Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Tom Brokaw advises Democrats not to block Gorsuch: ‘Why pick that as a fight?’ – TheBlaze.com

Former NBCNews anchor Tom Brokaw advised the Democratic Party on Friday against tryingto block President Donald Trumps nominee to the Supreme Court, U.S. Circuit Court Judge Neil Gorsuch.

During during a panel discussion on MSNBCs Morning Joe about recent violent protests at the University of California, Berkeley, Brokaw notedthat rage is not a policy.

Youve got to figure out what you want to do, Brokaw said. For example, there is going to be a big pushback about Judge Gorsuch on the part of the Democrats, theyre going to make that one of their testing places for them.

He said that Gorsuch has a very distinguished background in the judicial world.

I have friends in the federal judiciary who dont agree with his philosophy but say there is not a better judge in the federal circuit right now than him, so why pick that as a fight? Brokaw said. Because who are you going to get next?

NBCs Katy Tur concurred, saying that the party should choose its battles more wisely rather than opposing anything Republicans do.

Brokaw said the party should re-evaluate its strategy:

The other thing is the Democrats have a lot of reconstruction to do of their own party, and that is what they ought to be thinking about, and that is where they should be beginning. They should be out in the middle of America saying what do we need to know from you? rather than sitting in Washington reelecting Nancy Pelosi after they lost the House three different times.

See the original post here:
Tom Brokaw advises Democrats not to block Gorsuch: 'Why pick that as a fight?' - TheBlaze.com

Can the Democrats Be as Stubborn as Mitch McConnell? – New York Times


New York Times
Can the Democrats Be as Stubborn as Mitch McConnell?
New York Times
In laying the groundwork recently for President Trump's nomination for the Supreme Court, Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, had this to say: What we hope would be that our Democratic friends will treat President Trump's nominees in the same ...
Liberals To Senate Democrats: (Don't) Do Your JobsNPR
How Progressives Are Forcing Senate Democrats Into ActionThe Atlantic
Democrats boycott controversial EPA nominee Scott Pruitt's committee confirmation voteWashington Post
U.S. News & World Report -Los Angeles Times
all 1,768 news articles »

Read the original post:
Can the Democrats Be as Stubborn as Mitch McConnell? - New York Times

Democrats face their powerlessness – CNN

But as Democrats throw every procedural hurdle they can think of at Trump, they're facing a bleak reality: they have virtually no power in Washington.

The party has no clear successor to Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton who can speak with one voice for the party. And there is no consensus yet on a strategy to thwart Trump's legislative agenda -- or even how to prioritize the issues they plan to challenge him on.

There's one thing giving them comfort: Trump himself. The President's initial actions in office have been so breathtaking in their scope and breadth that frustrated Democrats say their base is galvanized in ways they haven't seen in a long time. That could make it easier for Democratic groups to gear up for a more forceful effort to sway the balance of power in 2018 and 2020.

Hilary Rosen, a Democratic strategist and CNN contributor, said there was lull after the November election, in part because many Democrats were legitimately shocked at Trump's win. At that time, Democratic congressional leaders were still debating whether it was more advantageous to try to work with the President on some areas, rather than to risk appearing obstructionist by trying to block him at every turn.

But they were emboldened, Rosen said, not only by their early success in stalling Trump's vow to immediately repeal Obama's health care law, but also by the unexpected energy of the crowds at womens' marches last month and the protests against the immigration ban around the country.

"It underscored that there was a large community of dissenters out there -- it came from the ground up and the leadership sort of jumped on top of it," Rosen said.

The final straw, she said, was Trump's hastily announced travel ban, which was criticized as a religious test.

"It cemented the left's view that we are not going to work with this guy -- the idea that this is not going to be someone we can appease; who we can compromise with. The base won't allow it," Rosen said. "I think what we've seen is the left and the center left kind of merge. ... There's not going to be any tolerance for the middle ground."

One early test of the strength of the resistance will be Trump's nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

There is disagreement among the Democratic ranks in the Senate about whether to pursue a filibuster that would require 60 votes for the nomination to advance -- a threshold the GOP can't reach on its own. But Republican leaders could respond by simply getting rid of the filibuster entirely, which would leave Democrats even weaker if Trump were to nominate a future justice who could change the court's balance of power.

The weak hand of Democrats was also on display Wednesday morning when Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee quashed their attempt to boycott two Trump Cabinet nominees, Steve Mnuchin for Treasury secretary and Rep. Tom Price to be secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Democrats did manage to temporarily delay the confirmation process of EPA nominee Scott Pruitt by boycotting his committee vote on Wednesday.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer called the boycott attempts "childish" and "a disservice to the American people."

As they forge a strategy to take back congressional seats in 2018 and 202, the most hopeful signs for Democrats may be beyond the Beltway, said former Obama aide Tommy Vietor.

Scores of demonstrators who turned out for the marches supporting womens' and immigrant rights were protesting for the first time. That fresh enthusiasm has helped ease some of the disappointment and disillusionment among Democrats about their losses in November.

"Suddenly the idea of protesting is becoming normalized," said Vietor, who co-hosts the podcast "Pod Save America." "That's the really hopeful thing for people who are opposed to Trump. They are trying to learn the lesson of the (2016) campaign. They're not pretending that social media activism is going to cut it."

The hope, Vietor said, is that sustained protests will draw attention to what he views as the Trump administration's "incompetence." And if the president's unpopularity grows, he thinks Republican members of Congress will be less eager to support his agenda.

Buffy Wicks, a Democratic strategist who was an early field organizer for then-candidate Barack Obama in 2008 and was one of his senior aides in 2012, said there has been an unusual confluence of three factors: first time activists taking to the streets, criticism of Trump policies by business leaders who normally stay out of the fray and "huge surges in members and donations" for established Democratic organizations.

"We are in a super unique moment in time," said Wicks. "The important part is for us now to take that energy and make sure we're funneling it in the right way in 2018 and 2020. That's how you actually make change, you have to translate that energy into electoral power."

Legal resistance to Trump's actions is also growing, and already has octopus-like tentacles with different groups seeking to unravel or block the most controversial aspects of his executive actions.

Immigration lawyers from the ACLU and other groups acted swiftly Friday night after Trump released his executive order limiting immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries. A federal judge blocked part of the order on Saturday, preventing the removal of some individuals who arrived at airports after the order was issued. Lawsuits were also filed in a number of other states.

Members of the California Legislature, which is dominated by Democrats, have retained former Attorney General Eric Holder, promising to challenge any Trump policy that threatens the state's progressive actions on issues like climate change.

San Francisco officials argue in the lawsuit that "in blatant disregard of the law, the President of the United States seeks to coerce local authorities" into abandoning their sanctuary city laws and policies.

They called Trump's executive order "a severe invasion of San Francisco's sovereignty" and argued that the Executive Branch "may not commandeer state and local officials to enforce federal law."

"This strikes at the heart of established principles of federalism and violates the U.S. constitution," the lawsuit says.

Go here to see the original:
Democrats face their powerlessness - CNN

Senate Republicans Bypass Another Boycott By Democrats To Advance EPA Nominee – NPR

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt at a Jan. 18 Senate Environment and Public Works Committee confirmation hearing for his nomination to lead the EPA. Pruitt's nomination passed in committee Thursday. He will still need to be confirmed by the full Senate. Bloomberg/Bloomberg via Getty Images hide caption

Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt at a Jan. 18 Senate Environment and Public Works Committee confirmation hearing for his nomination to lead the EPA. Pruitt's nomination passed in committee Thursday. He will still need to be confirmed by the full Senate.

For the second time in as many days, a Senate committee's GOP leadership has bypassed a boycott by Democrats to advance President Trump's Cabinet nominees.

The Democrats on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee boycotted the second meeting in a row to confirm Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA.

Committee rules say that two members of the minority party must be present for a vote, but chairman John Barrasso, R-Wyo., suspended the rules so Pruitt's nomination could pass the committee with only Republican votes, and he passed 11-0. Pruitt will still need to be confirmed by the full Senate, which appears likely. A Democratic aide from the EPW committee says they recognize that the move is "allowable under Senate rules" even if it's unprecedented for the committee.

Upon reconvening the committee, Barrasso said: "It is disappointing that they chose that course of action. We will not allow it to obstruct."

Hearings on Trump's nominee to run the Office of Management and Budget, Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C., were moving ahead Thursday morning.

Pruitt has faced fierce opposition from Democrats. He sued the EPA as Oklahoma's attorney general and was asked during his confirmation hearing on Jan. 18 by Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., whether he would recuse himself from cases he was a part of. Pruitt's response was that he would "follow the guidance and counsel" of ethics lawyers at EPA, which was not a satisfying answer for Democrats.

Democrats say they have not received full answers on Pruitt's record and positions. The committee's ranking member, Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., sent a letter to Barrasso on Monday requesting more records from Pruitt's time as Oklahoma attorney general, as well as more complete answers on his positions regarding clean air and water regulations.

"It's unacceptable and sets a dangerous precedent for the committee to allow him to stonewall on these important questions," said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., in a statement from committee Democrats after the vote on Thursday.

"This committee has conducted an extremely thorough and fair process of reviewing attorney general Pruitt's nomination," Barrasso said on Thursday. "That includes a hearing of unprecedented length, number of questions and timely responses from the nominee."

In the past, Pruitt has questioned climate change. Here's what the EPA nominee told senators at his confirmation hearing: "Let me say to you, science tells us that the climate is changing and that human activity in some matter impacts that change. The ability to measure with precision the degree and extent of that impact, and what to do about it, are subject to continuing debate and dialogue. And well it should be."

Democrats boycotted a hearing to vote on Pruitt's nomination Wednesday. Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee did the same to block votes on Trump's nominees to lead the Department of the Treasury as well as Health and Human Services earlier this week. On Wednesday, Finance Committee chairman Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, suspended committee rules to approve those nominees without Democrats present.

Delaying nominees is the most Democrats can do. Due to rule changes in recent years, Cabinet positions can clear the Senate with a simple majority, as opposed to the 60-vote threshold required on most legislation and Supreme Court nominees setting up a big fight in the months ahead of Trump's nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to replace the late Antonin Scalia.

There is growing frustration among some Democratic voters that their leaders are not doing enough to block nominees. At a rally held Monday night by congressional Democrats to protest Trump's executive order to pause the entry of refugees from all nations and immigrants from seven majority-Muslim countries, some in the crowd demanded action in addition to the words being offered. "That's just like the Republicans did for Obama, only this time with a good cause. They should really be fighting for everything they can do to hold up the administration," Tom Johnson of College Park, Md., told NPR.

In addition to boycotting committee votes, Democrats have delayed other Cabinet nominees on the Senate floor. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was confirmed Wednesday night after Democrats forced two full days of deliberation.

Without the filibuster, Democrats have been unable to block any Trump nominees so far. The only one that looks to be in serious trouble is Betsy DeVos, the nominee to lead the Department of Education. An advocate of school choice, she lost the support of Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska on Wednesday. She has no support from Democrats, and if one more Republican opposes DeVos she will not be able to be confirmed.

See more here:
Senate Republicans Bypass Another Boycott By Democrats To Advance EPA Nominee - NPR

Planned Parenthood and the Democrats – FactCheck.org

The president of Planned Parenthood says the group is willing to talk to Republicans about threats to its federal funding because [at] Planned Parenthood, were nonpartisan. In fact, the groups political action committee gave 98 percent of its campaign contributions in the 2016 election to Democrats.

The groups president, Cecile Richards, alsospoke at the Democratic National Convention in support of the partys 2016 presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton. Lets go win this election! she told Democrats.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., receives federal funding for health care services, but that funding is in jeopardy. House Speaker Paul Ryan announced last month that the House would move to defund Planned Parenthood as part of legislation to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

Planned Parenthoods funding has long been a target of Republicans over the groups abortion services. As we have noted before, the Hyde Amendmentlimitsfederal funding to only abortion cases involving rape, incest or endangerment to the life of the mother. Abortions accounted for about 3 percent of the groups total of nearly 9.5 million services in fiscal year 2014, according to itsannual report. Most of its health services were for contraception, treatment and tests for sexually transmitted diseases and infections, cancer screenings, and other womens health services.

Richardstouted the groups nonpartisan status during a Feb. 2 interview on MSNBCs Morning Joe. MikaBrzezinski, the shows co-host, asked Richards about the threat of losing federal funding, and whether the group was willing to negotiate with Republican President Donald Trumps administration.

Brzezinski, Feb. 2: But you realize you have to cut a deal of some sort with this new administration in some way? Would you come to the table?

Richards: Were always at the table. I mean we talk to everybody. I mean because Planned Parenthood, were nonpartisan.

Richards is the presidentof thePlanned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., which is a tax-exempt corporation under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3)and prohibited from political activities and making campaign contributions. She is also the president of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, which is the political arm of PPFA. Planned Parenthood Action Fund is registered as a 501(c)(4), which is a social welfare organization that is allowed to engage in political activity.

The Planned Parenthood Action Fund PAC, which is registered with theFederal Election Commission, contributed about $694,000 to congressional candidates in the 2016 cycle, and 98 percent of that went to Democratic candidates, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks federal campaign contributions.

The group also contributed $9,613 to Clintons presidential campaign. Richards, as we mention, spoke in support of Clinton at the Democratic National Convention. The daughter of former Democratic Texas Gov. Ann Richards, Cecile Richards told Democrats at the convention how proud her mother would be to see a woman elected president.

Richards, July 26, 2016:Tonight, we are closer than ever to putting a woman in the White House. And I can almost hear mom saying, Well, it sure took yall long enough. So what do you say? Are you ready to make history? Lets go win this election.

Richards support for Clinton and the PACs contributions to Democrats is not surprising given that many congressional Republicans oppose abortion rights and seek to defund Planned Parenthood. And we understand the point that Planned Parenthood Federation of America is a nonpartisan provider of health care services. But the groups leader and its PAC are not nonpartisan.

Continue reading here:
Planned Parenthood and the Democrats - FactCheck.org