Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Breakaway Democratic Group in State Senate Adds to Its Ranks – New York Times


New York Times
Breakaway Democratic Group in State Senate Adds to Its Ranks
New York Times
ALBANY The Independent Democratic Conference, whose collaboration with Republicans in the State Senate has allowed that party to control the chamber despite being outnumbered by Democrats, added an eighth member on Wednesday. By recruiting ...
Rift among NY Democrats grows againRochester Democrat and Chronicle
Queens State Senator Peralta Joins Independent Democratic ConferenceNY1
Another Democrat bolts from main Senate Democratic conferenceBuffalo News
DNAinfo -Olean Times Herald
all 13 news articles »

See original here:
Breakaway Democratic Group in State Senate Adds to Its Ranks - New York Times

Democrats, With Garland on Mind, Mobilize for Supreme Court Fight – New York Times


New York Times
Democrats, With Garland on Mind, Mobilize for Supreme Court Fight
New York Times
WASHINGTON Senate Democrats have one particular judge's name in mind as they await the identity of President Trump's Supreme Court nominee: Merrick B. Garland. Democrats and their allies remain furious that Senate Republicans refused to even ...
Democrats Want To Pick Their Battles With Trump. Their Base Wants All-Out War.Huffington Post
Democrats pitch $1T infrastructure plan - will Trump get on board?Fox News
Senate Democrats Propose $1 Trillion Infrastructure PlanNBCNews.com
TIME -Reuters -Washington Post
all 368 news articles »

Read the original:
Democrats, With Garland on Mind, Mobilize for Supreme Court Fight - New York Times

Analysis: Did Democrats Miss the Boat on the Women’s March? – NBCNews.com

People gather for the Women's March in Washington on Jan. 21. Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

In the weeks leading up the marches, many professional Democrats quietly lowered expectations in case they were not successful, given real concerns about the organization behind the events.

"At first there was reluctance to embrace from a lot of progressive organizations because it was not something that we were pulling together ourselves. Do we embrace or just let it happen?" said one official at a progressive group granted anonymity to speak candidly. "Quite frankly, it probably was successful because it wasn't organized by such and such Democratic group."

Turning that energy into a sustained, organized movement remains a challenge. But enthusiasm is often more valuable than infrastructure, as the 2016 election showed.

"The infrastructure does exist. It's just a question of plugging people in who are coming, perhaps for the first time this weekend, to understand what they can do," said Marcy Stech of Emily's List, the Democratic Women's group that hosted a training for 500 potential candidates after the march in Washington, D.C.

What's unclear is how many of those people will be funneled into the Democratic Party itself.

"People are looking for creative ways to take action and not necessarily wait to take marching orders," said Vicky Kaplan, the organizing director for MoveOn.org. "The Tea Party was very successful in getting people in their own party to choose sides."

The Tea Party movement sprung up organically after a defeat at the ballot box, then became more institutionalized by large "grass-tops" organizations like FreedomWorks and the Koch Brothers-funded Americans for Prosperity.

But it was always a double-edged sword for Republicans, as it fought a two-front war against both the Obama administration and the GOP establishment.

The Tea Party's leaderless independence was a source of its strength and credibility, said Leah Greenberg, a co-founder of "The Indivisible," a guide for progressive resistance to Trump, which looks at the conservative movement as a model. "You have to have some faith in people once they've been activated to figure out their own next steps," she said.

But that independence also made it impossible for the Republican Party to control, especially during contentious primary campaigns.

Tresa Undem, a pollster who has worked for reproductive rights and LGBT rights groups, said what's driving people to the streets is Trump and Republicans in Congress so the Democratic Party can only steer things so much.

"I'm not sure how much influence the Democratic party or progressive groups will have with controlling the momentum," she said. "They can tap into it, but I think the momentum has started and will end organically," she said.

This weekend's marches were far less confrontational or ideological than the Tea Party. But both were born and incubated outside the top professional ranks of their ideological movements.

The Tea Party was inspired by a rant from a TV commentator, while the march was sparked by a Facebook post from a grandmother in Hawaii and carried to fruition by a group of organizers with only limited affiliation to the Democratic establishment.

"This outpouring today is extraordinary and inspiring. But if all this energy isn't channeled into sustained pol action, it will mean little," former Obama advisor David Axelrod

In the end, major Democratic groups like Planned Parenthood did get onboard. And many members of Congress, governors, and other leaders proudly marched in Washington or their districts.

Now, many Democrats agree the party needs to let the marchers take the lead.

"Anyone who hopes to lead in either party needs to be listening to folks who turned out on Saturday...not capturing that energy but listening to it," said Ilyse Hogue, the President of NARAL Pro Choice, one of the sponsors of the event.

Despite Rep. Keith Ellison and former Labor Sec. Tom Perez, the two leading candidates for DNC Chair, echoed the point point, even though they missed the march.

"This weekend's marches showed us who really holds the power - the people," Ellison said. "And it proves to so many, including my own niece who invested so much during the election, that the Democratic Party must support and partner with the energetic activists we saw."

Perez said the party, "must keep up this energy and organize, organize, organize around our shared values of decency and equality while addressing the structural turnaround our party needs to support those efforts."

But it will be at least another month before either, or any of the other candidates, will have a chance to do that, as the national party waits until its next chair is elected in late February.

Read the original here:
Analysis: Did Democrats Miss the Boat on the Women's March? - NBCNews.com

Rauner and Democrats clash over State of the State – Chicago Tribune

Against the backdrop of a sharply divided and dysfunctional state government, Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner delivered his midterm State of the State address Wednesday saying he and other politicians have a "moral obligation" to fix Illinois.

But some Democrats, the majority party in the General Assembly that has opposed much of his agenda, questioned Rauner's morality in governing a state that has languished for more than 18 months without a full budget. In the meantime, safety net social programs have eroded at a time when gun violence in Chicago is rampant.

The governor addressed the city's violence in his speech a day after the issue was thrust further into the spotlight by a tweet from President Donald Trump. It warned if the city didn't get a handle on the problem, he would "send in the Feds!"

"The violence occurring in Chicago every night is intolerable. We cannot let it continue. We've got to bring it to an end," Rauner said.

He found his address ostensibly as a precursor to his campaign for re-election next year clouded by his fight with Democrats over spending plans.

Despite the lack of a high-profile, political bumper sticker-style signature achievement while budget progress remains stymied, Rauner sought to portray an optimistic tone for the state's future.

He touted moves that included increased ethics restrictions and more computerization in state government, as well as fewer punitive actions toward nonviolent offenders and programs to reduce children's exposure to lead. He even noted savings on paper and postage costs by digitizing applications and renewals for professional licensing.

"Despite the problems and uncertainties we face, I am deeply optimistic about the future of our beloved Illinois. We have big challenges, and like many of you, I'm frustrated by the slow pace of change in Springfield. But with great challenge comes great opportunity," Rauner said.

"All of us Republicans, Democrats and everyone in between have a moral obligation to work together to bring change. We, together, can return Illinois to a place of hope, opportunity and prosperity," he said.

Democrats, however, didn't share Rauner's optimism.

State Rep. Lou Lang of Skokie, a top deputy to Rauner political nemesis House Speaker Michael Madigan, said the governor "didn't say much" in his speech and "crowed about accomplishments that weren't his." Lang contended Democrats led the fight for more state funding for schools and changes in the criminal justice system.

Throughout his governorship, Rauner has pushed for pro-business, union-weakening changes in state laws as a condition for approving higher taxes likely needed to balance the state budget. Madigan and Democrats who control the legislature and are backed by unions and civil attorneys have opposed Rauner's agenda.

Madigan contended Rauner was pursuing an agenda that would reward "big corporations" at the expense of middle-class families. Madigan vowed a "thorough vetting process" of proposals to create jobs and boost wages, though he offered no specifics about that process.

Rauner, as he has often done in the past, called on lawmakers to send to voters proposed state constitutional amendments to limit politicians' terms and move to take much of the politics out of drawing legislative boundaries. Democratic lawmakers have rebuffed his calls.

And he said the state had made progress on three goals he set for his administration: improving ethics and efficiency, investing in education and making Illinois more competitive.

In speaking of Chicago's violence, Rauner made no mention of Trump. But he said in an interview earlier in the day on WGN 720-AM that he had not spoken to the president about the issue. The governor, however, said he had ruled out mobilizing the Illinois National Guard.

In his speech, the governor said he and the Illinois State Police "stand ready to do more" to assist the Chicago Police Department. State police patrol city expressways, which also have seen a surge in gun-related activity.

Rauner said there was "no single solution" to Chicago's gun violence and said a mix of policies "with a joint commitment between the city, the county, the state and the federal government" was required.

"Law enforcement plays a critical role in violence reduction but in the end, it's a treatment, not a cure," he said.

"Addressing the roots of this plague will take much more: to restore hope where hope has been lost, to build a long-term future of quality education and good jobs for communities that need it most. Tearing down the barriers to good jobs and economic opportunity. Getting rid of blight and incentivizing redevelopment. Making sure both the state and Chicago Public Schools treat low-income kids the same as high-income kids. Giving parents more choices and support to give their kids a world-class education. Putting vocational training back into our high schools so young people can see a clear path to a career rather than falling victim to the gang recruiters," he said.

Democrats countered that it was Rauner's refusal to negotiate a budget separate from his political agenda that's led to widespread cuts in child care, higher education and human service programs that has helped feed the city's violence.

"I thought overall it was just an incredibly tone-deaf speech. It's tough to hear the governor cry crocodile tears when I would argue he has blood on his hands with all the anti-violence programs he's cut since he was here," said Rep. Christian Mitchell, D-Chicago.

"Cuts to mental health, cuts to Medicaid, look at the savage cuts to higher education, which leads to more kids at home without the prospect of a job or future, then maybe turning to drugs and crime," he said.

But House Republican leader Jim Durkin of Western Springs, a former assistant Cook County prosecutor, said the city needs to have "a greater, strong law enforcement presence in certain areas, strategic areas."

"There's been a lot of piling on police officers throughout the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago. We need to stop. They need the ability to do their work," Durkin said.

Rauner's speech came as an effort by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton and Senate Republican leader Christine Radogno to ambitiously advance a blueprint for ending the state's budget stalemate stalled the day before.

The complex package, including tax increases and a two-year property tax freeze, as well as workers' compensation changes aimed at helping businesses and a new plan to alter state worker pensions, met with heavy opposition from an alliance of business and unions.

Republican Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, a top assistant to Radogno, said GOP senators don't believe a two-year property-tax freeze is enough to offset other tax hikes and want business groups to support the package they've opposed so far.

The governor went off his prepared script to encourage senators to continue working.

"Thank you for working so hard to try to come together on a bipartisan basis to find a compromise to get a truly balanced budget with changes to the system to help job creators and protect taxpayers," he said.

"We all know this is very, very difficult. There's a lot of arrows. Please don't give up. Please keep working. Please keep trying. The people of Illinois need you to succeed. Thank you," Rauner said.

Chicago Tribune's Haley BeMiller contributed.

rap@aol.com

mcgarcia@chicagotribune.com

Visit link:
Rauner and Democrats clash over State of the State - Chicago Tribune

How The Democratic Party Can Get Back Into The Game – Forbes


Forbes
How The Democratic Party Can Get Back Into The Game
Forbes
Democrats have ceded the term party of the people to the Republicans (or at least to nobody at all). The Democrats are indeed seen as Eastern or Western establishment, coastal, metropolitan, and campus-based. While the party has a substantial ...

and more »

Continued here:
How The Democratic Party Can Get Back Into The Game - Forbes