Archive for the ‘Ethereum’ Category

Ethereum fees hit lows while L2 capture users’ attention: IntoTheBlock – Crypto Briefing

Share this article

Ethereums transaction fees have reached a six-month low, caused by the shift of transactions to layer-2 (L2) blockchains, according to the latest edition of IntoTheBlocks On-chain Insights newsletter.

This migration has contributed to a decrease in the total fees accrued by Ethereum. In April, transactions on the largest three L2s, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, accounted for an unprecedented 82% of all Ethereum transactions.

With the inclusion of additional L2s, this percentage is likely even higher. The launch of EIP-4844 on March 13 played a crucial role in this transition by slashing L2 fees by more than tenfold, leading to a 10% drop in mainnet transactions and a shift in Ethereums token economics.

In the competitive landscape of L2s, different platforms are carving out their niches. Institutions have shown a preference for Arbitrum, which dominated 73% of Ethereums transaction volume among the top L2s. Conversely, Arbitrum accounted for only 39% of the number of transactions, while Base captured a 50% share. Notably, Blackrock and Securitize have recently applied to introduce the BUIDL real-world assets fund on Arbitrum.

On the retail side, Optimisms OP Stack has been gaining traction through SocialFi applications. Coinbases Base L2 experienced a surge in transactions following FriendTechs airdrop, and the social media-based card game Fantasy.top generated $6 million in fees this week on the Blast L2. This diversification of applications has intensified the competition among L2s, particularly in terms of market capitalization.

Optimisms OP token has seen a 48% increase from its April lows, outperforming ARBs 22% gain. The OP token now surpasses ARB in both circulating market cap and fully diluted valuation. Additionally, venture capital firm a16zs $90 million investment in OP has bolstered the projects resources and credibility.

The ongoing competition among L2s is leading to lower fees for Ethereum in the short term. However, it is simultaneously fostering a rich ecosystem of applications that promise to stimulate economic activity and offer long-term benefits, concludes IntoTheBlock.

Share this article

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

Crypto Briefing may augment articles with AI-generated content created by Crypto Briefings own proprietary AI platform. We use AI as a tool to deliver fast, valuable and actionable information without losing the insight - and oversight - of experienced crypto natives. All AI augmented content is carefully reviewed, including for factural accuracy, by our editors and writers, and always draws from multiple primary and secondary sources when available to create our stories and articles.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

More:

Ethereum fees hit lows while L2 capture users' attention: IntoTheBlock - Crypto Briefing

Solana could flip Ethereum in transaction fees within a week: Report – Cointelegraph

The Solana network could be on track to overtake the Ethereum network in transaction fees, a potentially significant development for Solanas status as a so-called Ethereum killer.

Solana could flip Ethereums transaction fees as soon as this week, according to Dan Smith, senior research analyst at Blockworks, who wrote in a May 7 X post:

Captured maximal extractable value, or MEV, refers to profits that are mostly captured through arbitrage trading on protocols. MEV measures the maximum amount of value that can be extracted from a blockchain by a user or a group of users.

Moreover, Solanas $2.8-million total economic value was near Ethereums $3.1-million total economic value on May 7, according to Smiths X post:

However, Solanas daily transaction fees are still far from Ethereums. Ethereum generated over $2.75 million worth of fees in the past 24 hours, compared to Solanas $1.49 million, according to DefiLlama data.

Looking at the total value locked (TVL), Solanas $3.94 billion in TVL is still a small fraction or around 7.4% of the Ethereum networks $53 billion TVL.

Related: How Binance played a key role in arrest of ZKasino scam suspect

Solana launched on mainnet in March 2020, with a claimed throughput of 50,000 transactions per second (TPS), promising to improve on the lack of scalability and inefficiencies of Ethereum, as a so-called Ethereum killer.

Unlike Ethereums modular approach to scalability via layer-2 (L2) scaling solutions, Solanas monolithic approach aims to create scalability and low fees as a standalone blockchain network.

However, Solanas approach saw widespread criticism following its previous outages. At the beginning of April, the demand for memecoins caused approximately 75% of Solana transactions to fail, as the network was unable to handle the large demand.

On Feb. 6, block production on Solana stopped for approximately five hours, before engineers and validators were able to restart the network, according to Solanas status page.

Related: Bankruptcy law firm S&C absolved from misconduct, according to new FTX proposal

Here is the original post:

Solana could flip Ethereum in transaction fees within a week: Report - Cointelegraph

Ethereum price lags due to ‘weaker capital rotation,’ but crypto macro uptrend remains – Cointelegraph

Ethers (ETH) price continues to underperform compared to Bitcoins (BTC) 2024 gains, but Glassnode analysts suggest that brighter days could lie ahead.

Data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows that Ether has been underperforming Bitcoin over the last two years, resulting in a weaker ETH/BTC ratio, which reached a low of $0.04622 on May 1, the lowest since April 2021.

Glassnode said Ethers under-performance this cycle relative to Bitcoin is due to a measurable lag in speculative interest from short-term holders (STHs).

The report defines the STH cohort as investors who acquired their coins within the last 155 days and are often considered a proxy for new investor demand.

Glassnode analysts explained that BTC experienced a noticeable increase in speculative activity in terms of capital accumulation among STHs in the run-up to all-time highs in March. This has not been reflected in ETH, which is yet to breach its previous all-time high.

The firms on-chain data reveals that while Bitcoins STH-realized cap is nearly at the same level as the last bull run peak, ETHs STH-realized cap is still less than half of previous cycle levels, suggesting a markedly lackluster inflow of new capital.

Related: Bitcoin exchange inflows drop to 10-year lows after $74K all-time highs

Historically, Ethers price performance has been closely linked to Bitcoin price moves, and the recent price action reflects this relationship.

Bitcoin experienced a sell-off after the fourth halving, dropping 11% to a two-month low of $56,500 on May 1. Bitcoins price has since recovered, consolidating within the $62,700$65,550 price range over the last two days.

Ether experienced a similar correction after the halving with a 6% drop, recording the worst post-halving performance ever, according to Glassnode.

However, measured from the $73,835 all-time high, Glassnode noted that Bitcoins price fell by 20.3% the deepest correction on a closing basis since the FTX lows in November 2022.

Using the Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) metric, the on-chain data analytics firm found that both ETH and BTC still have a relatively low realized cap associated with long-term holders (LTHs), suggesting the market is within the early stages of a macro uptrend.

In an earlier report, Glassnode established that capital inflows into ETH tend to lag behind those into BTC. For instance, during the 2021 cycle, the peak influx of new capital into BTC occurred 20 days before the peak influx into ETH.

Using a 30-day change in the realized cap to monitor the rotation of capital between these two assets, Glassnode analysts found that ETHs STH realized cap is yet to pick up momentum in the current cycle.

Glassnode concludes that while the post-halving market action has played out remarkably similar to previous cycles, several data points indicate that Ether has underperformed relative to BTC.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Follow this link:

Ethereum price lags due to 'weaker capital rotation,' but crypto macro uptrend remains - Cointelegraph

What is restaking, and how to restake Ethereum to boost rewards? – Cointelegraph

In proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains such as Ethereum, the networks security syncs with the number of active validators, the percentage of circulating tokens staked, and the allocation of these tokens among the active validators. Restaking mechanisms incentivize these staked tokens otherwise lying inactive to improve the overall functioning of the blockchain.

This article discusses what restaking is, the types of restaking, how liquid restaking works, collective security using staked Ether and concerns regarding restaking.

Restaking presents a novel concept in cryptocurrency security, enabling stakers to use their Ether (ETH) in the consensus layer more than once. It allows stakers to increase their rewards while strengthening the security of the staking network by facilitating the deployment of liquid staking tokens with validators across several networks.

Staked tokens usually sit idle on PoS blockchains. Restaking activates staked tokens, facilitating higher staking rewards for restakers. Whether someone is staking Ethereum directly or using a liquid staking token (LST), they could use a restaking protocol such as EigenLayer to receive additional rewards on their staked tokens.

The sheer number of validators on the Ethereum network participating in the PoS consensus mechanism makes it stand out. But staked ETH lies dormant. Thanks to liquid staking protocols, the staked ETH gets converted into fungible tokens, enabling stakers to use it in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. The mechanism sets aside the minimum 32 ETH staking cap, enabling users with smaller holdings to earn staking rewards.

Restaking can broadly be segregated into native and liquid restaking. Native restaking is available to users who run an Ethereum validator node. It functions through a set of smart contracts that supervise the management of assets staked inside a validators node.

Validators can benefit from the crypto-economic security offered by restaking protocols and can stake their tokens with them. To participate in a restaking program, validators need to install and execute additional node software for the restaking module.

Liquid restaking involves users utilizing liquid staking tokens (LST). When a staker stakes their assets with a validator in this procedure, the validator grants them a token that represents their stake. The staker would restake the LST to earn additional rewards.

Let us use the example of EigenLayer to understand how liquid restaking works. With a total value locked (TVL) of over $250 million, EigenLayer effectively acts as a bridge between Ethereum and other blockchain applications, offering both pooled security and a marketplace for it.

EigenLayer functions as the foundational framework for restaking. Anyone who has already staked their ETH directly or through liquid staking solutions can engage with EigenLayers smart contracts. This allows them to restake their holdings and contribute to the security of various platforms, effectively creating a collective security mechanism powered by Ethereum.

Here is the process to restake on EigenLayer

Step 1: Click Restake at the right of the top menu on the EigenLayer website.

The EigenLayer app will appear in the next tab, where the user can complete the restaking process.

Step 2: Click the Connect wallet button at the middle of the top. Users can select between MetaMask, Coinbase Wallet, WalletConnect and OKX Wallet.

At the top right, users can see an icon with three horizontal lines. Users can access support documentation, blogs, Discord and forum sections through it.

Step 3: In the section Liquid Restaking, click on the chosen LST.

Suppose a user selects Rocket Pool Ether. They can deposit or unstake on the window that appears. At the time of writing, deposits are paused.

Typically, launching a new protocol involves establishing a fresh network of trust for security purposes, which includes setting up a network of validators and introducing a native cryptocurrency.

Restaking changes the game by allowing these protocols or active validator sets (AVS) to leverage the collective security from Ethereums stakers, making development much more efficient. These AVS, also called EigenLayer modules, can range from sidechains and bridges to oracle networks, keeper networks and data availability layers.

In the past, an attacker could potentially breach the security of one of these AVS to cause disruption. However, with EigenLayers model of pooled security, any such attempt would require challenging the entire collective stake, valued at billions of dollars. Participating in EigenLayers smart contracts, however, introduces additional risks, including the possibility of increased slashing conditions for a users staked ETH.

For those staking their Ethereum, this model offers the chance to earn higher returns by securing various AVS with their restaked ETH without needing different tokens. EigenLayer facilitates this through a marketplace where AVS can attract the support of Ethereum validators, who are then able to select which modules to back based on the incentives provided.

A common concern about restaking is about the allocation of funds repeatedly to similar validators, increasing both yield and risk. Developers have warned that excessive leverage could result in the instability of projects. According to them, if more financial risk is embedded into the blockchain itself, it would only destabilize the whole ecosystem. Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of Ethereum, has cautioned that restaking protocols could expose the blockchain to significant systemic risk.

The rapid growth of restaking protocols means the associated risks are also escalating, demanding immediate attention. A voluminous failure could undermine the security of the underlying blockchain. In 2022, Ankr, a restaking protocol built on the BNB network, was exploited, and it should serve as a preview of a possible catastrophe for a blockchain network.

However, considering the possible risks posed by restaking, it can be deployed in scenarios with low-risk misbehaviors, like double signing, without compromising Ethereums decentralization norms.

As restaking continues to evolve, it is likely to emerge as a key DeFi component, drawing more liquidity and users into Ethereum staking, which historically has lagged behind other PoS networks in staking ratio. Through the synergies of LST and restaking, Ethereums staking ecosystem may see significant growth.

Possible risks to layer-1 blockchains due to restaking suggest a cautious approach regarding the development and deployment of staking services. Resolving potential conflicts after restaking gains significance will help prevent negative effects. Factoring in the long and short-term effects of restaking on the Ethereum ecosystem may result in a win-win situation for every staker.

Read the original:

What is restaking, and how to restake Ethereum to boost rewards? - Cointelegraph

Ethereum price weakens against Bitcoin Here’s why – Cointelegraph

Ether (ETH) had been rallying since the beginning of the new year but began tapering off in mid-March. The altcoin has trailed Bitcoin (BTC) since Jan. 1, gaining roughly 48% compared to BTCs 57% in their respective USD pairs year-to-date.

There are three main reasons why ETH has been underperforming BTC throughout the past several days, including a decrease in network activity and declining sentiment surrounding the approval of spot Ethereum ETFs in May.

Ether is down 13.5% over the last 30 days, underperforming Bitcoin and other top layer 1 tokens. BTCs price has dropped only 4% over the last 30 days, while other top-cap layer 1 tokens, such as BNB Chains BNB and Solanas SOL, have rallied 15.5% and 16%, respectively, over the same timeframe.

The ETH/BTC ratio began declining on March 8, reaching its year-to-date low of $0.047 on April 7.

There are several reasons why Ether has underperformed Bitcoin over the last month, including new all-time high prices, over $10 billion in investments into the spot BTC ETF, and Bitcoin Ordinals trading volume surging close to $3 billion. The upcoming Bitcoin supply halving, which has historically preceded a crypto market bull run, has also added to BTCs tailwinds.

Investigating Ethereums network activity, including its scaling solutions, can also give insight on why Ether continues to underperform BTC. Decentralized applications (DApps) are at the core of this layer 1 blockchain, and diminishing use in terms of users and volumes indicates less demand for ETH.

Data from Web3 data aggregator DappRadar shows that the top Ethereum decentralized applications (DApps) have seen an average 6.42% decrease in the number of active addresses over the last 30 days.

Over the past 30 days, Ethereum DApps experienced a 26.51% drop in transaction volume fueled by decreases in Uniswap, MetaMask Swap, Blur and OpenSea.

Additional data from Coinglass reveals a decline in Ethereums network activity (in specific metrics) over the last 30 days. Daily active addresses on Ethereum have dropped from 622,963 addresses on March 20 to 499,448 on April 10.

Although Ethereum remains the network to beat in the DeFi sector, Solana has recently captured its market share in this segment in terms of on-chain activity fueled by the memecoin frenzy andstablecoin transfer volume.

Besides weakening on-chain metrics, the decreasing likelihood of an Ethereum exchange-traded fund (ETF) being approved by May is adding to ETH's bearish momentum and lack of strength against Bitcoin.

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck is the latest to voice his skepticism regarding the May approval of spot Ether ETFs by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

In an April 9 interview with CNBC, van Eck said he believes the multibillion-dollar investment companys Ethereum ETF application will probably be rejected. VanEck and Cathie Woods ARK Invest were among the first wealth management firms to file for a spot in Ethereum ETF in the U.S. Both companies are awaiting the SECs final decision on their applications, which is scheduled for May 23 and May 24, respectively.

Van Eck explained the regulatory process, highlighting that the SEC typically provides comments on ETF applications and continuously engages with applicants. However, in the case of Ethereum, there has been a notable silence.

Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Blachunas, who had earlier held 70% odds of an Ethereum ETF approval by May, is also pessimistic, recently reducing the chances to 35%, saying that the lack of communication from the SEC to issuers could be a bad sign for those hoping for Ether ETF approvals by May.

Fellow analyst James Seyffart also expressed concern over the SECs inaction, questioning the reasons behind the lack of communication when the applications were anticipated.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

More here:

Ethereum price weakens against Bitcoin Here's why - Cointelegraph