Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Four members of Mueller’s team have donated to Democrats – The Hill

Four members of special counsel Robert Mueller's team on the Russia probe have donated to Democratic presidential campaigns and organizations, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

Michael Dreeben, who serves as the Justice Departments deputy solicitor general, is working on a part-time basis for Mueller,The Washington Postreported Friday.

Dreebendonated$1,000 dollars to Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonThe Memo: Trump allies turn fire on Mueller Feehery: Checks and balances Likely W.Va. Senate GOP rivals spar in radio appearances MOREs Senate political action committee (PAC), Friends of Hillary, while she ran for public office in New York. Dreeben did so while he served as the deputy solicitor general at the Justice Department.

The political affiliations of Mueller's team have been spotlighted by former House SpeakerNewt Gingrich(R-Ga.) an ally of Trump.

After initially hailing Mueller's appointment as special counsel, Gingrich questioned for former FBI director's abilityto be impartial on Monday because of "who he is hiring."

Republicans are delusional if they think the special counsel is going to be fair. Look who he is hiring.check fec reports. Time to rethink.

Two other members of Mueller's team also have donated to Democrats.

Andrew Weissmann, who serves in a top post within the Justice Departments fraud practice, is the most senior lawyer on the special counsel team,Bloomberg reported.He served as the FBIs general counsel and the assistant director to Mueller when the special counsel was FBI director.

Before he worked at the FBI or Justice Department, Weissman worked at the law firmJenner & BlockLLP, during which hedonated six timesto political action committees for Obama in 2008 for a total of $4,700.

James Quarles, who served as an assistant special prosecutor on the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, has donated to over a dozen Democratic PACs since the late 1980s. He was also identified by the Washington Post as a member of Mueller's team.

Starting in 1987, Quarles donated to Democratic candidate Michael Dukakiss presidential PAC,Dukakis for President. Since then, he has also contributed in 1999 to Sen. Al GoreAl GoreFour members of Mueller's team have donated to Democrats OPINION: Don't repeat the mistakes of Clinton and 1998 with Trump Overnight Energy: Coalition bucks Trump, commits to Paris climate goals MOREs run for the presidency, then-Sen. John KerryJohn KerryFour members of Mueller's team have donated to Democrats Kerry: New Iran sanctions may be dangerous Trump reignites debate over travel ban MOREs (D-Mass.) presidential bid in 2005, Obamas presidential PAC in 2008 and 2012, and Clintons presidential pac Hillary for America in 2016.

He also donated to two Republicans, Rep. Jason ChaffetzJason ChaffetzFour members of Mueller's team have donated to Democrats Rep. Trey Gowdy wins Oversight gavel Sessions rejects request to testify before Oversight on Fast and Furious MORE (R-Utah) in 2015 andSen. George Allen (R-Va.) in 2005.

Several of the figures on Mueller's team are well known and respected for their work at the Department of Justice.

Dreeben has reportedly received bipartisan praise for his handling of the departments criminal appellate cases, the Post reported.

Weissmann is well-known for his work in the investigation on Volkswagen cheating on their diesel emissions tests, which they pleaded guilty to earlier this year.

Mueller, who formerly served as FBI director, was first appointed by Republican President George W. Bush in 2001.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller as special counsel last month.

Read the rest here:
Four members of Mueller's team have donated to Democrats - The Hill

Democrats seek a change in California recall elections, and it could help an embattled state senator – Los Angeles Times

State Senate Democrats introduced legislationMonday tochange the rules governing recall elections to remove a lawmaker from office, potentially helping one of their own survive an effort now underway in Southern California.

The proposal, contained in one of the bills enacting a new state budget, comes after backers of aneffort to remove state Sen. Josh Newman (D-Fullerton) from office have submittedmore than 31,000 voter signatures to trigger a special election.

"Recalls are designed to be extraordinary events in response to extraordinary circumstances and it's in the publics overwhelming interest to ensure the security, integrity and legitimacy of the qualification process," said Jonathan Underland, a spokesman for Senate President Pro TemKevinde Len(D-Los Angeles).

The bill would effectively give people new ways to block recall efforts by allowing a 30-day window for any voterswho signed the petition to change their mind and have their signature be removed. Elections officials would then have 10 days to update their tally, and each signaturewould have to be verified manually.The proposal would then give lawmakers 30 additional days to review the financial impact of a recall election.

In total, all of that could delay any special election to remove a lawmaker by more than two months. And the language of the legislation makes the change apply to the current effort to recall Newman.

Supporters of the effort to oust Newman, a freshman senator who eked out a narrow win last fall, blasted the budget-related bill as a blatant effort to protect a single lawmaker.

"They can't simply rewrite the rules," said Carl DeMaio, a former San Diego city councilman and current radio talk show host who's leading the effort. "They want to push this election off for as long as possible."

DeMaio predicted a lawsuit will be filed to block the change from taking effect, assuming it is signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown later this month. The recall campaignhas focused almost exclusively on Newman'svote in favor of the$52-billion transportation plan that hinges on an increase in gas taxes, scheduled to take effect in November.

Republican legislators were equally critical of achange in state election law being added to state government's annual fiscal plan.

"The Democrats know the gas tax is toxic and Newman will likely lose," said Assembly Republican Leader Chad Mayes (R-Yucca Valley). "They control every thing in California and need to rig the system to protect their political power."

Newman, who said he didn't participate in writing the provision, said recall proponents are falsely promoting their signature drives as a way to stop the gas tax -- and that voters should be given a chance to strike their signature from the petition if they were misled.

"What we're seeing in my case is how susceptible this system is to manipulation, to distortion," he said.

Update 3:05 p.m. This story was updated to include comments from Assemblyman Mayes and Senator Newman.

Here is the original post:
Democrats seek a change in California recall elections, and it could help an embattled state senator - Los Angeles Times

Democrats Stick to Health Care Message Amid Russian Intrigue – Roll Call

Despite the daily drip about Russia and the Trump administration, national Democrats who hope to exploit Republicans vulnerabilities in 2018 are focusing theirmessaging squarely on health care before theJuly 4 recess.

Just minutes after former FBIDirector James B. Comey concluded his testimony Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee in which he said the president lied to the America people the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee blasted out a release.

The subject? Nevada Sen. Dean Hellers reported support for phasing out Medicaid expansion.

The Senate Democrats campaign arm issued no public statements about the Comey hearing.

Democrats are careful to say that just because Russia isnt a major campaign issue todaydoesnt mean it couldnt be a year from now. The 2018 cycle is still young, as is the unraveling of detailsabout Russias involvement in last years election.

But for now, many Democratic strategists and lawmakers say, the ins and outs of Russias meddling in U.S. politics is not the most pressing issue for voters.

Literally, I have gotten zero questions about Russia. Zero, Rep. Cheri Bustos said Thursday as she was leaving the Capitol after the last votes of the week.

The Illinois Democrat was describingthe interactions she has had so far this year at her Supermarket Saturday events, where she swings through grocery stores to chat with constituents in the aisles.

One of three co-chairs of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, Bustos is the only Midwestern member in House Democratic leadership.Trump narrowly carriedher district last fall.

Things that Washington, D.C., is obsessed about, in some cases, are barely even a blip in a rural area like mine, shesaid.

Health care is the issue her constituents have raised the most, Bustossaid. People with pre-existing conditions are freaking out, she said.

The Democratic super PAC Priorities USA released a messaging guidance memolate last month with a similar conclusion. Nearly half of the presidential-year voters surveyed expressed concern about Republicans supporting the GOP health care bill; only 35 percent had concerns about Republicans opposing an independent investigation into the Kremlin and Trump.

Its not to say Russia is not relevant, its just not as pertinent to peoples lives, a longtime Democratic strategist said.

New York Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney, who conducted an internal review of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committees 2016 election efforts, said he doesnt like to veer too far from the bread-and-butter issues that worry families in his district.

Its hard to compete with somebodys mortgage, or their retirement or the cost of their kids college, Maloney said as he exited the Capitol ahead of the weekend break.

We should not assume that ordinary Americans understand this and care about this as much as people in Washington, he said of Russia. Maloney said that while his constituents take the Russian election interference seriously, theyre also wary of Washington.

They are understandably suspicious about how politics can get played in this town. And they see that as being at odds with whats important at their own families kitchen tables, Maloney said.

A distraction is how Bustos characterizes the Washington frenzy over Russia.Part of her job as DPCC co-chairwoman is helping the party craft its message, especially in rural and swing areas of the country like hers.

I just say, This is distracting members of Congress from what we need to be focusing on, Bustos said, rattling off a list of other priorities such asa farm and infrastructure bill that she wants Congress to get done.

Maloney cautioned that its too soon to tell whether Russia will emerge as a more salient campaign issue. The facts may be so serious that they cannot be ignored, he said.

That uncertainty over whats going on with Russia is one reason some Democrats are finding it more helpful to talk abouthealth care.

Right now, the story is that something very troubling is happening in Washington, D.C. The middle and end of this story we just dont know yet, said a Democratic strategist who works on Senate campaigns.

The troubling aspects of the GOP health care plan, at least from the Democrats perspective, are much more clear-cut. And for a party largely ondefense in Senate races next year in states that Trump won (and where he remains popular), Democrats see health care as a strong offensive message, especially against their top two targets, Heller and Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake.

Earlier this year, the DSCC released non-skippable YouTube ads attacking the GOP health care plan for hurting older Americans and those with pre-existing conditions. Majority Forward, a nonprofit allied with Senate Majority PAC, also made health care the subject of its ads in Arizona and Nevada released earlier this year.

But Russia continues to dominate the news cycle.

At some level this is all a gift to Republicans because it takes focus off of this disastrous health care bill, Connecticut Sen. Christopher S. Murphy said Thursday.

So itll be up to Democratic groups to find ways to communicate their health care message to voters this summer.

Its important to let people know that as these investigations are going on, Trump and the Republicans are trying to pull the health care rug out from under the Americans, said Maryland Sen.Chris Van Hollen, the DSCC chairman.We need at least bifocals here.

The party can and should keep its eye on both things, said Jesse Ferguson, a veteran of the DCCC and Hillary Clintons campaign.

Its a false choice between talking about health care and talking about Russia, Ferguson said. In fact, he said, the two messages even amplify each other.

Democratic campaigns arent ignoring Russia completely, and with the liberal base motivated on the issue Indivisible and MoveOn.org both called for impeachment proceedings immediately after the Comey hearing they cant afford to.

The DCCC called on Republicans to support a bipartisan, independent committee to investigate Russias interference in our democracy after the Comey testimony. A smattering of Democratic House challengers released similar statements.

Russia is more salient in some districts than others. In its Thursday statement, the DCCCtook a shot at California GOP Rep. Devin Nunes, whose conduct in the Russian investigation has earned him a spot on the committees target list in 2018. Increased attention on Russia has also helped put the district of another California Republican, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher,on the map.

American Bridge, a liberal super PAC, is the rare Democratic outside group that has invested in paid communications on Russiathis year.

But its also beenvocal about health care. Its partnering with House Majority PAC on its Congressional Accountability Projectthis summer.

Make no mistake, pocketbook issues like health care ought to be front and center in Democratic messaging, American Bridge President Jessica Mackler said in an emailed statement. But Democrats can also walk and chew gum at the same time.

The Trump administrations Russia scandal must be investigated and Republicans who refuse to do their job and demand an independent investigation should be held accountable. We can do both, Mackler added.

Democrats see the Russia developments taking a toll on the presidents popularity and boosting their party inthe generic congressional ballot (with a longtime Democratic strategist pointing to the nearly 8-point edge his party has in FiveThirtyEights generic ballot tracker as a good sign for 2018).

In the end, the Trump administration, and their contortions and their lying about what happened, is feeding the perception they cant be trusted, Ferguson said. That perception makes it impossible for them to sell their health care agenda to the American people, he added.

Bridget Bowman contributed to this report.

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

Read the original here:
Democrats Stick to Health Care Message Amid Russian Intrigue - Roll Call

F-bombs could backfire on Democrats (opinion) – CNN.com – CNN

Three years and a Donald Trump presidential campaign later, the senator is less constrained about dropping so-called "f-bombs" in private or in public. Speaking to the Personal Democracy Forum last week, Gillibrand used the word twice. Last month in a New York Magazine interview, the senator dropped three f-bombs. She's not alone. Earlier this year, Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez, in a speech in which children were not just present but actually on stage, attacked President Trump as someone who "doesn't give a s*** about healthcare," while also saying "your g**damn right," Trump is a liar. Beto O'Rourke, the Texas Democratic Congressman challenging Sen. Ted Cruz accused Cruz of "sure as s*** not serving" his constituents. And Kamala Harris, the California Democratic senator, reportedly also used the f-word at a public event in San Francisco.

If this language is something of a new normal among Democratic politicians, their reactions represent a new normal, as well. In the past, politicians typically apologized for such language.

In part, that may be because past instances were mistakes, where a politician said the wrong thing while speaking passionately on an issue or opponent.

In today's Trump-changed political environment, this language is no mistake; it is intentional, calculated "spontaneity" designed to draw headlines and demonstrate outrage to similarly minded activists and donors -- using some of Trump's methodology to show their strong resistance to him.

After the titillating "sugar rush" these Democrats get from the sensationalism of using naughty words, there does not appear to be any substance behind it aside from projecting some sort of "authenticity" for speaking in the same way voters angry at Washington do. Democratic politicians using this language not only run the risk of distracting from their anti-Trump message, but may wind up looking like they're trying too hard, a phoniness voters can spot a mile away.

These were key messages Democrats used to ingrain into voters' minds that Trump was too callous and profane to serve as president.

Now? More and more Democrats appear to be in a non-stop limbo contest of words, knowing the lower they go, the more headlines and clicks they can get.

If anything, the number of Democrats following the example of their party leaders and potential 2020 candidates using this, and possibly other Trump tactics, will only increase.

That Trump's campaign and presidency has forever altered the Republican Party is seen as a given. Less discussed is how the Trump-era has already affected how Democrats campaign and how they are trying to use Trump's own tactics against him.

More here:
F-bombs could backfire on Democrats (opinion) - CNN.com - CNN

House Judiciary Democrats ask Sessions to confirm or deny Comey’s story – Washington Examiner

House Judiciary Committee Democrats asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday to confirm various comments former FBI Director James Comey made in a recent Senate hearing about incidents related to President Trump and Russia.

In a letter to Sessions, Ranking Member John Conyers and his Democratic colleagues stated Comey's "compelling testimony" about Trump's possible attempts to influence the Russian probe deserve further scrutiny.

"Given that you have now cancelled your scheduled appearance before the House and Senate appropriations committee a second time, and for the express purpose of avoiding questions about the Russia investigation the need for your public response is more pressing than ever," the committee wrote.

The Democrats asked Sessions about possible improper conduct by Trump, the extent of his disclosing meetings with Russian officials and if he has complied with his terms of recusal in the investigation.

The group is also concerned over Comey's claim that Trump asked Sessions to leave the Oval Office during a meeting of the three men on Feb. 14, as well as whether Trump asked Comey to drop the investigation into former national security adviser Mike Flynn.

Sessions was asked about Comey's reference to a potential additional meeting between himself and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak last year.

On Thursday, Comey testified he was "aware of facts that [he] can't discuss in an open setting that would make [Sessions'] continued engagement in a Russia-related investigation problematic."

The Judiciary Committee Democrats asked for responses by June 26. The request comes on the heels of Sessions' scheduled testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday.

More:
House Judiciary Democrats ask Sessions to confirm or deny Comey's story - Washington Examiner