Archive for the ‘Fifth Amendment’ Category

Judge Blocks Part of Trump’s Immigration Order – NBC New York

Federal Judge Ann M. Donnelly of the Eastern District of New York Courthouse in Brooklyn granted an injunction in response to a request filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other legal organizations on behalf of individuals subject to President Trump's immigration ban from seven predominantly Muslim countries. (Published Saturday, Jan. 28, 2017)

A federal judge blocked the government from deporting immigrants being held due to President Donald Trump's executive immigration order.

Federal Judge Ann M. Donnelly of the Eastern District of New York Courthouse in Brooklyn granted an injunction in response to a request filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and other legal organizations on behalf of individuals subject to President Trump's immigration ban from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

The stay blocks anyone with a valid visa being held at airports from being deported.

The stay applies only to those currently within the U.S., but not to anyone who tries to come to the U.S. going forward. And it does not mean detainees will be released, only that they can't be deported, according to ACLU attorneys.

"Everyone now who came is safe, and that is absolutely critical. The courts worked the way they're supposed to work in our country," Lee Gelernt, Deputy Legal Director for the ACLU's Immigrants Rights Project, told MSNBC. "The president could not override the courts."

The ACLU said the judge ordered a list of detainees to be provided, and said it would go through the names and ensure they are released.

The Department of Homeland Security issued a statement early Sunday that said the court order would not affect the overall implementation of the White House order and that the court order affected a small number of travelers who were inconvenienced by security procedures upon their return.

"President Trump's Executive Orders remain in place. Prohibited travel will remain prohibited, and the U.S. government retains its right to revoke visas at any time if required for national security or public safety," the statement said.

Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to the White House, said: "Nothing in the Brooklyn judge's order in anyway impedes or prevents the implementation of the president's executive order which remains in full, complete and total effect."

The judge's order was hailed as a victory for activists fighting the president's order, but some qualified it as a small one in a larger battle.

"We believe the executive order is unconstitutional," ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero told MSNBC. "We believe it violates the Fifth Amendment. We believe it violates the First Amendment. We think it's illegal under existing immigration statues. So we will live to fight another day to make sure this executive order dies on the vine."

Trump Immigration Order Triggers Protests Across US

U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., told MSNBC that the executive action resulted in infringements on the constitutional rights of detained travelers.

"Some of the folks who have been detained are American citizens," she said. "This is not all refugees."

She called what happened to travelers Saturday "a dangerous thing."

It was unclear how quickly the order might affect people in detention, the Associated Press was reporting.

Top News: Libya Migrants, Chinese New Year and More

The order signed by Trump on Friday puts in place a 120-day hold on entry of refugees to the U.S., and indefinitely suspends the admission of Syrian refugees until the president is satisfied that changes have been made.

It also suspends entry for 90 days from certain nations based on statute related to the Visa Waiver Program. The most recent version of that program lists Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen.

Critics blasted the order as "Muslim ban," which Trump has denied. Trump said the order was necessary to keep foreign terrorists out of the U.S. The president on the campaign trail and after taking office called for "extreme vetting" of some entering the country.

Under Trump's order, it had appeared that an untold number of foreign-born U.S. residents now traveling outside the U.S. could be stuck overseas for at least 90 days even though they held permanent residency "green cards" or other visas. However, an official with the Department of Homeland Security said Saturday night that no green-card holders from the seven countries cited in Trump's order had been prevented from entering the U.S.

Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU Immigrants Rights Project, told MSNBC that the goal going forward now is to ensure there are no more widespread airport detentions as there were Saturday.

"We will continue to put pressure on the government to try to ensure that people are not detained, because again, these are people who have gone through the whole process," he said, referring to the vetting procedures already in place for refugees and others entering the country.

"Stay is granted," ACLU Voting Rights Project Director Dale Ho announced earlier on Twitter. "Stay is national."

The ACLU's Gelernt said in a statement:

This ruling preserves the status quo and ensures that people who have been granted permission to be in this country are not illegally removed off U.S. soil.

The ACLU filed the suit on behalf of twoIraqi refugees who were detained after arriving at New York's John F. Kennedy Airport following the order. They were later released, and a senior Trump administration official said waivers would be granted.

Protests erupted in multiple airports across the nation Saturday over the order.

On Sunday morning, Trump reiterated his support for "extreme vetting" in a tweet.

"Our country needs strong borders and extreme vetting, NOW. Look what is happening all over Europe and, indeed, the world - a horrible mess!" he wrote.

Published at 9:22 PM EST on Jan 28, 2017 | Updated at 12:26 PM EST on Jan 29, 2017

See original here:
Judge Blocks Part of Trump's Immigration Order - NBC New York

Rights of Criminal Defendants | LegalMatch Law Library

Legal Topics > Criminal Law and Police > General Criminal Law > Criminal Law

When a person is charged with a crime, they become a criminal defendant. The government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before convicting and punishing a defendant for a crime.

The United States Constitution provides criminal defendants with many constitutional rights. These rights control how the government investigates, prosecutes and punishes criminal behavior. These include rights provided in the fourth, fifth, sixth, and eighth amendments.

The Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures:

The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination (the right to remain silent) and double jeopardy:

The Sixth Amendment provides criminal defendants with the right to legal representation, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to confront witnesses:

The Eighth Amendment provides criminal defendants with the right to a reasonable bail and the right to not be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment:

Yes. Legal representation can be crucial if you are charged with a crime. Criminal charges are life changing and it is in your best interest to get counsel. An experienced defense attorney can help protect your rights and represent you in court.

Consult a Lawyer - Present Your Case Now! Last Modified: 06-16-2015 02:09 PM PDT

Find the Right Lawyer Now

More here:
Rights of Criminal Defendants | LegalMatch Law Library

Convicted murderer takes fifth in trial involving Scranton native’s … – Scranton Times-Tribune

Article Tools

Tara Ord Sidorovich

PUNTA GORDA, FLA. Phillip Barr invoked his right to remain silent at the trial of his co-defendant, David McMannis, for the 2001 murder of West Scranton native Tara Ord Sidarovich.

Mr. McMannis trial began earlier this month. A grand jury indicted Mr. Barr and Mr. McMannis on first-degree murder charges in 2012, 11 years after Ms. Sidarovich disappeared from her home in Punta Gorda, Florida. Her skeletal remains were found in July 2002 in a wooded area in Charlotte County.

Mr. Barr, convicted for the murder in 2015 and sentenced to life in prison, was transported to Florida from Vermont where he is in custody pending a trial on other charges. He appeared at the Charlotte County Justice Center for a hearing on Thursday afternoon with his attorney, Mark DeSisto, and said he had been advised to invoke his fifth amendment right. Under the fifth amendment, criminal defendants are protected from giving a testimony which may incriminate themselves.

On Monday, Ms. Sidarovichs sister, Veronica Ord, testified about what she found when she arrived at the home soon after her sisters disappearance. Only 12 at the time, she and her younger brother, Paul, were the first to arrive home that afternoon. On the stand, she said they found the door unlocked and slightly ajar but no one inside.

Ms. Ord corroborated testimony given by her mother, saying Ms. Sidarovichs purse was on the dresser, and her car was in the driveway, but her sister was nowhere to be found. A sheet and blanket from Ms. Sidarovichs bed had been placed on Ms. Ords bed instead.

With an average of three witnesses a day, prosecutors expect to rest their case sometime during the week of Feb. 10. The defense plans to take another week and a half to present their case.

Contact the writer:

aeasker@sun-herald.com

More here:
Convicted murderer takes fifth in trial involving Scranton native's ... - Scranton Times-Tribune

An Important Message from Mike Pence – The New Yorker (satire)

CreditPHOTOGRAPH BY ALAN DIAZ / AP

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)Vice-President Mike Pence has issued the following message to the American people:

Dear American People,

What with all the hoopla and hullabaloo of Inauguration Week, we didnt really get a chance to get to know each other. And so, if you dont mind, I thought that Id take a minute or two to tell you a thing or two about Mike Pence.

Im what most people would call a fun guy. In my spare time, I enjoy golf and heterosexuality. And Im something of a voracious reader. My favorite book, of course, is the Bible, but I enjoy other books, too. Im a big fan of The Da Vinci Code, which has a lot of stuff about the Bible in it. And Paul Ryan just gave me a copy of Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand. I just started reading that one, so I havent gotten to any parts in it about the Bible yet, but its darn good.

Another thing I read recently, and its probably become my second-favorite piece of reading material right after the Bible, is the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Its all about how to remove the President and replace him with the Vice-President. I have to admit that it was a kick to start reading the dusty old Constitution for the very first time and see yours truly right in there!

It turns out that the Twenty-fifth Amendment says that the country can remove the President if he is found to be incapacitated. That can mean anything from physically incapacitated, like being in an irreversible coma, to mentally incapacitated, like being seen raving like a lunatic during a visit to the C.I.A. Either way, if folks decide that its time to put a fork in you, see you later, alligator!

Whenever I read something great, I tell everyone I know to go out and read it, too. And so, my fellow-Americans, I encourage each and every one of you, history buffs or otherwise, to read the Twenty-fifth Amendment todayespecially Section 4, which is a little complicated but really exciting, too. If you enjoy reading it as much as I did, let me know. Im in my office in Washington and you can reach me anytimeIm of sound mind and body.

Well, Im super-glad we had the chance to get to know each other a little better. Until next time, heres Mike Pence saying, God bless America. And God bless the Twenty-fifth Amendment.

See more here:
An Important Message from Mike Pence - The New Yorker (satire)

Man Tortured By Police Should Get $4 Million From City, Aldermen Recommend – DNAinfo

Shawn Whirl was exonerated in 2015 after serving 25 years in prison. View Full Caption

Shawn Whirl

DOWNTOWN The city should pay $4 million to a man wrongfully convicted of killing a cab driver after being tortured by Chicago Police, a City Council committee unanimously recommended Tuesday.

In 1991, 20-year-old Shawn Whirl was sentenced to 60 years in prison after confessing to the murder of a taxi driver in Pullman. But he recanted his confession and said he had been tortured by Detective James Pienta who had once worked under disgraced police Cmdr. Jon Burge.

Whirl was released in October 2015 after the Illinois Torture Inquiry and Relief Commission, designed to investigate abuse allegations against Burge and detectives under his supervision, found that his account was "strikingly similar" to those of other Burge victims in 2012.

Whirl said that while he was being questioned about the murder of Billy G. Williams, a married father of three who was found shot in his head, the detective slapped him and repeatedly dug a key into an existing leg wound and put a large potato chip bag over his head to stifle his screams while he was handcuffed to a wall.

After Whirl's conviction was overturned and his confession tossed out by an appellate court judge, Cook County prosecutors declined to retry him.

Pineta, who is no longer a Chicago Police officer, has been accused of torture by other people.

Called to testify at a hearing in Whirl's case, Pineta asserted his Fifth Amendment right and refused to answer questions.

From 1972 to 1991, Burge and his subordinates allegedly used cattle prods, suffocation, Russian roulette and beatings with phone books to elicit confessions from suspects, many of them African-Americans.

In May 2015, Mayor Rahm Emanuel apologized for the officers' actions and created a $5.5 million reparations fund for victims.

The fund will allow a maximum of $100,000 to be paid to each of the more than 100 Burge torture victims, while the ordinance also allows the victims and their families health care, counseling and free tuition at the City Colleges. It also calls for the subject of police torture to be taught to Chicago Public Schools students in junior high and high school.

In December, the City Council agreed to settle three police misconduct lawsuits for $5.5 million.

Go here to read the rest:
Man Tortured By Police Should Get $4 Million From City, Aldermen Recommend - DNAinfo