Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

At a ‘Unity’ Stop in Nebraska, Democrats Find Anything But – New York Times


New York Times
At a 'Unity' Stop in Nebraska, Democrats Find Anything But
New York Times
Mr. Sanders and the new leadership of the Democratic National Committee touched a party sore spot this week when they took their Unity Tour to Omaha to rally for a mayoral candidate who opposes abortion rights. Mr. Sanders, repurposing the themes of ...
Hillary Clinton doesn't deserve all the blame for Democrats' failureCNN
Bernie Sanders defends his endorsements of red state Democrats: Can't exclude people who disagree with usSalon
The senior Bernie Sanders backs party youth to remake DemocratsThe Spokesman-Review
The Root -Washington Post -The Federalist
all 415 news articles »

Link:
At a 'Unity' Stop in Nebraska, Democrats Find Anything But - New York Times

Democrats: This could be the time to flip the 5th District – The State


The State
Democrats: This could be the time to flip the 5th District
The State
Before that, however, the 5th District which includes Fairfield, Kershaw, Newberry and Sumter counties in the Midlands was represented by Democrat John Spratt for almost 30 years. And S.C. Democrats are hopeful the district could turn again in ...

and more »

Link:
Democrats: This could be the time to flip the 5th District - The State

Trump to Democrats: Pay for My Wall, or Obamacare Gets It! – Slate Magazine (blog)

Mick Mulvaney has an offer Democrats can almost certainly refuse.

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

President Trump is apparently trying to add another item to his resume of bumbled hostage-taking efforts this week, by threatening to sabotage the Affordable Care Act unless Democrats vote to fund a border wall with Mexico.

Sound familiar? It was just about two weeks ago that our president was busy threatening to sabotage Obamacare unless Democrats agreed to negotiate a plan to repeal and replace it. Having gotten nowhere with that bit of bluster, it seems Trump has moved on to the wall, which he's trying to secure funding for in the appropriations bill Congress must pass next week to avoid a government shutdown. Democrats have previously threatened to filibuster any legislation that included money for Trump's metastasized stump-speech applause line, so the White House is attempting to play hardball. As budget chief Mick Mulvaney explained in an interview with Bloomberg Friday, the administration is offering $1 of funding for Obamacare's crucial cost-sharing reduction subsidies for every $1 of money Democrats pony up for the wall. Here's the full quote:

The implicit threat here is that, if Democrats reject this deal, the White House will cease making the subsidy payments, and likely bring Obamacare crashing down. It is not especially credible. Democratic leaders are already responding with snark: Before, Mexico was supposed to pay for the border wall. Now, Trump's threatening the health care of millions to get taxpayers to cover it.

For a full rundown of the CSR drama, see my piece on it from last month. But briefly: Trump is currently deciding whether to continue appealing a federal court decision in which a judge ruled that the Obama administration did not have the right to continue making subsidy payments to insurers that were required under Obamacare, because Republicans in the House never appropriated money for them. If the White House decided to drop the case and cut off the flow of subsidies, insurance carriers would likely flee the Affordable Care Act's exchanges, leaving the individual market in rubble.

While this would no doubt be satisfying to some Republicans, it would almost certainly be a disaster for Trump's approval rating. Voters tend to blame the party in power for their personal miseryand in this case, they'd have every right to do so, since the administration would be taking active steps to burn down the health insurance market. Trump has tried to deny this, insisting that Obamacare is failing already and that Democrats own its impending collapse. But if he really believed that, he'd probably still be using the subsidies as a bargaining chip to get his own health care bill passed, instead of repurposing them to enact one of his other gold-plated pipe dreams.

Democrats, for their part, have very little incentive to negotiate here, since they'd be trading a temporary reprieve for Obamacare for a permanent border wall. The Trump administration says its precious barrier should cost up to $21 billion. That would pay for less than three years of the cost-sharing reduction subsidies, according to the Congressional Budget Office's projections, and giving Trump his wall now would almost certainly encourage him to make more extreme demands the next time the subsidies need more funding.

Trump has made the Democratic party an offer it will most certainly refuse. Maybe one day he'll figure out this whole negotiation thing.

Follow this link:
Trump to Democrats: Pay for My Wall, or Obamacare Gets It! - Slate Magazine (blog)

What went wrong at Oroville? Congressional Democrats demand answers – Sacramento Bee


Sacramento Bee
What went wrong at Oroville? Congressional Democrats demand answers
Sacramento Bee
Citing the near disaster at Oroville Dam, a group of congressional Democrats is pushing the government's watchdog agency to investigate federal oversight of dam safety regulations. The group, including Rep. Doris Matsui of Sacramento and five other ...

and more »

See the rest here:
What went wrong at Oroville? Congressional Democrats demand answers - Sacramento Bee

Cummings: Democrats need to be ‘big tent’ party – The Hill

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) on Friday said Democrats need to be a "big tent" party amid clashes over whether candidates are sufficiently progressive enough to be backed by the national party.

"I think we have to have a big tent," Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the Oversight panel and a frequent television presence for the party, said in an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"Because it's one thing to say, 'OK, I don't want to be bothered with these folks.' It's another thing to say, 'Let's pull them under the tent, so we can be effective and efficient in getting something done.' Period."

Cummings also talked about how conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats helped the party win legislative victories in the Obama years.

Separately, Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersEx-aide: Obama still the leader of the Democratic Party Sanders endorses Ossoff, but won't call him a progressive The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE (I-Vt.)saidhe did not know whether Georgia House candidate Jon Ossoff, a Democrat seeking to win a conservative-leaning district, was a true progressive.

Some Democrats have called recently to open the party up to opposing viewpoints in an effort to expand its reach and appeal to voters who may not align with certain planks of the Democratic platform.

That approach has won the support of DNC Chairman Tom Perez, who said that, while the Democratic platform supports abortion rights, the party needs to be open to working with people with opposing points of view in order to reach voters in Republican-leaning parts of the country.

If youre going to be a big tent party as we are, and you're going to help elect Democrats who have generated support in their communities ... the will of those voters is the will that we must respect," Perez told ABC News' Jonathan Karl.

Read the rest here:
Cummings: Democrats need to be 'big tent' party - The Hill