Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

AOC denounces top Democrats for supporting an anti-abortion congressman with an ‘A’ rating from the NRA on the heels of two mass shootings and news of…

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York at a press conference on Capitol Hill on April 7, 2022.Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

AOC slammed top Democrats for backing Rep. Henry Cuellar, an anti-abortion Democrat with an A rating from the NRA.

Cuellar faced a primary challenge from progressive Jessica Cisneros, but leads her by less than 200 votes.

"This was an utter failure of leadership," said AOC. "Congress should not be an incumbent protection racket."

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York laced into top House Democrats late on Tuesday night, condemning them for working to bolster conservative Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas over a progressive challenger.

"Accountability isn't partisan. This was an utter failure of leadership," Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter. "Congress should not be an incumbent protection racket and sadly it is treated as such by far too many."

Cuellar, the only House Democrat with an "A" rating from the National Rifle Association and the only House Democrat to vote against a bill that would codify abortion rights into law, faced a primary challenge from progressive lawyer Jessica Cisneros. As of Wednesday morning, the incumbent congressman led Cisneros by less than 200 votes.

But despite his conspicuous break from major party priorities, top Democrats held fundraisers and recorded robo-calls on behalf of Cuellar. That support became even more notable as aleaked draft Supreme Court opinion indicated that Roe v. Wade was likely to be overturned, and two mass shootings took place in Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas.

Adding to the drama, Cuellar's home and campaign office were raided by the FBI in January, though his lawyer says that the congressman is not the subject of the investigation.

"On the day of a mass shooting and weeks after news of Roe, Democratic Party leadership rallied for a pro-NRA, anti-choice incumbent under investigation in a close primary," Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "Robocalls, fundraisers, all of it."

Top Democrats had defended their support for Cuellar in light of the leaked abortion ruling. House Democratic Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told Insider earlier this month that the Democratic Party is a "diverse party" with "diverse opinions," while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi defended him as a "valued member of our caucus."

Story continues

"The fact is those who fail their communities deserve to lose," Ocasio-Cortez said. "They don't need rescuing from powerful leaders who state they fight for gun safety, the right to choose, and more."

The New York congresswoman and other top progressives including Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington had backed Cisneros, who was challenging Cuellar for the second time. And Cisneros had called on Democratic leaders to drop their support for Cuellar in light of the leaked abortion opinion.

Noting that the run-off was "extremely close," Ocasio-Cortez argued that Democratic leaders had "gone to the mat for a pro-NRA incumbent" and will have "mobilized against a badly needed grassroots" ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.

She also noted that Cuellar was a member of the "Unbreakable Nine," a group of conservative House Democrats who demanded that the bipartisan infrastructure law be passed separately from the now-doomed "Build Back Better" social spending bill, which ultimately imperiled the expanded child tax credit that was set to be renewed as part of the legislation.

"We can't afford to reward such acts," she concluded. "We can do better."

Read the original article on Business Insider

View post:
AOC denounces top Democrats for supporting an anti-abortion congressman with an 'A' rating from the NRA on the heels of two mass shootings and news of...

New Yorks Redistricting Has Caused a Train Wreck of Democrats Own Creation – The New Republic

A draft of the new map was released on May 16, with stakeholders having the opportunity to submit feedback throughout the week before a final map was produced on Friday. The newly drawn map features districts that are more compact, particularly in New York City, which is famed for its unusually apportioned seats. But opponents of the special masters draft map argued that the odd shapes of many current districts reflect the historic racial and ethnic makeup of those areas, thus giving those populations a voice in Congress.

It certainly is a fairer map from the partisan perspective than the one passed by the legislature, Michael Li, senior counsel for the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center, told The New Republic on Friday. The bigger issue is whether the map gets the right balance with respect to various communities, and in particular, communities of color. Its unclear to me that the map violates the Voting Rights Act, which is not to say it doesnt necessarily adversely affect communities of color.

Cervas seems to have taken some of these considerations into account in the finalized map, reuniting some communities that he had divided. One such example was Sunset Park, a neighborhood in Brooklyn that was previously divided between the districts of Representative Jerry Nadler and Representative Nydia Velazquez. Sunset Park has significant Asian and Hispanic populations, Lerner argued, so it made sense for part of the neighborhood to belong to Nadlers district, which includes Chinatown in Manhattan, and part to Velazquezs district, which has a plurality Hispanic population. But under the special masters initial map, the entirety of Sunset Park had been drawn into a new district with Staten Island, with smaller Hispanic and Asian populations. Cervass initial map therefore significantly diminished their voice within the district, said Susan Lerner, the executive director of Common Cause New York, an advocacy group that opposed the new map.

Read the original here:
New Yorks Redistricting Has Caused a Train Wreck of Democrats Own Creation - The New Republic

Vulnerable House Democrats urge action to prevent ObamaCare premium hike this fall – The Hill

A group of vulnerable House Democrats is warning of spikes in ObamaCare premiums this fall, saying that enhanced financial assistance from last years relief bill needs to be extended.

Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.) led the letter from 26 swing-district House Democrats to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), calling for the enhanced ObamaCare financial assistance to be extended as part of any party-line economic package that Democrats put together.

If Congress does not act, experts note ObamaCare enrollees will receive notices of increases in their premiums in the run-up to the midterm elections, adding a political blow for Democrats at a time when the party is already facing major electoral headwinds.

The American Rescue Plan signed by President Biden early last year temporarily provided enhanced premium help for ObamaCare enrollees. But those extra subsidiesare slated to expire at the end of this year, leading to calls for Congress to act to make the enhanced help permanent.

These out-of-pocket cost increases are imminent: starting this autumn, when enrollees begin receiving notices of their premium increases for 2023 health plans, our constituents will find that the same high-quality coverage that they have been able to afford thanks to the American Rescue Plan will now be out of reach, the lawmakers write.

We cannot allow the progress we have made to be temporary, they add.We must make lower out-of-pocket costs and expanded coverage a permanent pillar of our health care system, and reconciliation is our only chance to get this done.

Extending the enhanced ObamaCare subsidies was part of President Bidens Build Back Better package that House Democrats passed in November.

But negotiations over the Senate version of thepackage have been stalled for months, and it is unclear if leaders will be able to reach a deal with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), the key swing vote if Democrats hope to use reconciliation to bypass a Republican filibuster in the Senate.

Manchin has expressed openness to the enhanced ObamaCare subsidies in the past, though their fate is tied up in the larger negotiations.

If the enhanced subsidies are not extended, premium increases could be substantial. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that premiums would have been 53 percent higher on average this year without the extra financial assistance.

The lawmakers are also calling for a provision extending health coverage to low-income people in the 12 states that have not expanded Medicaid to be included in the package.

Original post:
Vulnerable House Democrats urge action to prevent ObamaCare premium hike this fall - The Hill

The Day – In Connecticut, Democrats are the abortion extremists – News from southeastern Connecticut – theday.com

Legislation sponsored by Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal supported by Connecticut's other senator, Chris Murphy, and Governor Lamont, Democrats all which was narrowly defeated in the Senate on May 11, titled the Women's Health Protection Act, isn't nutty just because it would authorize all abortions all the time, right up to birth. It's also nutty because, after its title, it doesn't mention women at all, not even once.

Instead, the text of the legislation substitutes "person" for "woman," apparently on a premise shared by all Democratic senators, except Joe Manchin of West Virginia, that there are no longer different genders and that men now can become pregnant.

The hallucination of transgenderism now rules the Senate Democratic caucus and Connecticut's Democratic Party.

After all, why title the bill the Women's Health Protection Act and then immediately cut women out of the text except to deceive and signal belief in transgenderism?

Since Connecticut's senators, the governor, and their supporters complain aboutRepublican extremism, they should be pressed about the implications of their legislation.

Do they really believe that men can become pregnant and need abortions?

Do they really believe that the law should be indifferent to the abortion of viable fetuses of full gestation?

Do they really believe that parents shouldn't necessarily know that their minor daughters are having surgery?

Last week the governor admitted that he opposes conditioning abortions for minors on the notification and consent of their parents, even though state law requires parental consent for mere tattooing. The governor argued that the law doesn't need to require parental notification because most minors seeking abortions tell their parents anyway.

Most may do so, but law is customarily enacted to apply to departures from the norm. Most people don't rob banks but, for good reason, bank robbery remains illegal, and a sensational case from 2009 provided Connecticut with everlasting good reason for requiring parental notification.

In that case, a 15-year-old girl who ran away from her home in Bloomfield and had been missing for almost a year was discovered living with an unrelated 41-year-old man in West Hartford. She had obtained an abortion at a Connecticut clinic after becoming pregnant from statutory rape of her by him, only to be returned tothe manand sex slavery because no one involved with the abortion asked critical questions.

While the age of majority in Connecticut is 18, for years now liberal Democrats in the state, starting with former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, have claimed that young people are incapable of taking full responsibility for themselves until they are 25 or so and that, as a result, they should be exempt from serious criminal penalties. So how do 15-year-olds become competent to decide by themselves on surgery?

The Women's Health Protection Act, which the Democrats likely will keep submitting in Congress, would duplicate the horrible conflict of interest that Connecticut law creates with abortion. It would deprive minors of any true guardians at a moment of the most profound risk to their physical and mental health, instead giving guardianship to their abortion providers, even though, by definition, the pregnancies to be terminated are the result of statutory rape or worse and the failure to notify parents, guardians, or law enforcement may conceal the most abusive felonies and facilitate still more abuse.

You're supposed to know better than to ask the barber if you need a haircut. So who should ask the abortion clinic if she needs an abortion?

Connecticut Democrats are calling the Republican nominee for governor, Bob Stefanowski, an extremist for his position on abortion. But Stefanowski supports the abortion policy established by Roe v. Wade unrestricted abortion prior to fetal viability, state regulation afterward as well as parental notification, which Roe allowed.

With the Women's Health Protection Act, the governor and Connecticut's senators and most state Democratic candidates would go far beyond Roe. Thus, they have become the extremists here, and crackpots as well because of their legislation's suggestion that there is no biological difference between men and women and that biology itself has been a myth all along.

Read the original post:
The Day - In Connecticut, Democrats are the abortion extremists - News from southeastern Connecticut - theday.com

What price will Democrats pay for high inflation? – The Week

Democrats are bracing for a bad election night this November, and if they aren't worrying, the pundits certainly are on their behalf. The president's party usually loses seats in midterm elections, especially the first off-year election for a new president, and Democrats have no seats to spare in Congress. But this year, Democrats have the added headwinds of high inflation and worse, the dreaded specter of "stagflation," or the combination of rising costs and lower economic growth.

How might inflation affect the 2022 midterms?

The Consumer Price Index the benchmark U.S. inflation gauge rose 8.3 percent year-over-year in April, down slightly from 8.5 percent in March but still the highest inflation rate since 1982. "Inflation erodes living standards, and especially the kind of inflation we're talking about of basic needs food and shelter and energy, the three pillars of existence," Diane Swonk, chief economist at the consulting firm Grant Thornton LLP, tells The Wall Street Journal.

Inflation is high everywhere, not just the U.S. Britain's inflation hit its own 40-year-high of 9 percent in April, and the European Union reported annual inflation of 7.4 percent. But Europeans aren't voting in U.S. elections this fall.

It can be hard to get a good read on what actually motivates voters, but "at this point, the answer to what Americans are most worried about is pretty straightforward: inflation," Geoffrey Skelley and Holly Fuong write at FiveThirtyEight. "We asked Americans this question in a variety of ways, but regardless of how we asked it, the top answer was always the same: inflation."

So while "the fundamentals of the U.S. economy are solid, with households still in a strong position financially as more people get jobs and return to old habits like traveling, dining out, and going to concerts," and wages are rising and unemployment is at a historically low 3.6 percent, the Journal reports, people aren't necessarily feeling it.

"Democrats tend to point to and focus on unemployment, which is certainly important to the people that are unemployed and their families and communities," veteran political analyst Charlie Cook tells NPR News. But about 4 percent of Americans are affected when unemployment rises, while "100 percent of people are affected by inflation, and so you could actually argue that it's like 25 times more." And people are confronted with higher prices every time they buy groceries or fill up their car at the gas station.

The main causes, as Democrats will highlight, are enduring supply chain issues stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic plus rising fuel and food prices tied to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and its fallout. President Biden also argues that some companies are greedily raising prices even as they rake in record profits, while Amazon's Jeff Bezos recently joined Republicans in blaming high inflation on Biden's American Rescue Plan and previous (bipartisan) stimulus checks people had money to spend on scarce products, driving up prices.

"They're both right. And they're both wildly overstating their positions," Allison Morrow writes at CNN Business. "The truth is that inflation doesn't have any single cause," or an "easy cure." Along with the Ukraine war, Chinese COVID shutdowns, and other supply chain kinks, the Federal Reserve "unleashed a flood of easy money while cutting interest rates to near zero to prevent an economic collapse," she adds. "And just to pile on: There remains an unsolved, psychologically complex imbalance in the labor market that's forcing businesses to shell out more on wages and other benefits."

It doesn't really matter, politically speaking, analysts say. With inflation or other bad economic news, "the one thing certain is that an incumbent president will get the blame," Stuart Rothenberg writes at Roll Call. "Indeed, Biden already has." It "wouldn't matter how great a job President Biden is doing on handling Ukraine or the coronavirus," Cook tells NPR. "If voters are mad about the economy in general and inflation in particular, then that's the rifle-shot vote, and that's what Democrats have to really worry about."

Republicans are pretty open about using it against Democrats, too."We're going to continue to have inflation, and then interest rates will go up," Sen. Rick Scott (R., Fla.), who heads the Senate Republican campaign arm, told The Wall Street Journal last fall. "This is a gold mine for us." And, he told NBC News, "this is going to be devastating for them."

If Biden "stresses that the economy is still growing, he risks looking out of touch," Rothenberg writes. "And it he turns to a revised 'Build Back Better' plan, he has to call for more government spending during a period of inflation not exactly an ideal place to be." But "the president doesn't have a lot of options when it comes to trying to slow inflation," he adds. "It's the Federal Reserve, after all, that is tasked to assure price stability, and the Fed may well have already miscalculated."

Presidents can't do much to lower consumer prices, tamp down oil prices, stop Russia's invasion, or unkink supply chains, but political strategists say it is still important for Biden "to communicate empathy and action even in the absence of good options as an otherwise divided Republican party unites around attacking the president over 'Bidenflation,'" Reuters reports. The White House has also "developed a three-prong strategy: act as aggressively as it can on prices it thinks it can impact on the margins, stress the role of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the pandemic, and attack Republicans, suggesting their economic policies would be worse."

And in fact, Biden honed in on Scott's "Rescue America" proposal, which the president said would "raise taxes on 75 million American families" while doing nothing "to hold big corporations and companies accountable." Look, "I happen to think it's a good thing when American families have a little more money in their pockets at the end of the month," Biden said. "The Republicans in Congress don't seem to think so. Their plan is going to make working families poorer." He went on list actions he has taken to address inflation, "his No. 1 priority," including cutting the budget deficit and hacking away at gas prices.

In the end, said economist Jason Furman, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under former President Barack Obama, "I don't think there's any message that would make people feel good about 7 percent inflation."

"Interviews with a half-dozen Republicans showed that while the party is not yet unified around a specific plan," NBC News reported last fall, their "proposals include boosting domestic energy production, eliminating COVID-19 restrictions and vaccine mandates, and cutting shipping and trucking regulations," ideas experts said "amount to a mixed bag: Some could help alleviate inflationary pressures, while others would have little effect or no effect in addressing the cause of increased costs or would not materially affect the economy for years."

Ideally, Republicans would get creative and come up with "a comprehensive program to dramatically cut back government benefits and tax breaks for people and businesses in the top 1 percent of income for their age cohort or firm size," conservative commentator Henry Olsen writes at The Washington Post. "A program such as this would combine populist politics with conservative economics," shrinking the government in a politically winning way.

In reality, "there's no great mystery behind the GOP's strategy: It's rooted in the idea that Americans are upset about something; Democrats hold the reins of federal power; so voters should blame the governing majority," Steve Benen writes at MSNBC. "It doesn't matter whether it makes sense or whether Republicans have meaningful solutions." And honestly, "that strategy might very well work."

And if we get stagflation, that "obviously would be a nightmare for Biden and his party," Rothenberg adds "Of course, anyone who has been around for a while knows that predictions about the economy and the stock market are even less reliable than the promises of a snake oil salesman. The problem for Biden is that snake oil salesmen seem to be having a pretty easy time selling their snake oil these days."

Excerpt from:
What price will Democrats pay for high inflation? - The Week