Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Bernie Sanders advises Democrats to ‘have the guts to take on … – Colorado Springs Gazette

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) had choice words of advice for Democratic candidates in upcoming elections, including the president himself.

The failed presidential candidate acknowledged during an interview on CBS News's Face the Nation on Sunday that his previous political party needs "to win back a working class" voter demographic. Sanders explained that 60% of the American population is living paycheck to paycheck, with 18 million households putting at least 50% of their income toward a mortgage or rent.

TRUMP HAS 46-POINT LEAD OVER DESANTIS AS MOST GOP VOTERS SEE INDICTMENTS AS 'POLITICALLY MOTIVATED': POLL

"What the Democratic Party has got to do is have the guts to take on corporate greed, which is unprecedented all over the economy," Sanders said. "People who own the large corporations are doing record-breaking profits. We have to create an economy that works for all, not just a few."

According to Sanders, President Joe Biden "has made some progress," but he insisted there was a lot more to do in order to win over more voters and secure a second term. Sanders detailed to anchor Bob Costa what angle the Democratic Party should take, in his opinion.

"Well, I think the issue is: Are Democrats doing enough to win back a working class, which is leaving the Democratic Party?" Sanders said. "So I think, Bob, what this campaign is going should be about is a contrast between the ideas that work for the working families of this country and what Republicans stand for, which is more tax breaks for billionaires and paying allegiance to the needs of corporate America, not ordinary Americans."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Sanders suggested that the Democratic Party campaign on expanding Social Security and Medicare, with the latter including dental and vision coverage.

Despite his recent visit to New Hampshire, which suggested to some that the senator would attempt yet another presidential bid, Sanders expressed his certainty that Biden would be the Democratic nominee.

Original Location: Bernie Sanders advises Democrats to 'have the guts to take on corporate greed'

Washington Examiner Videos

Read the original:
Bernie Sanders advises Democrats to 'have the guts to take on ... - Colorado Springs Gazette

Missouri Democrats to allow 17-year-olds to vote in party-run … – St. Louis Post-Dispatch

JEFFERSON CITY Missouri Democrats are planning to open up next years party-run presidential preference primary to 17-year-olds who turn 18 by the November 2024 presidential election, according to draft plans out for public comment.

Missouri legislators in 2022 repealed the state-run presidential preference primary, with proponents arguing that political parties and not taxpayers should pick up the tab for the party contests.

Because an effort to reinstate the state-run primary failed this past legislative session, both the state Republican and Democratic parties are moving forward with plans for party-run contests in 2024.

In a 51-page draft released Tuesday, Missouri Democrats said their privately run primary, to take place March 23, would allow certain 17-year-olds to vote. That is despite Missouri requiring voters in official state elections to be 18.

To encourage participation by youth in the delegate selection process, any individual who will have turned eighteen (18) years of age by the date of the general election will be allowed to participate in the delegate selection process, the draft plan says.

The March 23 primary run by the state Democratic Party will be the first step in assigning Missouris 71 delegates to the Democratic National Convention, taking place between Aug. 19-22 in Chicago.

The party said each county will have a polling place and that there would be multiple locations in the St. Louis and Kansas City metro areas.

The draft plan would allow voters to cast in-person ballots between 8 a.m. and noon on the day of the primary.

The party plans to distribute mail-in ballots starting Feb. 12. The party will require mail ballot requests to be made by March 12.

The Democratic Party must receive the ballots back by 10 a.m. on March 23, the draft said.

The plan states that if two or more candidates make the ballot, the party will use a ranked-choice voting system to allow maximum engagement consistent with a traditional caucus method of achieving viability.

Delegates to the National Convention will be proportionally apportioned to fairly reflect the results, the draft said.

Party members will select or certify Democratic National Convention delegates and alternates at the state partys June 29 convention in Jefferson City.

The Democrats also said in their draft that the voter rolls for this process are registered voters of the state of Missouri who have declared Democrat as their party affiliation.

Legislators last year approved of Missouri voters declaring a political party, which has been seen as a precursor to a closed primary system.

But few voters have taken advantage of the new option.

According to a Post-Dispatch analysis of voter data from the secretary of state, fewer than 1% of registered voters had chosen to affiliate with a political party as of August.

The Democrats also said they are committed to an aggressive fundraising program for the party-run primary. The party said its delegate selection plan was estimated to cost between $250,000 to $475,000.

The party pegged the estimated cost of election administration at $175,000, which it hopes to raise by the end of the year.

If these fundraising goals are not met, the Missouri Democratic Party reserves the right to adjust planned investments in order to administer an election and/or seek an alternative method of voting, the draft says.

The draft is available online and the Democrats said Tuesday they are accepting public comments for 30 days.

The Missouri Republican Party has not yet announced its plans for its 2024 presidential nominating contest. The Missouri GOP state committee is scheduled to meet Sept. 9.

Josh Renaud of the Post-Dispatch contributed to this report.

Take a look at some of the video highlights of 2022 from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch staff.

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

More:
Missouri Democrats to allow 17-year-olds to vote in party-run ... - St. Louis Post-Dispatch

Democrats Try To Whitewash Their Starring Role in School Closures – Reason

In what has become an annual tradition, Democrats and too many journalists are marking back-to-school season by trying to insist with a straight face that the COVID-era school closures from the autumn of 2020 all the way through 2022 were a bipartisan phenomenon, perhaps even mostly attributable to Republicans.

"Remember," White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Monday, echoing an administration "fact sheet" released the same day, "when the president walked [into office], more than 50 percent of schools were shut down because of COVID, because the last administration didn't have a plandidn't have a comprehensive planto deal with COVID and what it was doing to our economy and what it was doing to our kids. And because the president putschools reopening and businesses reopening and making sure that people got shots in arms, made that a priority, we were able to open up the schools."

There are several insufficiently factual assertions in that statement, beginning with the formulation that K-12 schools still shuttered as of January 20, 2021, remained so "because of COVID." The pandemic was the stated reason, to be sure, but schoolhouse closure at that point was an active policy choice, one that had been rejected by a majority of European countries, American private schools, and the (Republican-run) states of Wyoming, Montana, Florida, Arkansas, South Dakota, Texas, and so on.

President Donald Trump may not have had what the Biden administration would characterize as a "comprehensive plan" to reopen schools (in part because K-12 education in the United States is still governed at the state and local level), but he did as of July 2020when enough research and global experience had already demonstrated that children were overwhelmingly less likely to catch, transmit, and suffer from COVID-19urge schools to "Get open in the fall."

Republican governors such as Florida's Ron DeSantis took Trump's advice, as well as heaps of media/Democratic/teachers-union derision (some of which, defiantly, continues to this day). What did then-candidate Joe Biden say at the time?

"If we do this wrong, we will put lives at risk and set our economy and our country back," the Democrat warned while unveiling a plan that conditioned reopening on $58 billion in additional federal aid. Also: "If you have the ability to have people wear masks and you have teachers able to be in a position where they can teach at a social distancethat, I think is one thing.But it costs a lot of money to do that. If you don't have that capacity, I think it's too dangerous to open the schools."

Such fearmongering was routine for the types of teachers unions that First Lady Jill Biden belongs to. Union demonstrations against reopening in the fall of 2020, usually in Democratic-dominated cities, featured such subtle props as coffins, body bags, and gravestones; an American Federation for Teachers (AFT) anti-Trump ad that August claimed that "our kids are being used as guinea pigs." The states that closed their schools mostHawaii, Maryland, Washington, California, Oregon, New Jersey, Massachusettsdid not have in common levels of infection, or hospital capacity, or mortality; but rather that they each voted for Biden over Trump by double-digit margins.

DeSantis was right, Biden was wrong, and by now even NPR education reporters admit that the remote learning favored by Democratically governed jurisdictions has been a generational catastrophe, triggering a parental stampede out of free-of-charge, government-run schools.

The latest numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show that since the onset of the pandemic, just 1,689 of the 1,141,899 deaths attributed to COVID, or one out of every 675, were kids under the age of 18, and nearly half of those were under the kindergarten age of 5. K-12 teachers in the pre-vaccine year of 2020 had a lower COVID mortality rate than the average worker. Post-vaccination, the least likely pathway of in-school transmission has been from student to teacher. The one country in Europe that didn't close its schools even in the spring of 2020 is the one that has had the lowest rate of excess deaths.

President-elect Biden vowed in December 2020, if conditionally, that a majority of K-12 public schools would be open within his first 100 days of office. On his first day in office, he quietly downgraded that promise to just K-8 schools. By week three, "open" was reinterpreted to mean "at least one day per week."

There was a practical reason for such expectation-lowering. The administration and its teachers-union allies still wanted one last huge federal payout, in the form of the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, which (after being passed one month later) directed $122 billion to K-12 schools (on top of the $70 billion in emergency federal school funding those schools had already received), as well as an additional $350 billion to state and local governments, which typically spend about 20 percent of their budgets on pre-collegiate education.

"We need a Marshall Plan for our schools," urged the school superintendents of New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago in a December 2020 Washington Postop-ed. (Only NYC of the three was even half-heartedly open.) The hostage-taking was not subtle; neither was the White House's timing.

Just three days after redefining "open" as one day per week, and with the American Rescue Plan still hanging in the balance, the Biden administration unveiled its first major initiative affecting the pace of school reopening. And by "affecting," I do mean "slowing down." The CDC unveiled its long-awaited, allegedly science-based new guidance for how and when to fully reopen schools, and to the shock of epidemiologists, parents, and even some Democratic politiciansand in contradiction to the pre-CDC advice from new Director Rochelle Walenskythe ostensibly independent agency concluded schools should continue to enforce an average social distancing between students of 6 feet. For those many school districts, usually in heavily Democratic polities, that cut-and-pasted CDC guidelines as operational policy, that effectively meant hybrid and remote learning would extend into the indefinite future.

That was on February 12, 2021. On March 11, the American Rescue Plan was passed and signed into law, giving teachers their huge payday (very little of which, by the way, had anything to do with actual COVID-mitigation policies). Literally that same day came word thatta-da!the CDC was now considering revising the social-distance guideline to 3 feet after all, thus finally allowing the dwindling number of CDC-obedient districts to maybe fully reopen sometime.

"They are compromising the one enduring public health missive that we've gotten from the beginning of this pandemic in order to squeeze more kids into schools," complained an ungrateful AFT President Randi Weingarten, whose paw-prints had been all over the original CDC guidance. "Even with the significant investment of American Rescue Plan money," she wrote in a letter of protest to Walensky and Education Secretary Miguel Cardona, "districts lack the human resources and institutional planning ability to make changes like this quickly. Is this something that can be implemented in the fall, or perhaps the summer?"

You can understand why Joe Biden wants to falsely portray himself as a champion of reopening, just as you can see whyof all peopleso does Randi Weingarten: Extended school closures, long after the survey data and global experience argued convincingly against them, constituted one of the most egregious public policy failures in modern American history, the aftereffects of which are still massively reshaping American kids, families, education systems, and cities. They are deservedly unpopular, with few people beyond opinion-journalism trolls still attempting to defend them.

What Biden delivered was not school reopening but a gargantuan transfer of federal tax money to local school districts right as their customer base was running away screaming, especially in cities and states that closed schools most. Occasionally, if grudgingly, reporters will note that spending several multiples of the Department of Education's annual budget just on COVID relief to schools didn't exactly make the schools much better ventilated. ("Among the reasons," New York Times pandemic-beat writer Apoorva Mandavilli wrote on Sunday, include "a lack of clear federal guidance on cleaning indoor air, no senior administration official designated to oversee such a campaign, few experts to help the schools spend the funds wisely, supply chain delays for new equipment, and insufficient staff to maintain improvements that are made.")

But sometimes the president himself will let slip what the school-relief bill was really all about: more jobs for an otherwise shrinking industry.

The American Rescue Plan, Biden said last week at a teacher-of-the-year celebration, provided "historic funding for schools to reopen safely so teachers could get back to the classroom, doing what they do best. Before the American Rescue Plan, only 46 percent of schools were open and in-person. Today, that's now 100 percent. Plus, that law has delivered critical support for schools, including funding for after-school programs, summer programs; hiring more teachers, counselors, and school psychologists.Thanks to that law, the number of school social workers is up 48 percent. The number of school counselors is up 10 percent. The number of school nurses is up 42 percent. And since I took office, we've added nearly 80,000 additional public-school teachers80,000."

Read the original post:
Democrats Try To Whitewash Their Starring Role in School Closures - Reason

Arizona Democrats will have presidential preference election – Arizona Daily Star

Capitol Media Services

In a bit of a surprise, Arizona Democrats will have a 2024 presidential preference election to vote in.

The state Democratic Party had been widely expected to cancel their presidential primary and simply assign their party convention delegates to President Joe Biden.

It is common for political parties to cancel presidential primaries when their party holds the White House and the incumbent is seeking reelection.

For example, the Arizona GOP did not participate in the 2020 presidential preference election when then-President Donald Trump was seeking a second term.

However, both the state Democratic Party and the Republican Party will take part in the March 19 presidential preference election next year.

That means not only an open choice for Republicans but also that Biden could face opposition from Democrats hoping to make him a one-term president, such as candidate Robert Kennedy Jr.

Each party had a 5 p.m. deadline Friday, Sept. 1, to decide whether to opt out of the state-run election, and they did not act, said a spokesman for Secretary of State Adrian Fontes.

As reported Saturday in the Star, Arizona Republican Party Chair Jeff DeWit rejected a demand from the Maricopa County Republican Party to cancel Republicans participation in the state-run election and instead hold a party-run election so they could ban early and mail-in voting.

DeWit cited last-minute timing and various legal issues as reasons for his decision.

Get your morning recap of today's local news and read the full stories here: http://tucne.ws/morning

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

More here:
Arizona Democrats will have presidential preference election - Arizona Daily Star

‘An ode to bigotry and ignorance’: Democrats thrash defense bill … – POLITICO

The typically bipartisan bill dissolved into a nearly GOP-only measure Thursday as Republicans approved a raft of culture wars amendments.

As the rightward tilt became clear on the House floor, Democrats who had previously supported the NDAA in the Armed Services Committee derided the revamped bill.

The bill we passed out of committee sent a clear, united message to our allies and partners, global competitors, and the American people that democracy still works, and Congress is still functional, the Democrats said in their statement. That bill no longer exists.

The vote is a test for McCarthy, who needs near-unanimous GOP support in his five-seat majority. McCarthy and his team spent the week navigating Republican infighting over whether to hold votes on controversial amendments, which initially stalled the bill, and to minimize defections.

Adding conservative policies to the bill may win over members of the House Freedom Caucus and other far-right members who rarely, if ever, vote for the defense bill.

Rep. Jim Banks speaks with reporters as he arrives for the House Republican leadership election at the U.S. Capitol Nov. 15, 2022. | Francis Chung/POLITICO

They have no reason not to vote for this, Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) said of conservatives. It tackles a lot of the woke issues that have been pushed by the administration on our military in a strong way and it supports our military to keep America safe.

So theres no reason for any Republican to vote against it, he added.

If the bill makes it through the House, many of the most hardline provisions tacked on by House Republicans are unlikely to survive negotiations with the Democratic-led Senate on a compromise defense bill. The Senate is set to begin debate on its own defense legislation next week.

The clearest signal that Republicans would go their own way came on Thursday when the House narrowly adopted Rep. Ronny Jacksons (R-Texas) amendment to block Pentagon policies that reimburse travel costs for troops seeking abortions.

Democrats telegraphed that the proposal was a red line. The measure was adopted anyway in a 221-213 vote, with only two Republicans breaking ranks.

Republicans didnt stop there. They muscled through proposals to end coverage of transition surgeries and hormone treatments for transgender troops, gut diversity and inclusion programs and limit the specific flags that can be flown at military installations a move that would effectively ban flying the pride flag.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) ripped Republicans over the votes, arguing extreme MAGA Republicans had hijacked the legislation.

House Republicans have turned what should be a meaningful investment in our men and women in uniform into an extreme and reckless legislative joyride, the trio said in a statement.

The Armed Services Committee already took aim at a variety of contentious issues in its June markup of the legislation. The panel approved GOP proposals to pave the way for the return of troops kicked out for refusing the Covid-19 vaccine, barring funding for drag shows on military bases and banning the promotion of critical race theory. The legislation still won the support of all but one committee Democrat.

Still, some of the most hardline efforts were defeated late Thursday evening.

Far right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenes (R-Ga.) push to prohibit the transfer of U.S. cluster bombs to Ukraine failed in a lopsided 147-276 vote. Greenes largely symbolic amendment cluster munitions have already been delivered to Ukraine following Bidens decision was supported by 98 Republicans and 49 Democrats.

Lawmakers rebuffed Rep. Matt Gaetzs effort to block any diversity, equity and inclusion training after nine Republicans sided with Democrats.

Rep. Matt Gaetz, left, talks with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene in the House chamber on Jan. 5, 2023. | Alex Brandon/AP Photo

And Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.) came up well short in his bid to defund a congressionally mandated commission tasked with renaming Army bases and military property named in honor of Confederate leaders. The effort was largely symbolic as the panel has finished its work and most Army bases have already scrubbed Confederate names. Still, the measure garnered 177 votes from House Republicans.

In all, the legislation authorizes $886 billion for national defense programs in fiscal 2024, the same amount requested by President Joe Biden and equal to a spending cap set for defense spending in a recent debt limit deal.

The price tag includes authorizes $842 billion for the Pentagon and another $32 billion for nuclear weapons programs at the Energy Department. The legislation doesnt actually provide any funding, however, and must be followed by appropriations legislation.

Troops would see a 5.2 percent pay increase under the bill. It also authorizes $300 million for the Pentagon to continue to arm Ukraine.

The measure greenlights nine new ships for the Navy, including an amphibious warship that wasnt included in the Pentagons budget request. The Navy has said the extra ship was too expensive to procure this year, but Marine Corps leaders have publicly campaigned for the vessel as essential for their mission.

The legislation also would give the Space Force its own branch of the National Guard for its part-time personnel.

Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) inserted language to block improvements to U.S. Space Commands temporary Colorado headquarters until the Air Force selects a permanent home. The Trump administration selected Rogers state as the site for the new headquarters, but Colorado lawmakers have fought the move while the Air Force has delayed a final decision for months.

Link:
'An ode to bigotry and ignorance': Democrats thrash defense bill ... - POLITICO