Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Trump’s Israel envoy pick faces off with Democrats, protesters – Fox News

President Trumps nominee to be U.S. ambassador to Israel faced tough questioning from Democrats at his confirmation hearing Thursday about everything from past controversial comments to his stance on the so-called two-state solution.

The heated hearing captured an intense debate playing out over his nomination, in editorial pages and newspaper ads across the country. David Friedman is the latest Trump nominee targeted by Democrats, after they helped pressure labor secretary pick Andrew Puzder to withdraw from consideration on Wednesday.

Frankly, the language you have regularly used against those who disagree with your views has me concerned about your preparedness to enter the world of diplomacy,Ranking Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland told Friedman on Thursday.

The bankruptcy lawyer was not only grilled by Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee but heckled by pro-Palestinian protesters.

He showed contrition, though, about some of his past remarks -- specifically having called supporters of the liberal Jewish lobbying firm J Street worse than "kapos,"a term typically used to describe Jews who worked with Nazis in concentration camps.

There is no excuse. If you want me to rationalize it or justify it, I cannot. These were hurtful words and I deeply regret them. They are not reflective of my nature or my character, Friedman said Thursday.

On Wednesday, J Street issued a statement asserting a possible apology will not at this stage in Mr. Friedmans career will change the fact that his views, his actions and his temperament should disqualify him.

The criticism, though, does not mean the nomination is in jeopardy.Republicans mostly asked Friedman about policy, and he was introduced by South Carolina GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham, who said despite disagreements on some issues he never doubted the nominee's commitment to Israel.

Republicans on the panel also praised Friedmans longstanding support of Israel. Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio described Democrats relentless questions about his prior statements as unreal.

Democrats indeed directed their focus on Friedmans firebrand rhetoric, including describing Bill Clinton as more dangerous to the interests of Israel than any president since Eisenhower and arguing the Obama administration was more interested in fighting Republicans than terrorists.

Friedman said his comments were indefensible, but argued he recognizes there is an important difference between a political contest and a diplomatic mission.

The one-time lawyer to Trump was pressed about his public skepticism toward a two-state solution, in the context of remarks made by the president in his joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Breaking away from longstanding U.S. policy, Trump said he was not wedded to the idea of separate Palestinian and Israeli states.

I thought for a while the two-state looked like it may be the easier of the two. But honestly, if Bibi and if the Palestinians ... are happy, Im happy with the one they like the best, he said Wednesday.

In an interview with The New York Times, Trump declined to specifically address the issue. When pressed, Trump admitted to basically supporting the position.

Friedman has inspired an intense lobbying campaign that reflects deeper divisions within the Jewish community.

Working to support him, Christians United for Israel (CUFI), the nations largest pro-Israel organization, took out full-page ads in several newspapers this week backing Friedman.

"This nomination cannot get bogged down in petty bickering or sour grapes over the results of the election. Trump is the President, Friedman is the nominee, and the Senate needs to let them do their jobs, CUFI Action Fund Washington Director Gary Bauer said in a statement.

The New York Times editorial board, meanwhile, predicted the confirmation of Friedman would provoke conflict in Israel and undermine American leadership in the Middle East.

In aletter, former ambassadors Thomas Pickering, William Harrop, Edward Walker, Daniel Kurtzer and James Cunningham maintained Friedmans extreme, radical positions made him unqualified to serve as ambassador.

A confirmation vote hasyet to bescheduled.

Read more:
Trump's Israel envoy pick faces off with Democrats, protesters - Fox News

After clamoring for answers from immigration officials, Democrats say they were told arrests will be broad – Los Angeles Times

Democrats in Congresssay Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials told them Thursday the agency plans to employ a broader brush in making immigration arrests, armed with a new executive order from President Trump.

"They said that we can and should expect many more arrests and removals this year,"House Democratic Caucus vice chairwoman Linda Sanchez (D-Whittier) said Thursday. "I wish I had better news for our communities in this country, but unfortunately the administration has taken a turn from where our past commitment to immigrant communities has been."

The Times reported last week that up to 8 million people could be deported under Trump's immigration orders.

Democrats and Republicans in House leadership met in a closed-door meeting with Acting ICE Director Thomas Homan to talk about last week's immigration raids in Los Angeles and other cities, which netted nearly 700 people across the country last week.

Democrats have complained about getting little or conflicting information about who was targeted in the raids that have panicked many in the immigrant community.Still unclear, they say, is exactly how the Department of Homeland Security will enforce Trump's executive order, which allows almost any immigrant living in the U.S. illegally tobe targeted for deportation. Though deportations rose under President Obama, previous administrations have focused on removing people who had committed violent crimes.

Sanchez said she left the meeting believing "they are only constrained by the resources that they have in terms of who the priority is."

The agency characterized last week's raids as routine , butimmigrant advocacy groups say they went beyond the norm byarresting people without a violent criminal history.

According to a description of the meeting provided by an ICE spokeswoman,Homan told members the agency is targetingpeoplebased on law enforcement tips.But they'll also sweep up immigrants in the country illegally if they encounter them while making the targeted arrests.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) said some of the crimesarrested immigrants had committedincluded trespassing and traffic violations,along with serious felonies. ICE also provided a list of 112 people who were arrested but had no criminal history.

House Speaker Paul Ryan's office hosted the meeting.His spokeswoman said it was "limited to members with jurisdictional interests in immigration enforcement" at the Homeland Security Department's request.

Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-N.M.) was allowed to attend to represent the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, which she chairs, but was told other members weren't invited. The caucus had a meeting scheduled with Homanon Tuesday that was abruptly canceled .

Several California members who could not get intoThursday's closed meeting said it was unacceptable and waited outside. California's Rep. Norma Torres (D-Pomona), who emigrated from Guatemala as a child, said she knew she wasn't invited but came anyway.She was asked to leaveby Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (D-Va.).

Homan said he would have an additional meeting with the entire caucus, Lujan Grisham said, but it hasn't been scheduled.

See original here:
After clamoring for answers from immigration officials, Democrats say they were told arrests will be broad - Los Angeles Times

Democrats leave ICE meeting convinced arrests a taste of what’s to come – Arizona Daily Sun

WASHINGTON Democratic leaders left a meeting with immigration officials Thursday convinced that recent apprehensions, detentions and deportations have greatly expanded under President Donald Trump, and said they were told to expect more arrests.

That contradicts the official Immigration and Customs Enforcement position that recent arrests around the country are no different than the routine, targeted arrests carried out by ICEs Fugitive Operations teams on a daily basis.

ICE officials would not comment beyond the agencys prepared statement and Republican House members who were at Thursdays closed-door briefing with ICE Acting Director Thomas Homan did not immediately return requests for comment. But Democrats said the message they heard was clear.

It is hard to not leave that meeting and believe that the Trump administration is going to target as many immigrants as possible, said Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas. He said that aside from not targeting deferred deportation recipients, everything is fair game for them.

Democrats said they left the meeting with a general sense that all immigrant communities are at risk, not just those immigrants illegally who have committed serious crimes.

Of course we want those who are a danger to be deported, but for over 8 million of these people its just a status violation, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said. There shouldnt be grounds to allocate resources to arrest them.

The briefing followed the arrest of more than 680 people during a series of enforcement actions by ICE across the country over the past week. They included undocumented individuals with minor offenses such as traffic violations and 176 who the Democrats said were identified as non-criminals by Homan.

Those arrests also followed Trumps Jan. 27 executive orders that called for beefed-up enforcement of immigration law, the Democrats noted.

But ICE maintained that the arrests are routine.

ICE conducts these kind of targeted enforcement operations regularly and has for many years, said Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly in a statement released Monday and cited again Thursday. The focus of these enforcement operations is consistent with the routine, targeted arrests carried out by ICEs Fugitive Operations teams on a daily basis.

The statement said the actions targeted public safety threats, such as convicted undocumented criminals and gang members, as well as individuals who have violated immigration laws, including those who illegally re-entered the country after being removed.

But Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson, citing the arrest and deportation last week of Valley mother Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos, said that is far from business as usual for ICE.

Theyre saying, Were only going after hardened criminals, but theres too many cases coming up like the one in Arizona with the mom, Grijalva said Wednesday. Thats not a person-smuggling, drug cartel member, and she got swept up as part of this.

De Rayos was required to regularly check in with ICE after being convicted in 2009 of using a false Social Security number, and had done so with no consequences until last week.

Her lawyer, Ray Maldonado, said he absolutely believes his client was deported because of Trumps executive order, but said the when he asked ICE directly they wouldnt give me a direct answer.

Nothing has changed about Guadalupes case except Trump, Maldonado said. Under (President Barack) Obama they let her go and under Trump they deported her. That is a direct result.

Grijalva and immigration advocates say the recent ICE actions have caused a heightened sense of uncertainty and fear in immigrant communities. Tomas Robles, executive director of Living United for Change in Arizona LUCHA said ICEs actions have changed the way some people are living their lives.

Some of our members have talked to us about whether to take their kids to school or about potentially moving to a more friendly state, Robles said Wednesday. There is definitely a fear of the fact that these raids could happen at any time and that nobodys really safe.

Read the original post:
Democrats leave ICE meeting convinced arrests a taste of what's to come - Arizona Daily Sun

Democrats, advocates question ICE enforcement raids …

The actions are the first concerted effort by ICE under the Trump administration to arrest targeted undocumented immigrants for deportation proceedings.

It's unclear at this point in the nascent administration whether it was a sign of things to come, or whether the actions were conducted under any different procedures than could have been in place under the Obama administration.

Trump claimed credit for the raids Sunday, tweeting: "The crackdown on illegal criminals is merely the keeping of my campaign promise. Gang members, drug dealers & others are being removed!"

It was the uncertainty, the publicity of the raids and the high tensions raised by public comments on immigration by Trump administration officials that had Democrats asking for more information.

California Rep. Lou Correa fsent a letter to immigration officials, outlining the unanswered questions related to the latest immigration enforcement actions.

"These activities have caused fear and uncertainty for many of constituents," Correa wrote, and listed 10 questions for ICE, among them "What are the agency's priorities for removal? and "How far in advance were these enforcement activities planned?"

David Marin, Los Angeles field office director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said planning for the immigration operation carried out this week began during the Obama administration.

"This operation was in the planning stages before the current administration issued its executive order," Marin told reporters Friday. Trump signed an executive order regarding detention of undocumented immigrants on January 25. Marin said generally it takes weeks of planning before an operation is carried out because the agency needs the time to develop case targets and leads.

Officials are trying to stress that these actions are consistent with regular enforcement.

"We do these operations two to three times a year," Marin said. "This is on par with past operations."

Immigration activists are concerned, however, that these raids may have targeted a wider scope of individuals than had been common in the Obama administration.

Separately, a former Obama administration ICE official said that administration "targeted felons," and noted that under the Trump administration, the enforcement priorities laid out in his interior executive order were much broader and could include a wider range of targets than the Obama administration's enforcement priorities.

The official also questioned the Trump administration including in its general targets individuals with previous deportation orders. These are undocumented immigrants who went through court proceedings before and had a final order of removal, but had not been deported by the previous administration. The Los Angeles ICE office confirmed among its arrests five had no criminal histories but prior orders of removal.

"We ultimately decided those people were not a priority as there are literally millions of them and most have never committed any crime," the official said referring to violent crimes or felonies.

The official said that one appeal of targeting individuals with removal orders is that they can be deported "quickly," because no further court action would be necessary.

ICE in Los Angeles said it had conducted a five-day operation targeting criminals and fugitives, and said that the vast majority of those arrested had criminal histories.

Seeking to push back on reports of indiscriminate raids, ICE released the results of the operation from its Los Angeles office, saying about 160 foreign nationals were arrested during the week. Of those, 150 had criminal histories, and of the remaining arrests, five had final orders of removal or were previously deported. Ninety-five percent were male, they said.

A Homeland Security official told CNN on Saturday that 37 of those detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in California this week as part of the enforcement crackdown have now been deported to Mexico. The official said they had already been deported and had come back to the country illegally or had deportation orders against them. This group did not have to go through the adjudication process because they had already received deportation orders, the official said.

While specific numbers weren't available, ICE said "many" of the arrested individuals had prior felony convictions including violent charges like child sex crimes, weapons or assault charges.

An ICE official confirmed Atlanta had conducted a similar surge this week, and roughly 200 arrests were made in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina in a similar routine enforcement action. Texas Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro said in a statement that he had confirmed with ICE's San Antonio field office that similar actions were conducted across Texas, calling the action "Operation Cross Check." He said he would be following up to make sure the actions were targeting the worst offenders.

The Chicago ICE office said similar actions in the Midwest netted more than 200 arrests in the states of Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Kansas and Missouri. While Chicago said the targets were fugitives and criminals, the only data available about the individuals arrested was that the "majority" had prior criminal convictions.

Some arrested during the Midwest sweep "will face criminal prosecutions by the US attorney's office for illegal entry and illegal re-entry after deportation," the office said.

Still, as Trump continues to talk about cracking down on illegal immigration, advocates remain concerned that the new administration could be stepping up enforcement against otherwise peaceful undocumented immigrants.

On Thursday, protests sprang up at the deportation of Guadalupe Garcia de Rayos, a 35-year-old mother of two, who had checked in with ICE at an office in Phoenix the day before, as she had regularly since a 2008 conviction of using a fake Social Security number.

Friday, Democrats decried the actions nationwide as needlessly causing fear for immigrant communities.

"These reports show the serious consequences of the president's executive order, which allows all undocumented immigrants to be categorized as criminals and requires increased enforcement in communities, rather than prioritizing dangerous criminals," California Sen. Dianne Feinstein said in a statement responding to media reports of the stepped up enforcement, including some accounts that the actions were targeting low-priority undocumented immigrants, including family men and women.

"The President wants to show off and it appears he has unleashed the Department of Homeland Security to kick-out large numbers of immigrants and anyone they encounter, without much oversight, review or due process," said Illinois Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez. "The goal of such policies is to inject fear into immigrant communities, frighten families and children, and drive immigrants farther underground. It damages public safety and the fabric of American communities while putting a burden on local social services and the foster-care system."

Gutierrez's concerns were echoed by Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, a Democrat from California.

"I am outraged to hear of the recent ICE arrests in southern California. If the Trump administration is genuinely concerned about threats to American security, it should prioritize violent felons and others who pose real danger," Roybal-Allard said in a statement. "My office has been working to get detailed information from ICE."

And a city councilman from Austin, Texas, said he was concerned that ICE was making a public show of force in his city as retribution for being a sanctuary city.

"ICE actions like these are beyond reprehensible," Greg Casar said in a statement. "They instill fear in the community, and they make everyday people fear for their lives."

Trump made cracking down on illegal immigration a central focus of his presidential campaign.

While ICE characterized the actions as routine, fear remains that the Trump administration's recent executive order beefing up interior enforcement of immigration laws could mean a vast expansion of deportations of undocumented immigrants.

While the Obama administration had clear guidance prioritizing deportation of high-level criminals, an executive order signed by Trump in his first week set up enforcement priorities that could include virtually any undocumented immigrant living in the US.

On Saturday, the President defend another part of his campaign promise on immigration, vowing to keep costs down on a border wall that would span the US southern border with Mexico.

"I am reading that the great border WALL will cost more than the government originally thought, but I have not gotten involved in the ... design or negotiations yet. When I do, just like with the F-35 FighterJet or the Air Force One Program, price will come WAY DOWN!" Trump wrote in two consecutive tweets.

A Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman said overall about the agency's actions that everything is "routine," and are not part of casting a widespread net.

"ICE Fugitive Operations teams are out every day as part of routine, targeted enforcement operations," said acting press secretary Gillian Christensen. "These are existing, established fugitive operations teams. ICE does not conduct sweeps or raids that target aliens indiscriminately. ICE only conducts targeted enforcement of criminal aliens and other individuals who are in violation of our nation's immigration laws."

DHS secretary John Kelly told reporters at San Ysidro Port of Entry between San Diego and Tijuana on Friday that his department isn't "rounding anyone up."

"The people that ICE apprehend are people who are illegal and then some," he said. "ICE is executing the law and I would tell you I've been around a lot of pretty darn good men and women in the armed forces and what I saw today, the professionalism that I personally observed in a very potentially dangerous environment gave me great pride."

CNN's Kevin Bohn, Paul Vercammen, Rene Marsh, Ed Lavandera, Rosa Flores, Azadeh Ansari and Joe Sutton contributed to this report.

Here is the original post:
Democrats, advocates question ICE enforcement raids ...

Democratic Party chairs struggle to harness activism burst – USA TODAY

Democratic Party leaders are having trouble capitalizing on the momentum created by the Jan. 21 Women's March on Washington.(Photo: John Minchillo, AP)

WASHINGTON Local Democratic parties across the country are struggling to harness what looks like the emergence of a progressive grass-roots movement a liberal version of the Tea Party as protests and crowded town hall forums sweep the nation.

Interviews USA TODAY conducted with a dozen state party chairs and other local leaders show, above all, consensus that many states are poorly staffed and underfunded after eight years of neglect. While there are many nationalprogressive groups working with the political newcomers taking to the streets, it is these party officials whoknow their communities best and whohave historically been the linchpin of organizing and candidate recruitment drives.

The complaints, also echoed at recent Democratic National Committee listening sessions, may be the closest thing to an official autopsy similar to what the Republicans issued after Mitt Romney's failed 2012 bidthat Democrats pursue following another cycle of losses at the state and local level.

Theres a tremendous amount of people who want to do something. Im struggling to galvanize the resources, said Marcel Groen, the Democratic chairman in Pennsylvania who has a single political director responsible for 67 counties.

My biggest fear is that, as these activists turn their gaze to state parties, which is the natural transition, its whether the DNC and the state parties have the capacity to handle 500 or 1,000 activists who come to their doors, said Jaime Harrison, the South Carolina chairman who is also running for DNC chairman.

If they dont feel like they have a purpose then you lose them and you may never get them back, he said. We need to make sure we get resources down to state parties ASAP, Harrison said.

While the critiques are wide ranging, including the lack of a compelling economic narrative, there is agreement on this much: Over the past eight years, the priority of both the DNC and major party donors has been the Obama presidency and Hillary Clintons campaign, both of which siphoned crucial funding and talent from state parties. Outside progressive groups like Obamas one-time campaign arm, Organizing for Action, became rivals to the DNC instead of partners.

The candidacy of 2016 nominee Hillary Clinton used most of the Democratic Party's money, activists say.(Photo: Carolyn Kaster, AP)

Today, many Democratic state parties are down to five or six staffers, a failed model that will not work, said Ohio Democratic Chairman David Pepper. A lot of parties really are starting from almost nothing, he said, allowing that Ohio is an exception.

The imperative for reorganizing the Democratic Party over the next few years is critical.

If Democrats cant recruit and run successful candidates, their losses at the state level will becemented with the 2020 census that will provide the basis for another round of redistricting. During the last census yearin 2010, Republicans swept to huge gains around the country, which allowed them to gerrymander, or pack,Democrats into urban districts while drawing districts favorable to their party. Republicans are now in charge of 68 state legislative chambers and Democrats just 31. With one more legislature win, Republicans could even call a Constitutional Convention without Democrats, said Matt Bennett, a vice president at the moderate think tank Third Way in Washington.

This rot at the base is very serious, said Bennett. In the aftermath of the election, according to the Federal Election Commission, the DNC brought in $2.7 million in Decembercompared with theRepublican National Committees $16.2 million.

The problem is greater than how the DNC raises and allocates resources and extends to a different megadonor culture in each party.

The billionaire GOP Koch brothers have built an empirethat aims to raise and spend between $300 million and $400 million over the next two years to influence public policy and political races fromthe Senate to local contests.

Its been a 30-year plan of taking over 33 states with governors and legislatures. We come in and throw $5 million in the last six months of a congressional race and, win or lose, we pick up and leave town when its all over, said Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio. Theres no roots.

Democratic political action committees also tend to be built around personalities, Harrison said.

For instance, many donors gave to Obamas OFA in lieu of state parties. One of the richest Democratic donors, Tom Steyer, hasbuild his own political infrastructure largely focused on his climate change agenda and, potentially, his own bid for California governor. David Brock, who is behind a number of outside groups like Media Matters and American Bridge, is also trying to build his own network.

In contrast, in Missouri, a prior state law allowing unlimited campaign contributions helped to all but wipe out Democrats from governor to attorney general and treasurer, after Republican megadonors David Humphreys and Rex Sinquefield each poured millions into downballot races over the past several years, helping to complete a Republican takeover. The Democratic Party budget is $600,000 a yearand that includes just keeping the lights on, said Stephen Webber, the Democratic chairman.

Weve been decimated in the legislature in a perfect storm of redistricting, some bad luck with Democratic leaders and with these megadonors who are hammering us, said Webber. We dont have any major donors putting money into state and local races the same way they do, he said.

Even so, Republicans argue that unions often contribute large amounts at the local level, mostly to Democrats.

Clintons campaign and the Democratic National Committee established joint fundraising accounts with 38 state party committees during the 2016 campaign, allowing her campaign and party committees to band together to collect six-figure checks from wealthy donors.

But critics argued state parties only kept a small fraction of the money for party building. In the key battleground of Pennsylvania, the arrangement helped the state party take in more than $28 million during the 2016 campaign. And the state party plowed most of it $23.5 million into federal political activity, Federal Election Commission records show.

Read more:

Young Indiana mayor vies to lead Democratic Party

Labor Secretary Tom Perez is running for DNC chairman

Rep. Keith Ellison says he'll resign from Congress if elected DNC chairman

Meanwhile, according to Pepper, the DNCs approach to helping the state parties ahead of the 2016 election was to increase by $2,500 a monthly stipend through a state partnership program. I thought 'thats it, thats the vision of how the DNC and state parties work together?' Pepper said.

Under former chairman Howard Dean's "50-state strategy" during the 2008 cycle that elected Obama, the DNC helped pay for staff in various states depending on need. After the 2008 election, it all kind of fell apart, Harrison said.

There are some signs that Democrats may begin to draw in more money, both from crowdfunding, or soliciting small donors online, and from megadonors.

According to Brandon Dillon, the Michigan chairman,theres been a huge increase in small donations in the past three months, in part as a negative response to the appointment of Betsy DeVos, one of their state's biggest GOP donors, as Education secretary.

Houston trial lawyer Steve Mostyn, a top Democratic donor, said the 2016 election delivered a tough lesson about the perils of neglecting local organizing.

Mostyn donated more than $2 million last year to Priorities USA Action, the super PAC that supported Clintons failed bid. He and his law partner wife, Amber Mostyn, also have contributed some $5 million in recent years to state groups, such as Battleground Texas, which focused on boosting Democrats ground game in the Lone Star State.

Democrats have got to remember something thats been said for a long time: All politics is local, he said. What frustrates a lot of voters is that a campaign runs into their community three months before the election, asking them to vote and then they run the hell out of the community.

Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend another DNC chairman contestant, said he recently met with Silicon Valley donors.

Theyre asking themselves what would be our answer to the Koch Brothers, he said. Theyre ready to engage.

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2lbKz8e

Read the original:
Democratic Party chairs struggle to harness activism burst - USA TODAY