Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Former Twitter CEO Compares Meeting With President Trump to Waterboarding – Fortune

Former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo. Ethan Miller Getty Images

Former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo said that attending President Donald Trump's meetings with Silicon Valley leaders is like waterboarding yourself.

"If you dont get invited to this meeting and want to know what it was like, just drink a bottle of gin and then waterboard yourself," Costolo tweeted Friday.

The former Twitter chief, who ran the company from 2010 to 2015, was referencing news of Trump's impending meeting with entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in the tech space later this month, according to BuzzFeed.

Silicon Valley leaders have had a complicated relationship with the President since he was elected in November. A number of powerful industry leaders, including Apple's Tim Cook, Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg and Tesla's Elon Musk, met with Trump in December to smooth tensions following disagreements throughout his campaign.

Musk and Uber CEO Travis Kalanick also participated in White House advisory councils. The latter came under fire amid company scandals to the point of his resignation due to pressure from Uber employees and outside groups.

The Tesla chief meanwhile opted to stay on until Trump vowed to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement at the beginning of June.

Read the original here:
Former Twitter CEO Compares Meeting With President Trump to Waterboarding - Fortune

This week in Donald Trump’s conflicts of interest: Kushner may have problems, but Trump’s hotel raises lots of questions – Salon

It may seem unnecessary to write about President Donald Trumps conflicts of interest when so much attention is being paid to the Russia scandal, but the fact remains that a president who has refused to fully divest himself from a massive business empire is one who will always be fraught with conflicts that may impede his ability to impartially serve the public interest.

Let us proceed.

The Kushner familys company is trying to find a way to reimbursea $250 million loan from Chinese investors

The EB-5 visa program ostensibly exists to help combat unemployment and poverty. It allows foreign investors who spend at least $500,000 on projects with high unemployment or which require development for other reasons to receive a permanent resident visa in return. That said, theKushner familys real estate company is having trouble obtaining a $250 million loan to reimburse Chinese investors who helped fund a tower in Jersey City, according to a report by Bloomberg. Although the Kushners would keep $50 million and use the rest to reimburse investors and pay off a mortgage, apparently the ongoing controversy over the Kushners using the EB-5 program for questionable means (the project does not necessarily help the less fortunate) is scaring away banks.

Saudi Arabia has spent a lot of money at the Trump International Hotel. . .

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which is currently in the process of opposing an American terrorism law, has spent roughly $270,000 at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.,according to a report by USA Today. This included catering, lodging and parking expenses for the period between Oct. 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017 that is, from a little more than a month before Trump was elected president to a little more than two months after he was inaugurated. The Trump Organization has said they will donate all of these profits at the end of the year, although it remains to be seen whether theyll follow through on that.

. . . butTrump International Hotels conflicts dont stop there

As a recent Time Magazine article pointed out, Trumps Washington hotel has become a bastion of power in its own right, even though the president issupposed to avoid mixing his private businesses with the official work of the government. One former Trump campaign adviser told the magazine that of course we hang out there. Everyone hangs out there. Being in the Trump hotels lobby is a way to get people to know you. The conservative Heritage Foundation has loaned an American flag to the hotel, and as this series has noted already, guests who are willing and able to pay top dollar can interact with powerful domestic and foreign officials within the hotel.

Continue reading here:
This week in Donald Trump's conflicts of interest: Kushner may have problems, but Trump's hotel raises lots of questions - Salon

Donald Trump’s palpable fear of the truth – Chicago Tribune

None of us knows when the moment to gain immortality will arise, but Sarah Huckabee Sanders saw her opportunity and seized it. Asked Thursday about James Comey's assertion that President Donald Trump had lied, the White House spokeswoman answered, "No, I can definitively say the president's not a liar."

It is an audacious person who would stake her reputation, if not her immortal soul, on Trump's veracity. Years from now, people will have forgotten much about the scandal surrounding the president right now. But Sanders' risible assertion is built to live on as an example of taking mendacity too far. If she lives to be 100, her obituary will quote that sentence.

Sanders knows better than most that Trump cannot be taken at his word. After the president fired the FBI director, she said he had made the decision after getting a memo from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein only to hear the next day from Trump that, in fact, he had made up his mind beforehand.

Trump's lawyer showed an equal devotion to dissembling. After Comey testified before a Senate committee, Marc Kasowitz released a letter stating, "Mr. Comey's testimony also makes clear that the President never sought to impede the investigation into attempted Russian interference in the 2016 election."

It does no such thing. Comey testified that Trump said he hoped Comey would drop the investigation into his former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. When Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., asked whether the FBI director "perceived it as an order, given his position, the setting and some of the circumstances," Comey said, "Yes."

The White House can dispute what the president said in one-on-one conversations with Comey, though Trump's long habit of pathological lying does not give him an advantage in the credibility contest. But let's review what is not in dispute.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions met with the Russian ambassador at least twice last year and then denied doing so in his confirmation hearings. Flynn discussed the U.S. sanctions on Russia with the Russian ambassador in December and then lied about it to Vice President Mike Pence. Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner had many meetings with Russian officials but didn't disclose them as required when he applied for a security clearance.

Trump, by his own account, fired Comey because of the investigation into possible collusion between his campaign and agents of the Russian government. Hosting Russian officials in the Oval Office the next day, he told them, "I faced great pressure because of Russia. That's taken off." When the conversation was leaked to The New York Times, press secretary Sean Spicer criticized the leak but did not deny its accuracy.

All of this yields a picture of a president who does not want all the facts known. That image is enhanced by what has been said publicly by officials in the administration who are not notorious liars.

According to Comey whose veracity was taken for granted even by the Republican senators Trump expressed a wish for him to drop the Flynn probe, asked him to state publicly that Trump was not being investigated and informed him, "I expect loyalty." Comey didn't comply and was cashiered.

He's not the only one subjected to such requests. The Washington Post reported that the president asked Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats to urge Comey to lay off Flynn and that he asked Coats and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers to publicly say there was no evidence that his campaign colluded with the Russians.

When senators questioned them about that report Wednesday, they refused to answer and refused to say why. Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., told them, "I think your unwillingness to answer a very basic question speaks volumes."

Whether Trump's conduct rises to criminal obstruction of justice is not clear. What is clear is that Trump does not comport himself like an innocent person who knows that the truth will vindicate him.

Why would the president be so eager to see the investigation finished as he has made clear he is? The simplest explanation is a fear it will find evidence of guilt. The repeated secrecy and dishonesty exhibited by Trump and his subordinates raise the questions: Why did they hide what they did? What else are they hiding?

Special counsel Robert Mueller is likely to find out. After Comey was done, several Republicans pronounced it a good day for Trump. Compared with the days that lie ahead, they are probably right.

Steve Chapman, a member of the Tribune Editorial Board, blogs at http://www.chicagotribune.com/chapman.

Download "Recalculating: Steve Chapman on a New Century" in the free Printers Row app at http://www.printersrowapp.com.

schapman@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @SteveChapman13

What to read next:

Clarence Page:'Vindication'? Not so fast, Mr. President

Donald Trump is a profoundly incompetent president

Why Jared Kushner's Russia manuever is so troublesome

Donald Trump will never love America as much as he loves himself

The rest is here:
Donald Trump's palpable fear of the truth - Chicago Tribune

Jeremy Corbyn’s surprise success tapped into an anti-elite sentiment, but he’s no Donald Trump – Washington Post

Jeremy Corbyn seems to have pulled off the impossible. Britain's prime minister, Theresa May, called an early election just seven weeks ago, and at the time, Corbyn was seen as having no chance at getting even a half-respectable result. His left-wing Labour Party lagged as much as 20 points behind May's right-wing Conservatives.Even members of his own party warned ofa historic defeat.

And yet, asBritons voted Thursday, it became evident that something had changed. Corbyn had clear momentum. In the end, he was able to not onlyquash May's dreams of bolstering her slim majority in Parliament but to gain Labour seats. The Conservatives have now been forced into an unstable minority government with help fromNorthern Irish unionists to pass legislation. While May is staying in office for now, in the medium term, her chances of remaining at 10 Downing Street look dim.

Whenconsidering Corbyn's polling numbers over the past few weeks, it's tempting for Americans to look at another recent electoral upset by an underdog closer to home: Donald Trump.

Thecomparison is appropriate in some ways. Both politicians have tapped into anger at the status quo, a feeling that can be observed around much of the world.

Jeremy Corbyn represented a challenge to the government, saidBen Page, chief executive of the polling firm Ipsos MORI, adding that Labour's platform spoke to an anti-elite anxiety as widespread in Britain aselsewhere. One unnamed Corbyn aide even told Politicothis year that the Labour leader planned to copy media strategies from the Trumpplaybook.

But big differences in the political landscape, not to mention the candidates themselves, limit such comparisons. Corbyn's electoral success can also be read as a backlash to Britain's rightward swing in recent years, including last summer's vote to leave the European Union. He has some anti-establishment rhetoric, yes, but that rhetoric and the support it attracts are distinct from the ethos of Brexit or Trump.

As politicians, Corbyn and Trumpdo share some similarities. Both are roughly the same age but entered mainstream politics only recently. They grew their support through social media and rallies, while facing ridicule from the political elite and media outlets. At certain points, they have sharedsome views on international affairs, criticizing foreign intervention and the logic of NATO. And both Corbyn and Trump stand accused of making unrealistic promises on the campaign trail but ultimatelyperformed better than expected against more established female politicians (though both Corbyn's Labour and Trump received fewer votes than their rivals).

The contrasts in the two men's backgrounds far outweigh the similarities, however. Corbyn is an old-school British leftist who cut his teeth in the antinuclear protests of the 1980s. Trump is a real estate developerturned reality television star who made his political career by suggesting that President Barack Obama was born in Kenya. While Corbyn was riding his bike to work in Parliament, Trump was flying between resorts in a personally branded private jet.

These different backgrounds are reflected in their ideologies. The British politician has a dogmatic view of social democratic policies and has spent decades in that ideological world. Trump's political views seem to be malleable: A former Democrat, he is now a Republican who enjoys the support of the far-right fringe. Though Corbynwas once a leftist Euroskeptic, he campaigned for Britain to remain in the European Union last year. Meanwhile, Trump dubbed himself Mr. Brexit and formed a personal bond with Nigel Farage, the former leader of the anti-Europe, right-wing U.K. Independence Party.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/video/world/conservatives-lose-majority-in-british-parliament-calls-for-may-to-resign/2017/06/09/e0352cd2-4cdd-11e7-987c-42ab5745db2e_video.html

There is little possibility of warm personal ties developing between Corbyn and Trump. While May has been keen to present herself as one of the U.S. president's key allies, the Labour leader has criticized Trump frequently.Donald Trump should not be coming to the U.K., he said in February.

But the frustration with political norms that helped Trump in the United States is certainlyevident in Britain, too.Page pointed to the Ipsos Global Trends survey, which compares the attitudes of select countries, including Britain and the United States, on politics and social changes. The survey found last year that more than three-quarters of Brits and Americans believedthat the economy was rigged to favor the rich and powerful. Aslightly lower percentage thought the government does not prioritize their concerns and the concerns of those like them.

British exit polls don't collect the same complicated data that their U.S. peers do, so a full postmortem on how this anti-elite sentiment may have helped Corbyn isn't available yet. But there are some hints in pre-election polls.Chris Curtis, a political researcher with YouGov, notedthat in the final poll conducted this week, 58 percent of Labour supporters suggested that health care was the most important issue facing Britain, compared with 27 percent of Conservative supporters. May was widely accused of being out of touch after telling a nurse that her lack of pay raises was because there was no magic money tree.

Inclear contrast to Trump, who received support from significant numbers of older voters, under Corbyn Labour is believed to have found more younger supporters in part because of dramatic promises such asCorbyn's pledge to abolish tuition fees at British universities. Registered-voter turnout is reported to have risen to 69 percent for this election. We believe it will have rose proportionally among the young, said Page, adding that most of these young voters are likely to have gone to Corbyn.

Whereonce polls missed right-wing voters, now they ran the risk of missing younger left-leaning voters, Page said. Many of these voters were frustrated by the past seven years of Conservative rule. Britain was once politically divided by its class system, he added, but now we are a country divided by generations. Another factor was that after years of political fragmentation, Britain appears to be returning to a two-party system meaning a distinctly left-wing Labour may be regaining some voters who began supporting the more centrist Liberal Democrats a little over a decade ago.

The biggest similarity between Corbyn and Trump may not have been their campaigns or their support, but their opponents. In the United States,some analysts criticized Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton for running a lackluster and arrogant campaign against her underestimated, upstart rival.In Britain, much of Corbyn's success is being attributed to May's failures.

People went into this election with a very strong impression of Theresa May, Curtis said, then she ran a campaign that really went against her chief strengths. Instead ofoffering an impression of strong and stable leadership, Mayappeared weak and wobbly on the campaign trail. That failure may havehelped the initially unpopular Corbyn with the fastest and most incredible shift we've seen since YouGov started polling, Curtis said.

More on WorldViews

After last years Brexit vote, younger Britons look to turn the tide

View original post here:
Jeremy Corbyn's surprise success tapped into an anti-elite sentiment, but he's no Donald Trump - Washington Post

Fact Check: Donald Trump’s Claims About Infrastructure – New York Times


New York Times
Fact Check: Donald Trump's Claims About Infrastructure
New York Times
Mr. Trump announced plans to turn over the Federal Aviation Administration's air traffic control responsibilities to a private nonprofit organization on Monday, a broad push for a $1 trillion infrastructure investment on Wednesday, and the creation of ...

and more »

See the original post:
Fact Check: Donald Trump's Claims About Infrastructure - New York Times