Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

An Endangered Species: The Democrats Remain Seated – American Spectator

March 1, 2017, 1:25 pm

On my scorecard the Donald hit a home run last night. He covered the waterfront without any of his all-too-frequent imprecisions that make it easier for the left scorpions to paint him as a limb of Satan, and for conservatives to defend him. He may not have been pitch-perfect. But he was damned close. The boffo performance cleared the hall of Democrats in record time after the speech. (If you were a Democrat, would you have wanted to hang around after that?) It led to much moaning and gnashing of teeth on CNN and PMSNBC. No reports yet on what, if anything, went up Chris Matthews leg.

Give the Democrats some credit. They were nimble enough to choose someone whos not going to be running for office again to give the Democratic response to Trumps tour de force. A truly unenviable assignment. (The equivalent military assignment would be guarding a dog house in the Aleutians in January.) I only listened to the first half of what former Kentucky governor Steve Beshear had to say. It sounded like he had found a copy of a campaign speech Hillary Clinton had delivered in August and was reading it off the teleprompter. Adding incoherence to irrelevance, at one point Beshear said, Im a proud Democrat, but first and foremost, Im a proud Republican and Democrat, and mostly American. The only sensible reaction to this is, Huh? Trump soared. Beshear clanked.

Some of the usual suspects didnt stop at irrelevance and incoherence. They went on to disrespect war widow Carryn Owens, whose late husband, Navy SEAL Senior Chief Ryan Owens, died defending America, including Americans who could not be bothered to clap or stand while she was being honored. How low can you go? Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former DNC chairwomanperson, and current DNC co-chair Keith Ellison did not clap or get off their sorry backsides when the rest of the hall was honoring a widow who had lost so much, and an American warrior and hero who had given all.This behavior is, to use one of Hillary Clintons favorite adjectives, deplorable. (My own choice of adjective is despicable.) I hope and trust it will be seen as such in most precincts outside of the five boroughs, California, and university towns.

If national Democrats are circling the drain I believe they are much of the damage has been self-inflicted. Perhaps the only thing they can rely on now to save the remaining examples of them is the Endangered Species Act.

In a related and less important matter, my sources tell me that Willie Nelson tuned in the speech last night. But he didnt linger long after he learned what a joint address means.

YouTube

Read more here:
An Endangered Species: The Democrats Remain Seated - American Spectator

Senior House Democrat plans to skip Trump’s speech to Congress – ABC News

A liberal House Democrat from California plans to skip President Donald Trump's address to Congress Tuesday evening.

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California, the ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, told House Democrats at a caucus meeting this morning that she will not attend the speech because she doesn't think she will be able to control herself, according to Democrats who attended.

"The president is not going to say what I want him to say," Waters told ABC News in an interview after the meeting. "He's going to take credit for everything."

Waters has emerged as one of Trump's loudest critics on Capitol Hill. She has called his team a "bunch of scumbags" and said he is "leading himself" to impeachment.

Overall, Democrats have little appetite for causing a ruckus similar to the outburst by Rep. Joe Wilson, R-South Carolina, during a 2009 Obama address to legislators. The congressman's "You lie!" response to a line from Obama about health care was swiftly condemned on Capitol Hill as a breach of decorum.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California said not to expect any outbursts during the speech, telling MSNBC that the "House Democratic caucus will be very dignified."

During a closed door meeting with House Democrats Tuesday, Pelosi urged her colleagues to be on their best behavior, saying they should not be "out-classed" by Donald Trump, according to her office.

"I think we have to deal with this in the utmost dignity. We cannot become them; we don't like what they did to our president," she told Democrats, as first reported in Politico and later confirmed to ABC. "We cannot be out-classed by Donald Trump. That would be the worst of all outcomes."

House Democratic Caucus Chairman Joe Crowley, D-New York, agreed with Pelosi, saying he doesn't anticipate any organized protests during the remarks tonight from Democrats though some will be wearing commemorative pins.

Many House Democratic women are expected to wear white --- the color of the suffragette movement --- to "show their commitment to protecting women's rights." "We're taking the Michelle Obama" route, Rep. Lois Frankel, D-Florida, said. "We're going to be as dignified as possible under the circumstances."

"I think we intend to be polite and listen and obviously comment afterwards," said Rep. John Garamendi, D-California. "There is a place for torches and pitchforks but not in the House of Representatives."

Kentucky Rep. John Yarmuth, who, like Waters, skipped Trump's inauguration, plans to attend the speech tonight to "show solidarity with my fellow Democrats."

ABC's MaryAlice Parks contributed to this report.

Excerpt from:
Senior House Democrat plans to skip Trump's speech to Congress - ABC News

The Democrat Responding To Trump’s Big Speech Has A Warning For The President – Huffington Post

WASHINGTON Steve Beshear, the former Kentucky governor who will deliver the Democratic Partys official response to President Donald Trumps first address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, is not a fresh face, rising star, or future presidential candidate. Hes taken positions that buck Democratic ideology. And at 72 years old, his electoral career is over.

But atypical a choice as he may seem, the speech isnt meant to set up Beshear as the next star of the Democratic Party. Rather, his selection is a sign that Democrats now sense they have renewed political momentum in the key policy battle currently taking place in Washington: the fight to save the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.

And for that role, there may be no better pick.

Beshears Kentucky emerged as Obamacares signature success story soon after the health care law passed, and it has continued to serve as a lens into the laws past and potential future since Beshear left office.

As Republican repeal efforts continue in Washington, Kentucky is already engaged in its own miniature repeal-and-replace battle. Making Beshear the new face of Obamacare could help Democrats frame this fight around concrete results rather than partisan politics.

Of the states President Barack Obama lost twice, Kentucky was one of just two (along with Arkansas) that expanded Medicaid and set up its own health exchange. The Medicaid expansion gave government health insurance to more than 400,000 low-income Kentuckians; the exchange helped nearly 100,000 more access health coverage from private companies.

In a state just shy of 4.5 million people, an estimated 500,000 1 in 9 Kentuckians enrolled in health coverage through Obamacare. No state has seen a bigger drop in its uninsured rate since the law passed, and studies have shown that poor Kentuckians are healthier now than people in states that did not expand Medicaid. Kentucky also saw declines in the rates of people skipping needed care, visiting emergency rooms for care, and struggling to pay medical bills in the years after the law was implemented, according to a survey conducted by the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Beshear has always positioned his embrace of Obamacare as an opportunity to address major problems in one of Americas poorest and least healthy states a chance to improve the future of our state and the lives of our families, as he told a Senate committee this month rather than an act of toeing the party line.

The 20 million Americans who gained health care coverage through the law are Republicans, Democrats, independents, and folks that arent registered to vote at all, Beshear told The Huffington Post last week. But they deserve a better quality of life, and becoming healthier will give them a better quality of life.

Now Beshear is warning Trump and Republicans that rescinding the gains made under the law could be devastating.

Theyre faced with 22 million Americans who now have health care most of whom never had it before who dont want to give it up, Beshear said. Thats a lot of votes.

Beshear is already a veteran of the sort of fight taking place in Washington. Despite its successes, the Affordable Care Act remained unpopular among Kentucky voters throughout Beshears second and final term. A year before Trump won, Kentucky voters replaced Beshear with Republican Matt Bevin, a Louisville businessman who won the election while advocating a full dismantling of the law.

Bevin scrapped Kynect Kentuckys broadly popular insurance exchange during the opening year of his governorship. Rolling back the Medicaid expansion, however, proved more difficult: The month after Bevins election, nearly three-quarters of Kentuckians opposed changes to Medicaid, according to a poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation. Last August, Bevin decided instead to apply for a waiver from the Department of Health and Human Services that, while limiting or eliminating coverage for some Kentuckians, wouldnt end the expansion entirely.

Bevin still favors repealing and replacing Obamacare, he said at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last week. But to Beshear, Bevins difficulties in Kentucky foreshadow the problems Republicans are now facing in Congress.

Nationally, I think the president and the Republican Congress are like the dog that caught the car, Beshear said. I dont think that the Congress ever thought theyd ever actually be in this position to have to follow through with all the repeal promises they made.

Theyre finding it to be a lot more difficult issue than they ever thought it would be, he added. Folks that are advocating repeal didnt realize how successful it would end up being, and how many people would end up being [covered].

Providing specifics on their repeal and replace efforts has proven a source of consternation for congressional Republicans, especially as the Trump administration has promised that no one will lose coverage under the reforms.

GOP leadership has struggled to craft a replacement plan that wouldnt result in countless Americans losing health coverage. Members of the partys rank-and-file haveprivately worried about the political and policy implications of repealing the law without an adequate replacement. Polls have shifted against them, and GOP lawmakers faced raucous opposition to their repeal efforts at town halls in their districts during February recess.

That should force Republicans to consider amending the law to address its shortcomings instead of shooting for an all-out repeal,Beshear argues.

There are certainly issues with the Affordable Care Act that ought to be fixed, Beshear said. Thats really where Congress and the president ought to be spending their time, is trying to figure out how to make this better. I am sensing that some of the more thoughtful Republicans in Congress understand that.

Democrats might feel cautious optimism that a law they once presumed dead may now survive. Still, Beshear and Kentucky offer a warning to them, as well. Even if the law remains on the books, he cautions, Republicans can tinker with it in a way that limits its effectiveness without drawing such high-profile resistance.

Bevins Medicaid waiver, for instance, was crafted with the help of Seema Verma, a health policy consultant Trump picked to run the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. If it is approved, it could force thousands of Kentuckians to pay small premiums while also adding work requirements and other changes that could limit the states poorest residents access to health care.

Dismantling Kynect, meanwhile, shifted more than 74,000 Kentuckians onto the federal insurance exchange, where a comparably difficult process of obtaining insurance awaited them. And at CPAC, Bevin said he could support block granting Medicaid or sending a set amount of money to states each year to administer the program as they see fit a GOP hobbyhorse that Democrats and health policy experts have argued would have disastrous results.

Everything we do that makes it harder for these people to access health care will result in some people finally just giving up because they cant figure it out, Beshear said. Honestly, I think that is the goal of the administration in Kentucky, and it will be the goal of folks on the national level. In some way or another, they hope to be able to reduce the number of people who are involved in the program. Those of us who feel that every American [should be] involved in health care, thats our challenge.

Beshear is still hesitant to predict the fate of the law on the national level. But his speech on Tuesday will represent the next step in his and his partys fight to save the Affordable Care Act. That theyve chosen to focus their first response to Trump almost singularly on this issue is a sign they think they can do it.

Kentucky is, I think, a prototypical story of what happens if you look at health care through a bipartisan lens, said Andy Slavitt, who ran the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services during the final two years of Obamas presidency. When you add it all up, its a relatively modestly sized state that has a lot to lose, and [Beshear] can tell that story so well because he took the partisanship out of it and did what was best for the state.

Tapping Beshear is a move that excites Democrats familiar with his approach to the law. The former governor is a perfect person to offer a reality-based, factual response to President Trumps address on Tuesday, Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) said in an email.

Its one that might also annoy Republicans who still insist their repeal efforts are on track, as Bevin argued at CPAC last week.

Its discouraging for me that hes still in the arena throwing stones at people, Bevin said in response to Beshears characterization of his and the GOPs struggles to repeal Obamacare. I would think retirement would serve him well.

More:
The Democrat Responding To Trump's Big Speech Has A Warning For The President - Huffington Post

Democrat Joe Manchin gets in with Breitbart – Axios

The big issue: The hardliners don't like the tax credits to help people in the individual market buy coverage, although it's only one of many problems they have with a leaked draft of the plan. While moderate Republicans say people need help affording their premiums and might even say the size of the credit in the leaked plan isn't big enough conservatives are calling it another entitlement program. "Rolling out a massive new entitlement program is not the right approach to go," Sen. Ted Cruz told reporters.

Compare that to Senate HELP Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander. When asked whether a tax credit will end up in the bill, he said, "It could very well. A tax credit which would help lower-income Americans buy insurance has been one of the provisions in almost every one of the Republican proposals that have been made over the last several years."

OK, but: There may be some room for compromise. Yes, some conservatives will not like individual market assistance no matter what it looks like. But other ideas, like only giving tax credits to those who financially need them, could win over some hesitant members. "Means testing might be one of the options" for compromise, Meadows said.

But there are still other problems: A big one is the House GOP's proposed cap on the tax break given to those with employer-sponsored insurance, which is the only major source of revenue in the plan. Another is the overall cost of the plan, which is tied to the fact that the tax credits would be given to everyone on the individual market.

And then some members just want a straight repeal. "I think the repeal should just be repeal. That stuff can be in a replacement bill," said Rep. Jim Jordan, referring to various pieces of a replacement plan.

Why this matters: Former Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, summed this up well for me: "It's going to be most difficult to try and get the 218 votes" needed to pass a bill in the House, "knowing that everybody's got a certain standing where they are."

Read more from the original source:
Democrat Joe Manchin gets in with Breitbart - Axios

House Democrat says he will refuse to shake Trump’s hand at joint session – Washington Examiner

President Trump will not receive a handshake from at least one senior House Democrat, the lawmaker announced hours before Trump's first speech before a joint session of Congress.

"The president needs to work with all people and therefore I will listen to what he has to say today, but I will not greet him and shake his hand," New York Rep. Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during a brief speech on the House floor.

Engel, like several other lawmakers, has a long history of taking a seat on the aisle during State of the Union addresses; the positioning ensures that they are seen on television greeting the president as he enters and exits the joint session. But Engel intends the snub as a a rebuke of Trump's attacks on the media, lack of support for investigating the Russia-linked cyberattacks against the Democratic party during the 2016 elections, and other policy disagreements, he said.

"I have deep respect for the presidency and I will attend the joint session, but that respect between branches must be mutual," Engel said. "This goes beyond ideological and political differences."

Stay abreast of the latest developments from nation's capital and beyond with curated News Alerts from the Washington Examiner news desk and delivered to your inbox.

Sorry, there was a problem processing your email signup. Please try again later.

Processing...

Thank you for signing up for Washington Examiner News Alerts. You should receive your first alert soon!

It's a partisan moment for Engel, whose post at the Foreign Affairs Committee has produced regular instances of House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Ed Royce, R-Calif., and Engel saluting each other for their bipartisan collaboration. "I could take his speech and read it he could take mine and read it and we'd all agree with it," Engel said of Royce at a recent event on Iranian threats.

Engel's announcement comes as congressional Democrats are mulling how they should treat Trump during his speech. "I don't anticipate organized protests, that I'm aware of. I think that each member needs to be mindful of their own actions, that they are representatives of the House of Representatives and representatives of their constituency," New York Rep. Joe Crowley, who chairs the House Democratic Caucus, told the Washington Examiner.

"As much as we have nothing in common with the president, we do respect the office of the presidency. I respect the office of the presidency itself, and keeping that in mind we will be polite, but we'll show very little, if any enthusiasm at all for what I anticipate his speech will be about," he said.

Read the rest here:
House Democrat says he will refuse to shake Trump's hand at joint session - Washington Examiner