Mediaboss Marketing

Ive never been in any race Ive ever spoiled. Ive been in races to win. And if I get in the race, Im going to win, he said. With that being said, I havent made a decision.

Appearing alongside Manchin on Monday was Republican Jon Huntsman. The former Utah governor similarly dodged questions about whether he could be part of a unity presidential ticket.

The politicians mere presence in the first-in-the-nation primary state sent top New Hampshire Democrats from Rep. Annie Kuster on down scrambling to slam No Labels as a spoiler effort that could pave a path to potentially return to the White House.

Let me be clear: No Labels is trying to use a false message of unity to sow division, Kuster said in a statement. Their plan to run a third-party ticket in 2024 will pave the path for the most extreme, far-right candidate to win the White House namely, former President Trump.

On the same day as the No Labels event, a new group of prominent Democrats and Republicans including former House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and former Rep. Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.) said it was launching a super PAC specifically to fight No Labels.

The group, Citizens to Save Our Republic, paired its launch with internal polling that suggested to them a No Labels candidate could tip the election in favor of Trump. That comes on top of public polling that shows many Republicans and Democrats alike arent thrilled with the idea of a Biden-Trump rematch.

[No Labels] is not a serious effort. But they do have potentially a very important role to play in swinging the election in battleground states, former Rep. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.), whos involved with Citizens to Save Our Republic, told POLITICO outside No Labels New Hampshire event.

If Trump is the candidate, Joe Biden will win, Downey said. And the only way that he will not win is if we have third-party candidates on different ballots in different states.

Pat McCrory, the former North Carolina governor who is working with No Labels, who introduced Manchin and who spoke on the groups behalf, dismissed the backlash as nothing more than operatives out of Washington, D.C., who want to just keep the status quo.

But Im telling you it wont work, McCrory said on stage, flanked by Joe Lieberman, the former Democratic U.S. senator turned independent, and civil rights leader Benjamin Chavis Jr., the groups national co-chair. Were going to get on the ballot.

McCrory echoed No Labels previous comments that a decision on whether to come forward with an actual presidential candidate wont come until after Super Tuesday.

He said he hopes it wont be necessary but that if by Super Tuesday we see the final two candidates as Trump and Biden, we will present a president and vice president ... if we see we have an opportunity to win.

If the choices are Trump and Biden, Thats not the choice we want, McCrory said.

Manchin brushed aside the counter-offensive against No Labels, saying everybody has their motive.

The business of politics is big business, Manchin told reporters after greeting some of the attendees packed into overflow rooms at Saint Anselm College. The politics in Washington is a better business model if they can keep you divided. Were trying to say: Hey boys, get off your high horse on the right and the left and come back together and lets do our job.

The fear erupting among many Democrats and Trump-critical Republicans is that just enough voters will be attracted to the idea of another option, even though that option stands little chance of winning the Electoral College vote. No Labels call for a centrist White House and consensus governing might have enough resonance with enough of the electorate to matter.

Such a threat has united disparate factions within the Democratic ranks. Rahna Epting, executive director of the progressive MoveOn PAC said Manchin should just say so and stop playing footsie with the dark money, MAGA funded No Labels.

And the centrist Third Way issued a one-pager saying No Labels, for all its attention to the national debt, does not have a single, serious idea of how to reduce it.

Its a reference to No Labels just-released Common Sense policy agenda, which is inspired by Thomas Paines famed pamphlet calling for independence from England in 1776. No Labels agenda calls for lawmakers to bring down healthcare costs, regain control of the nations borders and fix the criminal justice system so career criminals cant keep committing crimes.

Even in the room for the town hall on Monday, several Democrats were voicing concerns about the impact No Labels could have on the outcome in 2024.

It was interesting to see how many people came, said Thalia Floras, a New Hampshire Democrat. Im very concerned about a third party and I wanted to be here to listen to what they have to say.

In addition to Manchin and Huntsman, the No Labels event listed among participants former Republican Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan, former director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair and former South Carolina Rep. Joe Cunningham, whose name turned heads because he was recently endorsed by Biden for his bid to be South Carolinas Democrat governor.

POLITICO requested interviews with Cunningham and Huntsman. No Labels initially agreed to make them available but then pulled back, saying reporters could instead ask questions during a question-and-answer session for reporters with Manchin and Huntsman.

No Labels could be particularly damaging to Biden in New Hampshire, where the outside group could capitalize on both the states sizable share of independent voters and on Democrats anger over the presidents attempts to strip the state of its prized first primary.

Steve Shurtleff, a New Hampshire lawmaker and former state House speaker who supported Bidens 2020 bid but is now open to alternatives said the planets seem to be aligned for No Labels to make a serious play in the state.

I personally like Joe Biden. Ive always supported him. I was one of his presidential electors two years ago, Shurtleff said in an interview. But I wish he would step down and not run.

Asked after No Labels made its case in New Hampshire whether he would be open to supporting the groups presidential candidate, Shurtleff said: Depending on the ticket and poll numbers between Biden and Trump, yes I would.

Kathy Sullivan, a former Democratic National Committeeperson from New Hampshire, dismissed the idea that Democrats dissatisfied with Biden would flock to No Labels instead, saying the group has been around for a while and never taken off.

Most Democrats in New Hampshire are not happy with the situation with the [primary] calendar, Sullivan said. But to try to hurt the incumbent Democratic president because youre in a snit about something?

The problem for Democrats is that No Labels overtures might resonate with moderate Republicans and independents, too.

New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu, a Republican who flirted with running for president before ultimately abandoning the idea, said No Labels has a shot at being viable.

Most of the country doesnt want either Trump or Biden, Sununu told reporters at the No Labels town hall. Theyre just trying to fill that void.

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

The rest is here:
No Labels throws a coming out party, stoking Dem fears of a third ... - POLITICO

In an episode of The Simpsons, Lionel Hutz, a lawyer, takes a pen to a business card to wheedle out of a commitment. Instead of no money down, he inserts a comma and an exclamation mark to change the meaning: No, money down!. On July 5th Tony Evers, the white-haired Democratic governor of Wisconsin, took inspiration from Mr Hutz, when he used his veto pen to excise seven words, four numbers and a hyphen from the Republican-controlled state legislatures proposed budget. In doing so, he changed a two-year increase of $325 in per-pupil school funding (and property taxes) into one that will instead last until 2425. This, Mr Everss office noted in a statement, would guarantee the uplift effectively in perpetuity.

Your browser does not support the

The ability to exercise such a line item veto, transforming the meaning of a law by deleting individual words, is a quirk in Wisconsin law that gives unusual power to governors. Under the states constitution, a governor can choose to approve parts of a law, rather than merely rejecting or assenting to the entire thing. Mr Everss creative use of his pen is not new. Indeed until 1990, governors in the Badger State could delete not just whole words but individual letters, in effect to create entirely new laws. Yet in a state where the legislature is dominated by Republicans, it shows a level of assertiveness to get Democratic priorities into law. In that, it is typical of a newly emerging willingness across the Midwest by Democratic politicians to use the power they have as much as possible.

In Minnesota, the legislative session that ended in May was described by the states governor, Tim Walz, as the most successful maybe in Minnesota history. With a slim House majority and a majority of just one in the state Senate, the Democratic-Farmer-Labour Party (DFL), the states Democratic affiliate, passed laws to strengthen abortion rights and gun control, create a family-leave programme, legalise marijuana and pour money into education, green-energy infrastructure, public transport and housing. In Michigan, which has an equally thin Democratic trifecta, the legislature overturned a decade-old Republican right to work law (which constrains unions), expanded tax credits for low-income households and repealed the states 1931 ban on abortion.

This rush of legislation sets such states apart from more traditionally Democratic ones, such as New York, where plans by Kathy Hochul, the governor, to allow more housing construction broke down in April, or California, where internecine fighting over the budget dragged on until last month. According to Ken Martin, the chairman of the Minnesota DFL, the difference in the Midwest is that Democrats have tiny majorities they only recently acquired. That has acted as a unifier: Power is fleeting, and so we have to use it where we can, he says. That is true in Michigan tooa state that helped to deliver Donald Trumps victory in 2016.

John Mark Hansen, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, says Democrats in the region are on a roll. Years of Republican control in places like Wisconsin helped to motivate activists to get back power. Even when Democrats are not in power, they are finding innovative ways to assert themselves, says Mr Hansen. For example, in Ohio, on July 5th, activists dropped off 700,000 signatures calling for a referendum on abortion rights in the stateenough to ensure a vote will be held in November. In Michigan last year a referendum on abortion bolstered Democratic turnout, though unluckily for the party, Ohio holds only local elections this year.

Can this assertiveness last? For now, Republicans are reeling. Theyre focused on these very divisive culture wars, says Mr Martin, of his opponents. In Michigan, such is the state of discord among Republicans that on July 8th a meeting of party officials ended in a physical fight. Even in Wisconsin, the long-standing Republican control of the legislature is threatened by a shift in the balance of power on the states Supreme Court. Yet as Mr Martin says, power can quickly switch back. That is why it has to be used.

Stay on top of American politics with Checks and Balance, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter, which examines the state of American democracy and the issues that matter to voters.

Original post:
Tony Evers's veto shows the growing power of Midwestern Democrats - The Economist

Rep. Mesha Mainor, D-Atlanta, center, speaks in favor of HB 231 in the House chambers during crossover day at the Georgia State Capitol, Monday, March 6, 2023, in Atlanta.

Atlanta voters will now have a Republican representing them in the state legislature. Now you might be wondering how a Republican managed to squeak through in one of the bluer districts in the country. And the answer is she was elected... as a Democrat.

On Tuesday, State Representative Mesha Mainor announced that she was leaving the Democratic party and joining the Republican party. The move makes Mainor the first Black woman to serve as a Republican in the Georgia General Assembly. Mainors district, which stretches from Westview to Midtown Atlanta, is deep-blue. And her former party was quick to call Mainor out for playing a bait and switch with her constituents.

Read more

Rep. Mesha Mainors switch to the GOP is a stinging betrayal of her constituents, who elected a Democrat to represent them in the state legislature, wrote the Georgia Democratic Party in a statement. House District 56 deserves a representative who will do the job they were elected to do.

However, Republicans like Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene applauded the move, welcoming her to the party. On Twitter, Mainor explained her decision by calling it a Moral decision, adding, I will NEVER apologize for being a black woman with a mind of my own.

Its an interesting move for Mainor, who told Axios in April that she would never switch parties, despite her disagreements over school vouchers and other Democratic policy platforms. In fact, she told the outlet that she was a lifelong Democrat because they fought for those that have been forgotten.

Mainor has clearly switched up her opinion on the two parties quickly. On Wednesday, she tweeted, Democrats cannot say they care about people in marginalized communities when they want to keep them oppressed and suppressed.

Story continues

The newly minted Republican isnt up for re-election until 2024, which means her mostly Democratic constituents are stuck with her until then. Mainor previously vowed to run again this cycle. But this time around, voters will likely have a whole new set of questions.

More from The Root

Sign up for The Root's Newsletter. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Click here to read the full article.

See the original post here:
Democrats Put Black Georgia State Rep. In office and Then She Does This... - Yahoo News

CORRECTION: Gal Luft was indicted in November 2022 in a filing that was unsealed on Monday. A previous version of this story included incorrect information.

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee are asking the GOP to turn over information detailing its interactions with Gal Luft, a recently charged think tank leader who called himself “patient zero of the Biden family investigation.”

Luft was indicted in November in a filing that was unsealed on Monday on numerous serious charges, including failing to register as a foreign agent when recruiting and paying an unnamed former high-ranking U.S. government official on behalf of China.

He is also accused of brokering illicit arms deals and violating Iran sanctions by setting up meetings between Iranian officials and a Chinese energy company to discuss oil deals. 

Luft has played a central role in Oversight Chair James Comer’s (R-Ky.) investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings as well as a probe into whether President Biden, in connection with son Hunter Biden, accepted a bribe – an assertion both men have flatly denied.

“We are concerned that an official committee of the House of Representatives has been manipulated by an apparent con man who, while a fugitive from justice, attempted to fortify his defense by laundering unfounded and potentially false allegations through Congress,” Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) wrote in a letter alongside Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.).

Luft was arrested Feb. 17 in Cyprus but fled after being released on bail and remains a fugitive, according to court filings from the Justice Department.

“Although Mr. Luft has been on the run for months, you touted him as a ‘potential witness’ and even prepared to interview him as part of your investigation. As recently as Friday, you described Mr. Luft as ‘a very credible witness’ about matters relating to the President’s son’s financial dealings with Chinese companies,” the two Democratic lawmakers wrote.

Read more here:
Democrats demand GOP turn over info on indicted think-tank leader ... - The Hill

Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, flanked by Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, addressed concerns about debt limit negotiations during a press conference on Thursday. A group of Senate Democrats sent a letter to President Biden urging him to invoke the 14th Amendment to avoid a debt default if he can't reach a deal with Republicans. Alex Wong/Getty Images hide caption

Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, flanked by Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, addressed concerns about debt limit negotiations during a press conference on Thursday. A group of Senate Democrats sent a letter to President Biden urging him to invoke the 14th Amendment to avoid a debt default if he can't reach a deal with Republicans.

Some Democrats on Capitol Hill are growing increasingly worried that President Biden will give into too many demands from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy in continuing talks over a deal to avoid a historic debt default.

After a second White House meeting earlier this week, and staff talks in the last couple of days, Biden and McCarthy both expressed optimism that a deal could get done.

"I see the path that we could come to an agreement. And I think we have a structure now and everybody's working hard," McCarthy told reporters Thursday morning.

But with two weeks before the country runs out of money to pay its bills and negotiations limited to a tight circle of the president's and the speaker's negotiators, many progressive lawmakers are nervous about the lack of details about what is or isn't on the table.

A key issue causing many on the left heartburn is Biden's recent signal that he's considering some changes to federal safety net programs, a central Republican demand.

The fear that Biden is entertaining going further in negotiations than some in his own party are comfortable with is driving a Democratic backup plan to get around having to strike any compromise with McCarthy.

Progressive Democrats are the most vocal about their trepidationand are putting the president on notice that they are keeping a close eye on every morsel of information coming out of the negotiations.

"I'm watchful. I'm always watchful," Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., told reporters Thursday.

Many in her caucus were alarmed by comments Biden made before departing for his trip to the G7 where he suggested the possibility of toughening requirements for federal safety net programs like food stamps a provision included in a bill House Republicans passed last month.

"I'm not going to accept any work requirements that go much beyond what is already what I I voted years ago for the work requirements that exist. But it's possible there could be a few others, but not anything of any consequence," he said when pressed what kind of proposal he was discussing with McCarthy.

Jayapal took note, calling his remarks "a little bit confusing."

"What I've said in the past is, you know, I understand he voted for work requirements in 1996 and some other things in '86 with the crime bill," she said. "But we didn't elect the Joe Biden of 1986 and 1996. We elected the Joe Biden of 2020."

President Biden delivered a brief update of the ongoing negotiations over the debt limit at the White House on Wednesday. Some of his comments about work requirements raised red flags to progressive Democrats. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images hide caption

President Biden delivered a brief update of the ongoing negotiations over the debt limit at the White House on Wednesday. Some of his comments about work requirements raised red flags to progressive Democrats.

The White House has made it clear that any work requirements changes for Medicaid are not acceptable, but that leaves programs like food stamps or cash assistance programs for low-income individuals and families as possible areas negotiators may be reviewing.

Florida freshman Rep. Maxwell Frost says now that the talks have narrowed between the president's team and the speaker's, he wants Biden to hold the line.

"I have trust in the president on this," he told NPR. "But I do want to make sure that him and administration know that we don't want to see any cuts to these essential programs like SNAP," referring to the program that distributes food assistance.

McCarthy wouldn't say what kinds of additional rules to these programs were on the table but he argued there were statistics showing the benefits for putting restrictions on those getting federal benefits.

"Work requirements help people get jobs. It takes them out of poverty," he said.

But Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., told reporters he reached out to the Biden administration to say any deal that could impact anti-poverty programs needs to be rejected.

"The people that I've talked to in the White House have been reassuring from my point of view," he said. "I haven't talked directly to the president about this you know, he's overseas right now. But make no mistake: what they are proposing would adversely impact the most vulnerable people in this country."

He added he'll break with the president if he has to, telling reporters, "I can't support a bill that screws poor people and this would screw poor people."

One senior Democratic aide acknowledged a significant number of House Democrats could oppose a final deal, and that the speaker runs a risk of not getting enough for a bipartisan majority to approve a deal if he pushes too many provisions from the House GOP plan.

Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., says the president has a record of hammering out bipartisan bills, but he suggested the other person at the negotiating table is the problem.

"We know that President Biden can cut deals. We know that he's a man of his word. And I have confidence and faith in the president in these negotiations. But I do not have faith in Speaker McCarthy and right wing Republican House members," Markey said.

The Massachusetts Democrat and 10 other Senate Democrats are pushing for the president to use the 14th amendment to the Constitution - which says the validity of the country's public debt cannot be questioned - and the president can pay its bills even if Congress doesn't raise the debt ceiling.

"Republicans' unwillingness to consider one penny in new revenue from the wealthy and large corporations, along with their diminishment of the disastrous consequences of default, have made it seemingly impossible to enact a bipartisan budget deal at this time," the group wrote in a letter to Biden on Thursday.

Biden said last week he has been considering invoking the 14th Amendment to keep making payments on the nation's debt but said he doesn't think there's enough time left before a looming deadline to use the untested strategy.

The idea has been raised repeatedly over the years. Recently, Harvard's Laurence Tribe a former adviser to Biden said he thinks it would be a legitimate way to solve the problem.

"The problem is, it would have to be litigated," Biden said May 9, noting a debt limit extension would likely to be needed to avoid economic calamity. "I'm thinking about taking a look at it months down the road," he said. "I don't think that solves our problem now."

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., acknowledged Democrats don't have a lot of detail about what the president and the speaker are discussing. But he says it's better to turn to the 14th amendment than agree to GOP demands.

"We're saying to the president, if the bottom line is that the only deal to be had that McCarthy will sign onto is one in which ordinary families are savaged and in which the economy is flooded with fossil fuels that is unacceptable," Merkley said.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a former Constitutional law professor, has been pressing the case for the president to rely on the 14th amendment for months. He says "it seems perfectly obvious" that the Constitution is the guiding authority.

"It's not an option. It's a requirement," Raskin told reporters on Thursday. "And it hasn't been raised before because no Congress has ever tried to push the president to this point of essentially committing an act of legislative extortion, saying, if you don't accept our legislative agenda, then we're not going to allow you to pay the debts of the country."

While some Democratic lawmakers are publicly saying it's time for a break glass moment like using the 14th Amendment, others are willing to let the process play out a bit longer. They have effusive praise for the top White House negotiators Steve Ricchetti, who has served in multiple Democratic administrations, and Shalanda Young, a veteran Capitol Hill aide with expertise in budget talks. The president and top Democratic leaders admit in divided government Democrats aren't going to like everything in any deal the president negotiates with House Republicans.

Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., says it's important to not jump to any conclusions about where a final debt ceiling bill will end up and whether new work requirements will make it in a deal.

"Negotiating can be conversational and hoping that you might draw a bite based upon something you've said, which means that conceivably is not in the final package," he said. "So who knows? But I do think that giving the president some latitude here is really important."

More here:
Democrats worry Biden might cave to some GOP demands on debt ceiling - NPR