Mediaboss Marketing

WASHINGTON - The sure-to-be politically fraught nomination process for Eric Holder's replacement as attorney general will come after next month's midterm elections, the White House said on Tuesday.

An official, speaking anonymously about the nomination process, said Senate Democrats urged the White House to wait until after November's contests to put a nominee forward to head the Justice Department. Democrats are urgently working to maintain control of the Senate, and are expected to lose seats in the Republican-controlled House.

RELATED: Eric Holder resigning as attorney general

Holder, the last of President Barack Obama's original cabinet members, was a politically divisive attorney general, and the fight to replace him is expected to be rancorous on Capitol Hill.

A nominee could be pushed through a lame duck session after the midterm elections, though other issues on the congressional docket -- like authorizing Obama's use of force in against ISIS -- are expected to dominate proceedings in November and December.

"I do anticipate that Democrats will hold the Senate," White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters after Holder resigned. "That said, I also anticipate that whoever the nominee is will earn and ultimately receive bipartisan support."

Democrats close to the nominating process have floated several names as potential Holder replacements: the current Labor Secretary Tom Perez, the former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler are all considered in the mix.

Others include U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara and former Justice Department official Tony West.

See original here:
No Holder replacement until after midterms

Eric Holder and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) may seem like polar opposites, but the outgoing U.S. Attorney General said this week that he and the libertarian-leaning senator have a surprising amount of views in common.

Speaking by phone Tuesday with MSNBC, Holder talked about his various priorities, including fighting strict state voter ID laws and restoring voting rights to felons. On the latter issue, in particular, Holder had some praise for Senator Paul: We agree on more things than people would expect.

Indeed, Sen. Paul has been among a handful of Republicans to join Holder in calling for an end to mandatory minimum sentencing laws, decrying the militarized police response to Ferguson, Mo., protests in August, and dismissing the GOP push for stricter voter ID laws as a waste of effort.

The potential 2016 candidate recently visited Ferguson for a listening session with local black leaders, a move that many consider to be another one of the his attempts to reach out to people infamously underrepresented in his party.

>> Follow Andrew Kirell (@AndrewKirell) on Twitter

See the original post here:
Eric Holder on Rand Paul: We Agree on More Things than People Would Expect

Attorney General Eric Holder on Wednesday said the unrest after a Missouri police officer fatally shot an unarmed black 18-year-old in August shows law enforcement must directly address tensions within communities.

Holder also called for an expanded review of police techniques and tactics in the wake of the Michael Brown shooting to provide national direction to law enforcement.

Holder and former President Bill Clinton spoke at the start of a two-day meeting of mayors and police chiefs gathered to talk about lessons from the shooting of Brown by white Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson and the protests that followed. Holder told the group what happened in the St. Louis suburb put a national spotlight on the rift between police and citizens in many cities.

The events in Ferguson reminded us that we cannot and we must not allow tensions, which are present in so many neighborhoods across America, to go unresolved, Holder said at the meeting held by the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

He said the Justice Departments broad review of police techniques, tactics and training should be expanded to provide strong, national direction on a scale not seen since President Lyndon Johnsons Commission on Law Enforcement nearly half a century ago.

Holder, who announced his resignation last month, visited Ferguson after the shooting to help ease tensions. The Justice Department is investigating whether Browns civil rights were violated.

When I traveled to Ferguson in the days after that incident, my pledge to the people of that community was that our nations Department of Justice would remain focused on the challenges they faced, and the deep-seated issues and difficult conversations that the shooting brought to the surface, long after national headlines had faded, he said.

The meeting on lessons from Ferguson was held at the Clinton presidential library in Little Rock and marked the 20th anniversary of Clinton establishing the Community Oriented Policing Services program. Clinton and Holder heralded the program, saying it was key to restoring trust between police and citizens.

We know that if we have a situation where the law enforcement community and the government generally is inclusive and represents all elements of the community and (is) connected, were more likely to make good decent decisions and less likely to make big bad mistakes, Clinton said.

Clinton also warned about the impact of departments using surplus military equipment under a program that is now the subject of a White House review. The program began during Clintons administration, but the former president said he didnt know about it.

The rest is here:
Bill Clinton, Eric Holder talk missteps of Ferguson ...

(c) 2014, The Washington Post.

WASHINGTON The continuing protests in St. Louis over the shooting death of a young black man offer a stark reminder that whoever replaces Eric Holder as attorney general will arrive at the Justice Department at a unique moment for the agency's civil rights and criminal justice work. While the department over the past 13 years has been preoccupied with terrorism and Wall Street's infractions, the next attorney general's tenure could well be shaped by confronting the legacy of racism in America.

Holder often spoke loudly on these issues, saying what President Barack Obama decided he could not, but his successor will have to wrestle with a complex array of issues. Racial tension over the police shooting of an unarmed teen in Ferguson, Mo., awakened this summer national concern about the makeup of local police departments and the bias and behavior of officers.

States have recently passed an array of new voting laws, from mandates to obtain a voter ID to limits on early voting, that raise civil-rights red flags as well. In confronting these new regulations, the Justice Department now must respond without the power of a key provision of the Voting Rights Act that was dismantled last year by the Supreme Court.

Seismic changes are also underway in how the Justice Department approaches sentencing guidelines and the war on drugs, which have long driven the unmatched rise of incarceration in America, and the parallel surge in costs particularly for minority communities. As a result of a shift in thinking about the goals of prison policy (and the effectiveness of the war on drugs), the federal prison population is now declining for the first time in three decades, a trend prison-reform groups are anxious to see continue.

For all of these reasons, criminal-justice and civil-rights advocates are counting on another vocal leader to replace Holder. They are looking for someone who will prioritize those roles of Justice Department's mission policing discrimination, protecting voting rights, redirecting prison policy which have been periodically neglected, deemed outdated, or unwise.

The intensity with which these issues remain in the news, however, will complicate the confirmation process for Obama's nominee. It's harder today than just a few years ago to dismiss the persistence of racial bias in the criminal justice system, a topic that may be easier to openly acknowledge post-Ferguson. But there remains far less (if any) political agreement on the racial impacts of new voting laws.

"If you say at your confirmation hearings 'we're going to spend a lot of time and effort on looking at these [state] statues that seem to restrict voting,' the Republicans are going to go crazy on that. Just crazy," says Richard Ugelow, a former longtime attorney in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department and now a member of the faculty at American University's Washington College of Law.

Part of the department's challenge in its civil-rights work is that broad public disagreement over whether discrimination still exists has widened as discrimination itself has taken on subtler forms. Government agencies no longer openly bar minority job applicants. But recruiting practices may still have the effect of excluding them. Landlords no longer advertise when blacks aren't welcome. But the housing options available to minorities are still constricted by the fewer possibilities shown to them by landlords and real estate agents.

Likewise, public schools are no longer segregated by policy. But housing patterns have the effect of making them so, exposing children to unequal education. And literal poll taxes no longer exist. But voter IDs have been likened to them even by federal judges.

More:
The many civil rights and criminal justice battles that await Eric Holder's successor

More than 1,000 protesters march overnight at St. Louis University to condemn the recent fatal shootings of two black teenagers by police. (Reuters)

The continuing protests in St. Louis over the shooting death of a young black man offer a stark reminder that whoever replaces Eric Holder as attorney general will arrive at the Justice Department at a unique momentfor the agency's civil rights and criminal justice work. While thedepartment over the past 13 yearshas been preoccupiedwith terrorismand Wall Street's infractions, the next attorney general's tenure could well be shaped by confronting the legacy of racism in America.

Holder often spoke loudly on these issues, saying what President Obama decided he could not, but his successor will have to wrestle with a complex array of issues.Racial tension over the police shooting of an unarmed teen in Ferguson, Mo., awakened this summer national concern about the makeup of local police departments and the bias and behavior of officers.

States have recently passed an array ofnew voting laws, from mandates to obtain a voter ID to limits on early voting, that raise civil-rights red flags as well. In confronting these new regulations, the DOJ now must respond without the power of a key provision of the Voting Rights Act that was dismantled last year by the Supreme Court.

Seismic changes are also underway in how the DOJ approaches sentencing guidelines and the war on drugs, which have long driven the unmatched rise of incarceration in America, and the parallel surge in costs particularly for minority communities. As a result of a shift in thinking about the goals of prison policy (and the effectiveness of the war on drugs), the federal prison population is now declining for the first time in three decades, a trend prison-reform groups are anxious to see continue.

For all of these reasons, criminal-justice and civil-rights advocates are counting on another vocal leader to replace Holder. They are looking for someone who will prioritize those roles of DOJ's mission policing discrimination, protecting voting rights, redirecting prison policy which have been periodically neglected, deemed outdated, or unwise.

The intensity with which these issues remain in the news, however, will complicate the confirmation process for Obama's nominee. It's harder today than just a few years ago to dismiss the persistence of racial bias in the criminal justice system, a topic that may be easier to openly acknowledge post-Ferguson. But there remains far less (if any) political agreement on the racial impacts of new voting laws.

"If you say at your confirmation hearings 'were going to spend a lot of time and effort on looking at these [state] statues that seem to restrict voting,' the Republicans are going to go crazy on that. Just crazy," says Richard Ugelow, a former longtime attorney in the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ and now a member of the faculty at American University's Washington College of Law.

Part of the department's challenge in its civil-rights work is that broad public disagreement over whether discrimination still exists has widened as discrimination itself has taken on subtler forms. Government agencies no longer openlybar minority job applicants. But recruiting practices may still have the effect of excluding them. Landlords no longer advertise when blacks aren't welcome. But the housing options available to minorities are still constricted by the fewer possibilities shown to them by landlords and real estate agents.

Likewise, public schools are no longer segregated by policy. But housing patterns have the effect of making them so, exposing children to unequal education. And literal poll taxes no longer exist. But voter IDs have been likened to them even by federal judges.

Follow this link:
Wonkblog: St. Louis protests show the many civil rights and criminal justice battles awaiting Eric Holders successor