Mediaboss Marketing

Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington and ranking member of the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, makes an opening statement during a hearing in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Top Democratic senators revealed a new online privacy bill Tuesday that could mark a milestone in the lengthy push for a federal privacy law and would strengthen the Federal Trade Commission's ability to enforce digital privacy protections.

Washington Sen. Maria Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, is leading the charge for the new bill as Congress has struggled to come to a consensus on what to include in federal privacy legislation.

Cantwell in a press release likened the bill's protections to "Miranda rights" for digital consumers. The bill would grant citizens the right to request their information from companies and ask for data to be deleted or corrected. It would also make companies responsible for getting permission to collect and share sensitive data, which includes biometric information and precise locations. Companies must not collect more information than they reasonably need to function under the bill's proposals.

Cantwell's legislation addresses two sticking points in privacy discussions that may stir up pushback from Republicans and tech companies. The proposal would allow for states to continue to issue their own privacy laws and give citizens a private right of action to bring their own lawsuits. The Commerce Committee is set to discuss privacy legislation proposals at a December hearing.

"The legislation released today reflects where the Democrats want to go," said Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the chairman of the Commerce Committee, in a statement. "But any privacy bill will need bipartisan support to become law. I am committed to continuing to work with the ranking member and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to get a bill that can get across the finish line. I expect that we will have a bill to discuss at next week's hearing."

Cantwell's bill, which is also sponsored by Sens. Ed Markey, D-Mass., Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, is not the first privacy bill to be floated in Congress. In the House, for example, two Silicon Valley congresswomen recently introduced a bill that goes beyond some of the measures in California's new privacy legislation. California's privacy law goes into effect in January and may serve as a testing ground for privacy ideas on the federal level.

The new Senate bill, dubbed the "Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act" or "COPRA" is significant because of Cantwell's standing on the Commerce Committee, which is heavily involved in tech issues. The committee has held hearings on automated vehicles, cybersecurity and social media in the wake of Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal. It also has oversight of the Federal Communications Commission.

The proposal would also further strengthen the Federal Trade Commission, which has been ridiculed by Democrats over its privacy settlements with Facebook and Google's YouTube this year, which some claimed were too weak to prevent further wrongdoing. Rather than create a new federal agency, as the Democratic House bill proposes, Cantwell's legislation would create a new bureau within the FTC to handle digital privacy enforcement. The bill mandates that bureau be fully staffed and operational within two years of its enactment.

State attorneys general could also enforce the federal law, as well as their state laws. Relief under the federal legislation would funnel into a consumer relief fund, according to the proposal.

The bill also places greater responsibility on company executives to ensure their adherence to digital privacy protections. Beginning one year after the law's enactment, CEOs of companies that hold large amounts of data would have to certify to the FTC on a yearly basis that they have "adequate internal controls" and reporting structures to comply with the law.

For tech companies, federal privacy legislation has been a top priority as Congress' stalemate has motivated states to take the matter into their own hands. Tech leaders have warned of the potential for fragmented platforms if states continue to impose varied standards, which would likely be more costly and less efficient for companies to comply with. Cantwell's proposal would not necessarily provide the relief tech companies have been looking for, as it would still allow states to enact and enforce their own privacy laws.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been among the tech leaders urging congressional leaders to move forward on federal regulation. Zuckerberg met with several representatives in September to discuss "future internet regulation" in closed-door meetings, a Facebook spokesperson said at the time.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH: Why Facebook's business model is only now coming under fire

Read more:
Senate Democrats reveal new digital privacy bill that would strengthen the FTC's enforcement powers over tech companies - CNBC

Despite such caps and advances in public financing long a goal of progressive activists officials with good government groups were left shaking their heads at how the commission arrived at its decisions after fractious public hearings and what they say were secret back-room negotiations.

The public hasnt seen any language. This commission has been operating largely out of sight, and it appears that the only feedback they react to is from governor and legislative leaders, said Blair Horner, the executive director of the New York Public Interest Research Group.

Indeed, the commission often seemed to be changing its mind on issues mid-thought: At one point on Monday morning, the panel rejected a proposal to raise the contribution limit for races in the Assembly. Minutes later, after the arrival of one of Mr. Cuomos appointees, Mylan L. Denerstein, the commission took up the proposal again and passed it.

In one victory for small parties, the commission did not eliminate so-called fusion voting, which allows candidates to collect votes on multiple lines, including third parties, thus helping those parties meet the thresholds for staying on the ballot.

As the groups deadline approached and third parties existential anxieties peaked, Senator Chuck Schumer, along with three New York Congress members, urged the panel to leave the practice alone. Mr. Cuomo had expressed measured support as well, saying he had benefited from fusion voting, which is allowed in only a handful of other states.

Leaders of the state Conservative Party, which seemed better positioned to survive a new 2 percent threshold, nonetheless also attacked the commission, questioning its constitutional authority.

This is a classic example of government engineering a crisis and then presenting an impossibly bureaucratic solution to it on the backs of taxpayers, the party chairman, Gerard Kassar, said in a statement.

Go here to see the original:
Democrats Plan Will Suppress Third Parties in New York - The New York Times

Attorney General William Barr discussing the counting of citizens in the country and the legal issues surrounding that effort, behind him stands Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, in the Rose Garden at the White House.

Michael Brochstein | LightRocket | Getty Images

The House Oversight Committee filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross over the Trump officials' refusal to turn over documents related to the administration's decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

"President Trump and his aides are not above the law," Committee Chairwoman Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said in a statement. "They cannot be allowed to disregard and degrade the authority of Congress to fulfill our core Constitutional legislative and oversight responsibilities."

The Supreme Court effectively killed the administration's plans to add the question in June, reasoning that the official reason provided was a pretext. The administration argued that the question was needed in order to better enforce certain provisions of the Voting Rights Act.

The committee's lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Washington, D.C. and asks the court to force the two top officials to comply with congressional subpoenas. The Justice Department declined to comment.

A spokesperson for the Commerce Department said in an email that the lawsuit was "fueled by overzealous Oversight Democrats" and "lacks merit."

"Moreover, the Department of Commerce has cooperated in good faith with the Committee," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson said the department made more than 2,000 documents available to the committee and "submitted hundreds of pages of additional documents since the Supreme Court's decision."

The lawsuit follows a vote in June to hold both Barr and Ross in contempt of Congress. At the time, Barr and Ross issued a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., urging her to postpone the vote because the materials sought by the committee were protected. Trump has asserted that the documents are covered by executive privilege.

In their lawsuit, the Democrats wrote that Barr and Ross "have identified no valid privilege that would justify their refusal to comply."

"Their unlawful withholding of information is injuring the Committee in carrying out two critical constitutional functions: conducting effective oversight of the Executive Branch and its officials, who have provided false testimony to Congress and misled Congress and the American public; and determining whether legislation is necessary, potentially on an emergency basis, to ensure the integrity of the 2020 Census," they wrote.

Earlier this month, Maloney issued a memorandum to the committee that said that the panel's investigation had collected evidence that the administration "may have been trying to stop immigrants from being counted in the Census or in legislative districts, which one Republican operative concluded would be 'advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites.'"

Trump backed down from his efforts to add a citizenship question to the census following the Supreme Court's decision, but said he would press on to obtain the information by other means.

During a July address, Trump said he ordered "every department and agency in the federal government to provide the Department of Commerce with all requested records regarding the number of citizens and non-citizens in our country."

"We will utilize these vast federal databases to gain a full, complete, and accurate count of the non-citizen population, including databases maintained by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration," he said.

Link:
House Democrats file lawsuit against William Barr and Wilbur Ross for refusing to hand over census docs - CNBC

Scott Jennings, Opinion contributor Published 11:20 a.m. ET Nov. 26, 2019

In 2016, Donald Trumps message of busting political correctness won him the White House. Rejecting the Democratic Partys identity politics run amok was a sneaky good strategy, working like a charm among working-class voters in Americas heartland. Trump, though he had just become a Republican five minutes ago, better sensed than the partys established leaders the emotional needs of rank-and-file Republicans.

For all his faults, this is Trumps superpower sensing cultural undercurrents and reflecting the emotions of histarget audience. He often says what regular folks are thinking but dont feel they are allowed to verbalize.

Today, a great many Americans feel angst about their children inheriting a country that allows for the indiscriminate destruction of reputations via cancel culture and promotes narratives over truths in the name of political correctness. In 2020, Trump can rekindle his old strategy by giving voice to these concerns to overcome serious political headwinds.

Scott Jennings: How Beshear deals with GOP will decide if term is Kentucky Democrats' last gasp

Extreme uneasinessexists in middle America over cancel culture, the practice of journalists and woke activists unearthing old utterances of celebrities, athletes, and even some regular peoplefor the purpose of embarrassing them and ruining their lives.

Do some human beings say or tweet dumb things? Yes. Does it often happen when a person is younger, less experienced in the world and not enlightened enough to know that at some point in the future someone might find their thoughtless tweet offensive? You bet.

If theres anyone in America who could rally the canceled to his cause, it's Trump, who faces cancellation attempts every day. Heck, several Democrats have proposed taking his twitter feed for violating the platforms terms of service.

But thats the point why should we tolerate a society in which a group of inquisitors is given carte blanche to silence people they dont like, banish political thoughts that arent welcome in liberal enclavesand ruin peoples lives over things uttered years ago? Never one to eschew affiliation with the controversial, Trump is uniquely positioned to make this a voting issue in 2020.

In Washington, D.C., when a 12-year-old African American girl claimed that three white boys at her private Christian school pinned her down and shaved her dreadlocks, the media predictably fell for it hook, line and sinker, demanding answers of Vice President Mike Pences wife, Karen, who teaches at the school.

The account was too perfect for media types who crave stories confirming their own political biases: white-on-black violence, Christian school, connection to Trump. Instead of seeking the truth, however, the media just as it did with the Covington Catholic and Jussie Smollett stories was blinded by a narrative instead of approaching the fantastical claim with caution.

After a few days, the little girl confessed to making it up. I dont blame her; in America these days, a good narrative is better than the truth when you want attention. Just ask the liberal politicians seeking the Democratic nomination for president.

Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris, for instance, falsely tweeted a debunked allegation that Michael Brown was murdered by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, never mind that President Barack Obamas Department of Justice disproved the hands up, dont shoot narrative long ago. In doing so, Warren and Harriscravenly served their political ends without regard for the societal damage done by spreading falsehoods on such tragic stories.

Scott Jennings: Trump's no angel, but liberals with their ugly threats have become what they claim to hate

Warrens use of false narrativesextends to her own origin story, which now includes multiple fabrications including that she is Native American and was once fired from a teaching job for getting pregnant. Last week, she misled a voter about sending her children to private school (she did, but claimed she didnt).

Scott Jennings, columnist(Photo: photo courtesy Scott Jennings)

Warren is not a woman of color, despite allowing employers to describe her as such, nor was she fired in the 1970s for becoming pregnant, according to recently discovered school board documents. But being a plain old white woman who declines job offers and is wealthy enough to send her kids to private school doesnt sell in todays Democratic Party, so she conjured a put-upon alter ego and rocketed to the top of the primary field.

No wonder our kids are inventing plights of their very own.

Americans are rightly worried about their children inheriting a sick culture. President Trump can jujitsu his political problems by relentlessly focusing on the need to defeat this cancer; hell get a lot of Amens in flyover country (think Pennsylvania, Michiganand Wisconsin) if he does, and no Democratic contender has the wherewithal to stop him.

Scott Jennings is a Republican adviser, CNN political commentator and partner at RunSwitch Public Relations. He can be reached at scott@RunSwitchPR.com and on Twitter @ScottJenningsKY. His firm represented Nicholas Sandmann in the aftermath of the Covington Catholic story.

Read or Share this story: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/opinion/2019/11/26/donald-trump-can-beat-democrats-and-their-false-narratives-race/4295360002/

View post:
Opinion: Trump can use his 'superpower' to defeat Democrats and their false narratives - Courier Journal

A top Democratic campaign consultant and former pollster for President Bill Clinton is pleading with partyleaders to abandon plans to vote on the impeachment of President Trumpor risk electoral disaster.

In an interview on "Fox and Friends" last week, Trump predicted that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi D-Calif., would not see the impeachmentprocess through to a vote.

"No, I dont expect it,"he said at the conclusion of two weeks of impeachment hearings, "I think its very hard for them to impeach you when they have absolutely nothing."

The Hill reportedon Saturday that aHouse Democratic leadership aidecalled it fantasy land to think that there wouldn't be a vote on the House floor.

Democratic strategist Doug Schoen suggested that he hopes that the president is right.

"I am praying for censure. It canturn what could be a loss into a certain victory," he said,arguing thatPelosishould forgo impeachment and instead vote to publicly reprimand the president.

"While the Democratic electorate is almost unanimously in favor of impeachment, swing voters in swing states... are decidedly mixed, if not negative,"the polling expert explained on Fox Nation's "Deep Dive."

"And given that states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Florida -- ones the Democrats have to win in some combination to win the presidential election, it's hard for me to see that impeachment is anything but a very problematic issue for the party," he argued.

Paradoxically, Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett, who has been harshly critical of the Democrats' impeachment effort, said that he hopesthat the House votes and moves theprocess to the Senate.

"I'm praying for a trial because it will boomerang terribly on the Democrats and only ensure the president's reelection come November," said Jarrett.

"Let's start exposing some of these malignant actions by people, not just [House Intelligence Committee Chairman]Adam Schiff, and the whistleblower, but others involved in this as well," Jarrett contended. "This is the witch hunt, the sequel. And it's ten times as preposterous as the original Trump/Russian collusion hoax."

COULD PELOSI ABANDON IMPEACHMENT EFFORTS?: LEGAL ANALYST PREDICTS SHE MAY

Jarrett argued that if the Senate wereto take up a trial of the president,Republicans would be in a position to raise questions over former Vice President Joe Biden's involvementin Ukraine policy, as well as his sonHunter's work with a notoriously corrupt Ukrainian company.

'There's an old saying -- the recoil is more dangerous than the projectile. And the recoil here is Hunter Biden and Joe Biden," continued Jarrett. "Ithink the more we find out about the machinations of Hunter Biden, who appears increasingly like a prodigious grifter, this is only going to damage his father in his quest to become the next president of United States. I mean, Lindsey Graham is vowing an investigation of the activities of Hunter Biden and by implication, Joe Biden's actions in a quid pro quo."

Schoen agreed with Jarrett that Joe and Hunter Biden's behavior appeared to have been wildly inappropriate.

"The idea that Burisma,Hunter Biden and Joe Biden didn't know what was going on is ridiculous," said Schoen. "To me,Joe Biden turned the other cheek, turned the other eye,put a bag over his head, whatever. Why did he do that? He had a troubled son who landed a big, lucrative gig, and he was hoping against hope that he could skate through. Well, we're seeing now that that's not the case. I don't know that there was anything that was done that was illegal. It sure smells and it smells really bad."

Schoen concluded that his party may regret devoting so much time and energy to the impeachment process.

"I also think that we Democrats are losing a huge opportunity because on issues like gun violence prevention, climate change, health care, we have an advantage. We won the midterm elections in 2018 because of the utilization and in part of those issues. And to not take advantage of what people care about, which is real-world day to day problems of our quality of life, and instead, just keep focusing on impeachment. If I were recommending to the Democrats what to do. I'd say vote for censure, get it and move on."

To watch all of"Deep Dive"go toFox Nationand sign up today.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR A FOX NATION FREE TRIAL

Fox Nationprograms are viewable on-demand and from your mobile device app, but only for Fox Nation subscribers.Go to Fox Nationto start a free trial and watch the extensive library from Tomi Lahren, Pete Hegseth, Abby Hornacek, Laura Ingraham, Ainsley Earhardt, Greg Gutfeld, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many more of your favorite Fox News personalities.

Read more here:
Top Democratic strategist pleads with party to abandon impeachment - Fox News