Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Donald Trump CNN town hall failure echoes McCarthy coverage … – The Capital Times

Christiane Amanpour has recently become an even brighter journalistic star, and it has nothing to do with her day job as chief foreign correspondent for CNN.

Its because she publicly condemned her employer for hosting a widely panned televised town hall in which former President Donald Trump did what he always does: repeatedly interrupted the moderator and lied incessantly, egged on by a studio audience of sycophants hooting approval at his cruelty.

Amanpour got most everything right in her critique, except the part in which she contrasted failings in covering Trump with how much better the press supposedly performed in covering Wisconsins Joseph McCarthy, the disgraced late U.S. senator, in the 1950s.

Larry Tye, who wrote a 500-page book on McCarthys demagoguery, begs to differ. Well get to that, as well as Tyes perspectives on the CNN event.

Amanpour, addressing the graduating class of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism recently, criticized CNN for allowing a Republicans-only studio audience and for presenting the event live, limiting any opportunity for fact-checking.

My management believes they did the right thing as service to the American people, she told the Columbia audience. I still respectfully disagree with allowing Donald Trump to appear in that particular format.

She said it was nave to think the event would succeed, given Trumps track record: He just seizes the stage and dominates, no matter how much flak the moderator tries to aim at the incoming. It doesnt often work. Amanpour had what she called a robust conversation with CNN Chairman and CEO Chris Licht, who has defended the town hall as newsworthy.

Amanpour said journalism leaders could learn from predecessors from the 1950s, whom she said refused to give McCarthy attention unless his foul lies, his witch hunts and his rants reached some basic level of evidence.

Sadly, this 1950s journalists-as-heroes theme did not ring true with me, having learned how much William T. Evjue, founder of The Capital Times, was a lonely outlier for years in this newspapers relentless scrutiny of McCarthy dating to the late 1940s.

I emailed Tye, a former Boston Globe reporter and prolific author whose exhaustively researched 2020 book on the disgraced Republican senator was titled: Demagogue: The Life and Long Shadow of Senator Joe McCarthy. (The Cap Times excerpted part of the book for a print cover story.)

Interesting comments by the great Amanpour, but sadly totally wrong, Tye emailed back. The press, as you know, published McCarthys false claims from the first big lie he told in Wheeling, West Virginia, in 1950, when he said he had in his hand a list of 205 spies at the State Department.

The fact that he couldnt back up that claim didnt matter, same as it didnt matter when he made page one day after day over the next couple of years, Tye said. Defenses from those he was accusing generally were relegated to page 57 in the next days paper, next to the corset ads.

McCarthy does offer an object lesson, but of what not to do how press inaction or complicity enables demagogues like McCarthy.

Tye said courageous journalists such as columnist Drew Pearson and television commentator Edward R. Murrow belatedly stepped up to make up for their colleagues errors and take on the bully. Tye said the press failed early on to expose McCarthy even though it would have been easier because he was only a senator and not an ex-president.

Tye elaborated further in a telephone conversation: Before the press was McCarthys disabler, it was his enabler in a dramatic and, I think, embarrassing fashion.

The press blew it, he said, when it uncritically covered McCarthys charges that there was a Communist behind every pillar in the State Department. By the time theyd ever sort of catch up with him and say what about this, we want to see the list that you were holding in your hand, he had already succeeded.

The press was perpetually a step behind in checking on his charges before they had made them page one news. And it was a huge challenge to the press, and it took the press like it took most leading government officials in America too long to figure out what it had done wrong and correct course.

Tye was scheduled to speak this week at the Eisenhower Presidential Library in Abilene, Kansas, about why it took then-President Dwight Eisenhower, a fellow Republican, so long to stand up to McCarthy. The press was similarly culpable, he said.

The mainstream of American media was out there just repeating what McCarthy said. Many of the exceptions were papers like yours in Wisconsin that knew who this guy was and knew how unjustifiable his charges had been from his earliest days, Tye added.

A key difference between McCarthy and Trump was that McCarthy was no master of the then-new medium of television, Tye said. His poor performances in front of cameras, including at the Army-McCarthy hearings and attempting, awkwardly, to rebut Murrow by appearing alone on Murrows show, hastened his downfall, Tye said.

Donald Trump doesnt play well in the print world that McCarthy dominated, but he has mastered the TV world in a way that the best reporter cant begin to contend with, Tye said.

Even giving CNN the benefit of the doubt that I am not sure it deserves, (the network) was trying to build a big audience, (not) a fair and balanced event. I think that they got a big audience and they learned the hard way that you dont take on the master of a medium in their medium.

Tye added, The idea that you can go on and give him a forum like that and expect that youre not going to get trampled is nave. You dont beat a demagogue in a demagogues forum.

Coming from an expert on political demagoguery, thats a maxim worth remembering.

The rest is here:
Donald Trump CNN town hall failure echoes McCarthy coverage ... - The Capital Times

Newt Gingrich’s Unintentional Burn Of Donald Trump Is Priceless – Yahoo News

Former GOP Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich suggested Wednesday that Donald Trump communicates better than Ron DeSantis but it didnt come off as complimentary to many. (Watch the video below.)

One of Trumps great advantages is he talks at a level where third, fourth and fifth grade educations can say, Oh yeah, I get that. I understand it. Gingrich told host Laura Ingraham on her Fox News show.

The comment drew mockery from online critics. The fact that [Trump] speaks to the children says everything you need to know about the educational level the Right is shooting for, one person on Twitter wrote. I dont see where thats good for somebody thats running a country. SMH, another commented.

Gingrich was assessing the strengths of the two leading Republican candidates for president after DeSantis officially entered the race on Wednesday. He praised the Florida governors intelligence but questioned his communication skills after Ingraham played a clip of DeSantis making a convoluted comparison involving financial institutions and elections.

Gingrich, a Fox News contributor, recommended that the Florida governor boil down the message to a slogan.

Here are other reactions to Gingrichs remarks about Trump:

Follow this link:
Newt Gingrich's Unintentional Burn Of Donald Trump Is Priceless - Yahoo News

Ex-DOJ Official Predicts When Donald Trumps Worst Nightmare Will Happen – Yahoo! Voices

Former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal predicted Wednesday that an indictment for Donald Trump in the classified documents scandal is coming soon and explained why it will be the former presidents worst nightmare.

Katyal, appearing on MSNBCs Deadline: White House, noted to anchor Nicolle Wallace how neither Attorney General Merrick Garland nor special counsel Jack Smith, whom Garland appointed to lead the investigation, are overtly political, much to Trumps annoyance.

Garland, although a political appointee, has a long-standing reputation in Washington of being bipartisan, of being a careful and respected jurist on both sides of the aisle, Katyal said.

Smith, meanwhile, is independent.

So, as between those two, when were talking about something as sensitive as Do you indict a former president?, it would make all the sense in the world that thats a Jack Smith determination, Katyal said.

And thats what Donald Trump is afraid of, he added. Hes afraid of having someone independent do this. If its someone political, at least he can trash it as being political or this or that. So this is Trumps worst nightmare.

Amid reports Smiths investigation has almost concluded, Katyal noted Justice Department rules are to bring prosecutions when they are ready and you dont really look to external influences or things like that.

My expectation is this is going to be soon, he added.

Former Trump White House lawyer Ty Cobb this week said the Department of Justice has a tight case against Trump for allegedly refusing to return classified documents after leaving the White House.

Trump denies any criminal wrongdoing.

Watch the interview here:

Read more:
Ex-DOJ Official Predicts When Donald Trumps Worst Nightmare Will Happen - Yahoo! Voices

Did Donald Trump rack up more debt than any other president? – PolitiFact

As White House and congressional Republican negotiators met to hammer out a way to raise the nations debt limit, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., cast blame for the nations $31 trillion-plus debt on the most recent Republican president, Donald Trump.

The debt limit could be met as soon as early June, and a failure to raise the limit could force the government to default on payments to bondholders, federal employees, contractors and beneficiaries of programs such as Social Security. Republicans have proposed raising the limit in tandem with spending cuts, but the White House considers the scale of the Republicans proposed cuts untenable.

In a May 12 tweet, Jeffries said Republicans were to blame for much of the debt. Jeffries wrote, "Trump ran up more debt than any other President in American history. He wants Republicans to force a dangerous default if they dont get their way. We cannot let right-wing extremists hold our economy hostage."

Strictly speaking, former President Barack Obama accumulated more debt than Trump. But Trump accumulated the most debt per year served in office.

Jeffries office did not answer an inquiry for this article.

What are the numbers?

Treasury Department data shows the gross federal debt rose by about $7.8 trillion on Trumps watch. But that wasnt the biggest increase of any president in raw dollars.

The record for the largest increase was set by President Barack Obama, with more than$9.5 trillion.

One caveat: Obamas figure is larger than Trumps partly because Obama served eight years, while Trump served four.

If you adjust the measurement for that reality by looking at debt accumulated per year in office, Trump does stand alone.

If you divide the debt accumulated during each presidents tenure by the number of years they served, Trump oversaw an increase in the debt of almost $2 trillion per year. President Joe Biden has overseen the addition of almost $1.6 trillion per year in his two-and-one-third years in office, which ranks second. In third place is Obama, who presided over the addition of nearly $1.2 trillion a year.

Why president-to-president comparisons are hard

The blame game on federal debt is not clear cut.

Much of the current federal debt stems from mandatory payments, such as those for Social Security and Medicare. These began spiking when the baby boom generation started drawing heavily from these programs around 2010. Not coincidentally, thats when the federal debt began accelerating.

Generations of politicians in both parties approved and modified these programs long before Trump took office.

"It is always challenging to figure out how much spending was on whose watch," said Steve Ellis, president of the federal budget-watching nonprofit group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

The biggest single spikes in the federal debt came from the initial rounds of coronavirus relief legislation in 2020. Trump signed them, but they passed with broad bipartisan support.

"Everyone, including me, said it was worth it, and without it, things would have been worse," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the center-right American Action Forum. "So, (its) not fair to blame Trump exclusively for something everyone thought was needed."

Our ruling

Jeffries said Trump "ran up more debt than any other president in American history."

Obama ran up more debt than any other president in American history. If you look at debt accumulated on a per-year basis, Trumps rate of increase in the debt was higher over four years than over Obamas eight.

Assigning debt to a particular president can be misleading because so much of it traces back to decades-old, bipartisan legislation that set the parameters for Social Security and Medicare.

The statement contains an element of truth but ignores evidence that would give a different impression, so we rate it Mostly False.

Go here to see the original:
Did Donald Trump rack up more debt than any other president? - PolitiFact

Donald Trump Jr.’s response to White House U-Haul crash reveals … – MSNBC

Authorities say a 19-year-old Missouri man with a Nazi flag in the truckcrashed a U-Haul into security barriers near the White House late Monday night. The Nazi flag that authorities say he had with him was later photographed unfurled on the ground near the truck. He could face multiple charges, including threatening to hurt the president.

Trump Jr. wrote, If the threat of white supremacy is so real, why do they have to outsource all the hate?

Donald Trump Jr., the son of the former president, soon retweeted a post that expressed skepticism about the official version of events and added more skepticism of his own. He said of federal law enforcement, You would think they would be able to do a much better job at creating fake crimes and fake hate. Later, in a tweet that drew attention to the suspects Indian name, Trump Jr. wrote, If the threat of white supremacy is so real, why do they have to outsource all the hate?

That wasnt the first time weve seen Trump Jr. accusing federal authorities of exaggerating the white supremacist threat.Last Saturday, after about a hundred members of the white nationalist group Patriot Front marched in Washington, Trump Jr. suggested the marchers were all feds: Do we really want to pretend its not a fed operation? he asked on a podcast. He was preaching to the choir of conspiracy theorists across platforms that echoed similar sentiments. Popular podcaster Joe Rogan joked with guest Matt Taibbi that the marchers had to be federal agents because, he said, there were no fat people among them.

Those high-profile people werent alone. In fact, claiming that federal authorities are falsely connecting crimes to white supremacists has become a trend. Almost as fast as the Secret Service descended on the man in the U-Haul, far-right MAGA followers launched a counteroffensive against any implication that the driver was one of theirs. Were in an interesting moment when followers and close associates of a former president seem compelled, sometimes in unison, to deny any association with the authoritarian, white supremacist, white nationalist or even neo-Nazi ideologies some of them seem to espouse. To paraphrase a character in Shakespeares Hamlet, Methinks they doth protest too much.

This new strategy involves claiming that any violent incident by someone who even appears to have such leanings is not just a false flag operation but maybe a false flag operation staged by the government. These claims happen so quickly, in such large volume and across so many social media platforms, that the word feds was trending on Twitter for much of Tuesday morning. At that time, we didnt yet have the report from authorities that the U-Haul suspect had praised Hitler to police and told them that his intent was to kill President Joe Biden. Facts werent needed. Someone had to defend the honor of MAGA loyalists.

The same strategy of feigned disbelief was on display after the May 6 mass shooting at a mall in Allen, Texas. The police reported that the Latino suspect had neo-Nazi ideation and wore associated patches and tattoos, but the MAGA faithful pretended it was all a government ruse designed to make them look bad. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., tweeted: Only dumb white people would believe that a Mexican gang member is killing people for white supremacy.

The fact that people who arent white have been known to identify with white supremacy didnt stop people from making arguments that law enforcements reports about the Allen shooter were wrong. Twitter CEO Elon Musk also joined in and claimed the shooters alleged ideologies seemed suspicious.

There are three reasons why this strategy of denying the validity of reports linking violent crimes to white supremacy and deflecting them onto scheming federal agents has become so prevalent.

The same strategy of feigned disbelief was on display after the May 6 mass shooting at mall in Allen, Texas.

First, the strategy sends a reassuring message to far-right adherents who might think that a hate-fueled mass shooting, or other violent attack, is their cue to leave the MAGA movement. Well-publicized claims that such crimes or the hateful marchers dressed in khaki cargo pants arent real, provides the kind of solace that helps delude adherents into sticking around. Effectively, the message to the MAGA masses is, Dont worry.We didnt do this.

Second, denial and deflection tactics help far-right extremists convince themselves that the problem of violence associated with white nationalism is overblown. It encourages far-right opinion writers to cherry-pick anecdotes in an attempt to demonstrate that the racism problem isnt as bad as its made out to be. But the data tells another story. Violent hate is on the rise.

In 2020, Christopher Wray, the then-FBI director who'd been appointed by Trump, said in testimony before Congress that the Bureaus data indicates that motivated violent extremistsin recent years have been responsible for the most lethal activity. Similarly, President Biden told the graduating class of Howard University last Saturday that white supremacy is the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland.

Third, the deniers and deflectors are increasingly aware that the feds, as they consistently call them, are not only investigating their leader but may be close to indicting him. They fear whats coming. If and when charges come, folks such as Donald Trump Jr. will need to be able to refute any charges by repeating the mantra that the feds make stuff up, including, even criminal cases. Theyll likely tell their followers that the folks who investigated Trump are the same people who staged violent incidents to make it look like MAGA followers were responsible.

Denial, deflection and delusion. Thats not just a Trump Jr. thing. It's also the strategic opiate of the chronically unaware. Sad to see how often it works.

Link:
Donald Trump Jr.'s response to White House U-Haul crash reveals ... - MSNBC