MVI 2057 Democrats Not Interested In Participating in,"Special Committee."
Congressman Trey Gowdy invited five Democrats to join his,"Special Committee." At the present time, none appear to be interested in joint the Committee.
By: Gabor Zolna
Read the original here:
MVI 2057 Democrats Not Interested In Participating in,"Special Committee." - Video
Democrats Divided Over Participating In Benghazi Probe
US House of Representatives Democrats are considering whether to participate in a Republican-led investigation into the deadly attack on the US consulate in ...
By: NewsCast
The rest is here:
Democrats Divided Over Participating In Benghazi Probe - Video
Will Democrats Ever Be Able to Turn Out the Vote During Midterms?
A listener calls in to discuss how democrats can turn out the vote during Midterms and what they can do to get young voters to go out and vote... This clip f...
By: Sam Seder
Read the original:
Will Democrats Ever Be Able to Turn Out the Vote During Midterms? - Video
Jesse Watters Confronts Democrats Steve Israel And Bennie Thompson
Jesse Watters confronts two Democratic congressmen for accusing the GOP of being racist. BillOReilly.com http://www.billoreilly.com/ Fox News: The O #39;Reilly Factor http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/orei...
By: yazchat
Go here to see the original:
Jesse Watters Confronts Democrats Steve Israel And Bennie Thompson - Video
Washington (CNN) Senate Democrats pushed back en masse against one of President Barack Obamas federal court nominees on Thursday, questioning Michael Boggs of Georgia about his past statements and beliefs about abortion, gay marriage and the Confederate flag.
Boggs is now a Georgia Court of Appeals judge, but his Senate Judiciary confirmation hearing focused on votes and statements from when he served as a conservative Democrat in the George state legislature, from 2000-2004.
You supported legislation that required doctors to report online (if they conduct abortions) and the number of abortions they conduct, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, recounted to Boggs at his confirmation hearing. Was that a mistake?
Boggs replied yes, that he now sees the vote was a mistake and that he didnt consider the threats made to doctors who perform abortions.
Looking back, Boggs replied, I regret that vote and I fully recognize the public safety risk.
Democrats were unconvinced and pressed him again and again on whether he believes key U.S. Supreme Court decisions upholding a womens abortion and contraceptive rights are stare decisis or settled law. Boggs answered that he did.
The deeply-held Democratic doubts about a Democratic nominee were only the most visible part of the plotline. Boggs was part of a seven-nominee agreement in which the White House and Republicans agreed to a package deal for a mix of more liberal and conservative judicial candidates.
Liberal interest groups cried foul over the deal, with NARAL Pro-Choice America, the National Organization for Women and the Human Rights Campaign stridently opposing Boggs nomination.
In the hearing, he tried to draw a hard line between his opinions as a state lawmaker and his rulings as a judge. Several Democrats asked whether he still opposes same-sex marriage.
My position on (same-sex marriage), it may or may not have changed as many peoples have, he said, notably adding, My position has never had any import on how Id decide cases.
See original here:
Nominated by Obama, then slowly skewered by Democrats