Mediaboss Marketing

Update (November 26, 2019 at 1:05pm EST): Please let the record show that the back-and-forth about Conans gender continued for another day:

Well leave this to your Thanksgiving table debate league to settle once and for all.

The original article continues below.

Every Monday before Thanksgiving the president and first lady get their first big Amazon order of the season. Their enormous Christmas tree arrives. This year was no different; Melania Trump threw on a great coat and came out with her husbandgosh, whats his name? Hold on, itll come to me!to welcome it, per tradition. It all went off without a hitch once again. But this year, there was a surprise guest to help usher in the tree. The president introduced Conan, hero dog, who played a key role in the targeted raid that led to the death of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in October, to the assembled press core. Like I always say, nothing says the holiday season like hosting a terrorist hunting dog at the White House.

Now, heres something: The dog is a girl. This according to Yahoo News Hunter Walker, the pool reporter sic-ed, as it were, on the president as he travels. Senior aides confirmed it on background, he wrote in his email, which goes out to press from all over the country. Shes a literal femme fatal. She is 100% that bitch, if you prefer.

Now, heres something else: Conan is actually a boy dog, also according to Yahoo News Hunter Walker, the pool reporter sic-ed, as it were, on the president as he travels. He issued a correction to his earlier report. I know! What a whirlwind!

But you know what? It doesnt matter. In this one video, that man refers to the pup behind him only as Conan and the dog, praising its capability for violence and intelligence like Conan is one of his golfing buddies. It makes sense that he would repeat the name of the dog and the word dog over and over again like a malfunctioning Dale Carnegie robot; my guy just learned what a dog was and what they do for a living, so he wants to repeat the word dog an absolute ton. See, it helps him remember what one is and also convinces everyone else that hes known it all along. Double whammy!

But in the end, its a useful, genderless compulsive speech pattern. Its like he doesnt see gender. He just sees a gorgeous dog, a beautiful dog, an intelligent dog, a kind of excitingly scary dog. Conan is neither man nor woman; it is simply a hot dog, in the presidents eyes.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

Kate Middleton is having a moment, and heres why the queen is a fan Caught between boomers and millennials, is Generation X really our last, best hope? Were Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, Kate Middleton, and Prince William ever actually the fab four? As the college-admissions scandal rolls onward, Felicity Huffmans and Lori Loughlins paths diverge once again Prince Andrews fallout continues as he seems unable to stay away from giving interviews From the Archive: The American nightmare and ballad of Richard Jewel

Looking for more? Sign up for our daily newsletter and never miss a story.

See original here:
Conan the Dog: Donald Trump Really Wants to Show Off This One Dog He Knows - Vanity Fair

The Art of the Deal ghostwriter said President Donald Trump and two of his adult children and a son-in-law all belong in prison.

Tony Schwartz co-authored Trump's notorious book, which was first published in 1987, and is now a vocal critic of the president.

"Crime family: Donald, Ivanka, Jared, Donald Jr. They all belong in prison," Schwartz tweeted on Monday evening.

President Trump is facing impeachment for alleged abuse of power by soliciting a foreign government's interference in the 2020 election to his personal benefit.

Trump is also facing probes by a number of bodies, including Congress and the New York attorney general, into allegations such as tax fraud, campaign finance violations, and his inauguration funds, among others.

The family real estate business, The Trump Organization, is caught up in some of those investigations.

The president's two eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, currently run the Trump Organization.

His eldest daughter, Ivanka Trump, was an executive there until her father entered the White House. She and her father both resigned from the company at the same time in 2017.

There are also a number of ethical concerns around the Trump family and its business dealings, such as Ivanka Trump's patent-seeking in China as her father wages a trade war against Beijing, and their alleged use of the presidency to promote their properties and businesses.

Jared Kushner, who is married to Ivanka Trump, has faced scrutiny for his dealings with foreign governments, in particular a bailout his own family's real estate business took from the Qataris, and his personal relationship with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman.

The Trump family denies any wrongdoing.

Back in May, Schwartz said, in light of everything we now know about President Trump, he would rename the book he wrote on behalf of the

"If I had to rename The Art of the Deal, I would call it The Sociopath," Schwartz said on CNN.

"Because he has no conscience, he has no guilt. All he wants to do is make the case that he would like to be true.

"And while I do think he is probably aware that more walls are closing around him than ever before, he does not experience the world in the way an ordinary human being would."

Then in June, when the journalist E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of sexual assault in the mid-1990s, adding to a list of women who have made such allegations against the president, Schwartz called him a "serial felon."

"A 16th woman yesterday accused Donald Trump of sexual assaultin this case rape, with very specific details," tweeted Schwartz.

"In what sane & decent world can this man continue as president of the United States?" continued Schwartz's tweet, adding that he believed Trump should be put on trial for repeated "violent criminal behavior."

Originally posted here:
Trump 'Crime Family...Belong in Prison,' Says 'The Art of the Deal' Ghostwriter - Newsweek

In advance of Trumps factory tour today, I took a look at the strange relationship thats developed between Tim Cook and Donald Trump over the past three years. One of the things that popped up was one specific story that Trump would tell about Apple, in rally after rally and meeting after meeting. The idea was that Trump had somehow induced the company to build a new factory in the US, through some combination of tax cuts and trade policy, which was both very politically useful and also very much not true.

Today, perhaps not surprisingly, he told the lie again.

Were seeing the beginning of a very powerful and important plant, Trump said at the factory. Anybody that followed my campaign, I would always talk about Apple, that I want to see Apple building plants in the United States. And thats whats happening.

This is not true for a couple reasons one of them nitpicky and one of them a lot more serious. The nitpicky problem is that Apple isnt actually building a manufacturing plant. The company is building a new campus in Austin, but its miles away from the factory and the jobs are going to be very similar to the kind of white-collar design and engineering work that Apple does in Cupertino. Apple doesnt do its own manufacturing, and the plant Trump is standing in belongs to a contractor called Flex Ltd (formerly Flextronics).

But the bigger problem is that what Flex is doing isnt anything new. This particular factory has been manufacturing Mac Pros since 2013, when Cook first announced it would assemble them in the United States. Thats before Trump took office. So the idea that were seeing the beginning of something, or that Trump has done something during his presidency to bring about this particular instance of US manufacturing, just doesnt hold water.

Trump is talking as if Apple has created a brand-new factory in Texas to build Mac Pros. If all you saw was a five-second clip on the news, thats probably the impression you would get but it just isnt true.

People often get very worked up about whether a politician is technically lying when they say something that isnt true, or if theyve just stumbled into falsehood as if accidentally falling off a chair. But when you say the same false thing over and over again for a year and a half, its hard to call it anything else.

Speaking of which, Trump just aired the lie on Twitter as well:

You can see the video footage of Trumps tour for yourself below.

Things actually get worse if you keep watching. Later in the video, Trump takes back the mic for a quick aside on how his tariff policy has benefited the factory.

The nice part is, he doesnt have to worry about tariffs, Trump says. When you build it here, you dont have to worry about tariffs.

This is also not true.

In fact, Apple is currently paying tariffs on a number of Mac Pro parts, which must be imported from China to Texas before the final device can be assembled. (Ten of Apples requested tariff exemptions were issued earlier this year, but five others were denied, including taxes on the cooling system, charging cable, and various circuit boards.) Because Trumps current array of tariffs are levied on components but not finished devices, Apple actually doesnt pay tariffs on the iPhones and MacBooks that are assembled in China.

The net effect is a tax on electronics assembled in the US. Its more expensive to assemble Mac Pros in the US, not just because of labor and production costs, but explicitly because of the tariffs Trump has placed on intermediary goods. Apple even briefly flirted with moving Mac Pro production back to China, as a way of driving home the cost of those tariffs, although the company ultimately backed down.

The structure of those taxes could change in the future, and a tariff on phones and other electronics has already been formally proposed, although it keeps getting delayed. On the other hand, talks with China could be so productive that earlier rounds of tariffs are lifted completely. With that much uncertainty, its hard for anyone to be sure about the best way to arrange a supply chain.

But the result is an alarming level of falsehood even by Trump standards. He claimed to have brought Apple manufacturing to the United States while standing in a factory that had already been building Apple products for six years, and one that had nearly lost the gig not benefited because of Trumps trade policy.

See the rest here:
Trump is lying about the new Apple factory - The Verge

SEOULPresident Donald Trumps demands for vast increases in South Korean and Japanese financial contributions to maintain U.S. bases and forces has triggered fears here that hes eager for massive troop withdrawals from the territory of these U.S. allies. And while the scale and the history are very different, the capricious way that Trump ordered U.S. forces pulled out of northeast Syria in October is seen as a cautionary example.

Although some U.S. troops reportedly are back in action in Syria, Trump created murderous confusion when he suddenly decided to pull about 1,000 of them out on Oct. 6, betraying longtime Kurdish allies beleaguered by the Turks, Syrians, Russians, and ISIS guerrillas. The overwhelming concern here is that the impetuous and ill-informed action in Syria was a rehearsal for much greater reductions in U.S. forces in northeast Asia. Trump has questioned the need for them, and their cost, for many years.

My Korean colleagues worry that the Syria withdrawal could also be applied to Korea, and potentially with similar very negative consequences, says Bruce Bennett, senior researcher at RAND Corp. Actions like the Syria withdrawal cause our allies to worry that they could be next, and that worry undermines the strength of our alliances.

The U.S. role in Korea was put to the test last week when James DeHart, chief U.S. negotiator on the bases, staged a precipitous walkout after two hours getting nowhere in a meeting here with South Koreas negotiator.

South Korea contributed approximately $900 million this year to the bases, up 8 percent from 2018. But Trump wants to up the price to Seoul by 400 percent to $5 billion, a figure he seems to have pulled out of thin air and that the Pentagon has had trouble justifying. (As MIT Prof. Vipin Narang told CNN in a memorable remark, Nothing says I love you like a shakedown.)

DeHart, Trumps negotiator, read a brief statement saying South Koreas counter-proposal to Trumps demand for raising the South Korean outlay was not responsive to our request for fair and equitable burden-sharing. Thus we cut short our participation in the talks in hopes the Koreans would put forward new proposals.

Maybe the Trump team thinks this is just the way things are done here on the peninsula. DeHarts remarks bear an uncanny resemblance to those of the North Korean negotiator who broke off talks in Stockholm last month with U.S. nuclear negotiator Stephen Biegun, claiming the U.S. had added nothing to the dialogue on the Norths nukes and missiles.

What will the rest of the world conclude about the value of an alliance with the U.S., and what will the world conclude about the need for national nuclear weapon programs?

Korea expert Bruce Bennett at RAND

Its not only the U.S. presence in South Korea thats imperiled; bases also are in doubt in Japan, where conservative Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is balking at Trumps demand for a $4 billion increase in its annual contribution.

Bruce Bennett at RAND raises the question of who has military superiority in the region if the U.S. breaks its historic alliances. North Korea has 1.1 million troops plus 30 to 60 nuclear warheads, he notes, while South Koreas armed forces, bereft of nukes, will be down to 365,000 by 2022.

If the North is in a position of dominance, Bennett asks, what will the rest of the world conclude about the value of an alliance with the U.S., and what will the world conclude about the need for national nuclear weapon programs? Such a move could well lead to the end of effective U.S. nuclear nonproliferation efforts."

During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump seemed to embrace the idea that South Korea and Japan should have their own nuclear weapons to defend against North Korea. At some point, he told Anderson Cooper in a CNN town hall, we have to say, you know what, were better off if Japan protects itself against this maniac in North Korea, were better off, frankly, if South Korea is going to start to protect itself.... Wouldnt you rather in a certain sense have Japan have nuclear weapons when North Korea has nuclear weapons?... Wouldnt you rather have Japan, perhaps, theyre over there, theyre very close, theyre very fearful of North Korea.

[Trump] truly believes that 'free rider' stuff he's been saying since the 1980s.

Van Jackson, author of 'On the Brink: Trump, Kim, and the Threat of Nuclear War'

By law Trump cannot arbitrarily slash the number of U.S. troops in Korea, now about 28,500, to below 22,000 without talking to the South Koreans and proving the drawdown wont compromise the alliance or defense of the South. Trump, however, has said repeatedly that he believes South Korea and Japan can fend for themselves and American forces are no longer needed.

The danger is Trump means what he says, but his friend Kim Jong Un is not cutting him much slack. On Monday, nine years after North Korean artillery killed four South Koreans on an island in the Yellow Sea, the Norths state media reported Kim had presided over an artillery exercise on a nearby islandas menacing as the Norths recent short-range missile tests in view of its proximity to South Korean territory but apparently not much of a worry for POTUS.

Trump is unafraid to push to the wire and beyond on cost-sharing negotiations with Korea and Japan because he believes he has all the leverage, says Victor Cha at Georgetown University. If they dont want to pay, he will pull them out.

Cha, who served on the National Security Council during the presidency of George W. Bush, bases this conviction on what he sees as Trumps unappreciation of the benefits of having allies around the world. His outlook as a businessman, he observes, leads him to a monetization of foreign policy in general.

Trumps tough bargaining position throws into doubt the future of the delicate alliance relationships that the U.S. has had since the Korean War to ward off another North Korean assault on South Koreaand possible Chinese intervention, too. Backing up U.S. forces in Korea, the U.S. has 50,000 troops in Japan, including a Marine division on Okinawa, plus more air and naval forces on Guam.

What we need to do is to change the regime in North Korea. Thats why were here today.

Otto Warmbier's father, Fred Warmbier, addressing a rally in Seoul

He truly believes that free rider stuff hes been saying since the 1980s, says Van Jackson, author of On the Brink: Trump, Kim, and the Threat of Nuclear War. He thinks were being taken to the cleaners by our allies, he doesnt get the security value of alliances or forward military presence, and the only acceptable redress for his grievance is maximal rent-seeking.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper, on a recent visit here, said South Korea is a wealthy country and could and should pay more to help offset the cost of defense, but were not threatening our allies over this. Jackson, who now lectures at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand, says he would be willing to bet Trump pulls a troop withdrawal stunt sometime in the next year if South Korea doesnt make some huge concessions.

The issue arouses intense fears and debate among South Koreans. Not only conservatives but also middle-of-the-roaders who supported President Moon Jae-in in the Candlelight Revolution of 2016 and 2017 are increasingly disillusioned by his policy of appeasing North Koreas leader Kim Jong Un in the quest for reconciliation. And the concern intensifies as the American defensive shield appears to be threatened.

At a rally Saturday in central Seoul, several hundred thousand people waving American and South Korean flags shouted slogans denouncing Moon.

There, Fred and Cindy Warmbier, the parents of Otto Warmbier, who was jailed in North Korea nearly four years ago for stealing a poster near the end of a brief tourist trip to Pyongyang, described their sons torture before he was sent home to die in June 2017. We look forward to working with you to solve the problem of North Korea, said Fred Warmbier, whose words were translated over mega-loudspeakers to thunderous applause. What we need to do is to change the regime in North Korea. Thats why were here today.

In the crowd, Ahn Chang, who had been jailed for refusing to leave a government office while protesting Moons policies, worried about whatever Trump will do. I am very afraid he will pull out troops, says Ahn. Unlike typical U.S. presidents, hes against this whole Korean-American alliance. If he pulled out troops, we are left alone to fight.

Ahn believes South Korean leftists have fallen for North Korean propaganda and wont stand up against attack from the North. The leftists are brain-washed, he says. We are already losing because of the lies they were telling to the people.

Moons real stance, however, may be somewhat ambivalent. On Friday, his government announced it would not take the controversial step of withdrawing from its deal for exchanging military intelligence information with Japan, as it had threatened to do. A Moon spokesman said South Korea would remain committed to GSOMIA (an acronym pronounced Gee-soh-mee-ya, for General Security of Military Intelligence Agreement) for the sake of national interest.

But South Korea will continue to press Japan to do away with constraints on export of vital chemicals and other equipment imposed after Koreas supreme court ruled that Nippon Steel and others had to compensate Koreans forced to work for the Japanese as de facto slave labor in World War II.

The sense is that Moon and others would not be thrilled by a U.S. decision to cut down the number of U.S. troops while North Korea shows no signs of scaling back, much less giving up, its nuclear and missile program.In fact, some analysts believe Trump would hesitate for fear of the rising power of China, which supports North Korea.

We know Trump doesnt want to spend money for alliances, says Choi Jin-wook, former director of the Korea Institute of National Unification, but he cannot withdraw U.S. troops from South Korea and Japan because of China.

But, really, theres no telling what Trump really has in mind. He does not seem to care about the post-World War II consensus on the U.S.-built liberal world order, says Daniel Pinkston, a longtime Korea analyst and lecturer at Troy University. He and a large part of his coalition view the liberal world order as rigged or ripping off the U.S. They would would rather ruin it and be spoilers.

Read the original here:
Trump Pushes South Korea and Japan to Go Nuclear by Demanding They Pay Billions More for US Troops - Daily Beast

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for to receive our biggest stories as soon as theyre published.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.s criminal investigation of the Trump Organization is scrutinizing the actions of one of the presidents oldest and most trusted deputies, ProPublica has learned.

The focus on Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg, a 72-year-old accountant now running the business with Trumps two adult sons, stems from his involvement in arranging a payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump (which Trump has denied).

Federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York, or SDNY, contended that the Trump Organization had improperly booked reimbursements for the hush-money scheme as legal expenses, with the aid of sham invoices. They granted legal immunity to Weisselberg and later closed their 18-month investigation with the guilty plea of one Trump associate, Michael Cohen. But Weisselbergs immunity deal applied only to federal proceedings.

Now Vances state grand jury is examining whether Weisselberg, among others and even the Trump Organization should face state criminal charges for falsification of business records, according to a source familiar with the investigation. Neither Weisselberg nor the Trump Organization responded to requests for comment. Vance, through a spokesman, declined to comment.

A handful of lawyers and investigators from Vances office, led by Chris Conroy, chief of the DAs major economic crimes bureau, traveled to the federal minimum-security prison camp in Otisville, New York, on Oct. 30 to meet for the third time with Cohen, who is serving a three-year prison sentence, according to two sources knowledgeable about the matter. Much of the discussion involved Weisselberg.

Subscribe to the Big Story newsletter.

Neither the president nor his sons appear to be in Vances crosshairs at this point in the investigation, which is at an early stage, according to the source familiar with the investigation. But, the source added, New York prosecutors are far from ruling that out.

The investigation is playing out amid an unusually public conflict between the offices of the Manhattan DA and the U.S. attorney, which are headquartered across the street from each other in Lower Manhattan.

Vance originally launched his investigation back in August 2018, after Cohens guilty plea and public testimony revealed the Trump Organizations deceits.

But when one of Vances staffers placed a courtesy call to inform the federal prosecutors of their investigation, according to the source familiar with the investigation, the DA was asked to stand down. The reason: The U.S. attorneys office said it was still investigating the Trump Organization, pursuing additional targets. (A spokesperson for the SDNY declined to comment.) Vance agreed to put his investigation on hold.

As late as May 2019, federal prosecutors told U.S. District Judge William Pauley that their investigation was ongoing. For months before that, the SDNY seemed to be gathering evidence for possible charges against people beyond Cohen. At least, that was the public impression created by the prosecutors decision to grant immunity and non-prosecution agreements, respectively, to Weisselberg and executives with the National Enquirer, who collaborated with Cohen on a second hush-money payoff, to former Playboy centerfold Karen McDougal. (Trump denied that relationship, too.)

Vances probe remained on hold for nearly a year until July 18, 2019 when Pauley revealed that federal prosecutors had informed him their investigation was effectively concluded.

With that, the Manhattan DA quickly restarted his state investigation. On Aug. 1, a grand jury subpoenaed an array of records from the Trump Organization involving the hush-money payments and Cohens work for Trump. The DA contended that the subpoena applied to Trumps tax records.

Over the next few weeks, Trumps business turned over 3,376 pages of documents, court filings show. Those documents did not include tax records. A subsequent filing by the DA asserted that approximately two-thirds of those 3,376 pages consisted of non-substantive Google alerts.

On Aug. 29, the DA subpoenaed Mazars USA, Trumps accounting firm, demanding Trumps personal and business tax returns dating back to 2011, as well as work papers and financial statements. Lawyers for the president then filed suit in federal court on Sept. 19 to quash the Mazars subpoena.

The U.S. Department of Justice intervened in the case, backing Trumps request to keep the dispute in federal, rather than state, court. The DOJ supported further delays to consider Trumps claims in federal court, but it did not then take a position on the merits of the underlying dispute.

The DOJ pleadings were co-signed by the SDNY. Privately, SDNY representatives, wary of appearing to do Trumps bidding, insisted that their offices role was limited, likening it to merely serving as local counsel.

Thats when the tensions between the federal and state prosecutors surfaced but they were largely ignored by the press, which focused on the bigger issue of whether the president can quash the subpoena for his taxes. Vances office bristled at the DOJs unusual decision to jump in with support from the SDNY.

The Manhattan DAs office argued in court that the delay caused by the SDNYs request to stand down has harmed its ability to bring a case. The clock is now running out on the DAs ability to bring misdemeanor false-records charges. Because the last disguised reimbursement payment, signed by Trump, is dated Dec. 5, 2017, the two-year statute of limitations expires next month. (Convicting a person of a misdemeanor fake-records charge requires proving an intent to defraud, according to lawyers. The charge can also be prosecuted as a felony, which has a five-year statute of limitations. Proving the felony requires not only establishing an intent to defraud, but also that the intention was aimed at committing or concealing a second crime, such as claiming improper deductions on a tax return or making a false representation on a financial statement.)

At a hearing in federal court on Sept. 25, Carey Dunne, general counsel for the DAs office, complained that the feds were aiding Trumps efforts to run out the clock: It is what they want in the end. What that means, if they get further delay, basically they win and we lose, without an adjudication by this court, and thats not what should happen today.

Dunne made a similar argument in an Oct. 3 letter to the federal judge overseeing the subpoena battle. As he put it, delaying enforcement of the subpoena will likely result in the expiration of the statutes of limitation that would apply to some of the transactions at issue in the grand jury investigation. Dunne called the DOJs involvement all the more audacious in view of the fact that, until quite recently and for more than a year, DOJ prosecutors in this very district conducted a highly publicized grand jury investigation into some of the very same transactions and actors that have been reported to be at issue in this matter.

Federal district and appeals courts quickly rejected Trumps claim of blanket immunity from criminal investigation, and he has now petitioned the Supreme Court to hear his case. If the court refuses to hear it, Vances investigators could be combing through Trumps tax records by year-end. A decision to hear the case would push any resolution well into 2020.

The scrutiny of Weisselberg stems from his reported role in hiding the hush-money payments. Cohen gave congressional committees a detailed account of how, at Trumps direction, he strategized with Weisselberg in October 2016 about how to fund the $130,000 payment to Daniels.

The adult-film actress was then threatening to go public. It was a fraught moment, immediately after the broadcast of the Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump talked about grabbing women by their genitals, and just one month before Election Day.

Cohen testified that he and Weisselberg argued over which one of them should come up with the hush money. Eventually, Cohen tapped a home-equity line of credit, a funding source that would be hidden from his wife. According to government filings, it was decided the Trump Organization would reimburse Cohen through monthly payments disguised as a legal retainer, and Cohen submitted sham invoices to paper over the deceit. Along with Donald Trump Jr., Weisselberg signed two of the monthly checks for Cohen. Trump signed six others.

Prosecutors said Cohen carried out his actions in coordination with and at the direction of Trump, who they identified in filings as Individual-1. Those filings identified two other Trump Organization figures Executive-1 and Executive-2 as processing Cohens phony monthly invoices. Those two executives were the Trump Organizations controller, Jeff McConney, a 32-year veteran of the company, and Weisselberg, according to a source familiar with the matter. (Previous published reports incorrectly identified Weisselberg as Executive-1 and McConney as Executive-2.) McConney did not respond to an emailed request for comment.

One of Cohens lawyers later released a surreptitious recording Cohen made of a September 2016 conversation with Trump discussing the arrangement to pay McDougal. In it, Cohen is heard telling Trump: Ive spoken to Allen Weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up.

Cohen was the only identified participant in the scheme to be charged in the federal investigation. (In addition to federal tax and false-statement crimes, he pleaded guilty to illegal campaign contributions for the payoffs, which benefited Trumps campaign by silencing the women through Election Day.) A DOJ policy memo barring federal prosecution of a sitting president protected Trump.

That shield, however, doesnt apply in state court, making the president, Trump Organization executives including Weisselberg (whose federal immunity, as noted, also doesnt apply in state proceedings) and even the Trump Organization itself potential targets.

A company can be charged if a high-ranking officer with authority to bind the business engages in illegal conduct, according to Adam Kaufmann, a white-collar attorney and former investigations chief for the Manhattan DAs office.

Weisselbergs employment dates back to the era of Fred Trump, the presidents father, and he has a reputation as the ultimate company man. In deposition excerpts filed by the New York attorney general in her case against the Trump Foundation which resulted in its shutdown, admissions of wrongdoing and an order to pay $2 million to charity Weisselberg, who served as the foundations treasurer, was questioned about Trumps use of the charity for a political event before the Iowa presidential primary.

He described receiving a phone call one morning in January 2016, as he was preparing for a dental appointment, asking him to fly to Iowa that night to write some checks. What did he think about this request to bring the checkbook, an assistant attorney general asked. It doesnt matter what I thought, Weisselberg replied. Hes my boss. I went.

As for Cohen, he has been attempting to insert himself into the investigation as a witness. His lawyers have been laboring to reduce his three-year term, offering the carrot of Cohens cooperation regarding what they claim is a litany of Trump Organization crimes. Recently, word was conspicuously leaked that he had stories to tell about his own contact with Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, the Rudy Giuliani associates indicted for using foreign funds to influence U.S. elections.

Federal prosecutors, who last year declined to urge a major reduction in the range for Cohens projected prison term, citing a pattern of deception that permeated his entire life, among other things, have rebuffed repeated entreaties from Cohens lawyers to reengage. Cohens lawyers had hoped such cooperation would prompt federal prosecutors to request a special post-sentence Rule 35 reduction in his prison term before the one-year window for such a request expired.

The Manhattan DAs team, with different targets and no power to urge a sentence reduction, has been more receptive. At the teams last meeting with Cohen and his lawyers, they discussed the possibility of obtaining a trove of evidence that federal agents seized in the raids on Cohens apartment, office and hotel suite in April 2018. The feds recently returned a flash drive containing the evidence including files, contracts, notes and tape recordings to Cohens legal team.

Cohens legal team, which includes Lanny Davis, has also urged congressional leaders to intervene on his behalf. Cohens team is promoting a new, albeit improbable, image for the man who once was proud to call himself Trumps fixer: the John Dean of his generation.

See the article here:
Prosecutors Investigating the Trump Organization Zero In on Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg - ProPublica