A top Democrat is trying to shame Internet providers for not renouncing fast lanes
A few months ago, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked a number of Internet providers to vowthat they'd never set up controversial Internet "fast lanes" where some Web sites would get sped up over others. So-called "paid prioritzation," he said then, would divide the Internet into haves and have-nots. The ISPs should commit to swearing off such fast lanes, Leahy said.
But in their responses, the companies Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Time Warner Cable and Charter didn't give him the promisehe was looking for. So now, the Vermont Democrat is calling them outfor an "unfortunate" failure to comply.
"This is disappointing," Leahy said in a statement Friday. "I was disappointed that some Internet service providers in their responses brushed aside these concerns dismissively."
Although the ISPs told him they didn'tcurrently have plans to engage in paid prioritization, they declined to rule out starting such programs in the future, as Leahy asked.
Leahy's requestwas unlikely to ever lead anywhere significant; the whole reason broadband companies are fighting federal regulators on net neutralityis becausemany wouldlike the freedom to engage in paid prioritization if theywanted to. It wouldn't make sense for them to box themselves into a corner. So the chairman's move was largely symbolic.
Still, the ISPs' silence on paid prioritization speaks volumes about their intentions.
Read Leahy's full statement here. Here also are his initial letters to the Internet providers, and their responses. I've asked the companies involved to comment, and will update if and when they reply.
Brian Fung covers technology for The Washington Post, focusing on telecom, broadband and digital politics. Before joining the Post, he was the technology correspondent for National Journal and an associate editor at the Atlantic.
Read this article:
A top Democrat is trying to shame Internet providers for not renouncing fast lanes