Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Lawmakers Demand Donald Trump Fire Top Aides, Saying They Encourage White Supremacists – HuffPost

The heads of Congress black, Hispanic, Asian and progressive caucuses sent a letter to the White House on Monday demanding the dismissal of top aides Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller and Sebastian Gorka, saying their presence in the White House has emboldened white supremacists.

The letter came after a white supremacy rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, turned violent, leavingone person dead and others injured when a man drove a car into a crowd of counterprotesters. Trump has faced criticism for his delay in condemning white supremacist groups following the violence, first blaming many sides before denouncing the hate groups on Monday.

The letter accuses the three advisers of encouraging white supremacist groups and says they should be removed because Americans deserve to know that white nationalists, white supremacists, and neo-Nazis are not in a position to influence U.S. policy.

The authors cite Bannons role as former chairman of Breitbart News, a site that promotes white nationalist views. The New York Times reported Monday that Bannon could be on the verge of being dismissed from the White House.

The lawmakers also express concern over links between Miller and Richard Spencer, a prominent white nationalist, and Gorkas ties to a far-right Hungarian group aligned with the Nazi party.

In this time of tumult in our country, Americans deserve a leader that will bring us all together and denounce those who seek to tear us apart. In that vein, we strongly urge you to move expeditiously to remove Steve Bannon, Sebastian Gorka and Stephen Miller from the White House. The ideology and political agenda of these men have no place in the highest office in the land, the letter says.

The letter is signed by Democratic Reps. Barbara Lee (Calif.), Judy Chu (Calif.), Cedric Richmond (La.), Michelle Lujan Grisham (N.M.), Mark Pocan (Wis.), Ral Grijalva (Ariz.) and David Cicilline (R.I.). Christopher Huntley, a Lee spokesman, said Lee led the effort on the letter and wanted to united lawmakers across a diverse range of backgrounds to speak to the White House after the Charlottesville violence.

Read the full letter below:

This article has been updated with the signed letter and list of lawmakers who sent it.

Here is the original post:
Lawmakers Demand Donald Trump Fire Top Aides, Saying They Encourage White Supremacists - HuffPost

Donald Trump retweeted an alt-right conspiracy theorist. Here’s why. – CNN

CNN Special Report "Twitter and Trump" with Bill Weir explores the President's fraught relationship with the social media platform Friday at 9 p.m. ET.

"Meanwhile: 39 shootings in Chicago this weekend, 9 deaths. No national media outrage. Why is that?"

Posobiec is a well-known figure on Twitter -- he has more than 181,000 followers -- thanks to his vociferous defenses of Trump and his willingness to promote conspiracy theories.

He is, to put it kindly, an unreliable source. He peddles falsehoods. He is a provocateur, more interested in making headlines than adhering to established facts.

So why the hell would Trump retweet Posobiec?

What's FAR more likely is that Trump knew Posobiec was an ally and liked the counter-narrative to Charlottesville offered by the murders in Chicago.

Remember this: In Trump's world, there isn't really right and wrong. There are people who love him/work for his interest and people who hate him/work against his interests. There is no gray area between those two poles.

If you are in the love category, you are, by definition, good. The reverse is true for those Trump puts in the hate column.

Posobiec likes Trump and supports Trump. That's all Trump cares about. That Posobiec has pushed conspiracy theories and is a card-carrying member of the alt-right doesn't matter to Trump. Those are Posobiec's issues! Not Trump's! All Trump is doing is retweeting someone making a good point!

Of course, Trump himself saw his candidacy born in a conspiracy theory -- Barack Obama wasn't born in the United States -- and has continued to peddle false conspiracy theories (Ted Cruz's father was involved in the JFK assassination, Muslims were celebrating on New Jersey roofs on 9/11, Barack Obama wiretapped phones in Trump Tower) throughout his candidacy and presidency.

There's one other piece of this Posobiec retweet. Not only does Trump divide the world between those who love him and those who hate him, he loves the people that love him.

If you are nice to Trump, Trump will be nice to you. It's as simple as that. That's why Trump retweeted something from a known conspiracy theorist. And why he'll do it again. And again.

UPDATE: This post has been updated to add context about the shootings in Chicago.

Read this article:
Donald Trump retweeted an alt-right conspiracy theorist. Here's why. - CNN

‘Donald Trump forest’ climate change project gains momentum – BBC News


BBC News
'Donald Trump forest' climate change project gains momentum
BBC News
A campaign to plant trees to compensate for the impact of President Trump's climate policies has 120,000 pledges. The project was started by campaigners upset at what they call the president's "ignorance" on climate science. Trump Forest allows people ...

and more »

Follow this link:
'Donald Trump forest' climate change project gains momentum - BBC News

Who may lose amid the CEO backlash and Trump? Americans. – USA TODAY

More CEOs are turning the back on President Trump following his delayed condemnation of white supremacists after the violent rally in Charlottesville. Buzz60

US President Donald J. Trump, left, listens to CEO of Merck Kenneth Frazier speak during the announcement of a pharmaceutical glass packaging initiative, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 20 July 2017. As part of 'Made in America' week, Trump announced a partnership of Merck, Pfizer, and Corning to produce glass medical containers in the United States.(Photo: MICHAEL REYNOLDS, EPA)

President Trumpis losing important friends in the corner offices of Corporate America and that could be hazardous to the health of his economic ambitions.

The Trump agenda, already reeling from political infighting in Washington, D.C., scandal and turmoil in his administrationand missteps by the tweet-driven president himself,has a new roadblock to confront: CEOs that are distancing themselves from himafter the deadly violence this weekend in Virginia during a white supremacist protest.

The president has come under fire for not quickly and forcibly denouncing the racist groups involved in the chaos in Charlottesville, Va.

"The business community peeling back support doesn't make (Trump's challenge) any easier," says Brian Nick, chief investment strategist at TIAA Investments.

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich speaks during a meeting with President Trump at the White House on Feb. 8, 2017, where Intel announced an investment of $7 billion to build a factory in Chandler, Ariz. to create advanced semi-conductor chips(Photo: Chris Kleponis, Pool/European Pressphoto Agency)

Trump's diminished stature in the eyes of some CEOs -- including Kenneth Frazier at drugmaker Merck, Brian Krzanich at tech giantIntel and Kevin Plank ofathletic-apparelmaker Under Armour, all who have resignedfrom the president's manufacturing advisory council --is the latest challenge to the president's ability to push his agenda of tax cuts and infrastructure through Congress.

The obstacle around the corner

The public rebuke of Trump from even a small handful oftop U.S. executivescould have negative repercussions for the economy andfinancial markets if it causes business and investor confidence to take a hit. And if it leads more Republicans to break ranks with the president.

The most immediate worry, however, is how Trump's latest setback will impact his ability this fall to get a new budget passed and negotiate with Congress to raise the nation's debt ceiling the amount of money the country can borrow to help pay its bills.

"The Trump agenda will hit an enormous obstacle in September because of budget issues, and he doesn't seem to have the political capital to prevail," says Greg Valliere, chief global strategist at Horizon Investments. "Charlottesville was the last straw for some Republicans, who are sick of defending Trump. So they will essentially ignore the White House."

Under Armour's CEO Kevin Plank.-- Photo by Maxine Park, USA TODAY staff [Via MerlinFTP Drop](Photo: USAT)

The biggest risk is a fresh bout of uncertainty that will result in businesses turning more cautious, which could slow down the economy and the hiring of workers.

"When businesses are dealing with a chaotic government and a series of unknowns, the natural instinct of decision makers like CEOs is to defer decisions and wait for clarity," says David Kotok, chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors, a money-management firm based in Sarasota, Fla.

Other Wall Street pros say the latest Trump controversy is "political noise" andnot likely to derail financial markets. "What is the feedback loop into the real economy? Unless it does work its way into the economy (in a negative way) it is unlikely to have a long-lasting impact on the market,"says Katie Nixon, chief investment officer at Northern Trust Wealth Management.

The risk of staying and the risk of going

Sydney Finkelstein, author of Why Smart Executives Fail and director of the Center for Leadership at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College, says it is too early to say whether this is the "tipping point" for lawmakers when deciding whether to stick with Trump or risk political backlash from constituents.

Finkelstein says business leaders must also weigh the risks of either denouncing Trump or steering clear of controversy by avoiding the issue.

Many CEOs, he says, are reluctant to refute or take on the president publicly for fear of getting in Trump's line of fire. But Finkelstein says there is a business risk of doing nothing, as employees and people that buy a company's products are watching.

"By not speaking up," says Finkelstein, "you are explicitly in agreement with how the administration has handled this. But you can't just sit on the sidelines if you are a leader, if you have hundreds of thousands of employees and millions of customers. That is an abdication of your responsibility as a leader."

CEOs that do speak out against injustice do so for business reasons.

"They're finding the cost of alignment with Trump is too high," says Bill Klepper, professor of management at Columbia Business School. "They have a social contract with stakeholders. Here's what we stand for. These are our core values. Here's how we're going to contribute and win as a business in society. And we're going to do it through ethical principles."

The CEO of retail giant Walmart, Doug McMillon, weighed in Tuesday on what critics say wasTrump's delayed denunciation of white supremacists and other hate groups.

The president "missed a critical opportunity to help bring our country together by unequivocally rejecting the appalling actions of white supremacists," McMillonwrote in a memo to employees. "I will," he added, "continue to strongly advocate on behalf of our associates and customers, and urge our elected officials to do their part to promote a more just, tolerant and diverse society."

Wall Street is overlooking Trump's missteps for now

For now, Trump's missteps have been overlooked by Wall Street. Not until the economy slows down, or corporate earnings are adversely impacted, or companies stop hiring, will investors view the latest political crisis for Trump as a big negative.

And today's Tuesday's reports on July retail sales and August homebuilder confidence continue the narrative of a stock market and economy being fueled by better performance.

"People have been willing to look past the slow start to Trump's policy agenda because the economy seems to be doing OK on its own," says TIAA's Nick.

Trump's pro-business mentality andpush to reduce red tape and regulations on businesses havealready resulted in improved confidence levels for consumers, small businesses and CEOs. And even though expectations are low for Trump's tax cuts and other agenda items getting enactedsoon, the market and economy will likely get a boost if Trump and Congress can get something done by early next year, says Nixon of Northern Trust.

Adds Brad McMillan, chief investment officer at Commonwealth Financial Network: "I don't see the resignations of the CEOs from the advisory council as being any sort of a game changer. Business has always had an arms-length relationship with politics."

Related:

Who's on and off Trump's manufacturing council? Here's the list.

Was Merck CEO Ken Frazier's decision to leave Trump council the right move?

Under Armour, Intel CEOs quit Trump's job council over Charlottesville rally response

Trump blasts CEOs as 'grandstanders' for departing his manufacturing council

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2w7s3Gc

Continued here:
Who may lose amid the CEO backlash and Trump? Americans. - USA TODAY

3 big mistakes Donald Trump made in his 2nd speech on Charlottesville – CNN

"Racism is evil -- and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans," Trump said. "Those who spread violence in the name of bigotry strike at the very core of America."

Which is good and right. But, let's be wary of giving Trump too much credit for saying, essentially, racism is bad. In fact, a closer look at Trump's words reveal three mistakes he made even in trying to clean up his comments from Saturday.

With scenes of Nazi flags waving and a car driven by a white supremacist allegedly being plowed on purpose into a group of counter-protesters, Trump delivered a speech in which he blamed "many sides" for the violence in Charlottesville. He also pre-emptively absolved himself of blame by insisting these sorts of incidents happened when Barack Obama was president, too.

Then, for the next 36 hours, he -- the most talkative (or tweet-ative) politician in the country -- went silent. His White House released a statement from an anonymous official insisting that of course Trump meant to condemn white supremacists. Even if he didn't, you know, say it.

But, that's the point. He didn't say it. It matters how you act in moments when the whole country -- and the whole world -- are watching. Do-overs aren't really a thing in politics -- particularly in a situation so fraught as the one in Charlottesville and with a politician with as spotty a record as Trump on condemning intolerance.

That Trump's instincts -- and those of his White House -- were so off at the start of all of this speaks to a deep misunderstanding of what the role of president is and should be. Leaders lead in moments when the country turns to them. That moment was Saturday. Today feels like a half-hearted attempt to step into the leadership void Trump himself created.

When Trump spoke about Charlottesville on Saturday, it was clear that he had shoe-horned a few paragraphs about it into a speech he was already planning to give about all of the great things that were happening in the country under his leadership. It felt off for the moment. What was required was a simple formula: Sympathy for the victims, condemnation for the attackers, the end.

And yet, Trump repeated that mistake Monday. He opened his remarks with this:

"Our economy is now strong. The stock market continues to hit record highs, unemployment is at a 16-year low and businesses are more optimistic than ever before. Companies are moving back to the United States and bringing many thousands of jobs with them. We have already created over one million jobs since I took office."

Why? Because it's against Trump's nature to acknowledge -- even without acknowledging it -- that he may have done something less than perfectly the first time around. So, he touts his unrelated accomplishments before he gets to what he should have said two days earlier. It's his little way of asserting himself amid what he undoubtedly believes is trumped-up overreaction to his initial remarks on Saturday.

Per No. 2, Trump almost certainly didn't feel like he needed to give the follow-up remarks that he gave Monday because he had already said it just fine on Saturday. This phrase captures that frustration. I already said all of this, Trump is saying, but I will say it again because, well, someone(s) told me I have to.

It suggests that Trump doesn't really understand the shortcomings of his first statement on Charlottesville and believes this is all just a bow to the news cycle rather than a moral imperative to speak out clearly against hate and evil.

Which bodes poorly for his ability to handle the next incident -- and, sadly, we know there will be a next incident -- any better.

The rest is here:
3 big mistakes Donald Trump made in his 2nd speech on Charlottesville - CNN