Mediaboss Marketing

A Pew Research survey released on Thursday indicates that Americans of both parties want employers, not the government, to administer paid family and medical leave.

For mothers facing the adoption or birth of a new child, 72 percent of Democratic family leave supporters said that it should primarily come from employers, along with 79 percent of Republicans. Only 29 percent of Democrats thought that government should provide it at the state and/or federal level. Results were similar in the case of paid leave for fathers.

These numbers, however, slightly decreased when Pew asked about situations focusing on older populations.

In the case of workers dealing with their own health conditions, 79 percent of Republican paid leave supporters said the policy should come from employers, while only 68 percent of Democrats agreed. And as for workers who become caretakers of seriously ill relatives, 69 percent of Republican paid leave supporters said that employers should be primarily responsible for payment versus 55 percent of Democrats.

The findings arrive as paid leave becomes a more prominent issue in Washington. Before he became president, Donald Trump indicated in September 2016 that he was open to six weeks of paid maternity leave. He then indicated a shift toward paid family leave during his address to Congress in February.

In the meantime, politicians have offered their own suggestions through separate pieces of legislation. Senators Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and Angus King (I-Maine) reintroduced a bill in February that would give a tax credit to businesses that provide two weeks of paid leave. Democratic leaders, on the other hand, held a press conference last week in support of "a nationwide insurance program that offers up to 12 weeks of leave with partial pay," as CNN reported.

Other results are more mixed. Most Americans support tax credits incentivizing paid leave: 87 percent of respondents "strongly" or "somewhat favor" it. But they are divided over whether there should be a government mandate: 51 percent say yes, 48 percent say no.

Additionally, 94 percent thought that if all Americans had paid leave, it would positively benefit families. Yet, 57 percent also believed that this would negatively affect small businesses.

And as for those who took less time off than they needed or desired, 69 percent said that they returned to work due to financial reasons.

More data can be found here.

See the original post:
Most Democrat Supporters of Paid Leave Say It Should Come from Employers - The Weekly Standard

|

Posted: Mar 25, 2017 12:01 AM

Its fine for Democrats to be upset that Donald Trump schlonged Hillary Clinton, but the reality is that they spent the entirety of the Obama years getting their brains beaten in. When Obama first took office, they held the House and 60 seats in the Senate and controlled the majority of governorships and state legislatures. Now, the GOP has a large majority in the House, 52 seats in the Senate, and the majority of state legislatures and governorships.

Democrats went from thinking they were on the verge of a permanent political ascendancy to the worst political bloodbath in American history. Put another way, Democrats are the George Armstrong Custer of political parties, and yet that doesnt seem to have inspired any soul searching at all. So here are some questions Democrats should be asking themselves right now:

1) Hillary Clinton? Seriously? Hillary had a potential FBI indictment hanging over her head even as Democrats nominated her. Shes unlikable, not particularly accomplished for a presidential candidate, campaigned on a radically liberal agenda, has corruption issues, and her campaign pitch could be boiled down to Vote For Me Because Im A Woman. On top of that, she was already so widely despised that she turned out Republicans. You could make a decent argument that shes the single worst presidential candidate of all time, yet she won anyway. Of course, you could make the argument that a radical socialist like Bernie Sanders would have been worse, but even if so, why do the Democrats have so few quality candidates? Where are the blue chip candidates?

2) Do Democrats Really Want To Be The One Size Of Liberalism Fits All Party? Were in an age where people have almost infinite choice when it comes to TV, music, clothing, groceries, websites and just about everything else. Yet, the standard Democratic position is that the federal government needs to be in charge of everything so San Francisco values can be forced on everyone. Dont like gay marriage in your state? Too bad. Dont want Obamacare? Too bad. You are going to get it and LIKE IT. Democrats are so proud that they believe in choice when it comes to abortion - even though the father and the baby have no choice. So why not allow other people to live like they choose?

3) Do Democrats Really Want To Be The Intolerant Fun Police? Over the last few years, Democrats have turned into sour, anger puritans shaking their fingers at everyone who steps outside their extremely narrowly approved set of liberal values. Weve actually gotten to the point where Democrats cant even tolerate OTHER PEOPLE listening to non-liberal viewpoints on campus. Whatever happened to being open-minded? Whatever happened to tolerating other viewpoints? Dont Democrats need to learn how to do that again?

4) Do Democrats Represent Anyone Other Than The Most Liberal Americans? If youre a man, Democrats accuse you of perpetuating rape culture. If youre white, they accuse you of being privileged. If youre a Christian, they accuse you of being as bad as radical Islamists. If youre a non-liberal woman, youre constantly told that women who hold you in contempt and dont represent your views speak for you. If youre moderate, for all intents and purposes, they tell you to shut your mouth and do as youre told. Democrats would rather offend a million Americans in flyover country than hack off a liberal college professor. At some point, if you want to represent people, you have to at least make an attempt to address issues they care about in a way that they appreciate. Democrats have abandoned this idea and have started explaining to Americans that theyre too stupid to know whats good for them. Thats not how you make friends and influence people.

5) Has The Democratic Party Gotten Too Extreme? Democrats from the Clinton years would think todays Democrats are nuts and Democrats from, say, 40 years ago would vote Republican before theyd vote for the radicalism that has been embraced by todays Democrat Party. Gay marriage, men in the womens restrooms, detaching gender from genitalia, trigger warnings, safe spaces, cultural appropriation, white privilege, open borders these are radical shifts for the Democrat Party that have happened in a relatively short period of time. At what point do you start to wonder if your party has moved too far, too fast?

6) Can The Democratic Party Continue To Advocate For More Spending? Democrats seem to start every discussion with the assumption that theres an infinite amount of money for them to divvy out to liberal interest groups and for votes. Meanwhile, were almost 20 trillion dollars in debt and adding more to that amount every year - and we are now reliant on nations like China and Saudi Arabia to keep loaning us money so we can pay Social Security and Medicare. This is an unsustainable situation and, whether by choice or necessity, the amount of money the federal government spends must drop substantially in the next decade or two. Can the Democrat Party continue to function without being able to give away taxpayer dollars? One way or another, were going to find out.

More:
6 Questions Democrats Should Be Asking Themselves Right Now - Townhall

In an open letter to Mayor Lovely Warren on Wednesday, leaders of one of the city's Democratic committees rebuked what they described as "bigoted, disrespectful and false statements" by City Councilman and Warren backer Adam McFadden.

Committees in each of the legislative districts in the city of Rochester meet to decide what city candidates should receive the party designation or endorsement.(Photo: Monroe County Board of Elections)

The dustup is the latest in an ongoing feud dating to last summer, when Rochester's Black Political Caucus called out what they saw as aneffort backed by New York State United Teachers to take over the city's Democratic committees that determine which candidates the party endorses. The committee in question did flip. And it is a notable one: The city's 25th Legislative District, which for decades was led by the late Willie Lightfoot.The 25th predominantly representsthe southwest side, east of Genesee Street.And it had, until the flip, beenin lockstep with the party faction aligned with Assemblyman David Gantt.

Now the committee is led by Beatriz LeBron, a candidate for city school board and a vocal supporter of mayoral challenger and County Legislator James Sheppard.

Lastweek,the 25th hosted a candidates night at the East End Tavern on Charlotte Street, and McFadden attended to speak on Warren's behalf. He later took to Facebook, posting "Willie Lightfoot is turning over in his grave," and elaborated in a separate post, saying the committee now waspredominately white with folks who don't live in the community or, in some cases, in the city.

"All in an effort to give James Sheppard the Democratic Party endorsement," he wrote, reiterating the charge against the union while noting that the committee met outside the district, in the East End. "I'm sorry if you are black and supporting Sheppard. Please be aware that he is working with a group of people who is purposefully disenfranchising black Democrats."

Black Political Caucus protests union 'takeover' in Rochester

There is much more to all of this, of course. Why it matters is that it strikes at the integrity of the process. Jamie Romeo, chairwoman of Monroe County Democrats, likened it to the questions and challenges that arose during the presidential primary. Then, as now, there is a need for introspection, she said, to be open and review established bylaws and practices. That is under way. There also is a need to make sure people understand and believe in the process, she said, adding: "That, at the end of the day, is my main responsibility that people trust this process."

But it would seem that to understandthe process, in this current circumstance, is to question its validity.

In their letter, also directed to McFadden, the 25th LD committee leaders countered McFadden's portrayal of the committee, stating that membership was 18.3 percent white while the population of the district is 30 percent white, and noted the diversity of its executive committee that includes a Latina and two black men. The letter calls McFadden's remarks at the meeting and on Facebook "shameful," intended to bully and intimidate committee members, and to inflame racial divisions.

"It is difficult to express how aghast we are that a current elected official made hateful statements aimed at community activists, many of whom are his constituents, with intent to delegitimize us," reads the letter that issigned by the executive committee, whose members include Paul Hypolite, a regional political organizer for NYSUT.

Not addressed was the residency issue.Like other committees on the west side, the 25th is populated with a smattering of residents living outside the neighborhood, mostly in the northeast.

Follow this link to an interactive version of this map.

Members of the city Democratic committee representing most of downtown inside the Inner Loop and areas immediately west and southwest.(Photo: Brian Sharp)

City districts are determined by county legislative districts, some of which have been redrawn to include a greater share of the suburbs, but membership is determined by state Assembly districts. This has been the case at least since 2006, and is why, to McFadden's point, not just suburbanites but residents from elsewhere in the city end up sitting on committees in the southwest while living in the northeast.

Overall, 40 or 4.5 percent of the 873 city Democratic committee members do not live in the city, Romeo said. Just .9 percent of the 25th committee live in the suburbs, however, while in the 26th LD, which extends along the city's western border, 19 percent live outside of Rochester. The issue of residency is being discussed by party leadership, and Romeo said she expects there to be a proposal made that would address the matter. But it would not affect the current nomination process, which has already begun.

Watching all of this is another Democratic mayoral challenger, former WROC-TV reporter/anchor Rachel Barnhart, whose campaign manager Joe Rittler weighed in Wednesday, issuinga statement that read:"We respect the committee members and the designation process, but it's clear that there is a predetermined outcome. The designation process is not representative of voters generally. Nonetheless, we believe everyone has a role to play in our city, and all voters have a right to know where the candidates stand on issues. For that reason, we feel it is important to participate in this process."

McFadden, in an interview, said he made no mention of the 25th LD committee's racial makeup at the meeting but felt compelled to note it later. Heis the leader of the adjoining 27th LD representing the 19th Ward, and his City Council district includes the 25th. He acknowledged not being aware of the full membership of the 25th, but based his assessment on those who identified themselves as committee members at the meeting a group, he said, that was predominately white.

"I wasnt even trying to assess the blackness or whiteness of the room," he said. "When I saw who raised their hand, I made a mental note. ... (Willie Lightfoot's)whole thing was making sure people of color had a seat at the table and a voice in the process. I know, because I came up through that.

"There is no way I could walk away from that and not say what I saw."

The letter called on Warren topublicly reprimand McFadden. Warren said that she had not yet seen the 25th LD's letter and had no comment.

"It's all about the nomination for mayor, and thats what it's about, and that's wrong," Gantt said in an interview this week, having previously expressed his concern over similar issues with committees in the northwest."If you can't vote for a person (in an election),then you ought not be voting them on the committee."

Follow this link to an interactive version of this map.

Where members of the northwest side city Democratic committees live.(Photo: Brian Sharp.)

Angie Rivera is a member of the 27th LD, and was one of the chief organizers of an effort last fall that resulted in a number of sitting committee members facing primaries. NYSUT supported that effort by assisting with the gathering of petition signatures. Rivera is president of Rochester Association of Paraprofessionals, representing about 600 teachersaides and assistants. In all, the effort helped placewhat Rivera estimated were 75 or more people, not all of them union members, onto city committees.She said at the time that the issue was grassroots, diverse, unassisted by any elected leader and not about the mayoral race, but education and labor issues, including the minimum wage.

"I believe that our voices will be heard moving forward," she said. "We are going to be involved in plenty of other races. It is not a one-time only. It is not about one issue. ... We want to be involved in the decisions, all of the decisions."

On the eastside, the committee membership appears more in line with district boundaries but exemplify another issue: Check the addresses of the combined 310 listed members of the three committees, and you find 58 duplicate addresses meaning more than a third of the membership is potentially related or at least are close acquaintances. In two instances, three committee members live at the same residence. In the northwest, with a combined 164 members listed, there are 25 duplicate addresses, with three residences each listing three members. Again, roughly a third of the total.

Warren and her husband both are members in the 21st District. Barnhart is not listed as a committee member, and was denied when she sought appointments. Specifically, she sought appointment to the 21st where she livesbut said the leader, Anthony Plonzynski, also Sheppard's campaign vice chairman, told her there were no seats available.

Barnhart's case highlights one of the problems with making the simple rule change Ganttsuggests. If a committee has no open seats, newcomers are denied the opportunity, or established members get knocked off. It also closes the door for people living in areas without an established committee. In Chili, for example, 23 percent of committee members, five in all, live in Ogden or other areas outside the town, Romeo said. There is nocommittee yet in Ogden, though the party wants to be more active there. This way, they can bring people into the fold rather than turn them away.

It is without question that the Democratic Party needs to find a path forward," Romeo said in formal statement issued in response to the 25th LD letter. "It is without a question that we have a growing number of voices, interest and ambitions from people all cross this community that are looking for ways to contribute in the political process. However, what also remains clear is that we as leaders of the Democratic Party must continue to prioritize and push for a constructive dialogue regarding our future. I will continue to urge our leaders to participate in our partys process to find our path to move this party forward.

BDSHARP@Gannett.com

Follow this link to an interactive version of this map.

Where members of the east side city Democratic committees live.(Photo: Brian Sharp.)

Read or Share this story: http://on.rocne.ws/2mRIRrE

Follow this link:
Democratic Party politics get messy in Rochester mayoral race - Rochester Democrat and Chronicle (blog)

Democrat Greg Pilkington of Indian Lake Estates has announced plans to run against U.S. Rep. Dennis Ross in the 2018 general election.

LAKELAND Democrat Greg Pilkington of Indian Lake Estates has announced plans to run against U.S. Rep. Dennis Ross in the 2018 general election.

He joins a short field of candidates who have filed federal elections papers to represent U.S. House District 15, which includes much of northwest Polk County and parts of Hillsborough and Lake counties.

That list includes Democrats Raymond Pena Jr. of Lakeland, and Cameron Magnuson of Washington, D.C. Others include Loretta Leah Lax Miller, a Republican from Clermont, and Jeffrey Rabinowitz, also of Clermont, who filed under no party affiliation. Under the Constitution, a person must be a resident of the state when elected.

Ross, a Lakeland Republican, was re-elected in November to a fourth two-year term.He defeated DemocraticJim Lange of Lutz with 58 percent of the vote.

Representativesare paid $174,000 per year.

Pilkington, 54, said he sees an advantage over Ross, who was closely allied with PresidentDonald Trump during thepresidential campaign andserved on Trumps transition team following his victory in November.

Pilkington said thatis certain to cost Ross some political capital among those Republicans and independents who are increasingly disenchanted with Trumps leadership.

He was one of Trumps earliest and staunchest supporters, he said, adding that Ross Tea Party leanings are out of step with an electorate ready for more progressive values.

Though a political ingnue, Pilkington, who grew up in Charlotte, N.C., was appointed to that citys mayoral International Cabinet, an advisory body to the City Council that provides input and recommendations on a variety of topics, including international affairs and promoting diversity.

His resume covers a broad spectrum of international experience, most recently as executive officer for budget and strategy for the World Customs Organization, an intergovernmental organization based in Brussels, Belgium.

He served in the appointed position for nine years. His resume also includes stints in international trade, serving as a global project manager for DHL Worldwide Express, and as a program management adviser for FedEx Express.

Pilkington received a bachelors degree in business administration from Pfeiffer University in 1999, followed by a masters in international business studies from the Moore School of Business at the University of South Carolina in 2001.

He and his wife of nearly 30 years, Beth, have three grown children.

Pilkington lists several key issues important to his campaign, including strengthening and protecting Social Security without increasing age limits. He said additional funding can be derived by removing the maximum Social Security tax cap from $127,200 to no limit on earned income.

He supports a single-payer health-care system and is in favor of passing proposed legislation that would expand Medicare to everyone.

Pilkington says that if elected he would fight for comprehensive immigration reform. He views the expansion of a wall on the Mexican border as wasteful and ineffective.

Eric Pera can be reached at eric.pera@theledger.com or 863-802-7528.

Here is the original post:
Democrat plans to oppose Ross in 2018 House election - News Chief

March 22, 2017, 2:15 p.m.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Burbank) said in a statement he had "grave concerns" about revelations made Wednesday by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Tulare).

Nunestold reporters that U.S. intelligence agencies monitoring foreign targets hd incidentally heard communications involving members of the Trump transition team and that reports about those communications were disseminated around the government.

Nunes is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and Schiff is the panel's ranking Democrat.

Schiffcalled Nunes' decision to talk to the media and the White House -- before speaking to him and the rest of the committee -- a "profound irregularity."

Here is Schiff's statement:

"This afternoon, Chairman Devin Nunes announced he had some form of intercepts revealing that lawfully gathered intelligence on foreign officials included information on U.S. persons, potentially including those associated with President Trump or the president himself. If accurate, this information should have been shared with members of the committee, but it has not been. Indeed, it appears that committee members only learned about this when the chairman discussed the matter this afternoon with the press. The chairman also shared this information with the White House before providing it to the committee, another profound irregularity, given that the matter is currently under investigation. I have expressed my grave concerns with the chairman that a credible investigation cannot be conducted this way.

"As to the substance of what the chairman has alleged, if the information was lawfully gathered intelligence on foreign officials, that would mean that U.S. persons would not have been the subject of surveillance. In my conversation late this afternoon, the chairman informed me that most of the names in the intercepted communications were in fact masked, but that he could still figure out the probable identity of the parties. Again, this does not indicate that there was any flaw in the procedures followed by the intelligence agencies. Moreover, the unmasking of a U.S. person's name is fully appropriate when it is necessary to understand the context of collected foreign intelligence information.

"Because the committee has still not been provided the intercepts in the possession of the chairman, it is impossible to evaluate the chairman's claims. It certainly does not suggest -- in any way -- that the president was wiretapped by his predecessor."

Read the rest here:
Top Democrat on House Intelligence Committee has 'grave concerns' about handling of Trump team intercepts - Los Angeles Times