Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Democrats Demand Inquiry of Russian Role in US Affairs; GOP Concern Grows – New York Times


Chicago Tribune
Democrats Demand Inquiry of Russian Role in US Affairs; GOP Concern Grows
New York Times
WASHINGTON The stunning resignation of Michael T. Flynn as White House national security adviser has emboldened congressional Democrats to demand a broader investigation into President Trump's ties to Russia and compelled a small group of ...
After Flynn resigns, Democrats ask what did Trump know and whenChicago Tribune
Flynn resigns, Democrats reactCBS News
Democrats want answers on Michael Flynn and RussiaChristian Science Monitor
TIME -ABC News -Mother Jones -Washington Post
all 3,275 news articles »

Original post:
Democrats Demand Inquiry of Russian Role in US Affairs; GOP Concern Grows - New York Times

Alabama House Democrats filibuster pro-Trump resolution – Montgomery Advertiser

The Alabama House of RepresentativesTuesday passed a resolution urging Congress to enact Donald Trumps agenda, but not before a three-hour filibuster from Democrats in the chamber.

Rep. Juandalynn Givan during discussion on the house floor in the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Ala. on Tuesday February 14, 2017.(Photo: Mickey Welsh / Advertiser)

Sponsored by Rep. Barry Moore, R-Enterprise, the resolution urges Congress to adopt what it calls the presidents ambitious government reform agenda, including stricter immigration laws, the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and confirmation of Trumps picks for his cabinet and the federal courts.

Those ambitions have sparked fury from many Democrats around the country. House Democrats Tuesday greeted Moores resolution with criticism and, sometimes, incredulity.

Has Congress ever done anything we asked them in a resolution to do? asked Rep. Marcel Black, D-Tuscumbia.

In a state where Trump easily won the Republican presidential primary and, in November, the states nine electoral votes, the 72 to 31 margin of passage was no surprise. Moore, the only Republican to speak during the lengthy filibuster, said he believed the presidents agenda would help the states economy.

I think the president understands what it takes in that market environment to create jobs, he said.

Democrats who took the floor launched a broad attack on Trump, with many speakers referring to the resignation of Michael Flynn, the presidents first national security adviser, amid questions about his contacts with a Russian ambassador. Rep. John Rogers, D-Birmingham, called Trump a danger to the security of the country, saying your own top security person can be blackmailed by the KGB.

Others suggested the resolution was a waste of time or criticized Trump for what they characterized as attacks on American society.

Mr. Trump wants to take away life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, said Rep. Thomas Jackson, D-Thomasville.

Rep. John Knight, D-Montgomery, echoed Blacks criticisms, noting that many legislators planned to oppose Gov. Robert Bentleys $800 million prison construction proposal.

How would you feel if Congress asked you to support everything a Republican governor did in Alabama? he asked.

The resolution was part of the Alabama House Republican Caucus priority agenda for the 2017 session.

Read or Share this story: http://on.mgmadv.com/2lhuH5W

See original here:
Alabama House Democrats filibuster pro-Trump resolution - Montgomery Advertiser

This is why Democrats lose in ‘rural’ postindustrial America – The … – Washington Post

By Jonathan Rodden By Jonathan Rodden February 14 at 8:00 AM

This is the second of two posts. Read the first one here.

As they try to understand what happened in November 2016 in the industrial heartland, Democratic strategists are focusing on the rural and small-town demographic.

In my earlier post I suggested that voters in rural areas and small industrial towns are often two rather distinct demographic groups that should not be conflated. Yes, Democratic candidates lost votes in both postindustrial towns and their surrounding rural environs. But their losses were especially dramatic in the latter, while they still have pockets of support in the former. In larger towns with an industrial history or a university (or both), Democrats still win majorities.

If Democrats try to reacquaint themselves with rural America as part of a strategy for winning back the pivotal postindustrial states, they must also come to grips with another important difference between town and countryside: turnout.

[Democrats policies are more popular. But Republicans are more ideologically unified.]

In postindustrial town centers, where Democrats still win majorities, comparatively few people turn out to vote. By contrast, in the surrounding rural areas where Republicans have gone from a slim to an overwhelming majority a much higher percentage of the population votes.

In the graphs below, I plot turnout among registered voters in 2016 against the log of population density for several counties in Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania; the size of the dot shows the precincts comparative size. The blue curve plots the 2016 turnout; the red curve shows the 2012 turnout for comparison.

In each case, a far higher percentage of registered voters actually turned out in surrounding suburbs and rural areas than in the town centers. In many cases the difference is quite striking.

In the overwhelmingly Democratic downtown precincts of Terre Haute and Muncie, Ind., turnout was only around 30 percent of registered voters; in the rural Republican precincts a few miles away, more than 60 percent voted. In Pennsylvania, where the presidential campaigns focused more energy, turnout in the downtown Democratic precincts was around 50 percent, but around 75 percent in the most rural precincts.

[How different are the Democratic and Republican parties? Too different to compare.]

By comparing the red lines and the blue lines, we can see that the pattern was quite similar in 2012, although the gap may have increased a bit in a handful of counties.

These graphs help explain Trumps narrow victory in the electoral college. His campaign focused on rural whites whotypically demonstrate relatively high levels of turnout in the crucial states. Conceivably, some habitual Democratic voters stayed home in these precincts while a set of new voters turned out for Trump. To show this would require individual-level data from voter files that are only now becoming available.

However, the lesson from these graphs, combined with those in my previous article, is that the Trump campaign successfully appealed to high-turnout rural areas that had been either evenly divided or delivered slim Republican majorities in the recent past.

The consistent high turnout of rural whites in postindustrial counties is not well understood. When examining exit polls or even post-election voter files, analysts tend to lump residents of low-turnout Muncie or Williamsport together with their high-turnout rural surroundings into a single, rural white category.

Worse, analysts might be tempted to draw inferences from aggregate county-level data, especially since they can be downloaded, merged with census data, and mapped in a matter of minutes. For instance, it is easy to download the Pennsylvania 2016 county-level presidential results, merge them with data on citizen voting-age population from the census, and then produce a graph like this one:

A look at this graph suggests a happy story for Democrats: Turnout is higher in relatively urban counties with higher overall population density (and higher overall support for Democrats). The graph looks similar if produced using data from Obamas victories in 2008 and 2012, and it looks similar in many other postindustrial states.

However, it is quite misleading. Returning to the fine-grained precinct-level graphs above, you can see that the relationship within Pennsylvania counties is exactly the opposite: People in low-density Republican areas are showing up to vote while those in the high-density towns are staying home.

To be technical for a moment, this is a classic case of what statisticians refer to as the modifiable aerial unit problem: a statistical bias that can arise when data on spatial phenomena such aspopulation density are aggregated to geographic units such ascounties.

Within Pennsylvania counties, turnout is substantially lower in relatively dense clusters populated with renters and young people than in the surrounding areas populated with older homeowners.

It will take some time to collect and geo-code precinct-level data from a full set of counties in the 2016 election, but the pattern was already very clear in the precinct-level data from earlier elections, including the 2008 presidential election. This is true not only in Pennsylvania, but in a large cross-section of states. This includes yesterdays battleground states, like Indiana and Missouri, as well as in the urbanizing battleground states of the future, including Georgia, Texas and Arizona.

AsDemocrats consider whether to completely give up on rural areas where they once brought in votes, they must keep in mind that rural voters might be able to make up for their dwindling raw numbers by voting at higher rates than growing urban populations.

Polarization between urban and rural areas is bad for the Democrats in several ways. Not only does it leave them underrepresented in the House and Senate, but it also magnifies a problem with turnout that faces left parties everywhere. Despite its gains among educated suburbanites, the Democratic Party still relies on a base of younger, lower-income renters who frequently change addresses. The Republican Party relies on a base of older, higher-income long-term homeowners who are more likely to vote.

This is just as true in towns such asMuncie and Williamsport as it is in cities such asIndianapolis and Philadelphia.

Jonathan Roddenis professor of political science and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

Read more:
This is why Democrats lose in 'rural' postindustrial America - The ... - Washington Post

Democrats demand independent probe after Flynn resignation – PBS NewsHour

JUDY WOODRUFF: He served just 24 days, the shortest tenure ever for a presidents national security adviser.

Now Michael Flynn has been forced out, but the firestorm over his resignation has just begun.

John Yang reports on this day of turmoil.

JOHN YANG: President Trump knew since late last month that his Michael Flynn had misled the White House about his telephone conversation with the Russian ambassador.

SEAN SPICER, White House Press Secretary: We have been reviewing and evaluating this issue, with respect to General Flynn, on a daily basis for a few weeks, trying to ascertain the truth.

JOHN YANG: Press Secretary Sean Spicer said the warning came from acting Attorney General Sally Yates, based on an NSA phone intercept.

SEAN SPICER: The White House counsel informed the president immediately. The president asked them to conduct a review of whether there was a legal situation there. That was immediately determined that there wasnt. That was what the president believed at the time, what he had been told, and he was proved to be correct.

The issue, pure and simple, came down to a matter of trust, and the president concluded that he no longer had the trust of his national security adviser.

JOHN YANG: Flynn had denied publicly, and to vice president-elect Pence directly, that he had discussed U.S. sanctions with the Russian ambassador to the United States during the transition. It came out last week that he had.

Today, Spicer argued Flynn didnt break the law against private citizens conducting diplomacy.

SEAN SPICER: There is nothing that the general did that was a violation of any sort. He was well within his duties to discuss issues of common concern between the two countries. I will say it again: What this came down to is a matter of trust.

JOHN YANG: By last night, Spicer said, the president asked for Flynns resignation.

Today, Mr. Trump ignored shouted questions about Flynn. Instead, he tweeted: The real story here is, why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington?

SEAN SPICER: Its not just something that is plaguing the current situation, but it goes back to the Obama administration, the Bush administration, the Clinton administration. When we have government employees that are entrusted with this and then leak it out, that undermines our national security, frankly.

JOHN YANG: At the Capitol, House Speaker Paul Ryan agreed that Flynn had to go.

REP. PAUL RYAN, R-Wis., Speaker of the House: I think the president made the right decision to ask for his resignation. You cannot have a national security adviser misleading the vice president and others.

JOHN YANG: Ryan wouldnt say if he thinks an investigation is needed. House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz said: The situation has taken care of itself.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said its highly likely that the Senate will investigate.

SEN. MITCH MCCONNELL, R-Ky., Majority Leader: The Intelligence Committee is already looking at Russian involvement in our election. And they have broad jurisdiction over the intel community writ large. And they can look at whatever they choose to.

JOHN YANG: Top Democrats demanded an independent probe.

REP. ELIJAH CUMMINGS, D-Md.: Do you hear the silence? This is the sound of House Republicans conducting no oversight of President Trump. Zero. That is what it sounds like when they abdicate their duty under the Constitution.

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER,D-N.Y., Minority Leader: There are potential violations of law here by General Flynn and potentially others. What I am calling for is an independent investigation with executive authority to pursue potential criminal actions.

JOHN YANG: In Moscow, the Kremlin called it an internal matter for the United States. But hard-line lawmakers like Alexei Pushkov said Flynn was the victim of a witch-hunt.

Mr. Trump named retired Army Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg as his acting national security adviser. Hes served as chief of staff for the National Security Council and advised Mr. Trump during his campaign. The leading contenders for a permanent replacement are widely reported to include former Vice Admiral Robert Harward, a retired Navy SEAL, and former CIA Director and retired Army General David Petraeus. Petraeus is currently on probation for revealing classified intelligence to his mistress.

Spicer said the president did not know that Flynn had discussed U.S. sanctions with the ambassador until acting Attorney General Yates contacted the White House on January 26. Spicer stressed that Flynns firing had nothing to do with the phone call itself Judy.

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, John, there are so many threads to this story. Among other things, were learning that the FBI interviewed General Flynn very shortly after the new administration took office.

What are the questions at the White House about how are they answering these questions about why it took so long, from then until now, for this to unfold, to come out?

JOHN YANG: What they say is that this had been reviewed for weeks and that it only was in the last night that Mr. Trump decided to ask for his resignation.

It was also last night that The Washington Post reported this contact from the acting attorney general with the White House. The interview story you mentioned is from The New York Times. They quote current and former officials, unnamed, saying that they found Mr. Flynn to be less than forthcoming in these FBI interviews immediately after the inauguration.

If officials conclude that he deliberately lied to the FBI, that could lead to a felony charge.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And just quickly, John, how is the White House dealing with this overall?

JOHN YANG: They are they came out today. They made a clean breast of it. They tried to be as forthcoming as they could in the briefing.

Sean Spicer stressed over and over again this was a matter of trust, that Flynn was doing his job as preparing to be national security adviser by talking to the ambassador. They said it should be no surprise that he was talking about issues of concern to both of them, but they are hoping that they can put this to rest.

JUDY WOODRUFF: John Yang at the White House, we thank you.

And at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue, our Lisa Desjardins joins us for the latest from Capitol Hill.

So, Lisa, we heard a little about this already in Johns report. But what are you picking up there? How are especially the leadership in both parties, how are they reacting?

LISA DESJARDINS: The White House may want to put this to rest, but theres no signs of that happening at the Capitol yet, Judy.

There are two camps, especially among Senate Republicans. Thats the place to watch. Some, like Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, say this should all be folded into an ongoing investigation already under way by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Thats over Russian hacking and Russian manipulation of the elections. We know that will include now questions about General Flynn.

But thats only in private, Judy. Other Senate Republicans say this needs to have more light of day. They want public hearings, including a public hearing with General Flynn. Thats a divide for Senate Republicans right now.

Meanwhile, some other Republicans say the real investigation up here should be into the leaks, not into Mr. Flynn. These are all issues swirling right now.

JUDY WOODRUFF: And, Lisa, what about the Democrats?

LISA DESJARDINS: Right. The Democrats came out strong today, as John reported.

Chuck Schumer, asking for this independent investigation, his folks told me that could include the FBI investigation under way, but only if new Attorney General Jeff Sessions recuses himself. That is a critical point for Democrats. Also, at the same time, theyre asking questions about House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes.

He has generally been supportive of General Flynn, said he made a decision to resign. But hes not investigating. Some point out that Mr. Nunes was himself on the Trump transition team. I asked him about that, asked his office about that. They said he will follow all the leads that he can.

Meanwhile, Democrats also eager to point out that another national security issue arose with Republicans in the past couple of years when they investigated Hillary Clinton, a Democrat, and they see this as somewhat hypocritical.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Lisa Desjardins, so much to follow. Thank you very much.

Original post:
Democrats demand independent probe after Flynn resignation - PBS NewsHour

Republicans block Democrats’ effort to get Trump’s tax returns – Boston.com

WASHINGTON (AP) House Republicans on Tuesday blocked an attempt by Democrats to use an obscure law to obtain President Donald Trumps tax returns from the IRS.

Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee tried to frame the issue as a matter of national security. They questioned whether Trump has any investments in Russia.

Trump has said he has no investments in Russia, and Democrats acknowledged that have no evidence otherwise. Thats why they want Trumps returns, said Rep. Joseph Crowley, R-N.Y.

The move came a day after Trumps national security adviser, Michael Flynn, was forced to resign over conversations he had with Russian officials before Trump took office.

People are concerned about Michael Flynn putting himself in a position to be blackmailed. What position is the president in? asked Crowley. Our national security is at risk.

The Ways and Means Committee has legal authority to obtain confidential tax records. The committee could then vote to make them public.

On Tuesday, committee Democrats tried to amend a routine annual oversight plan to insert a provision that called for obtaining Trumps tax returns. Republicans blocked it on a straight party-line vote, 23-15.

Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Texas, said the panel should only use its power to ensure that tax laws are being administered properly not to investigate the president.

As chairman of this committee I will not allow Washington to return to the bad old days when government officials used their powers to intimidate, harass and destroy their political enemies, Brady said. If Congress uses its power to rummage around the presidents tax returns for political purposes, whats prevents it from doing the same to average Americans?

Most famously, former President Richard Nixon was accused in his articles of impeachment of illegally obtaining tax records of his political enemies, and of ordering audits. Since then, federal law was changed so that neither the president nor the IRS commissioner can single out an individual for an audit.

Shunning decades of tradition, Trump has steadfastly refused to release his tax returns or to divest from his business. Instead, Trump said he has turned operation of his business over to his sons, while still retaining his stake.

Democrats tried to make Trumps taxes an issue during the presidential election, questioning his wealth and whether he generously donates to charity, as he claims. After the election, the head of the Office of Government Ethics scolded Trump for not divesting from his business, saying it is the only way to avoid conflicts of interest.

Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway has said people dont care about the presidents taxes.

Trumps tax returns would reveal a trove of information about his business dealings and his sources of income. They wouldnt show his overall net worth. But they would show his annual income and where it came from.

No one on this committee can say for sure that Trump doesnt have investments in Russia, said Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-N.J. We dont know.

Pascrell promised to raise the issue over and over and over again.

Im good at that, he said.

___

Follow Stephen Ohlemacher on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/stephenatap

Catch up with The Boston Globe for free.

Get The Globe's free newsletter, Today's Headlines, every morning.

Thanks for signing up!

View original post here:
Republicans block Democrats' effort to get Trump's tax returns - Boston.com