Archive for the ‘Eric Holder’ Category

Will every vote count and be counted? – Washington Times

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Well, folks, this is the year.

2020 will go down in history either as the year that every vote counted and was counted, or the year we royally screwed up.

Many of you are being misguided into thinking that this year is the year of the East Coast Rumblers, the year of Joe Biden vs. Donald Trump.

Dont be fooled, however, because so very much is at stake.

On Thursday morning, for example, Mayor Muriel Bowser held a press conference to encourage D.C. citizens to vote in the upcoming June presidential primary and special election, and again in the November presidential election, among other issues. But the D.C. Board of Elections blew it.

After following the mayors lead, an elections official explained the ins and outs, and the ups and downs about the need for voters to seek and deliver absentee ballots due to the COVID-19 scare.

So, the city wants registered voters to request an absentee ballot, await the arrival of an absentee ballot and deliver an absentee ballot.

But beware: There are electronic glitches already in the electronic voting system.

Android phones and the D.C. voting system cant shake hands, and, even if youre using an iPhone, voters might not receive proof from the elections board that it has received your request let alone your vote.

Its like the voting system is social distancing itself doing the chicken wing-like elbow-to-elbow greeting.

Thursdays presser proved that yet again the D.C. government isnt ready for 21st century voting.

In February, it sent voter-registration mailers to voters that were printed with the incorrect date for the presidential primary. The correct date is Tuesday, June 2.

That embarrassment wasnt the first, though. In 2012, a man who wasnt then-Attorney General Eric Holder almost got his hands on Mr. Holders ballot because of several foul-ups, including the failure of poll workers to ask the man for ID proving he was, in fact, Eric Holder.

(Ive never been asked to show ID or a voter-registration card at the D.C. polls.)

Which brings up back to another concern the candidates. Dont be fooled by the Pete Buttigiegs and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezes and Elizabeth Warrens, politicos capable of selling snake oil as cures for the coronavirus.

There are two questions, at the very least, that voters must consider before they vote: Who are the candidates and will every vote be counted?

I Voted stickers answer neither question.

Deborah Simmons can be contacted at [emailprotected]

Visit link:
Will every vote count and be counted? - Washington Times

Nipsey Hussle doc suggests he was murdered because he ‘forgot the rules’ – TheGrio

In an upcoming documentary, gang members reveal they believe slain rapper Nipsey Hussle was murdered and should have known he wasnt untouchable.

Last March, Hussle born Ermais Asghedom died after being shot outside of his Los Angeles clothing store. Eric Holder was arrested for the slaying and indicted on one count of murder, two counts of attempted murder and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon by a grand jury.

He has also since been indicted on two additional counts of assault with a firearm and is set to go on trial next month.

In a new BBC Three documentary, The Mysterious Murder Of Nipsey Hussle, filmmaker Ben Zand attempts to uncover the truth about his murder, through a series of interviews with everyone from LAPD officers to former gang members.

READ MORE: Eric Holder could go on trial for Nipsey Hussles murder soon

Nipsey was stupid, he was stupid, said Eight-Tray gang member Sedrick, who also runs a book and herbs shop, said. He didnt have, his gang didnt protect him and they wasnt going to protect him when he got that money.

He goes on to opine that Hussle should have never been outside his store without protection on the day of the shooting. Sedrick noted that the entrepreneurs fame and wealth made him an obvious target.

READ MORE: Ava DuVernay to direct Netflixs newly acquired film about Nipsey Hussles life

Its too risky, theres too many dudes that arent gonna like you Nipsey for one, he should have never been at that store without security. He thought he was untouchable.

The film also reveals that pre-trial hearing transcripts include allegations that right before Hussle was shot, he accused his suspected killer Eric Holder of being a snitch and working with the police. In fact, the word snitch which is considered a serious verbal slight in gang culture is mentioned 24 times.

READ MORE: Nipsey Hussle set to receive star-studded tribute during 2020 Grammy Awards

When asked if calling someone a snitch is really serious enough to warrant being shot, Sedrick confirmed, Thats the worst thing you can say, adding, You gotta go kill that n***** man, Ill call you if you call me a snitch and I aint a snitch.

Its the equivalent of being called a child molester, thats the level thats on, his fellow gang member chimed in.

Excerpt from:
Nipsey Hussle doc suggests he was murdered because he 'forgot the rules' - TheGrio

Microsoft Will No Longer Make Minority Investments in Facial Recognition Tech – Motley Fool

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is drawing a line in the sand when it comes to facial recognition technology. On Friday, the company announced it was divesting its stake in a facial recognition start-up and vowed to no longer make minority investments in the area.

Through its M12 venture fund, the software giantannounced over the weekendthat it and AnyVision, an Israeli-based facial recognition start-up, will part ways, with Microsoft divesting its stake in the company.

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

AnyVision has been mired in controversy since October, whenNBC News reportedthe start-up was using facial recognition technology to surveil Palestinians living in the West Bank. Microsoft drew criticism for taking part in AnyVision's Series Afundraising round in June, where it raised $74 million in venture funding.

Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and his team at law firm Covington & Burling conducted an audit of AnyVision. The law firm was able to confirm AnyVision's technology is used in border crossing checkpoints between Israel and the West Bank but found no evidence AnyVision's technology is powering a mass surveillance program in the West Bank. Nevertheless, Microsoft opted to divest its stake.

"For Microsoft, the audit process reinforced the challenges of being a minority investor in a company that sells sensitive technology, since such investments do not generally allow for the level of oversight or control that Microsoft exercises over the use of its own technology," the company said in a statement.

"By making a global change to its investment policies to end minority investments in companies that sell facial recognition technology, Microsoft's focus has shifted to commercial relationships that afford Microsoft greater oversight and control over the use of sensitive technologies."

Microsoft isn't giving up on the technology completely. The company does offer facial recognition tech through Azure, its cloud offering. Dubbed Face, it enables developers toembed facial recognitioninto apps.

Follow this link:
Microsoft Will No Longer Make Minority Investments in Facial Recognition Tech - Motley Fool

Census 2020 Is Happening Right Now. Here’s Why It Matters to the Black Community – The Root

Three-fifths. Thats all we were counted for. We were voiceless.

Thats how a recent Fair Count ad began. Of course, the advertisement referenced the 1787 Three-Fifths Compromise, which recommended counting three out of every five slaves as people when determining political representation. Sure, weve come a long way, but just how far, exactly?

The Urban Institute estimated that over 1.7 million black people could be undercounted in the 2020 Census. Each person counted brings federal dollars to their state (e.g., about $2,300 per person in Georgia). Conversely, each state loses money for every person not counted. At varying amounts in each state, the undercount of 1.7 million black people could result in a loss of over $3 billion in federal fundingevery year for the next 10 years. That loss in funding would impact education, transportation, healthcare and infrastructure resources in vulnerable communities that cannot afford losses. Furthermore, failure to get an accurate count negatively impacts our power, because census data are used to allocate political power at federal, state, and local levels.

Historically, black men, in particular, have experienced high net undercount rates in the Census, with some age groups being undercounted by 10 percent in 2010. In May 2019, Former Attorney General Eric Holder joined Stacey Abrams and Fair Count at the launch of the Black Men Count Statewide Complete Count Committee in Georgia, and he led a roundtable discussion to raise awareness of the impacts of undercounting black men in the census. Black Men Count is composed of faith leaders, elected officials, barbers, students, fraternity leaders, and returning citizens. These men have created an innovative approach for outreach targeting black men.

Along the way, Fair Count has partnered with similarly-minded groups like Black Dads Count and Sigma Pi Phi, Inc. (also known as the Boul), making Black Men Count a national initiative. One of the most innovative approaches for outreach is a program called Black Men Speak, which was created to give black men space to gather and strategize to ensure that theyre all being counted and engaging civically in Georgia and across the nation. These informal gatherings have led to the education and engagement of countless black men.

But there has been one group in particular that has not been mentioned yet, and this group has always contributed greatly to the positive outcomes for black men. You guessed itblack women. Black women have been an instrumental part of outreach to black men. Are we surprised? After all, black women have been the foundation of our communities for generations.

The news is saturated with articles about the power that black women will yield in 2020 elections, but black women must also harness that power and influence to ensure a fair count in the 2020 Census. As leaders, mothers, entrepreneurs, sisters, teachers, partners, and mentors, black women will lead the charge to make sure that black children, families and communities receive the resources and representation that they deserve. To make this a reality, Fair Count partnered with the National Council of Negro Women (NCNW), which reaches millions of black women across the country, to start the Sisters for the Census campaign.

The campaign kicked off with a virtual roundtable, hosted by Mo Ivory, featuring Fair Count Founder, Stacey Abrams and NCNW President, Dr. Johnnetta B. Cole. The lively conversation included discussions about how the Census impacts our daily lives, ways that we can get folks engaged, and even a threat to call down the spirits of our ancestors to haunt those that dont participate. However, the most poignant moment came from Cole who said, We cant see this as a 2020 issue. This is connected to every struggle we have been engaged in for our rights as human beings. So, if you cant take a matter of minutes to fill it outyou are saying that every one of the individuals that the good Lord made with this wonderful hueit doesnt matter what they have done, who they are. And most importantly, you are saying that the future of black children is meaningless.

In 2010, 3.8 million black people were flat out missed in the Census. Moreover, 2.2 million young children (under 5 years old) were missed, and black and brown children were twice as likely to be undercounted than white kids. We cant let this happen again. Between Black Men Count and Sisters for the Census. we plan to get every black man, woman, and child counted. Whether youre a citizen, immigrant, or undocumentedyou count. Because as Stacey Abrams said, [If] we are not counted, theyll erase us from the future of this country.

We also understand that were in the midst of a pandemic, so Fair Count is using virtual events, digital outreach, phone-based efforts, advertising and other creative strategies to safely engage people around the country during the COVID-19 pandemic. Please take time today to visit 2020 Census to complete the 2020 Census online. You can also participate by phone or mail. When youre done, encourage someone else to participate, and visit Fair Count for additional resources and to learn more about how you can get involved.

We can all agree that being counted in the 2020 Census as a whole person, whole family, whole household and whole community places us on an upward trajectory to creating a more fair and equitable society where our communities get the resources and power that they deserve. Remember, we only get one shot every 10 years, so we have to get it right this time. Our ancestors and children are watching.

Ed Reed is program director at Fair Count, and he leads Black Men Count. He and his wife recently welcomed an adorable baby boy!

Dr. Jeanine Abrams McLean is vice president at Fair Count, and she leads Sisters for the Census. She and her husband have two sons.

View original post here:
Census 2020 Is Happening Right Now. Here's Why It Matters to the Black Community - The Root

Giuliani slams Bloomberg over stop-and-frisk policy: He let it get ‘out of control’ – Washington Examiner

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani criticized his successor Michael Bloomberg for allowing the NYPDs stop-and-frisk program to spiral out of control and for now disowning the policy on the campaign trail.

"What is this stuff that hes condemning stop and frisk? I did it for eight years. He did it for 12. I did a hundred stops. He did six hundred. Six hundred! Hes the one who took the damn program and, you know, took it the level of six hundred, Giuliani said of the 2020 Democrat to radio host John Catsimatidis on The Cats Roundtable Sunday morning on New Yorks 970 AM.

Bloomberg, who continued stop and frisk following Giuliani's tenure in office, began apologizing for it back in November. However, previously recorded remarks by the former New York City mayor regarding how his administration used the policy to profile individuals by race surfaced last week, putting the candidate further on the defensive and apologizing for the policy.

I was always a little annoyed at him for taking the program and not really monitoring it and letting it run out of control, from a hundred to six hundred, down to only like 5% guns, Giuliani said of successor's handling of the stop-and-frisk policy his administration initially launched to tackle violent crime in New York City at the time.

According to Giuliani, former President Bill Clintons Justice Department under Janet Reno and Eric Holder reviewed the stop-and-frisk program when Giuliani was mayor of the city and found that it did not violate the Constitution, but after Bloomberg took office in 2001, Giuliani said his oversight of the program became too lax.

I went to the Justice Department eight years earlier and argued myself with Reno and Holder and talked him out of prosecuting us, the city for civil rights violations in 2000, 2001, and I knew the reason for that was that we kept very tight control on the data," the president's personal attorney explained.

According to Giuliani, one hundred was the appropriate number for which the city would get a return that showed it was proportionate to the city population.

They got so taken with the fact that if you search 600,000 people, surely you're going to keep the guns off the street because everybody's gonna get searched that walks around that neighborhood. But then again, there is a Constitution, and you can't search everybody, he said.

Looking back, Giuliani regretted defending Bloomberg nearly 20 years ago when people began questioning the Bloomberg administrations overuse of the stop-and-frisk policy.

I defended him throughout I had to keep my mouth shut," he said. "But now that he's turned on the program and turned on [former NYPD Commissioner Ray] Kelly, I mean, he was 100% in favor of that program, as enthusiastic about it as I was, and bragged about it a lot when he was mayor.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, agrees, having told reporters late last week that Bloomberg cannot blame Giuliani or anybody else for his own failure with the program.

"Stop and frisk was uniquely and largely a Bloomberg administration policy. I don't think he can blame it on a predecessor. I don't think you can blame it on anyone after, and also he never made the choice to stop, stop and frisk," she said. "It was a judge that struck it down. He appealed the judge's decision. And I think most importantly, when, you know, in this apology that was issued people's lives were ruined."

See the original post:
Giuliani slams Bloomberg over stop-and-frisk policy: He let it get 'out of control' - Washington Examiner