfast, scrubbed their floors and watched television. The Museum of Contemporary Art, Denver, is due to open an exhibition of The Neighbours in February 2016. One work from the series is in the collection of Harvard Business School.

The artist, who has likened himself to a bird watcher, monitored his neighbours for more than one year and took thousands of photographs of them with a telephoto lens. (He also consulted a privacy lawyer and watched the Hitchcock film Rear Window four times.)

Two residents of the building, Martha and Matthew Foster, sued Svenson after they saw an image of their young children published in a local newspaper article about the series.

A state appellate court reinforced a lower trial courts decision to dismiss the case on 9 April. The judges concluded that Svensons First Amendment rights as an artist outweighed the familys right to privacy in a city as dense as New York.

Unsettled by the images, the judges also encouraged the state to expand its privacy laws. Many people would be rightfully offended by the intrusive manner in which the photographs were taken, Judge Renwick wrote. In these times of heightened threats to privacy posed by new and ever more invasive technologies, we call upon the legislature to revisit this important issue, as we are constrained to apply the law as it exists.

Neither Svenson nor a lawyer for the Foster family immediately responded to a request for comment. Another exhibition of Svensons work is on view at Julie Saul Gallery until 30 May. The Workers, a sequel to The Neighbours, presents close-up images of men engaged in manual labour.

All comments are moderated. If you would like your comment to be approved, please use your real name, not a pseudonym. We ask for your email address in case we wish to contact you - it will not be made public and we do not use it for any other purpose.

Go here to read the rest:
Artist wins case against neighbours he secretly photographed

RFRA and the First Amendment Explained for Small Business Owners – Can you turn away business? – Video


RFRA and the First Amendment Explained for Small Business Owners - Can you turn away business?
http://businessinbluejeans.com http://samventola.com In this informative webinar, small business expert and marketing consultant, Susan Baroncini-Moe, and attorney at law and First Amendment...

By: Susan Baroncini-Moe

More:
RFRA and the First Amendment Explained for Small Business Owners - Can you turn away business? - Video

Plaintiff in Landmark Supreme Court Case Talks to Bentonville Students

BENTONVILLE -- The plaintiff in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case met with Bentonville High School students to discuss First Amendment rights Wednesday.

In 1965, Des Moines, Iowa students Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam war. The school prohibited the armbands and suspended the students.

A lawsuit was filed against the Des Moines School District, and after losing at the district and appeals court levels, the case went before the Supreme Court in 1969. The Supreme Court ruled that students could express themselves as long as it doesn't "materially and substantially interfere" with school or violate other's rights. Today, Tinker v. Des Moines is still used to define limits of free expression at school.

"It's a huge issue today as well, because so many students now are speaking up and standing up about all the issues of our day and where the limits are for the First Amendment, where hate speech should be limited and where students should be encouraged to have their speech rights," Tinker says.

Tinker spoke with Bentonville students about her experience, and the challenges to freedom of expression in the digital age.

See the original post:
Plaintiff in Landmark Supreme Court Case Talks to Bentonville Students

imissmygirls.com – Video


imissmygirls.com
A message to my girls 7th April 2015.

By: First Amendment Publishing

Here is the original post:
imissmygirls.com - Video

Bible in Caddo Parish Clerk of court office violates 1st Amendment

SHREVEPORT, LA (KSLA) - A Bible in the Caddo Parish Clerk of Court office had to be removed because it violated the First Amendment.

When Randall Lord asked a Bible to be removed from the Caddo Parish Clerk of Court office nearly a decade ago, he never thought he'd have to ask again.

"I sent an email to Caddo Parish attorney, at the time, Charles Grubb to ask that it be removed," said Lord.

But when Lord walked back into the Clerk of Court office recently he noticed the Bible was back.

"This violates the first amendment in that it's promoting a religion. Our government is not supposed to be in the business of promoting religion," he said.

According to the 1st amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the bible violates the establishment clause, which prohibits the U.S. government from endorsing any one religion.

"I don't have anything against any religion being a part of our community or being displayed, but the way it's being displayed is improper. If other religions are included along with the display there would be no issue here," said Lord.

Not long after KSLA News 12 obtained video of the Bible, it had been replaced with a Webster's Dictionary of similar size.

Caddo Parish Clerk of Court Chief Deputy Mike Spence says the Bible was returned to it's original location, away from public display.

"We're not here to cause controversy," said Spense."We're just here to store records and keep the courts going."

Read the original here:
Bible in Caddo Parish Clerk of court office violates 1st Amendment